Articles | Volume 13, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5053-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5053-2020
Methods for assessment of models
 | Highlight paper
 | 
27 Oct 2020
Methods for assessment of models | Highlight paper |  | 27 Oct 2020

The making of the New European Wind Atlas – Part 1: Model sensitivity

Andrea N. Hahmann, Tija Sīle, Björn Witha, Neil N. Davis, Martin Dörenkämper, Yasemin Ezber, Elena García-Bustamante, J. Fidel González-Rouco, Jorge Navarro, Bjarke T. Olsen, and Stefan Söderberg

Related authors

Evaluation of wind farm parameterizations in the WRF model under different atmospheric stability conditions with high-resolution wake simulations
Oscar García-Santiago, Andrea N. Hahmann, Jake Badger, and Alfredo Peña
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 963–979, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-963-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-963-2024, 2024
Short summary
The Impact of Climate Change on Extreme Winds over Northern Europe According to CMIP6
Xiaoli Guo Larsén, Marc Imberger, Ásta Hannesdóttir, and Andrea N. Hahmann
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2022-102,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2022-102, 2023
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Current and future wind energy resources in the North Sea according to CMIP6
Andrea N. Hahmann, Oscar García-Santiago, and Alfredo Peña
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2373–2391, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2373-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2373-2022, 2022
Short summary
Evaluating the mesoscale spatio-temporal variability in simulated wind speed time series over northern Europe
Graziela Luzia, Andrea N. Hahmann, and Matti Juhani Koivisto
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2255–2270, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2255-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2255-2022, 2022
Short summary
The Making of the New European Wind Atlas – Part 2: Production and evaluation
Martin Dörenkämper, Bjarke T. Olsen, Björn Witha, Andrea N. Hahmann, Neil N. Davis, Jordi Barcons, Yasemin Ezber, Elena García-Bustamante, J. Fidel González-Rouco, Jorge Navarro, Mariano Sastre-Marugán, Tija Sīle, Wilke Trei, Mark Žagar, Jake Badger, Julia Gottschall, Javier Sanz Rodrigo, and Jakob Mann
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5079–5102, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5079-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5079-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
WRF-Comfort: simulating microscale variability in outdoor heat stress at the city scale with a mesoscale model
Alberto Martilli, Negin Nazarian, E. Scott Krayenhoff, Jacob Lachapelle, Jiachen Lu, Esther Rivas, Alejandro Rodriguez-Sanchez, Beatriz Sanchez, and José Luis Santiago
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5023–5039, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5023-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5023-2024, 2024
Short summary
Representing effects of surface heterogeneity in a multi-plume eddy diffusivity mass flux boundary layer parameterization
Nathan P. Arnold
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5041–5056, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5041-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5041-2024, 2024
Short summary
Can TROPOMI NO2 satellite data be used to track the drop in and resurgence of NOx emissions in Germany between 2019–2021 using the multi-source plume method (MSPM)?
Enrico Dammers, Janot Tokaya, Christian Mielke, Kevin Hausmann, Debora Griffin, Chris McLinden, Henk Eskes, and Renske Timmermans
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4983–5007, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4983-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4983-2024, 2024
Short summary
A spatiotemporally separated framework for reconstructing the sources of atmospheric radionuclide releases
Yuhan Xu, Sheng Fang, Xinwen Dong, and Shuhan Zhuang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4961–4982, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4961-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4961-2024, 2024
Short summary
A parameterization scheme for the floating wind farm in a coupled atmosphere–wave model (COAWST v3.7)
Shaokun Deng, Shengmu Yang, Shengli Chen, Daoyi Chen, Xuefeng Yang, and Shanshan Cui
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4891–4909, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4891-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4891-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson, J. R., Hardy, E. E., Roach, J. T., and Witmer, R. E.: A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data, Tech. rep., United States Geological Service, availabl e at: https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/0964/report.pdf (last access: 18 October 2020), 1976. a
Badger, J., Frank, H., Hahmann, A. N., and Giebel, G.: Wind-climate estimation based on mesoscale and microscale modeling: Statistical-dynamical downscaling for wind energy applications, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 53, 1901–1919, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0147.1, 2014. a
Benjamin, S. G., Grell, G. A., Brown, J. M., and Smirnova, T. G.: Mesoscale weather prediction with the RUC hybrid isentropic-terrain-following coordinate model, Mon. Weather Rev., 132, 473–494, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<0473:MWPWTR>2.0.CO;2, 2004. a
Bosveld, F. C.: Cabauw In-situ Observational Program 2000 – Now: Instruments, Calibrations and Set-up, Tech. rep., KNMI, available at: http://projects.knmi.nl/cabauw/insitu/observations/documentation/Cabauw_TR/Cabauw_TR.pdf (last access: 28 June 2018), 2019. a
Chávez-Arroyo, R., Lozano-Galiana, S., Sanz-Rodrigo, J., and Probst, O.: Statistical-dynamical downscaling of wind fields using self-organizing maps, Appl. Therm. Eng., 75, 1201–1209, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.03.002, 2015. a
Short summary
Wind energy resource assessment routinely uses numerical weather prediction model output. We describe the evaluation procedures used for picking the suitable blend of model setup and parameterizations for simulating European wind climatology with the WRF model. We assess the simulated winds against tall mast measurements using a suite of metrics, including the Earth Mover's Distance, which diagnoses the performance of each ensemble member using the full wind speed and direction distribution.