125 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Evoking equity as a rationale for solar geoengineering research? Scrutinizing emerging expert visions of equity J. Flegal & A. Gupta 10.1007/s10784-017-9377-6
2. Quantifying the Role of Model Internal Year-to-Year Variability in Estimating Anthropogenic Aerosol Radiative Effects X. Shi & Y. Zeng 10.3390/atmos15010079
3. Global monsoon response to tropical and Arctic stratospheric aerosol injection W. Sun et al. 10.1007/s00382-020-05371-7
4. Climate Response to Aerosol Geoengineering: A Multimethod Comparison H. Muri et al. 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0620.1
5. Contrasting climate and carbon-cycle consequences of fossil-fuel use versus deforestation disturbance K. Jayakrishnan et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac69fd
6. Documenting numerical experiments in support of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) C. Pascoe et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-2149-2020
7. The Effects of Solar Radiation Management on the Carbon Cycle L. Cao 10.1007/s40641-018-0088-z
8. Next steps in geoengineering scenario research: limited deployment scenarios and beyond M. Sugiyama et al. 10.1080/14693062.2017.1323721
9. Inequal Responses of Drylands to Radiative Forcing Geoengineering Methods C. Park et al. 10.1029/2019GL084210
10. The Indonesian Throughflow circulation under solar geoengineering C. Shen et al. 10.5194/esd-14-1317-2023
11. PInc-PanTher estimates of Arctic permafrost soil carbon under the GeoMIP G6solar and G6sulfur experiments A. Liu et al. 10.5194/esd-14-39-2023
12. Impact of solar geoengineering on wildfires in the 21st century in CESM2/WACCM6 W. Tang et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5467-2023
13. Injection strategy – a driver of atmospheric circulation and ozone response to stratospheric aerosol geoengineering E. Bednarz et al. 10.5194/acp-23-13665-2023
14. Simulated Effect of Carbon Cycle Feedback on Climate Response to Solar Geoengineering L. Cao & J. Jiang 10.1002/2017GL076546
15. Scenarios for modeling solar radiation modification D. MacMartin et al. 10.1073/pnas.2202230119
16. Climate, Variability, and Climate Sensitivity of “Middle Atmosphere” Chemistry Configurations of the Community Earth System Model Version 2, Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model Version 6 (CESM2(WACCM6)) N. Davis et al. 10.1029/2022MS003579
17. Radiative forcing geoengineering causes higher risk of wildfires and permafrost thawing over the Arctic regions R. Müller et al. 10.1038/s43247-024-01329-3
18. Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: More research needed A. Robock 10.1002/2016EF000407
19. Potential ecological impacts of climate intervention by reflecting sunlight to cool Earth P. Zarnetske et al. 10.1073/pnas.1921854118
20. Increasing Arctic Sea Ice Albedo Using Localized Reversible Geoengineering L. Field et al. 10.1029/2018EF000820
21. The Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol Model Intercomparison Project (ISA-MIP): motivation and experimental design C. Timmreck et al. 10.5194/gmd-11-2581-2018
22. Could the Recent Taal Volcano Eruption Trigger an El Niño and Lead to Eurasian Warming? F. Liu et al. 10.1007/s00376-020-2041-z
23. Increased Variability of Biomass Burning Emissions in CMIP6 Amplifies Hydrologic Cycle in the CESM2 Large Ensemble K. Heyblom et al. 10.1029/2021GL096868
24. Impacts of three types of solar geoengineering on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation M. Xie et al. 10.5194/acp-22-4581-2022
25. Identifying the sources of uncertainty in climate model simulations of solar radiation modification with the G6sulfur and G6solar Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-21-10039-2021
26. Extreme temperature and precipitation response to solar dimming and stratospheric aerosol geoengineering D. Ji et al. 10.5194/acp-18-10133-2018
27. Bounding Global Aerosol Radiative Forcing of Climate Change N. Bellouin et al. 10.1029/2019RG000660
28. Estimating the potential cooling effect of cirrus thinning achieved via the seeding approach J. Liu & X. Shi 10.5194/acp-21-10609-2021
29. Seasonal drought severity identification using a modified multivariate index: a case study of Indo-Gangetic Plains in India V. Kumar & H. Chu 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130632
30. Interactive stratospheric aerosol models' response to different amounts and altitudes of SO2 injection during the 1991 Pinatubo eruption I. Quaglia et al. 10.5194/acp-23-921-2023
31. Stratospheric ozone response to sulfate aerosol and solar dimming climate interventions based on the G6 Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations S. Tilmes​​​​​​​ et al. 10.5194/acp-22-4557-2022
32. Simulated effect of sunshade solar geoengineering on the global carbon cycle J. Jiang et al. 10.1007/s11430-017-9210-0
33. An interactive stratospheric aerosol model intercomparison of solar geoengineering by stratospheric injection of SO<sub>2</sub> or accumulation-mode sulfuric acid aerosols D. Weisenstein et al. 10.5194/acp-22-2955-2022
34. Regional dynamical and statistical downscaling temperature, humidity and wind speed for the Beijing region under stratospheric aerosol injection geoengineering J. Wang et al. 10.5194/esd-13-1625-2022
35. Volcanic-induced global monsoon drying modulated by diverse El Niño responses S. Paik et al. 10.1126/sciadv.aba1212
36. Changes in clouds and thermodynamics under solar geoengineering and implications for required solar reduction R. Russotto & T. Ackerman 10.5194/acp-18-11905-2018
37. The Asia-Pacific’s role in the emerging solar geoengineering debate M. Sugiyama et al. 10.1007/s10584-017-1994-0
38. Intellectual property policies for solar geoengineering J. Reynolds et al. 10.1002/wcc.512
39. The Overlooked Role of the Stratosphere Under a Solar Constant Reduction E. Bednarz et al. 10.1029/2022GL098773
40. Comparison of UKESM1 and CESM2 simulations using the same multi-target stratospheric aerosol injection strategy M. Henry et al. 10.5194/acp-23-13369-2023
41. Flood damage costs under the sea level rise with warming of 1.5 °C and 2 °C S. Jevrejeva et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/aacc76
42. A review of the effects of solar radiation management on hydrological extremes Y. Tew et al. 10.1088/1755-1315/1238/1/012030
43. Can climate‐effective land management reduce regional warming? A. Hirsch et al. 10.1002/2016JD026125
44. Optimal Control of Aerosol Emissions into the Stratosphere to Stabilize the Earth’s Climate S. Soldatenko & R. Yusupov 10.1134/S0001433818050122
45. A statistical examination of the effects of stratospheric sulfate geoengineering on tropical storm genesis Q. Wang et al. 10.5194/acp-18-9173-2018
46. The CMIP6 Data Request (DREQ, version 01.00.31) M. Juckes et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-201-2020
47. Dependency of the impacts of geoengineering on the stratospheric sulfur injection strategy – Part 1: Intercomparison of modal and sectional aerosol modules A. Laakso et al. 10.5194/acp-22-93-2022
48. Performance assessment for climate intervention (PACI): preliminary application to a stratospheric aerosol injection scenario L. Wheeler et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1205515
49. Land radiative management as contributor to regional-scale climate adaptation and mitigation S. Seneviratne et al. 10.1038/s41561-017-0057-5
50. Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
51. The Choice of Baseline Period Influences the Assessments of the Outcomes of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection D. Visioni et al. 10.1029/2023EF003851
52. Towards a comprehensive climate impacts assessment of solar geoengineering P. Irvine et al. 10.1002/2016EF000389
53. Climate model projections from the Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) of CMIP6 C. Tebaldi et al. 10.5194/esd-12-253-2021
54. North Atlantic Oscillation response in GeoMIP experiments G6solar and G6sulfur: why detailed modelling is needed for understanding regional implications of solar radiation management A. Jones et al. 10.5194/acp-21-1287-2021
55. The impact of stratospheric aerosol intervention on the North Atlantic and Quasi-Biennial Oscillations in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) G6sulfur experiment A. Jones et al. 10.5194/acp-22-2999-2022
56. Machine dependence and reproducibility for coupled climate simulations: the HadGEM3-GC3.1 CMIP Preindustrial simulation M. Guarino et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-139-2020
57. The Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project (PAMIP) contribution to CMIP6: investigating the causes and consequences of polar amplification D. Smith et al. 10.5194/gmd-12-1139-2019
58. Coastal sea level rise with warming above 2 °C S. Jevrejeva et al. 10.1073/pnas.1605312113
59. The response of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling under different aerosol-based radiation management geoengineering H. Lee et al. 10.5194/esd-12-313-2021
60. Northern-high-latitude permafrost and terrestrial carbon response to two solar geoengineering scenarios Y. Chen et al. 10.5194/esd-14-55-2023
61. The G4Foam Experiment: global climate impacts of regional ocean albedo modification C. Gabriel et al. 10.5194/acp-17-595-2017
62. CMIP6 simulations with the compact Earth system model OSCAR v3.1 Y. Quilcaille et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-1129-2023
63. Future changes in atmospheric rivers over East Asia under stratospheric aerosol intervention J. Liang & J. Haywood 10.5194/acp-23-1687-2023
64. The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6 B. O'Neill et al. 10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016
65. Stratospheric aerosol injection may impact global systems and human health outcomes S. Tracy et al. 10.1525/elementa.2022.00047
66. A review of solar forecasting, its dependence on atmospheric sciences and implications for grid integration: Towards carbon neutrality D. Yang et al. 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112348
67. Climate intervention using marine cloud brightening (MCB) compared with stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) in the UKESM1 climate model J. Haywood et al. 10.5194/acp-23-15305-2023
68. Vatnajökull Mass Loss Under Solar Geoengineering Due to the North Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation C. Yue et al. 10.1029/2021EF002052
69. Climatic impacts of stratospheric geoengineering with sulfate, black carbon and titania injection A. Jones et al. 10.5194/acp-16-2843-2016
70. Solar Geoengineering in the Polar Regions: A Review A. Duffey et al. 10.1029/2023EF003679
71. Steering and Influence in Transnational Climate Governance: Nonstate Engagement in Solar Geoengineering Research J. Horton & B. Koremenos 10.1162/glep_a_00572
72. G6-1.5K-SAI: a new Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) experiment integrating recent advances in solar radiation modification studies D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-2583-2024
73. Reaching 1.5 and 2.0 °C global surface temperature targets using stratospheric aerosol geoengineering S. Tilmes et al. 10.5194/esd-11-579-2020
74. The Sensitivity of Moisture Flux Partitioning in the Cold‐Point Tropopause to External Forcing C. Kroll et al. 10.1029/2022GL102262
75. Comparing different generations of idealized solar geoengineering simulations in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) B. Kravitz et al. 10.5194/acp-21-4231-2021
76. Estimating the Impact of Artificially Injected Stratospheric Aerosols on the Global Mean Surface Temperature in the 21th Century S. Soldatenko 10.3390/cli6040085
77. SURFER v2.0: a flexible and simple model linking anthropogenic CO2 emissions and solar radiation modification to ocean acidification and sea level rise M. Martínez Montero et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-8059-2022
78. Stopping the flood: could we use targeted geoengineering to mitigate sea level rise? M. Wolovick & J. Moore 10.5194/tc-12-2955-2018
79. Responses of Extreme Climates in South Asia under a G6sulfur Scenario of Climate Engineering J. Wang et al. 10.3390/atmos14101490
80. Tropical Pacific climate variability under solar geoengineering: impacts on ENSO extremes A. Malik et al. 10.5194/acp-20-15461-2020
81. Lost options commitment: how short-term policies affect long-term scope of action M. Martínez Montero et al. 10.1093/oxfclm/kgae004
82. Impact of stratospheric aerosol intervention geoengineering on surface air temperature in China: a surface energy budget perspective Z. Liu et al. 10.5194/acp-22-7667-2022
83. Potential impact of stratospheric aerosol geoengineering on projected temperature and precipitation extremes in South Africa T. Patel et al. 10.1088/2752-5295/acdaec
84. Features of the development of space-based shading and lighting systems for the Earth’s surface A. Alpatov & E. Lapkhanov 10.15407/itm2023.01.025
85. Reflecting upon 10 years of geoengineering research: Introduction to the Crutzen + 10 special issue M. Boettcher & S. Schäfer 10.1002/2016EF000521
86. Solar geoengineering and carbon removal significantly lower economic climate damages A. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.oneear.2023.09.004
87. Differences in the quasi-biennial oscillation response to stratospheric aerosol modification depending on injection strategy and species H. Franke et al. 10.5194/acp-21-8615-2021
88. Differing responses of the quasi-biennial oscillation to artificial SO<sub>2</sub> injections in two global models U. Niemeier et al. 10.5194/acp-20-8975-2020
89. Optimal climate intervention scenarios for crop production vary by nation B. Clark et al. 10.1038/s43016-023-00853-3
90. Assessing the consequences of including aerosol absorption in potential stratospheric aerosol injection climate intervention strategies J. Haywood et al. 10.5194/acp-22-6135-2022
91. A round Earth for climate models M. Prather & J. Hsu 10.1073/pnas.1908198116
92. Is increasing ice crystal sedimentation velocity in geoengineering simulations a good proxy for cirrus cloud seeding? B. Gasparini et al. 10.5194/acp-17-4871-2017
93. Quantifying and Comparing Effects of Climate Engineering Methods on the Earth System S. Sonntag et al. 10.1002/2017EF000620
94. How geoengineering scenarios frame assumptions and create expectations A. Talberg et al. 10.1007/s11625-018-0527-8
95. The Model Intercomparison Project on the climatic response to Volcanic forcing (VolMIP): experimental design and forcing input data for CMIP6 D. Zanchettin et al. 10.5194/gmd-9-2701-2016
96. Climate response to off-equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections in three Earth system models – Part 1: Experimental protocols and surface changes D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-663-2023
97. Evaluation of CNRM Earth System Model, CNRM‐ESM2‐1: Role of Earth System Processes in Present‐Day and Future Climate R. Séférian et al. 10.1029/2019MS001791
98. Impacts of Sulfate Geoengineering on Rice Yield in China: Results From a Multimodel Ensemble P. Zhan et al. 10.1029/2018EF001094
99. Tools of the trade: practices and politics of researching the future in climate engineering S. Low & S. Schäfer 10.1007/s11625-019-00692-x
100. Thermosteric and dynamic sea level under solar geoengineering C. Yue et al. 10.1038/s41612-023-00466-4
101. Solar radiation modification challenges decarbonization with renewable solar energy S. Baur et al. 10.5194/esd-15-307-2024
102. The Detection and Attribution Model Intercomparison Project (DAMIP v1.0) contribution to CMIP6 N. Gillett et al. 10.5194/gmd-9-3685-2016
103. Substantial cooling effect from aerosol-induced increase in tropical marine cloud cover Y. Chen et al. 10.1038/s41561-024-01427-z
104. Impact of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection on the East Asian Winter Monsoon Z. Liu et al. 10.1029/2022GL102109
105. Effect of Regional Marine Cloud Brightening Interventions on Climate Tipping Elements H. Hirasawa et al. 10.1029/2023GL104314
106. An intensified hydrological cycle in the simulation of geoengineering by cirrus cloud thinning using ice crystal fall speed changes L. Jackson et al. 10.1002/2015JD024304
107. Brief communication: Reduction in the future Greenland ice sheet surface melt with the help of solar geoengineering X. Fettweis et al. 10.5194/tc-15-3013-2021
108. A Numerical Modeling Study on the Earth’s Surface Brightening Effect of Cirrus Thinning X. Shi et al. 10.3390/atmos15020189
109. How large is the design space for stratospheric aerosol geoengineering? Y. Zhang et al. 10.5194/esd-13-201-2022
110. On the Linearity of External Forcing Response in Solar Geoengineering Experiments J. Virgin & C. Fletcher 10.1029/2022GL100200
111. A subpolar-focused stratospheric aerosol injection deployment scenario W. Smith et al. 10.1088/2515-7620/ac8cd3
112. How explosive volcanic eruptions reshape daily precipitation distributions S. Paik et al. 10.1016/j.wace.2022.100489
113. Climate response to off-equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections in three Earth system models – Part 2: Stratospheric and free-tropospheric response E. Bednarz et al. 10.5194/acp-23-687-2023
114. How Northern High-Latitude Volcanic Eruptions in Different Seasons Affect ENSO W. Sun et al. 10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0290.1
115. Impact of climate change on volcanic processes: current understanding and future challenges T. Aubry et al. 10.1007/s00445-022-01562-8
116. Identifying the regional emergence of climate patterns in the ARISE-SAI-1.5 simulations Z. Labe et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acc81a
117. The Response of Permafrost and High‐Latitude Ecosystems Under Large‐Scale Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Its Termination H. Lee et al. 10.1029/2018EF001146
118. Precipitation and temperature response to sea salt injection into low marine clouds over West Africa M. Adeniyi & B. Bassey 10.1007/s42452-021-04388-9
119. Geoengineering as a design problem B. Kravitz et al. 10.5194/esd-7-469-2016
120. The hydrological cycle response to cirrus cloud thinning J. Kristjánsson et al. 10.1002/2015GL066795
121. Wetter Global Arid Regions Driven by Volcanic Eruptions M. Zuo et al. 10.1029/2019JD031171
122. Why cirrus cloud seeding cannot substantially cool the planet B. Gasparini & U. Lohmann 10.1002/2015JD024666
123. Geoengineering: Basic science and ongoing research efforts in China L. Cao et al. 10.1016/j.accre.2015.11.002
124. Stratospheric geoengineering impacts on El Niño/Southern Oscillation C. Gabriel & A. Robock 10.5194/acp-15-11949-2015
125. Five solar geoengineering tropes that have outstayed their welcome J. Reynolds et al. 10.1002/2016EF000416