Articles | Volume 10, issue 10
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3695–3713, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3695-2017
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3695–3713, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3695-2017

Methods for assessment of models 10 Oct 2017

Methods for assessment of models | 10 Oct 2017

Atmospheric inverse modeling via sparse reconstruction

Nils Hase et al.

Related authors

Spatial distributions of XCO2 seasonal cycle amplitude and phase over northern high-latitude regions
Nicole Jacobs, William R. Simpson, Kelly A. Graham, Christopher Holmes, Frank Hase, Thomas Blumenstock, Qiansi Tu, Matthias Frey, Manvendra K. Dubey, Harrison A. Parker, Debra Wunch, Rigel Kivi, Pauli Heikkinen, Justus Notholt, Christof Petri, and Thorsten Warneke
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 16661–16687, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16661-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16661-2021, 2021
Short summary
Validation of methane and carbon monoxide from Sentinel-5 Precursor using TCCON and NDACC-IRWG stations
Mahesh Kumar Sha, Bavo Langerock, Jean-François L. Blavier, Thomas Blumenstock, Tobias Borsdorff, Matthias Buschmann, Angelika Dehn, Martine De Mazière, Nicholas M. Deutscher, Dietrich G. Feist, Omaira E. García, David W. T. Griffith, Michel Grutter, James W. Hannigan, Frank Hase, Pauli Heikkinen, Christian Hermans, Laura T. Iraci, Pascal Jeseck, Nicholas Jones, Rigel Kivi, Nicolas Kumps, Jochen Landgraf, Alba Lorente, Emmanuel Mahieu, Maria V. Makarova, Johan Mellqvist, Jean-Marc Metzger, Isamu Morino, Tomoo Nagahama, Justus Notholt, Hirofumi Ohyama, Ivan Ortega, Mathias Palm, Christof Petri, David F. Pollard, Markus Rettinger, John Robinson, Sébastien Roche, Coleen M. Roehl, Amelie N. Röhling, Constantina Rousogenous, Matthias Schneider, Kei Shiomi, Dan Smale, Wolfgang Stremme, Kimberly Strong, Ralf Sussmann, Yao Té, Osamu Uchino, Voltaire A. Velazco, Corinne Vigouroux, Mihalis Vrekoussis, Pucai Wang, Thorsten Warneke, Tyler Wizenberg, Debra Wunch, Shoma Yamanouchi, Yang Yang, and Minqiang Zhou
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6249–6304, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6249-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6249-2021, 2021
Short summary
The drivers and health risks of the unexpected surface ozone enhancements over the Sichuan basin, China in 2020
Youwen Sun, Hao Yin, Xiao Lu, Justus Notholt, Mathias Palm, Cheng Liu, Yuan Tian, and Bo Zheng
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-664,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-664, 2021
Revised manuscript accepted for ACP
Short summary
Investigation of space-borne trace gas products over St. Petersburg and Yekaterinburg, Russia by using COCCON observations
Carlos Alberti, Qiansi Tu, Frank Hase, Maria V. Makarova, Konstantin Gribanov, Stefani C. Foka, Vyacheslav Zakharov, Thomas Blumenstock, Michael Buchwitz, Christopher Diekmann, Benjamin Ertl, Matthias M. Frey, Hamud Kh. Imhasin, Dmitry V. Ionov, Farahnaz Khosrawi, Sergey I. Osipov, Maximilian Reuter, Matthias Schneider, and Thorsten Warneke
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-237,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-237, 2021
Preprint under review for AMT
Short summary
A dataset of microphysical cloud parameters, retrieved from Emission-FTIR spectra measured in Arctic summer 2017
Philipp Richter, Mathias Palm, Christine Weinzierl, Hannes Griesche, Penny M. Rowe, and Justus Notholt
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2021-284,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2021-284, 2021
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Black carbon modeling in urban areas: investigating the influence of resuspension and non-exhaust emissions in streets using the Street-in-Grid model for inert particles (SinG-inert)
Lya Lugon, Jérémy Vigneron, Christophe Debert, Olivier Chrétien, and Karine Sartelet
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7001–7019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7001-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7001-2021, 2021
Short summary
Evaluation of global EMEP MSC-W (rv4.34) WRF (v3.9.1.1) model surface concentrations and wet deposition of reactive N and S with measurements
Yao Ge, Mathew R. Heal, David S. Stevenson, Peter Wind, and Massimo Vieno
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7021–7046, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7021-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7021-2021, 2021
Short summary
The CHIMERE v2020r1 online chemistry-transport model
Laurent Menut, Bertrand Bessagnet, Régis Briant, Arineh Cholakian, Florian Couvidat, Sylvain Mailler, Romain Pennel, Guillaume Siour, Paolo Tuccella, Solène Turquety, and Myrto Valari
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6781–6811, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6781-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6781-2021, 2021
Short summary
Verification of boundary layer wind patterns in COSMO-REA2 using clear-air radar echoes
Sebastian Buschow and Petra Friederichs
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6765–6780, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6765-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6765-2021, 2021
Short summary
Object-based analysis of simulated thunderstorms in Switzerland: application and validation of automated thunderstorm tracking with simulation data
Timothy H. Raupach, Andrey Martynov, Luca Nisi, Alessandro Hering, Yannick Barton, and Olivia Martius
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6495–6514, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6495-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6495-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Andrews, A. E., Kofler, J. D., Trudeau, M. E., Williams, J. C., Neff, D. H., Masarie, K. A., Chao, D. Y., Kitzis, D. R., Novelli, P. C., Zhao, C. L., Dlugokencky, E. J., Lang, P. M., Crotwell, M. J., Fischer, M. L., Parker, M. J., Lee, J. T., Baumann, D. D., Desai, A. R., Stanier, C. O., De Wekker, S. F. J., Wolfe, D. E., Munger, J. W., and Tans, P. P.: CO2, CO, and CH4 measurements from tall towers in the NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory's Global Greenhouse Gas Reference Network: instrumentation, uncertainty analysis, and recommendations for future high-accuracy greenhouse gas monitoring efforts, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 647–687, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-647-2014, 2014.
Andrieu, C., de Freitas, N., Doucet, A., and Jordan, M. I.: An Introduction to MCMC for Machine Learning, Mach. Learn., 50, 5–43, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020281327116, 2003.
Banks, H., Holm, K., and Robbins, D.: Standard error computations for uncertainty quantification in inverse problems: Asymptotic theory vs. bootstrapping, Math. Comput. Model., 52, 1610–1625, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2010.06.026, 2010.
Beck, A. and Teboulle, M.: A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems, SIAM J. Img. Sci., 2, 183–202, https://doi.org/10.1137/080716542, 2009.
Biraud, S. C., Torn, M. S., Smith, J. R., Sweeney, C., Riley, W. J., and Tans, P. P.: A multi-year record of airborne CO2 observations in the US Southern Great Plains, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 751–763, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-751-2013, 2013.
Download
Short summary
Inverse modeling uses atmospheric measurements to estimate emissions of greenhouse gases, which are key to understand the climate system. However, the measurement information alone is typically insufficient to provide reasonable emission estimates. Additional information is required. This article applies modern mathematical inversion techniques to formulate such additional knowledge. It is a prime example of how such tools can improve the quality of estimates compared to commonly used methods.