Articles | Volume 12, issue 5
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1869–1883, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1869-2019
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1869–1883, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1869-2019

Development and technical paper 10 May 2019

Development and technical paper | 10 May 2019

CO2 drawdown due to particle ballasting by glacial aeolian dust: an estimate based on the ocean carbon cycle model MPIOM/HAMOCC version 1.6.2p3

Malte Heinemann et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Malte Heinemann on behalf of the Authors (12 Mar 2019)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (19 Mar 2019) by Andrew Yool
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (31 Mar 2019)
RR by Anonymous Referee #3 (02 Apr 2019)
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (08 Apr 2019)
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (10 Apr 2019) by Andrew Yool
AR by Malte Heinemann on behalf of the Authors (18 Apr 2019)  Author's response    Manuscript
Download
Short summary
Ocean CO2 uptake played a crucial role for the global cooling during ice ages. Dust formation, e.g. by ice scraping over bedrock, potentially contributed to this CO2 uptake because (1) the iron in the dust is a fertilizer and (2) the heavy dust particles can accelerate sinking organic matter (ballasting hypothesis). This study tests the glacial dust ballasting hypothesis for the first time, using an ocean model. It turns out, however, that the ballasting effect probably played a minor role.