60 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Land radiative management as contributor to regional-scale climate adaptation and mitigation S. Seneviratne et al. 10.1038/s41561-017-0057-5
2. Towards a comprehensive climate impacts assessment of solar geoengineering P. Irvine et al. 10.1002/2016EF000389
3. Evoking equity as a rationale for solar geoengineering research? Scrutinizing emerging expert visions of equity J. Flegal & A. Gupta 10.1007/s10784-017-9377-6
4. Global monsoon response to tropical and Arctic stratospheric aerosol injection W. Sun et al. 10.1007/s00382-020-05371-7
5. Machine dependence and reproducibility for coupled climate simulations: the HadGEM3-GC3.1 CMIP Preindustrial simulation M. Guarino et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-139-2020
6. The Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project (PAMIP) contribution to CMIP6: investigating the causes and consequences of polar amplification D. Smith et al. 10.5194/gmd-12-1139-2019
7. Coastal sea level rise with warming above 2 °C S. Jevrejeva et al. 10.1073/pnas.1605312113
8. Climate Response to Aerosol Geoengineering: A Multimethod Comparison H. Muri et al. 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0620.1
9. The G4Foam Experiment: global climate impacts of regional ocean albedo modification C. Gabriel et al. 10.5194/acp-17-595-2017
10. Documenting numerical experiments in support of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) C. Pascoe et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-2149-2020
11. The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6 B. O'Neill et al. 10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016
12. The Effects of Solar Radiation Management on the Carbon Cycle L. Cao 10.1007/s40641-018-0088-z
13. Next steps in geoengineering scenario research: limited deployment scenarios and beyond M. Sugiyama et al. 10.1080/14693062.2017.1323721
14. Inequal Responses of Drylands to Radiative Forcing Geoengineering Methods C. Park et al. 10.1029/2019GL084210
15. A Model‐Based Investigation of Terrestrial Plant Carbon Uptake Response to Four Radiation Modification Approaches L. Duan et al. 10.1029/2019JD031883
16. Simulated Effect of Carbon Cycle Feedback on Climate Response to Solar Geoengineering L. Cao & J. Jiang 10.1002/2017GL076546
17. Climatic impacts of stratospheric geoengineering with sulfate, black carbon and titania injection A. Jones et al. 10.5194/acp-16-2843-2016
18. Steering and Influence in Transnational Climate Governance: Nonstate Engagement in Solar Geoengineering Research J. Horton & B. Koremenos 10.1162/glep_a_00572
19. Reaching 1.5 and 2.0 °C global surface temperature targets using stratospheric aerosol geoengineering S. Tilmes et al. 10.5194/esd-11-579-2020
20. Estimating the Impact of Artificially Injected Stratospheric Aerosols on the Global Mean Surface Temperature in the 21th Century S. Soldatenko 10.3390/cli6040085
21. Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: More research needed A. Robock 10.1002/2016EF000407
22. Stopping the flood: could we use targeted geoengineering to mitigate sea level rise? M. Wolovick & J. Moore 10.5194/tc-12-2955-2018
23. Tropical Pacific climate variability under solar geoengineering: impacts on ENSO extremes A. Malik et al. 10.5194/acp-20-15461-2020
24. Increasing Arctic Sea Ice Albedo Using Localized Reversible Geoengineering L. Field et al. 10.1029/2018EF000820
25. The Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol Model Intercomparison Project (ISA-MIP): motivation and experimental design C. Timmreck et al. 10.5194/gmd-11-2581-2018
26. Could the Recent Taal Volcano Eruption Trigger an El Niño and Lead to Eurasian Warming? F. Liu et al. 10.1007/s00376-020-2041-z
27. Reflecting upon 10 years of geoengineering research: Introduction to the Crutzen + 10 special issue M. Boettcher & S. Schäfer 10.1002/2016EF000521
28. Extreme temperature and precipitation response to solar dimming and stratospheric aerosol geoengineering D. Ji et al. 10.5194/acp-18-10133-2018
29. Differing responses of the quasi-biennial oscillation to artificial SO<sub>2</sub> injections in two global models U. Niemeier et al. 10.5194/acp-20-8975-2020
30. Bounding Global Aerosol Radiative Forcing of Climate Change N. Bellouin et al. 10.1029/2019RG000660
31. Simulated effect of sunshade solar geoengineering on the global carbon cycle J. Jiang et al. 10.1007/s11430-017-9210-0
32. A round Earth for climate models M. Prather & J. Hsu 10.1073/pnas.1908198116
33. Is increasing ice crystal sedimentation velocity in geoengineering simulations a good proxy for cirrus cloud seeding? B. Gasparini et al. 10.5194/acp-17-4871-2017
34. Quantifying and Comparing Effects of Climate Engineering Methods on the Earth System S. Sonntag et al. 10.1002/2017EF000620
35. How geoengineering scenarios frame assumptions and create expectations A. Talberg et al. 10.1007/s11625-018-0527-8
36. The Model Intercomparison Project on the climatic response to Volcanic forcing (VolMIP): experimental design and forcing input data for CMIP6 D. Zanchettin et al. 10.5194/gmd-9-2701-2016
37. Volcanic-induced global monsoon drying modulated by diverse El Niño responses S. Paik et al. 10.1126/sciadv.aba1212
38. Evaluation of CNRM Earth System Model, CNRM‐ESM2‐1: Role of Earth System Processes in Present‐Day and Future Climate R. Séférian et al. 10.1029/2019MS001791
39. Impacts of Sulfate Geoengineering on Rice Yield in China: Results From a Multimodel Ensemble P. Zhan et al. 10.1029/2018EF001094
40. Tools of the trade: practices and politics of researching the future in climate engineering S. Low & S. Schäfer 10.1007/s11625-019-00692-x
41. The Detection and Attribution Model Intercomparison Project (DAMIP v1.0) contribution to CMIP6 N. Gillett et al. 10.5194/gmd-9-3685-2016
42. Changes in clouds and thermodynamics under solar geoengineering and implications for required solar reduction R. Russotto & T. Ackerman 10.5194/acp-18-11905-2018
43. The Asia-Pacific’s role in the emerging solar geoengineering debate M. Sugiyama et al. 10.1007/s10584-017-1994-0
44. An intensified hydrological cycle in the simulation of geoengineering by cirrus cloud thinning using ice crystal fall speed changes L. Jackson et al. 10.1002/2015JD024304
45. Intellectual property policies for solar geoengineering J. Reynolds et al. 10.1002/wcc.512
46. Flood damage costs under the sea level rise with warming of 1.5 °C and 2 °C S. Jevrejeva et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/aacc76
47. Can climate‐effective land management reduce regional warming? A. Hirsch et al. 10.1002/2016JD026125
48. Optimal Control of Aerosol Emissions into the Stratosphere to Stabilize the Earth’s Climate S. Soldatenko & R. Yusupov 10.1134/S0001433818050122
49. Climate Response to Pulse Versus Sustained Stratospheric Aerosol Forcing L. Duan et al. 10.1029/2019GL083701
50. The CMIP6 Data Request (DREQ, version 01.00.31) M. Juckes et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-201-2020
51. How Northern High-Latitude Volcanic Eruptions in Different Seasons Affect ENSO W. Sun et al. 10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0290.1
52. The Response of Permafrost and High‐Latitude Ecosystems Under Large‐Scale Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Its Termination H. Lee et al. 10.1029/2018EF001146
53. Geoengineering as a design problem B. Kravitz et al. 10.5194/esd-7-469-2016
54. The hydrological cycle response to cirrus cloud thinning J. Kristjánsson et al. 10.1002/2015GL066795
55. Wetter Global Arid Regions Driven by Volcanic Eruptions M. Zuo et al. 10.1029/2019JD031171
56. Why cirrus cloud seeding cannot substantially cool the planet B. Gasparini & U. Lohmann 10.1002/2015JD024666
57. Geoengineering: Basic science and ongoing research efforts in China L. Cao et al. 10.1016/j.accre.2015.11.002
58. Geoengineering as a design problem B. Kravitz et al. 10.5194/esdd-6-1635-2015
59. Stratospheric geoengineering impacts on El Niño/Southern Oscillation C. Gabriel & A. Robock 10.5194/acp-15-11949-2015
60. Five solar geoengineering tropes that have outstayed their welcome J. Reynolds et al. 10.1002/2016EF000416