Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmdd-6-6835-2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmdd-6-6835-2013

Submitted as: methods for assessment of models 17 Dec 2013

Submitted as: methods for assessment of models | 17 Dec 2013

Review status: this preprint was under review for the journal GMD but the revision was not accepted.

Influences of calibration data length and data period on model parameterization and quantification of terrestrial ecosystem carbon dynamics

Q. Zhu1,2 and Q. Zhuang1,2,3 Q. Zhu and Q. Zhuang
  • 1Purdue Climate Change Research Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
  • 2Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
  • 3Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA

Abstract. Reliability of terrestrial ecosystem models highly depends on the quantity and quality of the data that have been used to calibrate the models. Nowadays, in situ observations of carbon fluxes are abundant. However, the knowledge of how much data (data length) and which subset of the time series data (data period) should be used to effectively calibrate the model is still lacking. In this study we use the AmeriFlux carbon flux data to parameterize the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (TEM) using an adjoint based data assimilation technique for five different ecosystem types including deciduous broadleaf forest, coniferous forest, grassland, shrubland and boreal forest. We hypothesize that calibration data covering various climate conditions for the ecosystems (e.g. drought and wet; high and low air temperature) can reduce the uncertainty of the model parameter space. Here parameterization is conducted to explore the impact of both data length and data period on the uncertainty reduction of the posterior model parameters and the quantification of site and regional carbon dynamics. We find that: (1) the model is better constrained when it uses two-year data comparing to using one-year data. Further, two-year data is long enough in calibrating TEM's carbon dynamics, since using three-year data could only marginally improve the model performance at our study sites; (2) the model is better constrained with the data that have a higher "climate variability" than that with a lower one. The climate variability is used to measure the overall possibility of the ecosystem to experience various climate conditions including drought and extreme air temperatures and radiation; (3) the US regional simulations indicate that the effect of calibration data length on carbon dynamics is amplified at regional and temporal scales, leading to large discrepancies among different parameterization experiments, especially in July and August. This study shall help the eddy flux observation community in conducting field observations. The study shall also benefit the ecosystem modeling community in using multiple-year data to improve model parameterization and predictability.

Q. Zhu and Q. Zhuang

 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Q. Zhu and Q. Zhuang

Q. Zhu and Q. Zhuang

Viewed

Total article views: 1,194 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
834 300 60 1,194 70 84
  • HTML: 834
  • PDF: 300
  • XML: 60
  • Total: 1,194
  • BibTeX: 70
  • EndNote: 84
Views and downloads (calculated since 17 Dec 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 17 Dec 2013)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 31 Jul 2021