Articles | Volume 6, issue 4
Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 875–882, 2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-875-2013

Special issue: Isaac Newton Institute programme on multiscale numerics for...

Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 875–882, 2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-875-2013

Model evaluation paper 03 Jul 2013

Model evaluation paper | 03 Jul 2013

Forecasts covering one month using a cut-cell model

J. Steppeler1, S.-H. Park2, and A. Dobler3 J. Steppeler et al.
  • 1Climate Service Center, Hamburg, Germany
  • 2National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA
  • 3Freie Universität Berlin, Institute of Meteorology, Berlin, Germany

Abstract. This paper investigates the impact and potential use of the cut-cell vertical discretisation for forecasts covering five days and climate simulations. A first indication of the usefulness of this new method is obtained by a set of five-day forecasts, covering January 1989 with six forecasts. The model area was chosen to include much of Asia, the Himalayas and Australia. The cut-cell model LMZ (Lokal Modell with z-coordinates) provides a much more accurate representation of mountains on model forecasts than the terrain-following coordinate used for comparison. Therefore we are in particular interested in potential forecast improvements in the target area downwind of the Himalayas, over southeastern China, Korea and Japan. The LMZ has previously been tested extensively for one-day forecasts on a European area. Following indications of a reduced temperature error for the short forecasts, this paper investigates the model error for five days in an area influenced by strong orography. The forecasts indicated a strong impact of the cut-cell discretisation on forecast quality. The cut-cell model is available only for an older (2003) version of the model LM (Lokal Modell). It was compared using a control model differing by the use of the terrain-following coordinate only. The cut-cell model improved the precipitation forecasts of this old control model everywhere by a large margin. An improved, more transferable version of the terrain-following model LM has been developed since then under the name CLM (Climate version of the Lokal Modell). The CLM has been used and tested in all climates, while the LM was used for small areas in higher latitudes. The precipitation forecasts of the cut-cell model were compared also to the CLM. As the cut-cell model LMZ did not incorporate the developments for CLM since 2003, the precipitation forecast of the CLM was not improved in all aspects. However, for the target area downstream of the Himalayas, the cut-cell model considerably improved the prediction of the monthly precipitation forecast even in comparison with the modern CLM version. The cut-cell discretisation seems to improve in particular the localisation of precipitation, while the improvements leading from LM to CLM had a positive effect mainly on amplitude.