Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 11, issue 11
Articles | Volume 11, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4399-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4399-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 11, issue 11
Model evaluation paper
 | 
02 Nov 2018
Model evaluation paper |  | 02 Nov 2018

Carbon–nitrogen coupling under three schemes of model representation: a traceability analysis

Zhenggang Du, Ensheng Weng, Lifen Jiang, Yiqi Luo, Jianyang Xia, and Xuhui Zhou

Viewed

Total article views: 4,311 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,863 1,337 111 4,311 394 117 181
  • HTML: 2,863
  • PDF: 1,337
  • XML: 111
  • Total: 4,311
  • Supplement: 394
  • BibTeX: 117
  • EndNote: 181
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Mar 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Mar 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,311 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,001 with geography defined and 310 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 08 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
In this study, based on a traceability analysis technique, we evaluated alternative representations of C–N interactions and their impacts on the C cycle using the TECO model framework. Our results showed that different representations of C–N coupling processes lead to divergent effects on plant production, C residence time, and thus the ecosystem C storage capacity. Identifying those effects can help us to improve the N limitation assumptions employed in terrestrial ecosystem models.
Read more
Share