Articles | Volume 13, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5007-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5007-2020
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
26 Oct 2020
Methods for assessment of models |  | 26 Oct 2020

A new bias-correction method for precipitation over complex terrain suitable for different climate states: a case study using WRF (version 3.8.1)

Patricio Velasquez, Martina Messmer, and Christoph C. Raible

Viewed

Total article views: 9,194 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
6,996 2,046 152 9,194 164 250
  • HTML: 6,996
  • PDF: 2,046
  • XML: 152
  • Total: 9,194
  • BibTeX: 164
  • EndNote: 250
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Jul 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Jul 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 9,194 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 8,429 with geography defined and 765 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 17 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
This work presents a new bias-correction method for precipitation that considers orographic characteristics, which can be used in studies where the latter strongly changes. The three-step correction method consists of a separation into orographic features, correction of low-intensity precipitation, and application of empirical quantile mapping. Seasonal bias induced by the global climate model is fully corrected. Rigorous cross-validations illustrate the method's applicability and robustness.
Share