64 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Stratospheric Ozone Changes From Explosive Tropical Volcanoes: Modeling and Ice Core Constraints A. Ming et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD032290
2. Quasi-Newton methods for atmospheric chemistry simulations: implementation in UKCA UM vn10.8 E. Esentürk et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3089-2018
3. Assessing and improving cloud-height-based parameterisations of global lightning flash rate, and their impact on lightning-produced NOx and tropospheric composition in a chemistry–climate model A. Luhar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7053-2021
4. Improvements to the representation of BVOC chemistry–climate interactions in UKCA (v11.5) with the CRI-Strat 2 mechanism: incorporation and evaluation J. Weber et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5239-2021
5. Radiative impact of improved global parameterisations of oceanic dry deposition of ozone and lightning-generated NOx A. Luhar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13013-2022
6. A radiative transfer module for calculating photolysis rates and solar heating in climate models: Solar-J v7.5 J. Hsu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2525-2017
7. Separating the role of direct radiative heating and photolysis in modulating the atmospheric response to the amplitude of the 11-year solar cycle forcing E. Bednarz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9833-2019
8. Evaluation of simulated photolysis rates and their response to solar irradiance variability T. Sukhodolov et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024277
9. Representing ozone extremes in European megacities: the importance of resolution in a global chemistry climate model Z. Stock et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3899-2014
10. Stratospheric ozone changes under solar geoengineering: implications for UV exposure and air quality P. Nowack et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4191-2016
11. Stratospheric dayside-to-nightside circulation drives the 3D ozone distribution on synchronously rotating rocky exoplanets M. Braam et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad2704
12. The relative importance of methane sources and sinks over the Last Interglacial period and into the last glaciation A. Quiquet et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.01.004
13. On the radiative impact of aerosols on photolysis rates: comparison of simulations and observations in the Lampedusa island during the ChArMEx/ADRIMED campaign S. Mailler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1219-2016
14. Virtual Integration of Satellite and In-situ Observation Networks (VISION) v1.0: In-Situ Observations Simulator (ISO_simulator) M. Russo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-181-2025
15. Aerosol microphysics simulations of the Mt.~Pinatubo eruption with the UM-UKCA composition-climate model S. Dhomse et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11221-2014
16. Modelling the impact of megacities on local, regional and global tropospheric ozone and the deposition of nitrogen species Z. Stock et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12215-2013
17. Co-emission of volcanic sulfur and halogens amplifies volcanic effective radiative forcing J. Staunton-Sykes et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9009-2021
18. Development, intercomparison, and evaluation of an improved mechanism for the oxidation of dimethyl sulfide in the UKCA model B. Cala et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14735-2023
19. Global sensitivity of tropospheric ozone to precursor emissions in clean and present-day atmospheres: insights from AerChemMIP simulations W. Wang & C. Gao https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-14535-2025
20. Lightning-induced chemistry on tidally-locked Earth-like exoplanets M. Braam et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2722
21. Future Arctic ozone recovery: the importance of chemistry and dynamics E. Bednarz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12159-2016
22. Cloud impacts on photochemistry: building a climatology of photolysis rates from the Atmospheric Tomography mission S. Hall et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16809-2018
23. Review of the global models used within phase 1 of the Chemistry–Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) O. Morgenstern et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-639-2017
24. Inter-model comparison of global hydroxyl radical (OH) distributions and their impact on atmospheric methane over the 2000–2016 period Y. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13701-2019
25. Simulating the atmospheric response to the 11-year solar cycle forcing with the UM-UKCA model: the role of detection method and natural variability E. Bednarz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5209-2019
26. Evaluation of the new UKCA climate-composition model – Part 2: The Troposphere F. O'Connor et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-41-2014
27. The importance of vertical velocity variability for estimates of the indirect aerosol effects R. West et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6369-2014
28. Processes Controlling Tropical Tropopause Temperature and Stratospheric Water Vapor in Climate Models S. Hardiman et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0075.1
29. Attribution of recent ozone changes in the Southern Hemisphere mid-latitudes using statistical analysis and chemistry–climate model simulations G. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10495-2017
30. Evaluation of the WRF and CHIMERE models for the simulation of PM2.5 in large East African urban conurbations A. Mazzeo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10677-2022
31. Quantifying the impact of global nitrate aerosol on tropospheric composition fields and its production from lightning NOx A. Luhar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-14005-2024
32. The Met Office HadGEM3-ES chemistry–climate model: evaluation of stratospheric dynamics and its impact on ozone S. Hardiman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1209-2017
33. Influence of future climate and cropland expansion on isoprene emissions and tropospheric ozone O. Squire et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1011-2014
34. Using a virtual machine environment for developing, testing, and training for the UM-UKCA composition-climate model, using Unified Model version 10.9 and above N. Abraham et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3647-2018
35. A study of the effect of aerosols on surface ozone through meteorology feedbacks over China Y. Qu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5705-2021
36. Stratospheric ozone response to sulfate aerosol and solar dimming climate interventions based on the G6 Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations S. Tilmes​​​​​​​ et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4557-2022
37. Modeling the Processing of Aerosol and Trace Gases in Clouds and Fogs B. Ervens https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5005887
38. Aerosol radiative effects on tropospheric photochemistry with GEOS-Chem simulations R. Tian et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.03.032
39. Sensitivity of stratospheric water vapour to variability in tropical tropopause temperatures and large-scale transport J. Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2469-2021
40. Correcting ozone biases in a global chemistry–climate model: implications for future ozone Z. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12543-2022
41. Constraints on aerosol processes in climate models from vertically-resolved aircraft observations of black carbon Z. Kipling et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5969-2013
42. Evaluation of the ACCESS – chemistry–climate model for the Southern Hemisphere K. Stone et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2401-2016
43. Heterogeneous reaction of N2O5 with airborne TiO2 particles and its implication for stratospheric particle injection M. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6035-2014
44. Response of future near-surface ozone extremes in Europe to changes in precursor emissions and climate R. Crespo-Miguel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2026.121774
45. The Space Weather Atmosphere Models and Indices (SWAMI) project: Overview and first results D. Jackson et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2020019
46. Implementation and evaluation of updated photolysis rates in the EMEP MSC-W chemistry-transport model using Cloud-J v7.3e W. van Caspel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7433-2023
47. What controls the vertical distribution of aerosol? Relationships between process sensitivity in HadGEM3–UKCA and inter-model variation from AeroCom Phase II Z. Kipling et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2221-2016
48. Description and evaluation of the UKCA stratosphere–troposphere chemistry scheme (StratTrop vn 1.0) implemented in UKESM1 A. Archibald et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1223-2020
49. UKESM1: Description and Evaluation of the U.K. Earth System Model A. Sellar et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001739
50. Atmospheric isoprene measurements reveal larger-than-expected Southern Ocean emissions V. Ferracci et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46744-4
51. CHIMERE-2017: from urban to hemispheric chemistry-transport modeling S. Mailler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2397-2017
52. Improvements to stratospheric chemistry scheme in the UM-UKCA (v10.7) model: solar cycle and heterogeneous reactions F. Dennison et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1227-2019
53. Ensembles of Global Climate Model Variants Designed for the Quantification and Constraint of Uncertainty in Aerosols and Their Radiative Forcing M. Yoshioka et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001628
54. Lightning NOx, a key chemistry–climate interaction: impacts of future climate change and consequences for tropospheric oxidising capacity A. Banerjee et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9871-2014
55. Ozone chemistry on tidally locked M dwarf planets J. Yates et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz3520
56. A large ozone-circulation feedback and its implications for global warming assessments P. Nowack et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2451
57. The Impact of Stratospheric Ozone Feedbacks on Climate Sensitivity Estimates P. Nowack et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027943
58. Methane Emissions in a Chemistry‐Climate Model: Feedbacks and Climate Response I. Heimann et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS002019
59. On the emissions and transport of bromoform: sensitivity to model resolution and emission location M. Russo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-14031-2015
60. Possibilities for Improvement in Long-term Predictions of the Operational Climate Prediction System (GloSea6) for Spring by including Atmospheric Chemistry-Aerosol Interactions over East Asia H. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2024.45.1.19
61. Description and evaluation of the new UM–UKCA (vn11.0) Double Extended Stratospheric–Tropospheric (DEST vn1.0) scheme for comprehensive modelling of halogen chemistry in the stratosphere E. Bednarz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6187-2023
62. Assessing the sensitivity of the hydroxyl radical to model biases in composition and temperature using a single-column photochemical model for Lauder, New Zealand L. López-Comí et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14599-2016
63. A description and evaluation of an air quality model nested within global and regional composition-climate models using MetUM L. Neal et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3941-2017
64. Earth-like Exoplanets in Spin–Orbit Resonances: Climate Dynamics, 3D Atmospheric Chemistry, and Observational Signatures M. Braam et al. https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/ad9565