Articles | Volume 12, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4603-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4603-2019
Model evaluation paper
 | 
06 Nov 2019
Model evaluation paper |  | 06 Nov 2019

Multimodel simulations of a springtime dust storm over northeastern China: implications of an evaluation of four commonly used air quality models (CMAQ v5.2.1, CAMx v6.50, CHIMERE v2017r4, and WRF-Chem v3.9.1)

Siqi Ma, Xuelei Zhang, Chao Gao, Daniel Q. Tong, Aijun Xiu, Guangjian Wu, Xinyuan Cao, Ling Huang, Hongmei Zhao, Shichun Zhang, Sergio Ibarra-Espinosa, Xin Wang, Xiaolan Li, and Mo Dan

Viewed

Total article views: 4,381 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
3,015 1,291 75 4,381 381 75 77
  • HTML: 3,015
  • PDF: 1,291
  • XML: 75
  • Total: 4,381
  • Supplement: 381
  • BibTeX: 75
  • EndNote: 77
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Apr 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Apr 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,381 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,885 with geography defined and 496 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 19 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
Dust storms are thought to be a worldwide societal issue, and numerical modeling is an effective way to help us to predict dust events. Here we present the first comprehensive evaluation of dust emission modules in four commonly used air quality models for northeastern China. The results showed that most of these models were able to capture this dust event and indicated the dust source maps should be carefully selected or replaced with a new one that is constructed with local data.