Articles | Volume 11, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4399-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4399-2018
Model evaluation paper
 | 
02 Nov 2018
Model evaluation paper |  | 02 Nov 2018

Carbon–nitrogen coupling under three schemes of model representation: a traceability analysis

Zhenggang Du, Ensheng Weng, Lifen Jiang, Yiqi Luo, Jianyang Xia, and Xuhui Zhou

Viewed

Total article views: 4,905 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
3,239 1,520 146 4,905 472 144 234
  • HTML: 3,239
  • PDF: 1,520
  • XML: 146
  • Total: 4,905
  • Supplement: 472
  • BibTeX: 144
  • EndNote: 234
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Mar 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Mar 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,905 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,592 with geography defined and 313 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 30 May 2026
Download
Short summary
In this study, based on a traceability analysis technique, we evaluated alternative representations of C–N interactions and their impacts on the C cycle using the TECO model framework. Our results showed that different representations of C–N coupling processes lead to divergent effects on plant production, C residence time, and thus the ecosystem C storage capacity. Identifying those effects can help us to improve the N limitation assumptions employed in terrestrial ecosystem models.
Share