Articles | Volume 13, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5053-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5053-2020
Methods for assessment of models
 | Highlight paper
 | 
27 Oct 2020
Methods for assessment of models | Highlight paper |  | 27 Oct 2020

The making of the New European Wind Atlas – Part 1: Model sensitivity

Andrea N. Hahmann, Tija Sīle, Björn Witha, Neil N. Davis, Martin Dörenkämper, Yasemin Ezber, Elena García-Bustamante, J. Fidel González-Rouco, Jorge Navarro, Bjarke T. Olsen, and Stefan Söderberg

Related authors

Low-level jets in the North and Baltic Seas: Mesoscale Model Sensitivity and Climatology
Bjarke Tobias Eisensøe Olsen, Andrea Noemi Hahmann, Nicolás González Alonso-de-Linaje, Mark Žagar, and Martin Dörenkämper
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3123,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3123, 2024
Short summary
Evaluation of wind farm parameterizations in the WRF model under different atmospheric stability conditions with high-resolution wake simulations
Oscar García-Santiago, Andrea N. Hahmann, Jake Badger, and Alfredo Peña
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 963–979, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-963-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-963-2024, 2024
Short summary
The Impact of Climate Change on Extreme Winds over Northern Europe According to CMIP6
Xiaoli Guo Larsén, Marc Imberger, Ásta Hannesdóttir, and Andrea N. Hahmann
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2022-102,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2022-102, 2023
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Current and future wind energy resources in the North Sea according to CMIP6
Andrea N. Hahmann, Oscar García-Santiago, and Alfredo Peña
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2373–2391, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2373-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2373-2022, 2022
Short summary
Evaluating the mesoscale spatio-temporal variability in simulated wind speed time series over northern Europe
Graziela Luzia, Andrea N. Hahmann, and Matti Juhani Koivisto
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2255–2270, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2255-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2255-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Evaluation of dust emission and land surface schemes in predicting a mega Asian dust storm over South Korea using WRF-Chem
Ji Won Yoon, Seungyeon Lee, Ebony Lee, and Seon Ki Park
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2303–2328, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2303-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2303-2025, 2025
Short summary
Sensitivity studies of a four-dimensional local ensemble transform Kalman filter coupled with WRF-Chem version 3.9.1 for improving particulate matter simulation accuracy
Jianyu Lin, Tie Dai, Lifang Sheng, Weihang Zhang, Shangfei Hai, and Yawen Kong
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2231–2248, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2231-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2231-2025, 2025
Short summary
A Bayesian method for predicting background radiation at environmental monitoring stations in local-scale networks
Jens Peter Karolus Wenceslaus Frankemölle, Johan Camps, Pieter De Meutter, and Johan Meyers
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1989–2003, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1989-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1989-2025, 2025
Short summary
Inclusion of the ECMWF ecRad radiation scheme (v1.5.0) in the MAR (v3.14), regional evaluation for Belgium, and assessment of surface shortwave spectral fluxes at Uccle
Jean-François Grailet, Robin J. Hogan, Nicolas Ghilain, David Bolsée, Xavier Fettweis, and Marilaure Grégoire
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1965–1988, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1965-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1965-2025, 2025
Short summary
Development of a fast radiative transfer model for ground-based microwave radiometers (ARMS-gb v1.0): validation and comparison to RTTOV-gb
Yi-Ning Shi, Jun Yang, Wei Han, Lujie Han, Jiajia Mao, Wanlin Kan, and Fuzhong Weng
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1947–1964, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1947-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1947-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson, J. R., Hardy, E. E., Roach, J. T., and Witmer, R. E.: A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data, Tech. rep., United States Geological Service, availabl e at: https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/0964/report.pdf (last access: 18 October 2020), 1976. a
Badger, J., Frank, H., Hahmann, A. N., and Giebel, G.: Wind-climate estimation based on mesoscale and microscale modeling: Statistical-dynamical downscaling for wind energy applications, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 53, 1901–1919, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0147.1, 2014. a
Benjamin, S. G., Grell, G. A., Brown, J. M., and Smirnova, T. G.: Mesoscale weather prediction with the RUC hybrid isentropic-terrain-following coordinate model, Mon. Weather Rev., 132, 473–494, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<0473:MWPWTR>2.0.CO;2, 2004. a
Bosveld, F. C.: Cabauw In-situ Observational Program 2000 – Now: Instruments, Calibrations and Set-up, Tech. rep., KNMI, available at: http://projects.knmi.nl/cabauw/insitu/observations/documentation/Cabauw_TR/Cabauw_TR.pdf (last access: 28 June 2018), 2019. a
Chávez-Arroyo, R., Lozano-Galiana, S., Sanz-Rodrigo, J., and Probst, O.: Statistical-dynamical downscaling of wind fields using self-organizing maps, Appl. Therm. Eng., 75, 1201–1209, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.03.002, 2015. a
Short summary
Wind energy resource assessment routinely uses numerical weather prediction model output. We describe the evaluation procedures used for picking the suitable blend of model setup and parameterizations for simulating European wind climatology with the WRF model. We assess the simulated winds against tall mast measurements using a suite of metrics, including the Earth Mover's Distance, which diagnoses the performance of each ensemble member using the full wind speed and direction distribution.
Share