Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
Articles | Volume 14, issue 6
Articles | Volume 14, issue 6
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3269–3294, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3269-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3269–3294, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3269-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 14, issue 6

Model evaluation paper 03 Jun 2021

Model evaluation paper | 03 Jun 2021

Improvement of modeling plant responses to low soil moisture in JULESvn4.9 and evaluation against flux tower measurements

Anna B. Harper et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,589 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,158 417 14 1,589 183 15 23
  • HTML: 1,158
  • PDF: 417
  • XML: 14
  • Total: 1,589
  • Supplement: 183
  • BibTeX: 15
  • EndNote: 23
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Sep 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Sep 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,307 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,301 with geography defined and 6 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 23 Jul 2021
Download
Short summary
We evaluated 10 representations of soil moisture stress in the JULES land surface model against site observations of GPP and latent heat flux. Increasing the soil depth and plant access to deep soil moisture improved many aspects of the simulations, and we recommend these settings in future work using JULES. In addition, using soil matric potential presents the opportunity to include parameters specific to plant functional type to further improve modeled fluxes.
Read more