Articles | Volume 12, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3759-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3759-2019
Model evaluation paper
 | 
28 Aug 2019
Model evaluation paper |  | 28 Aug 2019

Snowfall distribution and its response to the Arctic Oscillation: an evaluation of HighResMIP models in the Arctic using CPR/CloudSat observations

Manu Anna Thomas, Abhay Devasthale, Tristan L'Ecuyer, Shiyu Wang, Torben Koenigk, and Klaus Wyser

Viewed

Total article views: 2,748 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,893 812 43 2,748 347 58 60
  • HTML: 1,893
  • PDF: 812
  • XML: 43
  • Total: 2,748
  • Supplement: 347
  • BibTeX: 58
  • EndNote: 60
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Mar 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Mar 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,748 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,513 with geography defined and 235 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 17 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
Snow cover significantly influences the surface albedo and radiation budget. Therefore, a realistic representation of snowfall in climate models is important. Here, using decade-long estimates of snowfall derived from the satellite sensor, four climate models are evaluated to assess how well they simulate snowfall in the Arctic. It is found that light and median snowfall is overestimated by the models in comparison to the satellite observations, and extreme snowfall is underestimated.