Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 12, issue 2
Articles | Volume 12, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-597-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-597-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 12, issue 2
Model experiment description paper
 | 
06 Feb 2019
Model experiment description paper |  | 06 Feb 2019

Limitations of the 1 % experiment as the benchmark idealized experiment for carbon cycle intercomparison in C4MIP

Andrew Hugh MacDougall

Viewed

Total article views: 2,765 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,978 722 65 2,765 224 81 70
  • HTML: 1,978
  • PDF: 722
  • XML: 65
  • Total: 2,765
  • Supplement: 224
  • BibTeX: 81
  • EndNote: 70
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Jul 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 16 Jul 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,765 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,457 with geography defined and 308 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Discussed (final revised paper)

Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
The 1 % per year exponential change in CO2 concentration experiment is an idealized climate change scenario that has traditionally been used to facilitate comparison of different climate models and to create benchmark statistics. Here, we examine the limitations of this experiment for assessing the global carbon cycle and propose an alternative idealized experiment.
Read more