Articles | Volume 14, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6071-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6071-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Development and technical paper
| 
12 Oct 2021
Development and technical paper |
| 12 Oct 2021
| 12 Oct 2021
Accounting for forest management in the estimation of forest carbon balance using the dynamic vegetation model LPJ-GUESS (v4.0, r9710): implementation and evaluation of simulations for Europe
Mats Lindeskog
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund
University, Lund, Sweden
Benjamin Smith
Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund
University, Lund, Sweden
Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University,
Penrith NSW, Australia
Fredrik Lagergren
Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund
University, Lund, Sweden
Ekaterina Sycheva
TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of
Munich, Freising, Germany
Andrej Ficko
Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Hans Pretzsch
TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of
Munich, Freising, Germany
Anja Rammig
TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of
Munich, Freising, Germany
Viewed
Total article views: 5,217 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,554 | 1,573 | 90 | 5,217 | 67 | 99 |
- HTML: 3,554
- PDF: 1,573
- XML: 90
- Total: 5,217
- BibTeX: 67
- EndNote: 99
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 27 Jan 2021)
Total article views: 3,993 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 Oct 2021)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,988 | 940 | 65 | 3,993 | 60 | 82 |
- HTML: 2,988
- PDF: 940
- XML: 65
- Total: 3,993
- BibTeX: 60
- EndNote: 82
Total article views: 1,224 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 27 Jan 2021)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 566 | 633 | 25 | 1,224 | 7 | 17 |
- HTML: 566
- PDF: 633
- XML: 25
- Total: 1,224
- BibTeX: 7
- EndNote: 17
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 5,217 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,879 with geography defined
and 338 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,993 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,770 with geography defined
and 223 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,224 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,109 with geography defined
and 115 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States of America | 1 | 1215 | 23 |
| China | 2 | 780 | 14 |
| Germany | 3 | 725 | 13 |
| Sweden | 4 | 358 | 6 |
| Netherlands | 5 | 144 | 2 |
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States of America | 1 | 804 | 20 |
| China | 2 | 705 | 17 |
| Germany | 3 | 560 | 14 |
| Sweden | 4 | 252 | 6 |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 119 | 2 |
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States of America | 1 | 411 | 33 |
| Germany | 2 | 165 | 13 |
| Sweden | 3 | 106 | 8 |
| China | 4 | 75 | 6 |
| Netherlands | 5 | 58 | 4 |
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
- 1215
1
1215
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
- 804
1
804
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
- 411
1
411
Cited
27 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Carbon restoration potential on global land under water resource constraints S. Peng et al. 10.1038/s44221-024-00323-5
- Comparison of nutrient and carbon stocks in the aboveground biomass of mature silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst) stands T. Čihák & M. Vejpustková 10.17221/37/2023-JFS
- Regional estimates of gross primary production applying the Process-Based Model 3D-CMCC-FEM vs. Remote-Sensing multiple datasets D. Dalmonech et al. 10.1080/22797254.2023.2301657
- CLASH – Climate-responsive Land Allocation model with carbon Storage and Harvests T. Ekholm et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-3041-2024
- Quantifying the impact of key factors on the carbon mitigation potential of managed temperate forests K. Gregor et al. 10.1186/s13021-023-00247-9
- Differential Vegetation Feedback on the Global Land Monsoon System during the Mid-Holocene and Last Interglacial Z. Wang et al. 10.1007/s00376-024-4284-6
- Climate and parameter sensitivity and induced uncertainties in carbon stock projections for European forests (using LPJ-GUESS 4.0) J. Oberpriller et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-6495-2022
- Predictions of Carbon Stock in the Southern Moscow Region Forests Under Different Forest Use Scenarios V. Shanin et al. 10.31857/S0024114824020028
- Soil organic carbon change can reduce the climate benefits of biofuel produced from forest residues K. Lan et al. 10.1016/j.joule.2023.12.018
- Climate Warming Benefits Plant Growth but Not Net Carbon Uptake: Simulation of Alaska Tundra and Needle Leaf Forest Using LPJ-GUESS C. Liu et al. 10.3390/land13050632
- Carbon sequestration in different urban vegetation types in Southern Finland L. Thölix et al. 10.5194/bg-22-725-2025
- Mitigating drought mortality by incorporating topography into variable forest thinning strategies A. Thomas et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad29aa
- Drainage Ditch Cleaning Has No Impact on the Carbon and Greenhouse Gas Balances in a Recent Forest Clear-Cut in Boreal Sweden C. Tong et al. 10.3390/f13060842
- Projected global warming-induced terrestrial ecosystem carbon across China under SSP scenarios R. Kong et al. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108963
- Trade‐Offs for Climate‐Smart Forestry in Europe Under Uncertain Future Climate K. Gregor et al. 10.1029/2022EF002796
- Analyzing asymmetries in the response of European beech to precipitation anomalies in various stand and site conditions using decadal diameter censuses V. Trifković et al. 10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.109195
- Model Estimates of Changes in Soil Organic Matter Stocks in Forested Areas of European Russia under Different Forest Management Regimes I. Priputina et al. 10.1134/S1064229324602026
- Predictions of Carbon Stock in Forests of the Southern Moscow Region under Different Scenarios of Forest Use V. Shanin et al. 10.1134/S1995425524700823
- Modelling past and future impacts of droughts on tree mortality and carbon storage in Norway spruce stands in Germany T. Anders et al. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110987
- The key role of forest disturbance in reconciling estimates of the northern carbon sink M. O’Sullivan et al. 10.1038/s43247-024-01827-4
- Frost matters: incorporating late-spring frost into a dynamic vegetation model regulates regional productivity dynamics in European beech forests B. Meyer et al. 10.5194/bg-21-1355-2024
- Kilometre-scale simulations over Fennoscandia reveal a large loss of tundra due to climate warming F. Lagergren et al. 10.5194/bg-21-1093-2024
- Projected effects of climate change and forest management on carbon fluxes and biomass of a boreal forest M. Islam et al. 10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.109959
- The influence of thinning and prescribed burning on future forest fires in fire-prone regions of Europe S. Rabin et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac6312
- Modelling managed forest ecosystems in Sweden: An evaluation from the stand to the regional scale J. Bergkvist et al. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110253
- LPJ-GUESS/LSMv1.0: a next-generation land surface model with high ecological realism D. Martín Belda et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-6709-2022
- Increased Central European forest mortality explained by higher harvest rates driven by enhanced productivity M. Scheel et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac9635
26 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Carbon restoration potential on global land under water resource constraints S. Peng et al. 10.1038/s44221-024-00323-5
- Comparison of nutrient and carbon stocks in the aboveground biomass of mature silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst) stands T. Čihák & M. Vejpustková 10.17221/37/2023-JFS
- Regional estimates of gross primary production applying the Process-Based Model 3D-CMCC-FEM vs. Remote-Sensing multiple datasets D. Dalmonech et al. 10.1080/22797254.2023.2301657
- CLASH – Climate-responsive Land Allocation model with carbon Storage and Harvests T. Ekholm et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-3041-2024
- Quantifying the impact of key factors on the carbon mitigation potential of managed temperate forests K. Gregor et al. 10.1186/s13021-023-00247-9
- Differential Vegetation Feedback on the Global Land Monsoon System during the Mid-Holocene and Last Interglacial Z. Wang et al. 10.1007/s00376-024-4284-6
- Climate and parameter sensitivity and induced uncertainties in carbon stock projections for European forests (using LPJ-GUESS 4.0) J. Oberpriller et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-6495-2022
- Predictions of Carbon Stock in the Southern Moscow Region Forests Under Different Forest Use Scenarios V. Shanin et al. 10.31857/S0024114824020028
- Soil organic carbon change can reduce the climate benefits of biofuel produced from forest residues K. Lan et al. 10.1016/j.joule.2023.12.018
- Climate Warming Benefits Plant Growth but Not Net Carbon Uptake: Simulation of Alaska Tundra and Needle Leaf Forest Using LPJ-GUESS C. Liu et al. 10.3390/land13050632
- Carbon sequestration in different urban vegetation types in Southern Finland L. Thölix et al. 10.5194/bg-22-725-2025
- Mitigating drought mortality by incorporating topography into variable forest thinning strategies A. Thomas et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad29aa
- Drainage Ditch Cleaning Has No Impact on the Carbon and Greenhouse Gas Balances in a Recent Forest Clear-Cut in Boreal Sweden C. Tong et al. 10.3390/f13060842
- Projected global warming-induced terrestrial ecosystem carbon across China under SSP scenarios R. Kong et al. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108963
- Trade‐Offs for Climate‐Smart Forestry in Europe Under Uncertain Future Climate K. Gregor et al. 10.1029/2022EF002796
- Analyzing asymmetries in the response of European beech to precipitation anomalies in various stand and site conditions using decadal diameter censuses V. Trifković et al. 10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.109195
- Model Estimates of Changes in Soil Organic Matter Stocks in Forested Areas of European Russia under Different Forest Management Regimes I. Priputina et al. 10.1134/S1064229324602026
- Predictions of Carbon Stock in Forests of the Southern Moscow Region under Different Scenarios of Forest Use V. Shanin et al. 10.1134/S1995425524700823
- Modelling past and future impacts of droughts on tree mortality and carbon storage in Norway spruce stands in Germany T. Anders et al. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110987
- The key role of forest disturbance in reconciling estimates of the northern carbon sink M. O’Sullivan et al. 10.1038/s43247-024-01827-4
- Frost matters: incorporating late-spring frost into a dynamic vegetation model regulates regional productivity dynamics in European beech forests B. Meyer et al. 10.5194/bg-21-1355-2024
- Kilometre-scale simulations over Fennoscandia reveal a large loss of tundra due to climate warming F. Lagergren et al. 10.5194/bg-21-1093-2024
- Projected effects of climate change and forest management on carbon fluxes and biomass of a boreal forest M. Islam et al. 10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.109959
- The influence of thinning and prescribed burning on future forest fires in fire-prone regions of Europe S. Rabin et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac6312
- Modelling managed forest ecosystems in Sweden: An evaluation from the stand to the regional scale J. Bergkvist et al. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110253
- LPJ-GUESS/LSMv1.0: a next-generation land surface model with high ecological realism D. Martín Belda et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-6709-2022
Latest update: 04 May 2025
Short summary
Forests play an important role in the global carbon cycle and for carbon storage. In Europe, forests are intensively managed. To understand how management influences carbon storage in European forests, we implement detailed forest management into the dynamic vegetation model LPJ-GUESS. We test the model by comparing model output to typical forestry measures, such as growing stock and harvest data, for different countries in Europe.
Forests play an important role in the global carbon cycle and for carbon storage. In Europe,...
