Articles | Volume 14, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3361-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3361-2021
Development and technical paper
 | 
04 Jun 2021
Development and technical paper |  | 04 Jun 2021

Addressing biases in Arctic–boreal carbon cycling in the Community Land Model Version 5

Leah Birch, Christopher R. Schwalm, Sue Natali, Danica Lombardozzi, Gretchen Keppel-Aleks, Jennifer Watts, Xin Lin, Donatella Zona, Walter Oechel, Torsten Sachs, Thomas Andrew Black, and Brendan M. Rogers

Viewed

Total article views: 2,753 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,919 747 87 2,753 393 67 83
  • HTML: 1,919
  • PDF: 747
  • XML: 87
  • Total: 2,753
  • Supplement: 393
  • BibTeX: 67
  • EndNote: 83
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Dec 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 14 Dec 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,753 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,544 with geography defined and 209 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 21 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
The high-latitude landscape or Arctic–boreal zone has been warming rapidly, impacting the carbon balance both regionally and globally. Given the possible global effects of climate change, it is important to have accurate climate model simulations. We assess the simulation of the Arctic–boreal carbon cycle in the Community Land Model (CLM 5.0). We find biases in both the timing and magnitude photosynthesis. We then use observational data to improve the simulation of the carbon cycle.