144 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. A multi-diagnostic approach to cloud evaluation K. Williams & A. Bodas-Salcedo https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2547-2017
2. The roles of volatile organic compound deposition and oxidation mechanisms in determining secondary organic aerosol production: a global perspective using the UKCA chemistry–climate model (vn8.4) J. Kelly et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2539-2019
3. A cloudy planetary boundary layer oscillation arising from the coupling of turbulence with precipitation in climate simulations X. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS000993
4. Sustained methane emissions from China after 2012 despite declining coal production and rice-cultivated area J. Sheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac24d1
5. Similar spatial patterns of global climate response to aerosols from different regions M. Kasoar et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0022-z
6. Large Variations in Volcanic Aerosol Forcing Efficiency Due to Eruption Source Parameters and Rapid Adjustments L. Marshall et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090241
7. Initial trials of convective‐scale data assimilation with a cheaply tunable ensemble filter J. Flowerdew https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3038
8. Description and Evaluation of the specified-dynamics experiment in the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative C. Orbe et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3809-2020
9. Assessing a New Coupled Data Assimilation System Based on the Met Office Coupled Atmosphere–Land–Ocean–Sea Ice Model D. Lea et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0174.1
10. Clear-sky ultraviolet radiation modelling using output from the Chemistry Climate Model Initiative K. Lamy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10087-2019
11. The Springtime Influence of Natural Tropical Pacific Variability on the Surface Climate of the Ross Ice Shelf, West Antarctica: Implications for Ice Shelf Thinning K. Clem et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30496-5
12. Exploring How Eruption Source Parameters Affect Volcanic Radiative Forcing Using Statistical Emulation L. Marshall et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028675
13. Data supporting the North Atlantic Climate System Integrated Study (ACSIS) programme, including atmospheric composition; oceanographic and sea-ice observations (2016–2022); and output from ocean, atmosphere, land, and sea-ice models (1950–2050) A. Archibald et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-135-2025
14. Structure of a shear‐line polar low D. Sergeev et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2911
15. Climate variability can outweigh the influence of climate mean changes for extreme precipitation under global warming K. Nordling et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1659-2025
16. Determination of global Earth outgoing radiation at high temporal resolution using a theoretical constellation of satellites J. Gristey et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025514
17. Turbulent Collapse and Recovery in the Stable Boundary Layer Using an Idealized Model of Pressure-Driven Flow with a Surface Energy Budget A. Holdsworth & A. Monahan https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0312.1
18. Decomposing the response of the stratospheric Brewer–Dobson circulation to an abrupt quadrupling in CO2 A. Chrysanthou et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-155-2020
19. Prognostic precipitation with three liquid water classes in the ECHAM5–HAM GCM V. Sant et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8717-2015
20. The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 7.0/7.1 and JULES Global Land 7.0 configurations D. Walters et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1909-2019
21. Examining the Predictability of the Stratospheric Sudden Warming of January 2013 Using Multiple NWP Systems O. Tripathi et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0010.1
22. Review of the global models used within phase 1 of the Chemistry–Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) O. Morgenstern et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-639-2017
23. The impact of lightning on tropospheric ozone chemistry using a new global lightning parametrisation D. Finney et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7507-2016
24. Atmospheric observations show accurate reporting and little growth in India’s methane emissions A. Ganesan et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00994-7
25. The South Asian Monsoon Response to Remote Aerosols: Global and Regional Mechanisms D. Shawki et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028623
26. Estimating nitrogen risk to Himalayan forests using thresholds for lichen bioindicators C. Ellis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109401
27. Increase in severe and extreme soil moisture droughts for Europe under climate change M. Grillakis https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.001
28. The Impact of Satellite‐Derived Land Surface Temperatures on Numerical Weather Prediction Analyses and Forecasts B. Candy et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026417
29. Dynamical response of Mediterranean precipitation to greenhouse gases and aerosols T. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8439-2018
30. Assessing and improving cloud-height-based parameterisations of global lightning flash rate, and their impact on lightning-produced NOx and tropospheric composition in a chemistry–climate model A. Luhar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7053-2021
31. A renewed rise in global HCFC-141b emissions between 2017–2021 L. Western et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9601-2022
32. What is the Role of Sea Surface Temperature in Modulating Cloud and Precipitation Properties over the Southern Ocean? Y. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0768.1
33. Evaluation of JULES-crop performance against site observations of irrigated maize from Mead, Nebraska K. Williams et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1291-2017
34. PALADYN v1.0, a comprehensive land surface–vegetation–carbon cycle model of intermediate complexity M. Willeit & A. Ganopolski https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3817-2016
35. The “Grey Zone” cold air outbreak global model intercomparison: A cross evaluation using large‐eddy simulations L. Tomassini et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000822
36. Can Measurements of the Near‐Infrared Solar Spectral Irradiance be Reconciled? A New Ground‐Based Assessment Between 4,000 and 10,000 cm−1 J. Elsey et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073902
37. Characteristics of LDAPS-Predicted Surface Wind Speed and Temperature at Automated Weather Stations with Different Surrounding Land Cover and Topography in Korea D. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11111224
38. The Met Office HadGEM3-ES chemistry–climate model: evaluation of stratospheric dynamics and its impact on ozone S. Hardiman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1209-2017
39. Gravity-Wave Drag in the Stable Boundary Layer Over Moderate Terrain A. Lapworth & S. Osborne https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-018-00422-3
40. A Comparison of Stochastic and Deterministic Downscaling in Eddy Resolving Ocean Modelling: The Lakshadweep Sea Case Study G. Shapiro et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11020363
41. Modeling study of the impact of SO2 volcanic passive emissions on the tropospheric sulfur budget C. Lamotte et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11379-2021
42. Representation of Rossby wave propagation and its effect on the teleconnection between the Indian summer monsoon and extratropical rainfall in the Met Office Unified Model X. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05940-4
43. Perfluorocyclobutane (PFC-318, c-C4F8) in the global atmosphere J. Mühle et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10335-2019
44. Advanced Two-Moment Bulk Microphysics for Global Models. Part I: Off-Line Tests and Comparison with Other Schemes A. Gettelman & H. Morrison https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00102.1
45. The impact of biogenic, anthropogenic, and biomass burning volatile organic compound emissions on regional and seasonal variations in secondary organic aerosol J. Kelly et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7393-2018
46. Investigating the dispersion and transport of carbon monoxide in West Africa with a focus on biomass burning and gas flaring sources A. Onojeghuo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44292-025-00038-6
47. The linearity of the El Niño teleconnection to the Amundsen Sea region Y. Yiu & A. Maycock https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3731
48. Effect of aerosol radiative forcing uncertainty on projected exceedance year of a 1.5 °C global temperature rise A. Peace et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aba20c
49. Response of surface shortwave cloud radiative effect to greenhouse gases and aerosols and its impact on summer maximum temperature T. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8251-2020
50. Clumped canopy architecture raises global crop yield and reduces N2O emissions Y. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-025-02172-w
51. Evaluation of different versions of NCUM global model for simulation of track and intensity of tropical cyclones over Bay of Bengal A. Routray et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2017.04.001
52. Western European emission estimates of CFC-11, CFC-12 and CCl4 derived from atmospheric measurements from 2008 to 2021 A. Redington et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7383-2023
53. Description and evaluation of aerosol in UKESM1 and HadGEM3-GC3.1 CMIP6 historical simulations J. Mulcahy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6383-2020
54. Response of the link between the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and the East Asian winter monsoon to Asian anthropogenic sulfate aerosols Z. Jia et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8805-2025
55. A single ice approach using varying ice particle properties in global climate model microphysics X. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS000952
56. The source of discrepancies in aerosol–cloud–precipitation interactions between GCM and A-Train retrievals T. Michibata et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15413-2016
57. Evaluating the Met Office Unified Model land surface temperature in Global Atmosphere/Land 3.1 (GA/L3.1), Global Atmosphere/Land 6.1 (GA/L6.1) and limited area 2.2 km configurations J. Brooke et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1703-2019
58. Experimental protocol for phase 1 of the APARC QUOCA (QUasibiennial oscillation and Ozone Chemistry interactions in the Atmosphere) working group C. Orbe et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-773-2026
59. Quantification of the Uncertainty in Coastal Storm Hazard Predictions Due to Wave‐Current Interaction and Wind Forcing C. Lyddon et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086123
60. Lagrangian and Eulerian modelling of 106Ru atmospheric transport in 2017 over northern hemisphere L. Adenis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2024.107416
61. The response of stratospheric water vapor to climate change driven by different forcing agents X. Wang & A. Dessler https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13267-2020
62. Exploring Impacts of Size‐Dependent Evaporation and Entrainment in a Global Model I. Karset et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031817
63. The Turbulent Structure and Diurnal Growth of the Saharan Atmospheric Boundary Layer L. Garcia-Carreras et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0384.1
64. Differing responses of precipitation in Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes to increased black carbon aerosols and carbon dioxide J. Xue et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.112938
65. Influence of sun zenith angle on canopy clumping and the resulting impacts on photosynthesis R. Braghiere et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108065
66. The BRIDGE HadCM3 family of climate models: HadCM3@Bristol v1.0 P. Valdes et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3715-2017
67. Quantifying fossil fuel methane emissions using observations of atmospheric ethane and an uncertain emission ratio A. Ramsden et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3911-2022
68. Assessing methods for representing soil heterogeneity through a flexible approach within the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES) at version 3.4.1 H. Rumbold et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1875-2023
69. Evidence for gravity wave drag in the boundary layer of a numerical forecast model: a comparison with observations A. Lapworth & S. Osborne https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2909
70. A role of the Atlantic Ocean in predicting summer surface air temperature over North East Asia? P. Monerie et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3935-z
71. Australia-Asian monsoon in two versions of the UK Met Office Unified Model and their impacts on tropical–extratropical teleconnections L. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04821-1
72. Evaluation of Subgrid-Scale Hydrometeor Transport Schemes Using a High-Resolution Cloud-Resolving Model M. Wong et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0060.1
73. Regional and global temperature response to anthropogenic SO2 emissions from China in three climate models M. Kasoar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9785-2016
74. Mechanisms of improved rainfall simulation over the Maritime Continent due to increased horizontal resolution in an AGCM H. Rashid & A. Hirst https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3413-z
75. Initiation and Propagation of an Atmospheric Bore in a Numerical Forecast Model: A Comparison with Observations S. Osborne & A. Lapworth https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0045.1
76. Predicting the seasonal evolution of southern African summer precipitation in the DePreSys3 prediction system P. Monerie et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4526-3
77. Inter-model comparison of global hydroxyl radical (OH) distributions and their impact on atmospheric methane over the 2000–2016 period Y. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13701-2019
78. A regime analysis of Atlantic winter jet variability applied to evaluate HadGEM3‐GC2 G. Masato et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2897
79. Skillful Seasonal Forecasts of Winter Disruption to the U.K. Transport System E. Palin et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-15-0102.1
80. The impact of spatiotemporal variability in atmospheric CO2 concentration on global terrestrial carbon fluxes E. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5635-2018
81. ORCHIDEE-ROUTING: revising the river routing scheme using a high-resolution hydrological database T. Nguyen-Quang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4965-2018
82. On the Seasonality of the El Niño Teleconnection to the Amundsen Sea Region Y. Scott Yiu & A. Maycock https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0813.1
83. Advanced Two-Moment Bulk Microphysics for Global Models. Part II: Global Model Solutions and Aerosol–Cloud Interactions* A. Gettelman et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00103.1
84. Korean Renewables Management System: Copulas Model-Based Adaptive Droop Control Strategy for Energy Storage Systems S. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3337373
85. A Review of Operational Ensemble Forecasting Efforts in the United States Air Force E. Kuchera et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12060677
86. Impact of remotely sensed soil moisture and precipitation on soil moisture prediction in a data assimilation system with the JULES land surface model E. Pinnington et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2575-2018
87. Interactive stratospheric aerosol models' response to different amounts and altitudes of SO2 injection during the 1991 Pinatubo eruption I. Quaglia et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-921-2023
88. On the characteristics of aerosol indirect effect based on dynamic regimes in global climate models S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2765-2016
89. A hybrid system for forecasting 24-h power load profile for Polish electric grid S. Brodowski et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.04.053
90. A global data set of soil hydraulic properties and sub-grid variability of soil water retention and hydraulic conductivity curves C. Montzka et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-529-2017
91. Assessment of the unified model in reproducing West African precipitation and temperature climatology T. Annor et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-022-03973-1
92. Understanding the glacial methane cycle P. Hopcroft et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14383
93. A projected decrease in lightning under climate change D. Finney et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0072-6
94. Process-level improvements in CMIP5 models and their impact on tropical variability, the Southern Ocean, and monsoons A. Lauer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-33-2018
95. Processes Controlling Tropical Tropopause Temperature and Stratospheric Water Vapor in Climate Models S. Hardiman et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0075.1
96. Underestimation of Global Photosynthesis in Earth System Models Due to Representation of Vegetation Structure R. Braghiere et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB006135
97. UKESM1.1: development and evaluation of an updated configuration of the UK Earth System Model J. Mulcahy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1569-2023
98. Towards a simple representation of chalk hydrology in land surface modelling M. Rahman & R. Rosolem https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-459-2017
99. The Influence of Remote Aerosol Forcing from Industrialized Economies on the Future Evolution of East and West African Rainfall C. Scannell et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0716.1
100. A PDRMIP Multimodel Study on the Impacts of Regional Aerosol Forcings on Global and Regional Precipitation L. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0439.1
101. Assessing the stratospheric temperature response to volcanic sulfate injections by Mt. Pinatubo: insights from the Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol Model Intercomparison Project K. Perny et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-10997-2026
102. JULES-GL7: the Global Land configuration of the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator version 7.0 and 7.2 A. Wiltshire et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-483-2020
103. A revised global ozone dry deposition estimate based on a new two-layer parameterisation for air–sea exchange and the multi-year MACC composition reanalysis A. Luhar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4329-2018
104. Revisiting the Mystery of Recent Stratospheric Temperature Trends A. Maycock et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078035
105. The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 8.0 and JULES Global Land 9.0 configurations M. Willett et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-1473-2026
106. The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 6.0/6.1 and JULES Global Land 6.0/6.1 configurations D. Walters et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1487-2017
107. Two‐Moment Bulk Cloud Microphysics With Prognostic Precipitation in GFDL's Atmosphere Model AM4.0: Configuration and Performance H. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002453
108. Rolling DICE to advance knowledge of land–atmosphere interactions M. Best et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4944
109. Using regime analysis to identify the contribution of clouds to surface temperature errors in weather and climate models K. Van Weverberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2603
110. An Evaluation of Modeled Evaporation Regimes in Europe Using Observed Dry Spell Land Surface Temperature P. Harris et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0227.1
111. Estimates of North African Methane Emissions from 2010 to 2017 Using GOSAT Observations L. Western et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00327
112. High-resolution global climate modelling: the UPSCALE project, a large-simulation campaign M. Mizielinski et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1629-2014
113. Comparison of Effective Radiative Forcing Calculations Using Multiple Methods, Drivers, and Models T. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD030188
114. Using high frequency observations of δ13C-CH4 and δ2H-CH4 and uncertain regional isotopic signatures to estimate sources of UK methane emissions A. Ramsden et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11421-2026
115. Sea-Breeze Dynamics and Convection Initiation: The Influence of Convective Parameterization in Weather and Climate Model Biases C. Birch et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00850.1
116. PDRMIP: A Precipitation Driver and Response Model Intercomparison Project—Protocol and Preliminary Results G. Myhre et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0019.1
117. Effect of solar zenith angle specification in models on mean shortwave fluxes and stratospheric temperatures R. Hogan & S. Hirahara https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066868
118. Coral-reef-derived dimethyl sulfide and the climatic impact of the loss of coral reefs S. Fiddes et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5883-2021
119. Sensitivity of Flood Hazard and Damage to Modelling Approaches C. Lyddon et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8090724
120. Understanding the West African Monsoon from the analysis of diabatic heating distributions as simulated by climate models G. Martin et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000697
121. Can we trust climate models to realistically represent severe European windstorms? T. Trzeciak et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2777-9
122. Idealized climate change simulations with a high‐resolution physical model: HadGEM3‐GC2 C. Senior et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015MS000614
123. Finding plausible and diverse variants of a climate model. Part 1: establishing the relationship between errors at weather and climate time scales D. Sexton et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04625-3
124. A decline in emissions of CFC-11 and related chemicals from eastern China S. Park et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03277-w
125. Finding plausible and diverse variants of a climate model. Part II: development and validation of methodology A. Karmalkar et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04617-3
126. The first Met Office Unified Model–JULES Regional Atmosphere and Land configuration, RAL1 M. Bush et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1999-2020
127. Scale Interactions between the MJO and the Western Maritime Continent C. Birch et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0557.1
128. Non‐additive response of the high‐latitude Southern Hemisphere climate to aerosol forcing in a climate model with interactive chemistry J. Pope et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.1004
129. Evaluating the simulated radiative forcings, aerosol properties, and stratospheric warmings from the 1963 Mt Agung, 1982 El Chichón, and 1991 Mt Pinatubo volcanic aerosol clouds S. Dhomse et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13627-2020
130. Spatial and temporal CCN variations in convection-permitting aerosol microphysics simulations in an idealised marine tropical domain C. Planche et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3371-2017
131. Parameterized Gravity Wave Momentum Fluxes from Sources Related to Convection and Large-Scale Precipitation Processes in a Global Atmosphere Model A. Bushell et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0022.1
132. CAUSES: Attribution of Surface Radiation Biases in NWP and Climate Models near the U.S. Southern Great Plains K. Van Weverberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027188
133. Analysis of the global atmospheric background sulfur budget in a multi-model framework C. Brodowsky et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5513-2024
134. Source estimation of an unexpected release of Ruthenium-106 in 2017 using an inverse modelling approach L. Western et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2020.106304
135. The Influence of Vertical Advection Discretization in the WRF-ARW Model on Capping Inversion Representation in Warm-Season, Thunderstorm-Supporting Environments D. Nevius & C. Evans https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-18-0103.1
136. Evaluation of autoconversion schemes in a single model framework with satellite observations T. Michibata & T. Takemura https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023818-T
137. Distinct surface response to black carbon aerosols T. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13797-2021
138. Analysis of recent lower-stratospheric ozone trends in chemistry climate models S. Dietmüller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6811-2021
139. CAUSES: On the Role of Surface Energy Budget Errors to the Warm Surface Air Temperature Error Over the Central United States H. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027194
140. Using laboratory and field measurements to constrain a single habit shortwave optical parameterization for cirrus H. Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.05.005
141. Evaluation of biomass burning aerosols in the HadGEM3 climate model with observations from the SAMBBA field campaign B. Johnson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14657-2016
142. Ensembles of Global Climate Model Variants Designed for the Quantification and Constraint of Uncertainty in Aerosols and Their Radiative Forcing M. Yoshioka et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001628
143. Robust observational constraint of uncertain aerosol processes and emissions in a climate model and the effect on aerosol radiative forcing J. Johnson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9491-2020
144. Radiative impact of improved global parameterisations of oceanic dry deposition of ozone and lightning-generated NOx A. Luhar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13013-2022