Articles | Volume 10, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3207-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3207-2017
Review and perspective paper
 | 
01 Sep 2017
Review and perspective paper |  | 01 Sep 2017

Practice and philosophy of climate model tuning across six US modeling centers

Gavin A. Schmidt, David Bader, Leo J. Donner, Gregory S. Elsaesser, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Cecile Hannay, Andrea Molod, Richard B. Neale, and Suranjana Saha

Viewed

Total article views: 18,153 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
10,633 7,231 289 18,153 348 382
  • HTML: 10,633
  • PDF: 7,231
  • XML: 289
  • Total: 18,153
  • BibTeX: 348
  • EndNote: 382
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Feb 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 14 Feb 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 18,153 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 16,680 with geography defined and 1,473 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 09 Feb 2026
Short summary
The development of coupled ocean atmosphere climate models is a complex process that inevitably includes multiple calibration steps (sometimes called tuning). Tuning uses degrees of freedom allowed by uncertainties in model approximations to modify parameters to make the simulation better align with some selected observed target(s). We describe how these tuning targets, parameters, and philosophy vary across six US modeling centers in order to increase the transparency of the practice.
Share