Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 14, issue 10
Articles | Volume 14, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6445-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6445-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 14, issue 10
Methods for assessment of models
 | Highlight paper
 | 
25 Oct 2021
Methods for assessment of models | Highlight paper |  | 25 Oct 2021

The interpretation of temperature and salinity variables in numerical ocean model output and the calculation of heat fluxes and heat content

Trevor J. McDougall, Paul M. Barker, Ryan M. Holmes, Rich Pawlowicz, Stephen M. Griffies, and Paul J. Durack

Viewed

Total article views: 5,715 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
3,900 1,689 126 5,715 66 62
  • HTML: 3,900
  • PDF: 1,689
  • XML: 126
  • Total: 5,715
  • BibTeX: 66
  • EndNote: 62
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Jan 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Jan 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 5,715 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 5,387 with geography defined and 328 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Discussed (final revised paper)

Discussed (preprint)

Latest update: 04 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
We show that the way that the air–sea heat flux is treated in ocean models means that the model's temperature variable should be interpreted as being Conservative Temperature, irrespective of whether the equation of state used in an ocean model is EOS-80 or TEOS-10.
Read more