Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 15, issue 4
Articles | Volume 15, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1841-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1841-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 15, issue 4
Model evaluation paper
 | 
03 Mar 2022
Model evaluation paper |  | 03 Mar 2022

Extreme events representation in CMCC-CM2 standard and high-resolution general circulation models

Enrico Scoccimarro, Daniele Peano, Silvio Gualdi, Alessio Bellucci, Tomas Lovato, Pier Giuseppe Fogli, and Antonio Navarra

Viewed

Total article views: 2,745 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,051 616 78 2,745 165 45 45
  • HTML: 2,051
  • PDF: 616
  • XML: 78
  • Total: 2,745
  • Supplement: 165
  • BibTeX: 45
  • EndNote: 45
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Sep 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Sep 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,745 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,474 with geography defined and 271 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
This study evaluated the ability of the CMCC-CM2 climate model participating to the last CMIP6 effort, in representing extreme events of precipitation and temperature at the daily and 6-hourly frequencies. The 1/4° resolution version of the atmospheric model provides better results than the version at 1° resolution for temperature extremes, at both time frequencies. For precipitation extremes, especially at the daily time frequency, the higher resolution does not improve model results.
Read more