209 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Global-to-local-to-global interactions and climate change U. Baldos et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acc95c
2. Heterogeneous impacts of excessive wetness on maize yields in China: Evidence from statistical yields and process-based crop models W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.109205
3. Historical and projected impacts of climate change and technology on soybean yield in China S. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103522
4. Automatic data matching for geospatial models: a new paradigm for geospatial data and models sharing Y. Zhu & J. Yang https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2019.1670735
5. Compound drought-heatwave events accelerate the potential risk on rice yield over Southeast Asia Y. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2025.108410
6. Representing water scarcity in future agricultural assessments J. Winter et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2017.05.002
7. Global Phosphorus Losses from Croplands under Future Precipitation Scenarios W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c03978
8. Direct and indirect effects of CO2increase on crop yield in West Africa B. Sultan et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5960
9. Progress in modelling agricultural impacts of and adaptations to climate change R. Rötter et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2018.05.009
10. Spatial frameworks for robust estimation of yield gaps J. Rattalino Edreira et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00365-y
11. The GGCMI Phase 2 experiment: global gridded crop model simulations under uniform changes in CO2, temperature, water, and nitrogen levels (protocol version 1.0) J. Franke et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2315-2020
12. Evaluation of global gridded crop models in simulating sugarcane yield in China D. Yin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aosl.2023.100329
13. Dissecting the nonlinear response of maize yield to high temperature stress with model‐data integration P. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14632
14. Soil nitrous oxide emissions from global land ecosystems and their drivers within the LPJ-GUESS model (v4.1) J. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3131-2025
15. A framework for analyzing climate change impacts on agricultural value chain T. Ali et al. https://doi.org/10.26599/ECM.2024.9400005
16. Modeling the macroeconomic consequences of natural disasters: Capital stock, recovery dynamics, and monetary policy S. Hallegatte et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106787
17. Africa Would Need to Import More Maize in the Future Even Under 1.5°C Warming Scenario R. Zhai et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001574
18. Global food self-sufficiency in the 21st century under sustainable intensification of agriculture A. Beltran-Peña et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab9388
19. Climate change impact and potential adaptation strategies under alternate realizations of climate scenarios for three major crops in Europe M. Donatelli et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/7/075005
20. The optimization of model ensemble composition and size can enhance the robustness of crop yield projections L. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01016-9
21. A data-driven model for quantifying how maize yields in North-East China respond to summer climate A. Cottrell et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/adac33
22. Estimating the Global Influence of Cover Crops on Ecosystem Service Indicators in Croplands With the LPJ‐GUESS Model J. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003142
23. A harmonised gridded input dataset for simulation modelling of the major crops of South Asia P. Shirsath et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2026.113054
24. Climate shifts within major agricultural seasons for +1.5 and +2.0 °C worlds: HAPPI projections and AgMIP modeling scenarios A. Ruane et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.05.013
25. Representing winter wheat in the Community Land Model (version 4.5) Y. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1873-2017
26. Projected changes in crop yield mean and variability over West Africa in a world 1.5 K warmer than the pre-industrial era B. Parkes et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-119-2018
27. Assessing the impacts of agricultural managements on soil carbon stocks, nitrogen loss, and crop production – a modelling study in eastern Africa J. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2145-2022
28. Economic shifts in agricultural production and trade due to climate change L. Porfirio et al. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0164-y
29. Evaluating the Sensitivity of Agricultural Model Performance to Different Climate Inputs M. Glotter et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-15-0120.1
30. Uncertainties in estimating global potential yields and their impacts for long-term modeling M. Ollenburger et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-021-01228-x
31. Processing tomato production is expected to decrease by 2050 due to the projected increase in temperature D. Cammarano et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00521-y
32. From fixed calendars to dynamic triggers: climate-responsive field management with SWAT+ decision tables M. Eini et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.135767
33. Intra-growing season dry–wet spell pattern is a pivotal driver of maize yield variability in sub-Saharan Africa P. Marcos-Garcia et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-024-01040-8
34. Modeling the Global Sowing and Harvesting Windows of Major Crops Around the Year 2000 T. Iizumi et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001477
35. Assessing the Effect of Glacier Runoff Changes on Basin Runoff and Agricultural Production in the Indus, Amu Darya, and Tarim Interior Basins R. Calvo‐Gallardo et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EF005064
36. Towards a multiscale crop modelling framework for climate change adaptation assessment B. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-0625-3
37. Recent changes in county-level maize production in the United States: Spatial-temporal patterns, climatic drivers and the implications for crop modelling G. Leng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.026
38. A food crop yield emulator for integration in the compact Earth system model OSCAR (OSCAR-crop v1.0) X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-5857-2026
39. Multi-wheat-model ensemble responses to interannual climate variability A. Ruane et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.03.008
40. Parameterization-induced uncertainties and impacts of crop management harmonization in a global gridded crop model ensemble C. Folberth et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221862
41. Mangrove Social-Ecological Resilience Appraisal (MaSERA): a novel interdisciplinary framework for assessment S. Gnansounou et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-026-10172-6
42. A multi-model analysis of teleconnected crop yield variability in a range of cropping systems M. Heino et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-113-2020
43. Forecasting Corn Yield With Machine Learning Ensembles M. Shahhosseini et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.01120
44. Crop yield sensitivity of global major agricultural countries to droughts and the projected changes in the future G. Leng & J. Hall https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.434
45. Global Response Patterns of Major Rainfed Crops to Adaptation by Maintaining Current Growing Periods and Irrigation S. Minoli et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF001130
46. Modelling crop yield and harvest index: the role of carbon assimilation and allocation parameters H. Camargo-Alvarez et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01625-x
47. Contrasting area and yield responses to extreme climate contributes to climate-resilient rice production in Asia N. Hosokawa et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33413-7
48. Implications of climate mitigation for future agricultural production C. Müller et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125004
49. Climate change impacts on rice yield of a large-scale irrigation scheme in Malaysia A. Houma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106908
50. A modelling platform for climate change impact on local and regional crop water requirements S. Masia et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107005
51. Management practices and elevated atmospheric CO2 levels helped to sustain a high level of global rice production T. Lin & A. Jain https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-55973-0
52. Exploring the challenges with soil data in regional land use analysis C. Hendriks et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.01.007
53. Climate impacts on global agriculture emerge earlier in new generation of climate and crop models J. Jägermeyr et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00400-y
54. Increased probability of hot and dry weather extremes during the growing season threatens global crop yields M. Heino et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29378-2
55. Limitation of Maize Potential Yield by Phosphorus at the Global Scale B. Ringeval et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70485
56. The role of cover crops for cropland soil carbon, nitrogen leaching, and agricultural yields – a global simulation study with LPJmL (V. 5.0-tillage-cc) V. Porwollik et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-957-2022
57. Observed meteorological drought trends in Bangladesh identified with the Effective Drought Index (EDI) M. Mondol et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107001
58. Irrigation-driven trade-offs between yields and nitrogen losses in global major crop production Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2026.110504
59. Developing an eco-physiological process-based model of soybean growth and yield (MATCRO-Soy v.1): model calibration and evaluation A. Yusara et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-8801-2025
60. Global investigation of impacts of PET methods on simulating crop-water relations for maize W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.02.017
61. Potential yield simulated by global gridded crop models: using a process-based emulator to explain their differences B. Ringeval et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1639-2021
62. A similarity-based automatic data recommendation approach for geographic models Y. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2017.1300805
63. The impact of future climate change and potential adaptation methods on Maize yields in West Africa B. Parkes et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2290-3
64. Climate change and the future of winter wheat in Iran: Insights for food and water security M. Nouri & S. Veysi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2026.102144
65. Different uncertainty distribution between high and low latitudes in modelling warming impacts on wheat W. Xiong et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-019-0004-2
66. Taking climate model evaluation to the next level V. Eyring et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0355-y
67. Emergence of robust precipitation changes across crop production areas in the 21st century M. Rojas et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1811463116
68. Modeling symbiotic biological nitrogen fixation in grain legumes globally with LPJ-GUESS (v4.0, r10285) J. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-815-2022
69. Irrigation-induced economic value for global major crops: A biophysical perspective on yield benefits versus greenhouse gas emission costs of croplands Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2026.104884
70. The Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison phase 1 simulation dataset C. Müller et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0023-8
71. Disentangling the separate and confounding effects of temperature and precipitation on global maize yield using machine learning, statistical and process crop models X. Yin et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac5716
72. Improving maize growth processes in the community land model: Implementation and evaluation B. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.11.012
73. Water resources conservation and nitrogen pollution reduction under global food trade and agricultural intensification W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.306
74. A meta-analysis of crop response patterns to nitrogen limitation for improved model representation V. Seufert et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223508
75. Evaluation of the accuracy of satellite-based rainfed wheat yield dataset over an area with complex geography M. Eini et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2023.104963
76. Crop models: integrating systems from the molecular to global for agricultural productivity and sustainability X. Piao & M. Matthews https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2026.103438
77. Future climate impacts on global agricultural yields over the 21st century S. Waldhoff et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abadcb
78. Decreases in global beer supply due to extreme drought and heat W. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0263-1
79. Review of Methods and Models for Potato Yield Prediction M. Piekutowska & G. Niedbała https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15040367
80. Maize yield loss risk under droughts in observations and crop models in the United States G. Leng https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd500
81. Current status and obstacles of narrowing yield gaps of four major crops W. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.13801
82. Closing global yield gap of rainfed wheat by optimizing nitrogen and phosphorus inputs A. Dadrasi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179367
83. Monthly 1-km yield mapping without census statistics: An approach combining satellite, crop model, field data and machine learning tested in three countries with diverse rice cropping patterns T. IIZUMI et al. https://doi.org/10.2480/agrmet.D-25-00040
84. An Integrated Agriculture, Atmosphere, and Hydrology Modeling System for Ecosystem Assessments L. Ran et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001708
85. Estimation of Spring Maize Planting Dates in China Using the Environmental Similarity Method M. Sheng et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14010097
86. Crop planting date matters: Estimation methods and effect on future yields L. Dobor et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.03.023
87. Uncertainty in soil data can outweigh climate impact signals in global crop yield simulations C. Folberth et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11872
88. Future projections of European maize yields using AquaCrop with an adaptive growing season L. Busschaert et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2025.127920
89. Projecting Exposure to Extreme Climate Impact Events Across Six Event Categories and Three Spatial Scales S. Lange et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001616
90. Projection of future drought and its impact on simulated crop yield over South Asia using ensemble machine learning approach F. Prodhan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151029
91. Evapotranspiration simulations in ISIMIP2a—Evaluation of spatio-temporal characteristics with a comprehensive ensemble of independent datasets R. Wartenburger et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac4bb
92. Crop productivity changes in 1.5 °C and 2 °C worlds under climate sensitivity uncertainty C. Schleussner et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab63b
93. Spatiotemporal patterns of winter wheat phenology and its climatic drivers based on an improved pDSSAT model Y. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-020-9821-0
94. Achieving High Crop Yields with Low Nitrogen Emissions in Global Agricultural Input Intensification W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b03610
95. The impact of climate change on barley yield in the Mediterranean basin D. Cammarano et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2019.03.002
96. Worldwide Maize and Soybean Yield Response to Environmental and Management Factors Over the 20th and 21st Centuries T. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JG006304
97. Global gridded crop model evaluation: benchmarking, skills, deficiencies and implications C. Müller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1403-2017
98. Estimating sowing and harvest dates based on the Asian summer monsoon C. Mathison et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-563-2018
99. Probabilistic Assessment of Cereal Rye Cover Crop Impacts on Regional Crop Yield and Soil Carbon T. Rai et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13010176
100. Regional aggregation bias in the global computable general equilibrium model: Issues in assessing the economic impact of climate change and trade liberalization Y. Kunimitsu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106885
101. A regional nuclear conflict would compromise global food security J. Jägermeyr et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1919049117
102. Process-based assessment of wheat yield gap in Mediterranean rainfed conditions: Cultivar, nutrient, and sowing optimization L. Ousayd et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2025.127967
103. Future climate change significantly alters interannual wheat yield variability over half of harvested areas W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1fbb
104. Changing occurrence of crop water surplus or deficit and the impact of irrigation: An analysis highlighting consequences for rice production in Bangladesh M. Mondol et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107695
105. Assessing Climate Change Impacts on Second-Crop Soybean Yield and Irrigation Requirements Using AquaCrop in a Mediterranean Climate Ş. Yüzbaşı & E. Akkuzu https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-026-00432-z
106. Noah‐MP‐Crop: Introducing dynamic crop growth in the Noah‐MP land surface model X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025597
107. Performance analysis of regional AquaCrop (v6.1) biomass and surface soil moisture simulations using satellite and in situ observations S. de Roos et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7309-2021
108. Modelling fertiliser significance in three major crops B. Parkes et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.06.012
109. Analysis on Heat Characteristics for Summer Maize Cropping in a Semi-Arid Region Z. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12061435
110. Propagating shocks and transitions across networked food systems: Insights from multiplayer microeconomic modeling B. Zaitchik et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2321155123
111. The impact of climate change on Brazil's agriculture M. Zilli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139384
112. A review of global gridded cropping system data products K. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac20f4
113. The influence of spatial correlations in crop production on global crop failures in model simulations S. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2026.111021
114. Mapping the Global-Scale Maize Drought Risk Under Climate Change Based on the GEPIC-Vulnerability-Risk Model Y. Yin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-021-00349-3
115. Soil organic carbon improvement for mitigating crop yield losses under global warming Q. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2025.127739
116. Focus on agriculture and forestry benefits of reducing climate change impacts J. Martinich et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa6f23
117. Sensitivity of soybean planting date to wet season onset in Mato Grosso, Brazil, and implications under climate change M. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03223-9
118. Supporting sustainability initiatives through biometeorology education and training M. Allen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-017-1408-z
119. Simulating Agriculture in the Community Land Model Version 5 D. Lombardozzi et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JG005529
120. Evaluation of global gridded crop models (GGCMs) for the simulation of major grain crop yields in China Z. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2022.087
121. Prescreening-Based Subset Selection for Improving Predictions of Earth System Models With Application to Regional Prediction of Red Tide A. Elshall et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.786223
122. Aggravation of global maize yield loss risk under various hot and dry scenarios using multiple types of prediction approaches X. Yin et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.8371
123. Recent changes in county-level corn yield variability in the United States from observations and crop models G. Leng https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.017
124. Estimating uncertainty in crop model predictions: Current situation and future prospects D. Wallach & P. Thorburn https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.06.001
125. Water savings potentials of irrigation systems: global simulation of processes and linkages J. Jägermeyr et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3073-2015
126. Toward large-scale crop production forecasts for global food security G. Badr et al. https://doi.org/10.1147/JRD.2016.2591698
127. Modelling adaptation and transformative adaptation in cropping systems: recent advances and future directions A. Farrell et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101265
128. An integrated assessment of provincial economic damages from climate change in China H. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.130689
129. Global historical soybean and wheat yield loss estimates from ozone pollution considering water and temperature as modifying effects B. Schauberger et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.11.004
130. Unraveling the impact of environmental factors on wheat yield across the European Union via explainable machine learning W. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2025.111268
131. Exploring uncertainties in global crop yield projections in a large ensemble of crop models and CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate scenarios C. Müller et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd8fc
132. Spatio-temporal downscaling of gridded crop model yield estimates based on machine learning C. Folberth et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.09.021
133. Simulation of Staple Crop Yields for Determination of Regional Impacts of Climate Change: A Case Study in Chonnam Province, Republic of Korea J. Choi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11122544
134. Monsoon Asia Rice Calendar (MARC): a gridded rice calendar in monsoon Asia based on Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 images X. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3893-2024
135. Aligning the harvesting year in global gridded crop model simulations with that in census reports is pivotal to national-level model performance evaluations for rice T. Iizumi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2021.126367
136. Irrigation in the Earth system S. McDermid et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00438-5
137. Implementation of a dynamic specific leaf area (SLA) into a land surface model (LSM) incorporated crop-growth model Z. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.108238
138. Global patterns of crop yield stability under additional nutrient and water inputs C. Müller et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198748
139. Climate and management interaction cause diverse crop phenology trends E. Eyshi Rezaei et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.11.003
140. Phosphorus in agricultural soils: drivers of its distribution at the global scale B. Ringeval et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13618
141. Global Carbon Budget 2016 C. Le Quéré et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-605-2016
142. Increased wheat price spikes and larger economic inequality with 2°C global warming T. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.07.004
143. Potential impacts of projected warming scenarios on winter wheat in the UK D. Cammarano et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859621000903
144. Simulated vs. empirical weather responsiveness of crop yields: US evidence and implications for the agricultural impacts of climate change M. Mistry et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa788c
145. Untangling irrigation effects on maize water and heat stress alleviation using satellite data P. Zhu & J. Burney https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-827-2022
146. Global irrigation contribution to wheat and maize yield X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21498-5
147. Hydrologic and Agricultural Earth Observations and Modeling for the Water-Food Nexus A. McNally et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00023
148. Role of Modelling in International Crop Research: Overview and Some Case Studies M. Reynolds et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8120291
149. The use of biogeochemical models to evaluate mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from managed grasslands R. Sándor et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.020
150. Türkiye’de İklim Değişikliği ile Şeker Pancarı Üretimi Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi: Zamanla Değişen Simetrik ve Asimetrik Nedensellik Analizi C. DEMİRTAŞ & M. ILIKKAN ÖZGÜR https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.995302
151. Climate analogues suggest limited potential for intensification of production on current croplands under climate change T. Pugh et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12608
152. An AgMIP framework for improved agricultural representation in integrated assessment models A. Ruane et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa8da6
153. Modelling cropping periods of grain crops at the global scale S. Minoli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2018.12.013
154. Assessment of Crop Yield in China Simulated by Thirteen Global Gridded Crop Models D. Yin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-023-2234-3
155. Transdisciplinary coordination is essential for advancing agricultural modeling with machine learning L. Sweet et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2025.101233
156. Regionally variable responses of maize and soybean yield to rainfall events in China J. Fu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110458
157. PRISM: A methodological framework for reproducible data-to-model translation in spatial crop modeling F. Tonle et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2026.112223
158. Improving the representation of major Indian crops in the Community Land Model version 5.0 (CLM5) using site-scale crop data N. Kangari et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-763-2025
159. Simulating the effect of tillage practices with the global ecosystem model LPJmL (version 5.0-tillage) F. Lutz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2419-2019
160. Spatial and temporal uncertainty of crop yield aggregations V. Porwollik et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2016.08.006
161. Biophysical and economic implications for agriculture of +1.5° and +2.0°C global warming using AgMIP Coordinated Global and Regional Assessments A. Ruane et al. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01520
162. The critical benefits of snowpack insulation and snowmelt for winter wheat productivity P. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01327-3
163. Calibration‐induced uncertainty of the EPIC model to estimate climate change impact on global maize yield W. Xiong et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000625
164. Advanced machine learning for regional potato yield prediction: analysis of essential drivers D. Tamayo-Vera et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44264-025-00052-6
165. Significant changes in global maize yield sensitivity to vapor pressure deficit during 1983–2010 L. Han & G. Leng https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109107
166. Extending a first-principles primary production model to predict wheat yields S. Qiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.107932
167. Management outweighs climate change on affecting length of rice growing period for early rice and single rice in China during 1991–2012 X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.10.016
168. Agriculture's Historic Twin-Challenge Toward Sustainable Water Use and Food Supply for All J. Jägermeyr https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00035
169. Systemic Risk in Global Agricultural Markets and Trade Liberalization under Climate Change: Synchronized Crop-Yield Change and Agricultural Price Volatility Y. Kunimitsu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410680
170. Verifiable soil organic carbon modelling to facilitate regional reporting of cropland carbon change: A test case in the Czech Republic J. Balkovič et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111206
171. Modelling global impacts of climate variability and trend on maize yield during 1980–2010 X. Yin & G. Leng https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6792
172. Implementing the nitrogen cycle into the dynamic global vegetation, hydrology, and crop growth model LPJmL (version 5.0) W. von Bloh et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2789-2018
173. Heat stress may cause a significant reduction of rice yield in China under future climate scenarios Q. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151746
174. Coupling Process-Based Crop Model and Extreme Climate Indicators with Machine Learning Can Improve the Predictions and Reduce Uncertainties of Global Soybean Yields Q. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12111791
175. 100 Years of Progress in Applied Meteorology. Part III: Additional Applications S. Haupt et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-18-0012.1
176. Representing agriculture in Earth System Models: Approaches and priorities for development S. McDermid et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000749
177. Enhancing Maize Yield Simulations in Regional China Using Machine Learning and Multi-Data Resources Y. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16040701
178. Uncertainties of potentials and recent changes in global yields of major crops resulting from census- and satellite-based yield datasets at multiple resolutions T. Iizumi et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203809
179. Varying applicability of four different satellite-derived soil moisture products to global gridded crop model evaluation T. Sakai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2015.09.011
180. Assessing inter-sectoral climate change risks: the role of ISIMIP C. Rosenzweig et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/12/1/010301
181. The importance of management information and soil moisture representation for simulating tillage effects on N2O emissions in LPJmL5.0-tillage F. Lutz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3905-2020
182. Climate-Based Estimation of Multi-Cropping Rice Transplanting Dates Using a Geographical Random Convolutional Kernel Transform H. Zhuang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16080852
183. Spatial variations in crop growing seasons pivotal to reproduce global fluctuations in maize and wheat yields J. Jägermeyr & K. Frieler https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat4517
184. Contribution of Remote Sensing on Crop Models: A Review D. Kasampalis et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging4040052
185. Increasing concurrent exposure of global breadbaskets to reproductive heat extremes H. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad6467
186. Predicting spatial and temporal variability in crop yields: an inter-comparison of machine learning, regression and process-based models G. Leng & J. Hall https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab7b24
187. Emulator-based optimization of APSIM-Sugar using the results of sensitivity analysis performed with the software GEM-SA M. Gunarathna et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1157854
188. Assessing uncertainties in crop and pasture ensemble model simulations of productivity and N2O emissions F. Ehrhardt et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13965
189. Evaluation of crop model prediction and uncertainty using Bayesian parameter estimation and Bayesian model averaging Y. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108686
190. Coordinating AgMIP data and models across global and regional scales for 1.5°C and 2.0°C assessments C. Rosenzweig et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0455
191. Selection of a representative subset of global climate models that captures the profile of regional changes for integrated climate impacts assessment A. Ruane & S. McDermid https://doi.org/10.1186/s40322-017-0036-4
192. The statistical emulators of GGCMI phase 2: responses of year-to-year variation of crop yield to CO2, temperature, water, and nitrogen perturbations W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7203-2023
193. Bayesian calibration of management practices for a crop model implemented in a subsistence farming region D. Quintero et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2025.127524
194. How much control do smallholder maize farmers have over yield? M. Cecil et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2023.109014
195. Quantifying the Limitation to World Cereal Production Due To Soil Phosphorus Status M. Kvakić et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GB005754
196. Carbon uptake by European agricultural land is variable, and in many regions could be increased: Evidence from remote sensing, yield statistics and models of potential productivity M. Neumann & P. Smith https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.268
197. Soil carbon management in large-scale Earth system modelling: implications for crop yields and nitrogen leaching S. Olin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-745-2015
198. Assessing recall bias and measurement error in high-frequency social data collection for human-environment research A. Bell et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-019-0314-1
199. A crop yield change emulator for use in GCAM and similar models: Persephone v1.0 A. Snyder et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1319-2019
200. Field-scale mapping of evaporative stress indicators of crop yield: An application over Mead, NE, USA Y. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.02.020
201. Empirical estimation of weather-driven yield shocks using biophysical characteristics for U.S. rainfed and irrigated maize, soybeans, and winter wheat A. Snyder et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac15ce
202. Historical simulation of maize water footprints with a new global gridded crop model ACEA O. Mialyk et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-923-2022
203. Improving the representation of cropland sites in the Community Land Model (CLM) version 5.0 T. Boas et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-573-2021
204. Observational constraint of process crop models suggests higher risks for global maize yield under climate change X. Yin & G. Leng https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac7ac7
205. Consistent negative response of US crops to high temperatures in observations and crop models B. Schauberger et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13931
206. Development of a 10-km resolution global soil profile dataset for crop modeling applications E. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.05.012
207. Climate change has likely already affected global food production D. Ray et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217148
208. Large potential for crop production adaptation depends on available future varieties F. Zabel et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15649
209. Flash droughts reduce national-scale crop yields in the United States W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03556-2