Articles | Volume 11, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4399-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4399-2018
Model evaluation paper
 | 
02 Nov 2018
Model evaluation paper |  | 02 Nov 2018

Carbon–nitrogen coupling under three schemes of model representation: a traceability analysis

Zhenggang Du, Ensheng Weng, Lifen Jiang, Yiqi Luo, Jianyang Xia, and Xuhui Zhou

Viewed

Total article views: 5,080 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
3,331 1,580 169 5,080 497 168 260
  • HTML: 3,331
  • PDF: 1,580
  • XML: 169
  • Total: 5,080
  • Supplement: 497
  • BibTeX: 168
  • EndNote: 260
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Mar 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Mar 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 5,080 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,739 with geography defined and 341 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 10 Sep 2026
Download
Short summary
In this study, based on a traceability analysis technique, we evaluated alternative representations of C–N interactions and their impacts on the C cycle using the TECO model framework. Our results showed that different representations of C–N coupling processes lead to divergent effects on plant production, C residence time, and thus the ecosystem C storage capacity. Identifying those effects can help us to improve the N limitation assumptions employed in terrestrial ecosystem models.
Share