Articles | Volume 8, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3055-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3055-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Model description paper
| 
02 Oct 2015
Model description paper |
| 02 Oct 2015
A soil diffusion–reaction model for surface COS flux: COSSM v1
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
K. Maseyk
Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
now at: The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
C. Lett
Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
now at: British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, UK
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
Viewed
Total article views: 3,652 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 03 Jul 2015)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,440 | 1,009 | 203 | 3,652 | 325 | 166 | 166 |
- HTML: 2,440
- PDF: 1,009
- XML: 203
- Total: 3,652
- Supplement: 325
- BibTeX: 166
- EndNote: 166
Total article views: 3,183 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 02 Oct 2015)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,181 | 810 | 192 | 3,183 | 325 | 162 | 162 |
- HTML: 2,181
- PDF: 810
- XML: 192
- Total: 3,183
- Supplement: 325
- BibTeX: 162
- EndNote: 162
Total article views: 469 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 03 Jul 2015)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 259 | 199 | 11 | 469 | 4 | 4 |
- HTML: 259
- PDF: 199
- XML: 11
- Total: 469
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 4
Cited
25 citations as recorded by crossref.
- In situ soil COS exchange of a temperate mountain grassland under simulated drought F. Kitz et al. 10.1007/s00442-016-3805-0
- Soil COS Exchange: A Comparison of Three European Ecosystems F. Kitz et al. 10.1029/2019GB006202
- Soil carbonyl sulfide exchange in relation to microbial community composition: Insights from a managed grassland soil amendment experiment F. Kitz et al. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.04.005
- Root and rhizosphere contribution to the net soil COS exchange F. Kitz et al. 10.1007/s11104-023-06438-0
- Carbonyl sulfide exchange in soils for better estimates of ecosystem carbon uptake M. Whelan et al. 10.5194/acp-16-3711-2016
- A new mechanistic framework to predict OCS fluxes from soils J. Ogée et al. 10.5194/bg-13-2221-2016
- Global modeling of hydrogen using GFDL-AM4.1: Sensitivity of soil removal and radiative forcing F. Paulot et al. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.088
- Disentangling the rates of carbonyl sulfide (COS) production and consumption and their dependency on soil properties across biomes and land use types A. Kaisermann et al. 10.5194/acp-18-9425-2018
- Soil Carbonyl Sulfide (OCS) Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems: An Empirical Model M. Whelan et al. 10.1029/2022JG006858
- Towards understanding the variability in biospheric CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes: using FTIR spectrometry and a chemical transport model to investigate the sources and sinks of carbonyl sulfide and its link to CO<sub>2</sub> Y. Wang et al. 10.5194/acp-16-2123-2016
- Evaluation of carbonyl sulfide biosphere exchange in the Simple Biosphere Model (SiB4) L. Kooijmans et al. 10.5194/bg-18-6547-2021
- Assimilation of carbonyl sulfide (COS) fluxes within the adjoint-based data assimilation system – Nanjing University Carbon Assimilation System (NUCAS v1.0) H. Zhu et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-6337-2024
- Optimizing the terrestrial ecosystem gross primary productivity using carbonyl sulfide (COS) within a two-leaf modeling framework H. Zhu et al. 10.5194/bg-21-3735-2024
- Optimizing the carbonic anhydrase temperature response and stomatal conductance of carbonyl sulfide leaf uptake in the Simple Biosphere model (SiB4) A. Cho et al. 10.5194/bg-20-2573-2023
- Carbonyl sulfide: comparing a mechanistic representation of the vegetation uptake in a land surface model and the leaf relative uptake approach F. Maignan et al. 10.5194/bg-18-2917-2021
- Soil–atmosphere exchange of carbonyl sulfide in a Mediterranean citrus orchard F. Yang et al. 10.5194/acp-19-3873-2019
- Reviews and syntheses: Carbonyl sulfide as a multi-scale tracer for carbon and water cycles M. Whelan et al. 10.5194/bg-15-3625-2018
- Inverse modelling of carbonyl sulfide: implementation, evaluation and implications for the global budget J. Ma et al. 10.5194/acp-21-3507-2021
- A top-down approach of surface carbonyl sulfide exchange by a Mediterranean oak forest ecosystem in southern France S. Belviso et al. 10.5194/acp-16-14909-2016
- Isotopic Fractionation of Sulfur in Carbonyl Sulfide by Carbonyl Sulfide Hydrolase of <i>Thiobacillus thioparus</i> THI115 T. Ogawa et al. 10.1264/jsme2.ME17130
- Soil fluxes of carbonyl sulfide (COS), carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide in a boreal forest in southern Finland W. Sun et al. 10.5194/acp-18-1363-2018
- Soil exchange rates of COS and CO18O differ with the diversity of microbial communities and their carbonic anhydrase enzymes L. Meredith et al. 10.1038/s41396-018-0270-2
- Peak growing season gross uptake of carbon in North America is largest in the Midwest USA T. Hilton et al. 10.1038/nclimate3272
- Global modelling of soil carbonyl sulfide exchanges C. Abadie et al. 10.5194/bg-19-2427-2022
- A new mechanistic framework to predict OCS fluxes from soils J. Ogée et al. 10.5194/bgd-12-15687-2015
24 citations as recorded by crossref.
- In situ soil COS exchange of a temperate mountain grassland under simulated drought F. Kitz et al. 10.1007/s00442-016-3805-0
- Soil COS Exchange: A Comparison of Three European Ecosystems F. Kitz et al. 10.1029/2019GB006202
- Soil carbonyl sulfide exchange in relation to microbial community composition: Insights from a managed grassland soil amendment experiment F. Kitz et al. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.04.005
- Root and rhizosphere contribution to the net soil COS exchange F. Kitz et al. 10.1007/s11104-023-06438-0
- Carbonyl sulfide exchange in soils for better estimates of ecosystem carbon uptake M. Whelan et al. 10.5194/acp-16-3711-2016
- A new mechanistic framework to predict OCS fluxes from soils J. Ogée et al. 10.5194/bg-13-2221-2016
- Global modeling of hydrogen using GFDL-AM4.1: Sensitivity of soil removal and radiative forcing F. Paulot et al. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.088
- Disentangling the rates of carbonyl sulfide (COS) production and consumption and their dependency on soil properties across biomes and land use types A. Kaisermann et al. 10.5194/acp-18-9425-2018
- Soil Carbonyl Sulfide (OCS) Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems: An Empirical Model M. Whelan et al. 10.1029/2022JG006858
- Towards understanding the variability in biospheric CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes: using FTIR spectrometry and a chemical transport model to investigate the sources and sinks of carbonyl sulfide and its link to CO<sub>2</sub> Y. Wang et al. 10.5194/acp-16-2123-2016
- Evaluation of carbonyl sulfide biosphere exchange in the Simple Biosphere Model (SiB4) L. Kooijmans et al. 10.5194/bg-18-6547-2021
- Assimilation of carbonyl sulfide (COS) fluxes within the adjoint-based data assimilation system – Nanjing University Carbon Assimilation System (NUCAS v1.0) H. Zhu et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-6337-2024
- Optimizing the terrestrial ecosystem gross primary productivity using carbonyl sulfide (COS) within a two-leaf modeling framework H. Zhu et al. 10.5194/bg-21-3735-2024
- Optimizing the carbonic anhydrase temperature response and stomatal conductance of carbonyl sulfide leaf uptake in the Simple Biosphere model (SiB4) A. Cho et al. 10.5194/bg-20-2573-2023
- Carbonyl sulfide: comparing a mechanistic representation of the vegetation uptake in a land surface model and the leaf relative uptake approach F. Maignan et al. 10.5194/bg-18-2917-2021
- Soil–atmosphere exchange of carbonyl sulfide in a Mediterranean citrus orchard F. Yang et al. 10.5194/acp-19-3873-2019
- Reviews and syntheses: Carbonyl sulfide as a multi-scale tracer for carbon and water cycles M. Whelan et al. 10.5194/bg-15-3625-2018
- Inverse modelling of carbonyl sulfide: implementation, evaluation and implications for the global budget J. Ma et al. 10.5194/acp-21-3507-2021
- A top-down approach of surface carbonyl sulfide exchange by a Mediterranean oak forest ecosystem in southern France S. Belviso et al. 10.5194/acp-16-14909-2016
- Isotopic Fractionation of Sulfur in Carbonyl Sulfide by Carbonyl Sulfide Hydrolase of <i>Thiobacillus thioparus</i> THI115 T. Ogawa et al. 10.1264/jsme2.ME17130
- Soil fluxes of carbonyl sulfide (COS), carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide in a boreal forest in southern Finland W. Sun et al. 10.5194/acp-18-1363-2018
- Soil exchange rates of COS and CO18O differ with the diversity of microbial communities and their carbonic anhydrase enzymes L. Meredith et al. 10.1038/s41396-018-0270-2
- Peak growing season gross uptake of carbon in North America is largest in the Midwest USA T. Hilton et al. 10.1038/nclimate3272
- Global modelling of soil carbonyl sulfide exchanges C. Abadie et al. 10.5194/bg-19-2427-2022
1 citations as recorded by crossref.
Saved (final revised paper)
Latest update: 21 Nov 2024
Short summary
We report a soil COS flux model that is the first to resolve both vertical transport and microbial sources and sinks in soil and litter. By evaluation with field data, we show that the model can reproduce observed daily and long-term variations of soil COS flux. We also demonstrate that diffusion is important in controlling the flux, by limiting the COS available for soil uptake when there is strong litter uptake and modulating the water content dependence of soil uptake.
We report a soil COS flux model that is the first to resolve both vertical transport and...
