68 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Seasonality of global and Arctic black carbon processes in the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme models R. Mahmood et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD024849
2. Summertime Near‐Surface Temperature Biases Over the Central United States in Convection‐Permitting Simulations H. Qin et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD038624
3. The Weather Research and Forecasting Model with Aerosol–Cloud Interactions (WRF-ACI): Development, Evaluation, and Initial Application T. Glotfelty et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0267.1
4. Using aircraft measurements to characterize subgrid-scale variability of aerosol properties near the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Southern Great Plains site J. Fast et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11217-2022
5. Incorporating an advanced aerosol activation parameterization into WRF‐CAM5: Model evaluation and parameterization intercomparison Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD023051
6. A comparative study of two-way and offline coupled WRF v3.4 and CMAQ v5.0.2 over the contiguous US: performance evaluation and impacts of chemistry–meteorology feedbacks on air quality K. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7189-2021
7. Implementing and Improving CBMZ-MAM3 Chemistry and Aerosol Modules in the Regional Climate Model WRF-CAM5: An Evaluation over the Western US and Eastern North Pacific X. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14071122
8. Impact of Nudging Strategy on the Climate Representativeness and Hindcast Skill of Constrained EAMv1 Simulations J. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001831
9. Impacts of a double-moment bulk cloud microphysics scheme (NDW6-G23) on aerosol fields in NICAM.19 with a global 14 km grid resolution D. Goto et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-651-2024
10. Improvements to the WRF-Chem 3.5.1 model for quasi-hemispheric simulations of aerosols and ozone in the Arctic L. Marelle et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3661-2017
11. Simulating Aerosol Optical Depth and Direct Radiative Effects over the Tibetan Plateau with a High-Resolution CAS FGOALS-f3 Model M. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-022-1424-8
12. Brown Carbon in East Asia: Seasonality, Sources, and Influences on Regional Climate and Air Quality F. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenvironau.4c00080
13. Aerosols at the poles: an AeroCom Phase II multi-model evaluation M. Sand et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12197-2017
14. Atmospheric processing and aerosol aging responsible for observed increase in absorptivity of long-range-transported smoke over the southeast Atlantic A. Fakoya et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7879-2025
15. Improvement of aerosol activation/ice nucleation in a source-oriented WRF-Chem model to study a winter Storm in California H. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104790
16. An Evaluation of the CHIMERE Chemistry Transport Model to Simulate Dust Outbreaks across the Northern Hemisphere in March 2014 B. Bessagnet et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos8120251
17. An improved hindcast approach for evaluation and diagnosis of physical processes in global climate models H. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015MS000490
18. Impacts of global open-fire aerosols on direct radiative, cloud and surface-albedo effects simulated with CAM5 Y. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14805-2016
19. Nonlinear impacts of future anthropogenic aerosol emissions on Arctic warming S. Dobricic et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf8ee
20. Quantifying the impact of sub-grid surface wind variability on sea salt and dust emissions in CAM5 K. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-607-2016
21. Simulated precipitation diurnal cycles over East Asia using different CAPE-based convective closure schemes in WRF model B. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3712-z
22. Assessing the sensitivity of aerosol mass budget and effective radiative forcing to horizontal grid spacing in E3SMv1 using a regional refinement approach J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1327-2024
23. Sensitivity of simulated chemical concentrations and aerosol‐meteorology interactions to aerosol treatments and biogenic organic emissions in WRF/Chem Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD024882
24. Evaluating BC Aging Processes in the Community Atmosphere Model Version 6 (CAM6) W. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037427
25. Modeled and observed properties related to the direct aerosol radiative effect of biomass burning aerosol over the southeastern Atlantic S. Doherty et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1-2022
26. A missing component of Arctic warming: black carbon from gas flaring M. Cho et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab374d
27. Thirty years of arctic primary marine organic aerosols: patterns, seasonal dynamics, and trends (1990–2019) A. Leon-Marcos et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-1109-2026
28. Estimation of excess mortality due to long-term exposure to PM2.5 in Japan using a high-resolution model for present and future scenarios D. Goto et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.015
29. Precipitation Characteristics in the Community Atmosphere Model and Their Dependence on Model Physics and Resolution D. Chen & A. Dai https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001536
30. Sources of springtime surface black carbon in the Arctic: an adjoint analysis for April 2008 L. Qi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9697-2017
31. Model representations of aerosol layers transported from North America over the Atlantic Ocean during the Two‐Column Aerosol Project J. Fast et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025248
32. Cloud adjustments from large-scale smoke–circulation interactions strongly modulate the southeastern Atlantic stratocumulus-to-cumulus transition M. Diamond et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12113-2022
33. CAUSES: Attribution of Surface Radiation Biases in NWP and Climate Models near the U.S. Southern Great Plains K. Van Weverberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027188
34. Rainfall From Resolved Rather Than Parameterized Processes Better Represents the Present‐Day and Climate Change Response of Moderate Rates in the Community Atmosphere Model G. Kooperman et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS001188
35. Fossil fuel combustion and biomass burning sources of global black carbon from GEOS-Chem simulation and carbon isotope measurements L. Qi & S. Wang https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11545-2019
36. Assessing the Resolution Adaptability of the Zhang‐McFarlane Cumulus Parameterization With Spatial and Temporal Averaging Y. Yun et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS001035
37. A regional model study of the characteristics and indirect effects of marine primary organic aerosol in springtime over East Asia Z. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.10.014
38. Modeled Full‐Flight Aircraft Emissions Impacts on Air Quality and Their Sensitivity to Grid Resolution L. Vennam et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026598
39. Revisiting the climate impacts of cool roofs around the globe using an Earth system model J. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/8/084014
40. Global aerosol simulations using NICAM.16 on a 14 km grid spacing for a climate study: improved and remaining issues relative to a lower-resolution model D. Goto et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3731-2020
41. Technical Note: On the use of nudging for aerosol–climate model intercomparison studies K. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8631-2014
42. Decadal evaluation of regional climate, air quality, and their interactions over the continental US and their interactions using WRF/Chem version 3.6.1 K. Yahya et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-671-2016
43. An overview of the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) project: aerosol–cloud–radiation interactions in the southeast Atlantic basin J. Redemann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1507-2021
44. Unrealistically pristine air in the Arctic produced by current global scale models Y. Sato et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26561
45. Sowing Storms: How Model Timestep Can Control Tropical Cyclone Frequency in a GCM C. Zarzycki https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002791
46. Impact of a New Cloud Microphysics Parameterization on the Simulations of Mesoscale Convective Systems in E3SM J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002628
47. Long-range transport of black carbon to the Pacific Ocean and its dependence on aging timescale J. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11521-2015
48. Aerosol transport and wet scavenging in deep convective clouds: A case study and model evaluation using a multiple passive tracer analysis approach Q. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023647
49. Introduction to CAUSES: Description of Weather and Climate Models and Their Near‐Surface Temperature Errors in 5 day Hindcasts Near the Southern Great Plains C. Morcrette et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027199
50. Fine-scale application of WRF-CAM5 during a dust storm episode over East Asia: Sensitivity to grid resolutions and aerosol activation parameterizations K. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.12.014
51. How does increasing horizontal resolution in a global climate model improve the simulation of aerosol‐cloud interactions? P. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064183
52. Biomass-burning smoke's properties and its interactions with marine stratocumulus clouds in WRF-CAM5 and southeastern Atlantic field campaigns C. Howes et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13911-2023
53. Further improvement and evaluation of nudging in the E3SM Atmosphere Model version 1 (EAMv1): simulations of the mean climate, weather events, and anthropogenic aerosol effects S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6787-2022
54. CAUSES: On the Role of Surface Energy Budget Errors to the Warm Surface Air Temperature Error Over the Central United States H. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027194
55. Emission or atmospheric processes? An attempt to attribute the source of large bias of aerosols in eastern China simulated by global climate models T. Fan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1395-2018
56. Precipitation characteristics of CAM5 physics at mesoscale resolution during MC3E and the impact of convective timescale choice W. Gustafson et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014MS000334
57. Modeling the smoky troposphere of the southeast Atlantic: a comparison to ORACLES airborne observations from September of 2016 Y. Shinozuka et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11491-2020
58. Application of an Online-Coupled Regional Climate Model, WRF-CAM5, over East Asia for Examination of Ice Nucleation Schemes: Part I. Comprehensive Model Evaluation and Trend Analysis for 2006 and 2011 Y. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli3030627
59. Description and evaluation of a new four-mode version of the Modal Aerosol Module (MAM4) within version 5.3 of the Community Atmosphere Model X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-505-2016
60. Multi-year application of WRF-CAM5 over East Asia-Part I: Comprehensive evaluation and formation regimes of O3 and PM2.5 J. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.06.015
61. Sensitivities of simulated global aerosol optical depth and aerosol-radiation interactions to different horizontal resolutions in CAS-FGOALS-f3 M. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118920
62. Sources and pathways of the upscale effects on the Southern Hemisphere jet in MPAS‐CAM4 variable‐resolution simulations K. Sakaguchi et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000743
63. Impact of resolution on simulation of closed mesoscale cellular convection identified by dynamically guided watershed segmentation M. Martini et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021962
64. Effect of Tropical Nonconvective Condensation on Uncertainty in Modeled Projections of Rainfall B. Stephens et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0833.1
65. Droplet collection efficiencies inferred from satellite retrievals constrain effective radiative forcing of aerosol–cloud interactions C. Beall et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5287-2024
66. Using radar observations to evaluate 3-D radar echo structure simulated by the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) version 1 J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-719-2021
67. Using an explicit emission tagging method in global modeling of source‐receptor relationships for black carbon in the Arctic: Variations, sources, and transport pathways H. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022297
68. Cross-polar transport and scavenging of Siberian aerosols containing black carbon during the 2012 ACCESS summer campaign J. Raut et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10969-2017