Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 14, issue 11
Articles | Volume 14, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6945-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6945-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 14, issue 11
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
17 Nov 2021
Methods for assessment of models |  | 17 Nov 2021

Plume spreading test case for coastal ocean models

Vera Fofonova​​​​​​​, Tuomas Kärnä, Knut Klingbeil, Alexey Androsov, Ivan Kuznetsov, Dmitry Sidorenko, Sergey Danilov, Hans Burchard, and Karen Helen Wiltshire

Viewed

Total article views: 2,873 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,831 949 93 2,873 129 56 54
  • HTML: 1,831
  • PDF: 949
  • XML: 93
  • Total: 2,873
  • Supplement: 129
  • BibTeX: 56
  • EndNote: 54
Views and downloads (calculated since 26 Feb 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 26 Feb 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,873 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,606 with geography defined and 267 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
We present a test case of river plume spreading to evaluate coastal ocean models. Our test case reveals the level of numerical mixing (due to parameterizations used and numerical treatment of processes in the model) and the ability of models to reproduce complex dynamics. The major result of our comparative study is that accuracy in reproducing the analytical solution depends less on the type of applied model architecture or numerical grid than it does on the type of advection scheme.
Read more