208 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Constraining size-dependence of vegetation respiration rates A. Ito https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61239-0
2. Temperate northern hemisphere dominates the global soil CH4 sink X. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-021-7126-3
3. An analysis of global terrestrial carbon, water and energy dynamics using the carbon–nitrogen coupled CLASS-CTEMN+ model S. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.05.019
4. A Practical Algorithm for Correcting Topographical Effects on Global GPP Products X. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JG007553
5. Joint CO2 Mole Fraction and Flux Analysis Confirms Missing Processes in CASA Terrestrial Carbon Uptake Over North America S. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GB006914
6. Analysis of Spatiotemporal Dynamics of the Chinese Vegetation Net Primary Productivity from the 1960s to the 2000s E. Shang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10060860
7. Implementation of Dynamic Effective Rooting Depth in Evapotranspiration Model Deepens Understanding of Evapotranspiration Partitioning Under Soil Moisture Gradients in China R. Shao et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR032962
8. How well do terrestrial biosphere models simulate coarse-scale runoff in the contiguous United States? C. Schwalm et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.02.006
9. CO2 fertilization is spatially distinct from stomatal conductance reduction in controlling ecosystem water-use efficiency increase X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac6c9c
10. Spatiotemporal evolutionary and mechanism analysis of grassland GPP in China P. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109323
11. Global estimation of effective plant rooting depth: Implications for hydrological modeling Y. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019392
12. Guidelines for Publicly Archiving Terrestrial Model Data to Enhance Usability, Intercomparison, and Synthesis M. Simmonds et al. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2022-003
13. Representing leaf and root physiological traits in CLM improves global carbon and nitrogen cycling predictions B. Ghimire et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015MS000538
14. Diagnosing the Temperature Sensitivity of Ecosystem Respiration in Northern High‐Latitude Regions D. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005998
15. The complex drought effects associated with the regulation of water-use efficiency in a temperate water-limited basin S. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100864
16. Ecosystem biogeochemistry model parameterization: Do more flux data result in a better model in predicting carbon flux? Q. Zhu & Q. Zhuang https://doi.org/10.1890/ES15-00259.1
17. Mapping Chinese annual gross primary productivity with eddy covariance measurements and machine learning X. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159390
18. Atmospheric teleconnection influence on North American land surface phenology M. Dannenberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa85a
19. Modeling suggests fossil fuel emissions have been driving increased land carbon uptake since the turn of the 20th Century C. Schwalm et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66103-9
20. Influence of Vegetation Growth on the Enhanced Seasonality of Atmospheric CO2 W. Yuan et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GB005802
21. An analytical model for relating global terrestrial carbon assimilation with climate and surface conditions using a rate limitation framework Y. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066835
22. Impact of Spatial Scales on the Intercomparison of Climate Scenarios W. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2017.3621222
23. Projected Increases in Global Terrestrial Net Primary Productivity Loss Caused by Drought Under Climate Change D. Cao et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF002681
24. A multi-algorithm approach for modeling coastal wetland eco-geomorphology Z. Tan et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2024.1421265
25. Coupled models of water and carbon cycles from leaf to global: A retrospective and a prospective Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110229
26. Fossil fuel CO2 emissions over metropolitan areas from space: A multi-model analysis of OCO-2 data over Lahore, Pakistan R. Lei et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112625
27. Global Pyrogenic Carbon Production During Recent Decades Has Created the Potential for a Large, Long‐Term Sink of Atmospheric CO2 X. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JG004490
28. Modeling demographic-driven vegetation dynamics and ecosystem biogeochemical cycling in NASA GISS's Earth system model (ModelE-BiomeE v.1.0) E. Weng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8153-2022
29. Contribution of environmental forcings to US runoff changes for the period 1950–2010 W. Forbes et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabb41
30. Uncertainties of gross primary productivity of Chinese grasslands based on multi-source estimation P. He et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.928351
31. A Multiyear Gridded Data Ensemble of Surface Biogenic Carbon Fluxes for North America: Evaluation and Analysis of Results Y. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JG005314
32. Uncertainty analysis of terrestrial net primary productivity and net biome productivity in China during 1901–2005 J. Shao et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JG003062
33. Contrasting Regional Carbon Cycle Responses to Seasonal Climate Anomalies Across the East‐West Divide of Temperate North America B. Byrne et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GB006598
34. A review of the major drivers of the terrestrial carbon uptake: model-based assessments, consensus, and uncertainties T. Tharammal et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab3012
35. Changes in Water Use Efficiency Caused by Climate Change, CO2 Fertilization, and Land Use Changes on the Tibetan Plateau B. Jia et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-022-2172-5
36. Academic influence index evaluation report of geographic simulation models (2023) D. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106737
37. Benchmarking carbon fluxes of the ISIMIP2a biome models J. Chang et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa63fa
38. Improving the MODIS LAI compositing using prior time-series information J. Pu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113493
39. Estimating forest carbon fluxes using four different data-driven techniques based on long-term eddy covariance measurements: Model comparison and evaluation X. Dou & Y. Yang https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.202
40. Lagged effects regulate the inter-annual variability of the tropical carbon balance A. Bloom et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-6393-2020
41. Mechanistic Processes Controlling Persistent Changes of Forest Canopy Structure After 2005 Amazon Drought M. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JG003966
42. Evapotranspiration on a greening Earth Y. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00464-3
43. Multiscale assessment of North American terrestrial carbon balance K. Foster et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-869-2024
44. Increased light‐use efficiency in northern terrestrial ecosystems indicated by CO2 and greening observations R. Thomas et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070710
45. Evaluating land cover influences on model uncertainties—A case study of cropland carbon dynamics in the Mid-Continent Intensive Campaign region Z. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.07.002
46. Future Land Use/Land Cover Change Has Nontrivial and Potentially Dominant Impact on Global Gross Primary Productivity H. Hou et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002628
47. Unveiling uncertainties in soil organic carbon modeling: the critical role of climate response functions H. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106537
48. A model for urban biogenic CO2 fluxes: Solar-Induced Fluorescence for Modeling Urban biogenic Fluxes (SMUrF v1) D. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3633-2021
49. Application of PRIM for understanding patterns in carbon dioxide model-observation differences T. Gerken et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13327-2025
50. Global patterns and controls of soil organic carbon dynamics as simulated by multiple terrestrial biosphere models: Current status and future directions H. Tian et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB005021
51. Atmospheric Carbon and Transport – America (ACT‐America) Data Sets: Description, Management, and Delivery Y. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001634
52. An Analytical Solution for the Impact of Vegetation Changes on Hydrological Partitioning Within the Budyko Framework S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR022028
53. Seasonal Characteristics of Model Uncertainties From Biogenic Fluxes, Transport, and Large‐Scale Boundary Inflow in Atmospheric CO2 Simulations Over North America S. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031165
54. Field-experiment constraints on the enhancement of the terrestrial carbon sink by CO2 fertilization Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0436-1
55. Quantitative analysis of the contributions of land use change and CO2 fertilization to carbon use efficiency on the Tibetan Plateau X. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138607
56. Long‐term CO2 fertilization increases vegetation productivity and has little effect on hydrological partitioning in tropical rainforests Y. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003475
57. Forest expansion dominates China’s land carbon sink since 1980 Z. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32961-2
58. Analysis of spatial and temporal patterns of net primary production and their climate controls in China from 1982 to 2010 W. Liang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.01.015
59. Interannual variability in summer climate change controls GPP long-term changes P. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113409
60. Prior biosphere model impact on global terrestrial CO2 fluxes estimated from OCO-2 retrievals S. Philip et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13267-2019
61. Decadal trends in the seasonal-cycle amplitude of terrestrial CO₂ exchange resulting from the ensemble of terrestrial biosphere models A. Ito et al. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v68.28968
62. Climate Change and Rising CO2 Amplify the Impact of Land Use/Cover Change on Carbon Budget Differentially Across China B. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003057
63. A multi-perspective input selection strategy for daily net ecosystem exchange predictions based on machine learning methods Ö. Ekmekcioğlu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-022-04265-4
64. Evaluation of CNRM Earth System Model, CNRM‐ESM2‐1: Role of Earth System Processes in Present‐Day and Future Climate R. Séférian et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001791
65. Nutrient Limitations Lead to a Reduced Magnitude of Disequilibrium in the Global Terrestrial Carbon Cycle N. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JG006764
66. Trends in ecosystem recovery from drought S. Seneviratne & P. Ciais https://doi.org/10.1038/548164a
67. Exploring constraints on a wetland methane emission ensemble (WetCHARTs) using GOSAT observations R. Parker et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5669-2020
68. Atmospheric CO2 Observations Reveal Strong Correlation Between Regional Net Biospheric Carbon Uptake and Solar‐Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Y. Shiga et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076630
69. Evaluating changes of biomass in global vegetation models: the role of turnover fluctuations and ENSO events A. Cantú et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac63c
70. Spatiotemporal variations and driving factors of global terrestrial vegetation productivity gap under the changing of climate, CO2, landcover and N deposition D. Cao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162753
71. Across‐model spread and shrinking in predicting peatland carbon dynamics under global change E. Hou et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16643
72. Greenhouse gas fluxes from Alaska's North Slope inferred from the Airborne Carbon Measurements campaign (ACME-V) J. Tadić et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118239
73. Evaluation of the ORCHIDEE ecosystem model over Africa against 25 years of satellite-based water and carbon measurements A. Traore et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JG002638
74. Matrix approach to land carbon cycle modeling: A case study with the Community Land Model Y. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13948
75. Biome-scale temperature sensitivity of ecosystem respiration revealed by atmospheric CO2 observations W. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02093-x
76. Decoupling of greenness and gross primary productivity as aridity decreases Z. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113120
77. New tree-ring data from Canadian boreal and hemi-boreal forests provide insight for improving the climate sensitivity of terrestrial biosphere models A. Mirabel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158062
78. Maximum carbon uptake rate dominates the interannual variability of global net ecosystem exchange Z. Fu et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14731
79. Coupling the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CTEM v. 2.0) to Environment and Climate Change Canada's greenhouse gas forecast model (v.107-glb) B. Badawy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-631-2018
80. A global wetland methane emissions and uncertainty dataset for atmospheric chemical transport models (WetCHARTs version 1.0) A. Bloom et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2141-2017
81. Evaluation of simulated soil carbon dynamics in Arctic-Boreal ecosystems D. Huntzinger et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab6784
82. Response of Water Use Efficiency to Global Environmental Change Based on Output From Terrestrial Biosphere Models S. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GB005733
83. The role of residence time in diagnostic models of global carbon storage capacity: model decomposition based on a traceable scheme C. Yizhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16155
84. Sensitivity of land use change emission estimates to historical land use and land cover mapping S. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005360
85. A model comparison of fire return interval impacts on carbon and species dynamics in a southeastern U.S. pineland S. Flanagan et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3836
86. Contributions of climate change, land use change and CO2 to changes in the gross primary productivity of the Tibetan Plateau X. LUO et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/16742834.2020.1695515
87. Reduced North American terrestrial primary productivity linked to anomalous Arctic warming J. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2986
88. Source Partitioning of Methane Emissions and its Seasonality in the U.S. Midwest Z. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JG004356
89. Low and contrasting impacts of vegetation CO2 fertilization on global terrestrial runoff over 1982–2010: accounting for aboveground and belowground vegetation–CO2 effects Y. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3411-2021
90. Main environmental driver and seasonality of water use efficiency in tropical forests Y. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132944
91. Large‐Scale Reductions in Terrestrial Carbon Uptake Following Central Pacific El Niño M. Dannenberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092367
92. Harmonized global maps of above and belowground biomass carbon density in the year 2010 S. Spawn et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0444-4
93. The PROFOUND Database for evaluating vegetation models and simulating climate impacts on European forests C. Reyer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1295-2020
94. Global land carbon sink response to temperature and precipitation varies with ENSO phase Y. Fang et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa6e8e
95. Tropical Indian Ocean forcing on North American terrestrial and agricultural productivity decline under greenhouse warming Y. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-03126-y
96. Improving the dynamics of Northern Hemisphere high-latitude vegetation in the ORCHIDEE ecosystem model D. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2263-2015
97. Contrasting terrestrial carbon cycle responses to the 1997/98 and 2015/16 extreme El Niño events J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-1-2018
98. How can biosphere models simulate enough vegetation biomass in the mountains of the western United States? Implications of meteorological forcing H. Duarte et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105288
99. Role of CO2, climate and land use in regulating the seasonal amplitude increase of carbon fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems: a multimodel analysis F. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-5121-2016
100. The paleoclimatic footprint in the soil carbon stock of the Tibetan permafrost region J. Ding et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12214-5
101. Spatiotemporal dynamics of ecosystem fires and biomass burning-induced carbon emissions in China over the past two decades A. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2020.03.002
102. Model Structure and Climate Data Uncertainty in Historical Simulations of the Terrestrial Carbon Cycle (1850–2014) G. Bonan et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GB006175
103. Downscaling global land cover projections from an integrated assessment model for use in regional analyses: results and evaluation for the US from 2005 to 2095 T. West et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/6/064004
104. Considerable Uncertainties in Simulating Land Carbon Sinks Induced by Different Precipitation Products M. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JG006524
105. The GRENE-TEA model intercomparison project (GTMIP): overview and experiment protocol for Stage 1 S. Miyazaki et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2841-2015
106. Response of Growing Season Gross Primary Production to El Niño in Different Phases of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation over Eastern China Based on Bayesian Model Averaging Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-0265-1
107. Understanding the Land Carbon Cycle with Space Data: Current Status and Prospects J. Exbrayat et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-019-09506-2
108. Carbon cost of plant nitrogen acquisition: global carbon cycle impact from an improved plant nitrogen cycle in the Community Land Model M. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13131
109. Multi-Resolution Mapping of Aboveground Biomass and Change in Puerto Rico’s Forests with Remote Sensing and Machine Learning N. Haghtalab et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18081190
110. Effects of in-situ and reanalysis climate data on estimation of cropland gross primary production using the Vegetation Photosynthesis Model C. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.07.003
111. Modeling the Terrestrial Biosphere J. Fisher et al. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012913-093456
112. Assessing inter-sectoral climate change risks: the role of ISIMIP C. Rosenzweig et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/12/1/010301
113. A decreasing carbon allocation to belowground autotrophic respiration in global forest ecosystems X. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149273
114. Patterns and drivers of soil carbon change (1980s-2010s) in the northeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116488
115. Potential Transient Response of Terrestrial Vegetation and Carbon in Northern North America from Climate Change S. Flanagan et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli7090113
116. Validation of terrestrial biogeochemistry in CMIP6 Earth system models: a review L. Spafford & A. MacDougall https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5863-2021
117. Addressing biases in Arctic–boreal carbon cycling in the Community Land Model Version 5 L. Birch et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3361-2021
118. OCO‐2 Satellite‐Imposed Constraints on Terrestrial Biospheric CO2 Fluxes Over South Asia S. Philip et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035035
119. Tracing carbon dynamics during vegetation succession in a subtropical forest L. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.70319
120. Combined Effects of Warming and Grazing on Rangeland Vegetation on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau C. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.797971
121. Spatial Scaling of Gross Primary Productivity Over Sixteen Mountainous Watersheds Using Vegetation Heterogeneity and Surface Topography X. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005848
122. Continuity of Global MODIS Terrestrial Primary Productivity Estimates in the VIIRS Era Using Model‐Data Fusion K. Endsley et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JG007457
123. Vegetation Functional Properties Determine Uncertainty of Simulated Ecosystem Productivity: A Traceability Analysis in the East Asian Monsoon Region E. Cui et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB005909
124. Model structures amplify uncertainty in predicted soil carbon responses to climate change Z. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04526-9
125. Accelerating rates of Arctic carbon cycling revealed by long-term atmospheric CO 2 measurements S. Jeong et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aao1167
126. Asymmetric impact of vegetation change on runoff and evapotranspiration in the Yellow River source region Y. Ni et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2026.103239
127. Technical note: 3-hourly temporal downscaling of monthly global terrestrial biosphere model net ecosystem exchange J. Fisher et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-4271-2016
128. Modelling impacts of recent warming on seasonal carbon exchange in higher latitudes of North America Z. Mekonnen et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2016-0009
129. Sources of Uncertainty in Modeled Land Carbon Storage within and across Three MIPs: Diagnosis with Three New Techniques S. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0357.1
130. Characterizing biospheric carbon balance using CO2 observations from the OCO-2 satellite S. Miller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6785-2018
131. Leveraging Uncertainty in Terrestrial Ecosystem Carbon Stocks and Fluxes A. Trugman & G. Quetin https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003322
132. Academic influence index evaluation report of geographic simulation models (2022) K. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.105970
133. NDVI joint process-based models drive a learning ensemble model for accurately estimating cropland net primary productivity (NPP) Z. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1304400
134. The Terrestrial Biosphere Model Farm J. Fisher et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002676
135. Divergent historical GPP trends among state-of-the-art multi-model simulations and satellite-based products R. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-833-2022
136. Constraining Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions From Urban Area Using OCO‐2 Observations of Total Column CO2 X. Ye et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030528
137. Terrestrial ecosystem process model Biome-BGCMuSo v4.0: summary of improvements and new modeling possibilities D. Hidy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4405-2016
138. The Global N2O Model Intercomparison Project H. Tian et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0212.1
139. Greening-induced increase in evapotranspiration over Eurasia offset by CO2-induced vegetational stomatal closure X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac3532
140. Growth-stage dependent changes of leaf chlorophyll content as a proxy for photosynthetic capacity in maize W. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2026.1758994
141. A Lagrangian approach towards extracting signals of urban CO2 emissions from satellite observations of atmospheric column CO2 (XCO2): X-Stochastic Time-Inverted Lagrangian Transport model (“X-STILT v1”) D. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4843-2018
142. Contrasting changes in gross primary productivity of different regions of North America as affected by warming in recent decades Z. Mekonnen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.11.016
143. Effects of Warming Hiatuses on Vegetation Growth in the Northern Hemisphere H. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10050683
144. Effects of Anthropogenic Activity on Global Terrestrial Gross Primary Production I. Melnikova & T. Sasai https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JG005403
145. A global-drive analysis of ecosystem respiration in the Arctic and Third Pole X. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109668
146. The responses of ecosystem water use efficiency to CO2, nitrogen deposition, and climatic drivers across China X. Cai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129696
147. Surface Solar Radiation in North America: A Comparison of Observations, Reanalyses, Satellite, and Derived Products* A. Slater https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0087.1
148. Global patterns of drought recovery C. Schwalm et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23021
149. Carbon sources and sinks of North America as affected by major drought events during the past 30 years Z. Mekonnen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.05.006
150. Progress of vegetation modelling and future research prospects S. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-023-1367-1
151. Impact of Prior Terrestrial Carbon Fluxes on Simulations of Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations Y. Fu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD034794
152. Impact of Vegetation Physiology and Phenology on Watershed Hydrology in a Semiarid Watershed in the Pacific Northwest in a Changing Climate B. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028394
153. Midwest US Croplands Determine Model Divergence in North American Carbon Fluxes W. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020AV000310
154. Divergence in land surface modeling: linking spread to structure C. Schwalm et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ab4a8a
155. Carbon and Water Use Efficiencies: A Comparative Analysis of Ten Terrestrial Ecosystem Models under Changing Climate B. El Masri et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50808-7
156. Land carbon models underestimate the severity and duration of drought’s impact on plant productivity H. Kolus et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39373-1
157. Sensitivity of modeled NEP to climate forcing and soil at site and regional scales: Implications for upscaling ecosystem models Z. Mekonnen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.10.004
158. Current status of broad-scale meteorological data available for agrometeorological studies A. ITO https://doi.org/10.2480/cib.J-18-043
159. Enhanced causal effect of ecosystem photosynthesis on respiration during heatwaves J. Ping et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adi6395
160. Reliability ensemble averaging of 21st century projections of terrestrial net primary productivity reduces global and regional uncertainties J. Exbrayat et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-153-2018
161. RECCAP2 Future Component: Consistency and Potential for Regional Assessment to Constrain Global Projections C. Jones et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023AV001024
162. Toward “optimal” integration of terrestrial biosphere models C. Schwalm et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064002
163. Global vegetation biomass production efficiency constrained by models and observations Y. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14816
164. Evapotranspiration increment was underestimated in China due to underrepresented land cover changes X. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad4977
165. Comment on “Recent global decline of CO 2 fertilization effects on vegetation photosynthesis” Y. Sang et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg4420
166. The North American Carbon Program Multi-scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project – Part 2: Environmental driver data Y. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2875-2014
167. Data-driven quantification of nitrogen enrichment impact on Northern Hemisphere plant biomass Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac7b38
168. Modeling Global Vegetation Gross Primary Productivity, Transpiration and Hyperspectral Canopy Radiative Transfer Simultaneously Using a Next Generation Land Surface Model—CliMA Land Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002964
169. Optimal model complexity for terrestrial carbon cycle prediction C. Famiglietti et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2727-2021
170. Attributing Past Carbon Fluxes to CO2 and Climate Change: Respiration Response to CO2 Fertilization Shifts Regional Distribution of the Carbon Sink G. Quetin et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GB007478
171. 植被模型研究进展与展望 思. 李 et al. https://doi.org/10.1360/SSTe-2023-0204
172. Simulating CH4 and CO2 over South and East Asia using the zoomed chemistry transport model LMDz-INCA X. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9475-2018
173. Do ecological–economic tradeoffs triggered by budget allocations for forest carbon sequestration change under different market conditions? S. Cho et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00844-4
174. Disentangling climatic and anthropogenic controls on global terrestrial evapotranspiration trends J. Mao et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/094008
175. Observation‐based global soil heterotrophic respiration indicates underestimated turnover and sequestration of soil carbon by terrestrial ecosystem models Y. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16286
176. Aquatic carbon cycling in the conterminous United States and implications for terrestrial carbon accounting D. Butman et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1512651112
177. On the causes of trends in the seasonal amplitude of atmospheric CO2 S. Piao et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13909
178. Isentropic transport and the seasonal cycle amplitude of CO2 E. Barnes et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025109
179. Land surface models significantly underestimate the impact of land-use changes on global evapotranspiration Q. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac38db
180. The Impact of Parametric Uncertainties on Biogeochemistry in the E3SM Land Model D. Ricciuto et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS000962
181. Plant functional type classification for earth system models: results from the European Space Agency's Land Cover Climate Change Initiative B. Poulter et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2315-2015
182. Impacts of land use change and elevated CO2 on the interannual variations and seasonal cycles of gross primary productivity in China B. Jia et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-235-2020
183. Regional contribution to variability and trends of global gross primary productivity M. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa8978
184. Postdrought Recovery Time Across Global Terrestrial Ecosystems S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005699
185. Persistent and enhanced carbon sequestration capacity of alpine grasslands on Earth’s Third Pole Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.ade6875
186. The impact of spatiotemporal variability in atmospheric CO2 concentration on global terrestrial carbon fluxes E. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5635-2018
187. The observed and model-simulated response of southern African vegetation to drought S. Lawal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107698
188. Global divergent responses of primary productivity to water, energy, and CO2 Z. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab57c5
189. Impact of large‐scale climate extremes on biospheric carbon fluxes: An intercomparison based on MsTMIP data J. Zscheischler et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004826
190. Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback predictions D. Huntzinger et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03818-2
191. The response of terrestrial vegetation carbon use efficiency to global environmental changes Y. Zhang & A. Ye https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2024.104537
192. Enhanced peak growth of global vegetation and its key mechanisms K. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0714-0
193. Evolution and Mechanism Analysis of Terrestrial Ecosystems in China with Respect to Gross Primary Productivity H. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13091346
194. The terrestrial biosphere as a net source of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere H. Tian et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16946
195. Revisiting assessments of ecosystem drought recovery L. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab4c61
196. The decadal state of the terrestrial carbon cycle: Global retrievals of terrestrial carbon allocation, pools, and residence times A. Bloom et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1515160113
197. Effect of meteorological data assimilation using 3DVAR on high-resolution simulations of atmospheric CO2 concentrations in East Asia M. Seo & H. Kim https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2023.101759
198. North American terrestrial CO2 uptake largely offset by CH4 and N2O emissions: toward a full accounting of the greenhouse gas budget H. Tian et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1072-9
199. Forests dominate the interannual variability of the North American carbon sink Y. Shiga et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aad505
200. Climate constrains the enhancement of CO2 fertilization on forest gross primary productivity X. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/add177
201. Mapping an Observation-Based Global Solar Irradiance Climatology across the Conterminous United States D. Rupp et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-21-0236.1
202. Advancements and opportunities to improve bottom–up estimates of global wetland methane emissions Q. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/adad02
203. The Community Land Model Version 5: Description of New Features, Benchmarking, and Impact of Forcing Uncertainty D. Lawrence et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001583
204. Sensitivity of global terrestrial carbon cycle dynamics to variability in satellite‐observed burned area B. Poulter et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GB004655
205. Net primary productivity orchestrates uncertainty sources driving global soil organic carbon under land use change C. Gang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03312-6
206. Simulating county‐level crop yields in the Conterminous United States using the Community Land Model: The effects of optimizing irrigation and fertilization G. Leng et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000645
207. Increasing sensitivity of dryland vegetation greenness to precipitation due to rising atmospheric CO2 Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32631-3
208. Evaluating year-to-year anomalies in tropical wetland methane emissions using satellite CH4 observations R. Parker et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.02.011