Articles | Volume 14, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-675-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-675-2021
Model description paper
 | 
02 Feb 2021
Model description paper |  | 02 Feb 2021

PyCHAM (v2.1.1): a Python box model for simulating aerosol chambers

Simon Patrick O'Meara, Shuxuan Xu, David Topping, M. Rami Alfarra, Gerard Capes, Douglas Lowe, Yunqi Shao, and Gordon McFiggans

Related authors

A theory-informed, experiment-based constraint on the rate of autoxidation chemistry – an analytical approach
Lukas Pichelstorfer, Simon P. O'Meara, and Gordon McFiggans
Aerosol Research, 3, 417–428, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-417-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-417-2025, 2025
Short summary
Determination of the atmospheric volatility of pesticides using Filter Inlet for Gases and AEROsols–chemical ionisation mass spectrometry
Olivia M. Jackson, Aristeidis Voliotis, Thomas J. Bannan, Simon P. O'Meara, Gordon McFiggans, Dave Johnson, and Hugh Coe
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6257–6272, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6257-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6257-2025, 2025
Short summary
Impact of HO2∕RO2 ratio on highly oxygenated α-pinene photooxidation products and secondary organic aerosol formation potential
Yarê Baker, Sungah Kang, Hui Wang, Rongrong Wu, Jian Xu, Annika Zanders, Quanfu He, Thorsten Hohaus, Till Ziehm, Veronica Geretti, Thomas J. Bannan, Simon P. O'Meara, Aristeidis Voliotis, Mattias Hallquist, Gordon McFiggans, Sören R. Zorn, Andreas Wahner, and Thomas F. Mentel
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 4789–4807, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4789-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4789-2024, 2024
Short summary
Characterisation of the Manchester Aerosol Chamber facility
Yunqi Shao, Yu Wang, Mao Du, Aristeidis Voliotis, M. Rami Alfarra, Simon P. O'Meara, S. Fiona Turner, and Gordon McFiggans
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 539–559, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-539-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-539-2022, 2022
Short summary
Maxwell–Stefan diffusion: a framework for predicting condensed phase diffusion and phase separation in atmospheric aerosol
Kathryn Fowler, Paul J. Connolly, David O. Topping, and Simon O'Meara
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1629–1642, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1629-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1629-2018, 2018
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Impact of multiple radar wind profiler data assimilation on convective-scale short-term rainfall forecasts: OSSE studies over the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region
Juan Zhao, Jianping Guo, and Xiaohui Zheng
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4075–4101, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4075-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4075-2025, 2025
Short summary
New submodel for emissions from Explosive Volcanic ERuptions (EVER v1.1) within the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy, version 2.55.1)
Matthias Kohl, Christoph Brühl, Jennifer Schallock, Holger Tost, Patrick Jöckel, Adrian Jost, Steffen Beirle, Michael Höpfner, and Andrea Pozzer
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3985–4007, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3985-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3985-2025, 2025
Short summary
Quantifying the oscillatory evolution of simulated boundary-layer cloud fields using Gaussian process regression
Gunho Loren Oh and Philip H. Austin
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3921–3940, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3921-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3921-2025, 2025
Short summary
Numerical investigations on the modelling of ultrafine particles in SSH-aerosol-v1.3a: size resolution and redistribution
Oscar Jacquot and Karine Sartelet
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3965–3984, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3965-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3965-2025, 2025
Short summary
The third Met Office Unified Model–JULES Regional Atmosphere and Land Configuration, RAL3
Mike Bush, David L. A. Flack, Huw W. Lewis, Sylvia I. Bohnenstengel, Chris J. Short, Charmaine Franklin, Adrian P. Lock, Martin Best, Paul Field, Anne McCabe, Kwinten Van Weverberg, Segolene Berthou, Ian Boutle, Jennifer K. Brooke, Seb Cole, Shaun Cooper, Gareth Dow, John Edwards, Anke Finnenkoetter, Kalli Furtado, Kate Halladay, Kirsty Hanley, Margaret A. Hendry, Adrian Hill, Aravindakshan Jayakumar, Richard W. Jones, Humphrey Lean, Joshua C. K. Lee, Andy Malcolm, Marion Mittermaier, Saji Mohandas, Stuart Moore, Cyril Morcrette, Rachel North, Aurore Porson, Susan Rennie, Nigel Roberts, Belinda Roux, Claudio Sanchez, Chun-Hsu Su, Simon Tucker, Simon Vosper, David Walters, James Warner, Stuart Webster, Mark Weeks, Jonathan Wilkinson, Michael Whitall, Keith D. Williams, and Hugh Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3819–3855, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3819-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3819-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Barley, M., Topping, D., and McFiggans, G.: Critical Assessment of Liquid Density Estimation Methods for Multifunctional Organic Compounds and Their Use in Atmospheric Science, J. Phys. Chem. A, 117, 3428–3441, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp304547r, 2013. a
Bertrand, A., Stefenelli, G., Pieber, S. M., Bruns, E. A., Temime-Roussel, B., Slowik, J. G., Wortham, H., Prévôt, A. S. H., El Haddad, I., and Marchand, N.: Influence of the vapor wall loss on the degradation rate constants in chamber experiments of levoglucosan and other biomass burning markers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10915–10930, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10915-2018, 2018. a
Carslaw, N., Mota, T., Jenkin, M. E., Barley, M. H., and McFiggans, G.: A Significant Role for Nitrate and Peroxide Groups on Indoor Secondary Organic Aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 9290–9298, https://doi.org/10.1021/es301350x, 2012. a
Charan, S. M., Huang, Y., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Computational Simulation of Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation in Laboratory Chambers, Chem. Rev., 119, 11912–11944, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00358, 2019. a, b, c, d, e
Chen, B. T., Yeh, H. C., and Cheng, Y. S.: Evaluation of an Environmental Reaction Chamber, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 17, 9–24, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829208959556, 1992. a
Download
Short summary
User-friendly and open-source software for simulating aerosol chambers is a valuable tool for research scientists in designing and analysing their experiments. This paper describes a new version of such software and will therefore provide a useful reference for those applying it. Central to the paper is an assessment of the software's accuracy through comparison against previously published simulations.
Share