Articles | Volume 10, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-639-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-639-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Review and perspective paper
| 
13 Feb 2017
Review and perspective paper |
| 13 Feb 2017
Review of the global models used within phase 1 of the Chemistry–Climate Model Initiative (CCMI)
Olaf Morgenstern
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA), Wellington, New Zealand
Michaela I. Hegglin
Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, UK
Eugene Rozanov
Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos – World Radiation Center (PMOD/WRC), Davos, Switzerland
Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zürich (ETHZ), Zürich, Switzerland
Fiona M. O'Connor
Met Office Hadley Centre (MOHC), Exeter, UK
N. Luke Abraham
Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
National Centre for Atmospheric Science (NCAS), UK
Hideharu Akiyoshi
National Institute of Environmental Studies (NIES), Tsukuba, Japan
Alexander T. Archibald
Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
National Centre for Atmospheric Science (NCAS), UK
Slimane Bekki
LATMOS, Institut Pierre Simon Laplace (IPSL), Paris, France
Neal Butchart
Met Office Hadley Centre (MOHC), Exeter, UK
Martyn P. Chipperfield
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Makoto Deushi
Meteorological Research Institute (MRI), Tsukuba, Japan
Sandip S. Dhomse
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Rolando R. Garcia
National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), Boulder, Colorado, USA
Steven C. Hardiman
Met Office Hadley Centre (MOHC), Exeter, UK
Larry W. Horowitz
National Atmospheric and Ocean Administration Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (NOAA GFDL), Princeton, New Jersey, USA
Patrick Jöckel
Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
Beatrice Josse
CNRM UMR 3589, Météo-France/CNRS, Toulouse, France
Douglas Kinnison
National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), Boulder, Colorado, USA
Meiyun Lin
National Atmospheric and Ocean Administration Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (NOAA GFDL), Princeton, New Jersey, USA
Princeton University Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
Eva Mancini
Department of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Universitá dell'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
Michael E. Manyin
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Flight Center (NASA GSFC), Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Lanham, Maryland, USA
Marion Marchand
LATMOS, Institut Pierre Simon Laplace (IPSL), Paris, France
Virginie Marécal
CNRM UMR 3589, Météo-France/CNRS, Toulouse, France
Martine Michou
CNRM UMR 3589, Météo-France/CNRS, Toulouse, France
Luke D. Oman
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Flight Center (NASA GSFC), Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
Giovanni Pitari
Department of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Universitá dell'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
David A. Plummer
Environment and Climate Change Canada, Montréal, Canada
Laura E. Revell
Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zürich (ETHZ), Zürich, Switzerland
Bodeker Scientific, Christchurch, New Zealand
David Saint-Martin
CNRM UMR 3589, Météo-France/CNRS, Toulouse, France
Robyn Schofield
School of Earth Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Andrea Stenke
Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zürich (ETHZ), Zürich, Switzerland
Kane Stone
School of Earth Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
now at: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Kengo Sudo
Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
Taichu Y. Tanaka
Meteorological Research Institute (MRI), Tsukuba, Japan
Simone Tilmes
National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), Boulder, Colorado, USA
Yousuke Yamashita
National Institute of Environmental Studies (NIES), Tsukuba, Japan
now at: Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokohama, Japan
Kohei Yoshida
Meteorological Research Institute (MRI), Tsukuba, Japan
Guang Zeng
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA), Wellington, New Zealand
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 13 Feb 2017)
- Supplement to the final revised paper
- Preprint (discussion started on 14 Sep 2016)
- Supplement to the preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
- Printer-friendly version
- Supplement
-
RC1: 'Review of Morgenstern et al.', Anonymous Referee #1, 02 Nov 2016
-
AC1: 'Reply to Referee 1', Olaf Morgenstern, 16 Dec 2016
-
AC1: 'Reply to Referee 1', Olaf Morgenstern, 16 Dec 2016
-
RC2: 'Review of "Review of the global models used within the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI)" by Morgenstern et al.', Anonymous Referee #2, 12 Nov 2016
-
AC2: 'Reply to referee 2', Olaf Morgenstern, 16 Dec 2016
-
AC2: 'Reply to referee 2', Olaf Morgenstern, 16 Dec 2016
Peer-review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Olaf Morgenstern on behalf of the Authors (16 Dec 2016)
Author's response
Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (19 Dec 2016) by Astrid Kerkweg
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (05 Jan 2017)
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (09 Jan 2017) by Astrid Kerkweg
AR by Olaf Morgenstern on behalf of the Authors (11 Jan 2017)
Author's response
Manuscript
Download
- Article
(4321 KB) - Full-text XML
Short summary
We present a review of the make-up of 20 models participating in the Chemistry–Climate Model Initiative (CCMI). In comparison to earlier such activities, most of these models comprise a whole-atmosphere chemistry, and several of them include an interactive ocean module. This makes them suitable for studying the interactions of tropospheric air quality, stratospheric ozone, and climate. The paper lays the foundation for other studies using the CCMI simulations for scientific analysis.
We present a review of the make-up of 20 models participating in the Chemistry–Climate Model...
