Key Laboratory of Research on Marine Hazards Forecasting, National
Marine Environmental Forecasting Center, Ministry of Natural Resources,
Beijing, China
Key Laboratory of Research on Marine Hazards Forecasting, National
Marine Environmental Forecasting Center, Ministry of Natural Resources,
Beijing, China
Qizhen Sun
Key Laboratory of Research on Marine Hazards Forecasting, National
Marine Environmental Forecasting Center, Ministry of Natural Resources,
Beijing, China
Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modelling,
Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
L. Bruno Tremblay
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, McGill University,
Montreal, Canada
Bo Lin
Key Laboratory of Research on Marine Hazards Forecasting, National
Marine Environmental Forecasting Center, Ministry of Natural Resources,
Beijing, China
Xiaoping Mai
Key Laboratory of Research on Marine Hazards Forecasting, National
Marine Environmental Forecasting Center, Ministry of Natural Resources,
Beijing, China
Fu Zhao
Key Laboratory of Research on Marine Hazards Forecasting, National
Marine Environmental Forecasting Center, Ministry of Natural Resources,
Beijing, China
Key Laboratory of Research on Marine Hazards Forecasting, National
Marine Environmental Forecasting Center, Ministry of Natural Resources,
Beijing, China
Na Liu
Key Laboratory of Research on Marine Hazards Forecasting, National
Marine Environmental Forecasting Center, Ministry of Natural Resources,
Beijing, China
Zhikun Chen
Key Laboratory of Research on Marine Hazards Forecasting, National
Marine Environmental Forecasting Center, Ministry of Natural Resources,
Beijing, China
Yunfei Zhang
Key Laboratory of Research on Marine Hazards Forecasting, National
Marine Environmental Forecasting Center, Ministry of Natural Resources,
Beijing, China
Viewed
Total article views: 3,865 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
2,486
1,264
115
3,865
154
209
HTML: 2,486
PDF: 1,264
XML: 115
Total: 3,865
BibTeX: 154
EndNote: 209
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Jun 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 19 Jun 2020)
Total article views: 3,158 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
2,148
929
81
3,158
111
166
HTML: 2,148
PDF: 929
XML: 81
Total: 3,158
BibTeX: 111
EndNote: 166
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Feb 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 24 Feb 2021)
Total article views: 707 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
338
335
34
707
43
43
HTML: 338
PDF: 335
XML: 34
Total: 707
BibTeX: 43
EndNote: 43
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Jun 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 19 Jun 2020)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,865 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,387 with geography defined
and 478 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,158 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,811 with geography defined
and 347 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 707 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 576 with geography defined
and 131 with unknown origin.
Sea ice plays a crucial role in global energy and water budgets. To get a better simulation of sea ice, we coupled a sea ice model with an atmospheric and ocean model to form a fully coupled system. The sea ice simulation results of this coupled system demonstrated that a two-way coupled model has better performance in terms of sea ice, especially in summer. This indicates that sea-ice–ocean–atmosphere interaction plays a crucial role in controlling Arctic summertime sea ice distribution.
Sea ice plays a crucial role in global energy and water budgets. To get a better simulation of...
