Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 9, issue 7
Articles | Volume 9, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2301-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2301-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Articles | Volume 9, issue 7
Model evaluation paper
 | 
06 Jul 2016
Model evaluation paper |  | 06 Jul 2016

Performance and applicability of a 2.5-D ice-flow model in the vicinity of a dome

Olivier Passalacqua, Olivier Gagliardini, Frédéric Parrenin, Joe Todd, Fabien Gillet-Chaulet, and Catherine Ritz

Viewed

Total article views: 3,996 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,671 1,133 192 3,996 271 338
  • HTML: 2,671
  • PDF: 1,133
  • XML: 192
  • Total: 3,996
  • BibTeX: 271
  • EndNote: 338
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Feb 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Feb 2016)

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 23 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
In ice-flow modelling, computing in 3-D requires a lot of resources, but 2-D models lack physical likelihood when the flow is diverging. That is why 2-D models accounting for the divergence, so-called 2.5-D models, are an interesting trade-off. However, the applicability of these 2.5-D models has never been systematically examined. We show that these models are ineffective in the case of highly diverging flows, but also for varying temperature, which was not suspected.
Read more
Share