Articles | Volume 4, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-287-2011
© Author(s) 2011. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-287-2011
© Author(s) 2011. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Development and technical paper
| 
08 Apr 2011
Development and technical paper |
| 08 Apr 2011
ESP v1.0: methodology for exploring emission impacts of future scenarios in the United States
D. H. Loughlin
US Environmental Protection Agency, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
W. G. Benjey
US Environmental Protection Agency, National Exposure Research Laboratory, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
C. G. Nolte
US Environmental Protection Agency, National Exposure Research Laboratory, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 5,519 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Feb 2013, article published on 02 Nov 2010)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,803 | 2,402 | 314 | 5,519 | 327 | 333 |
- HTML: 2,803
- PDF: 2,402
- XML: 314
- Total: 5,519
- BibTeX: 327
- EndNote: 333
Total article views: 4,613 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Feb 2013, article published on 08 Apr 2011)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,548 | 1,784 | 281 | 4,613 | 303 | 328 |
- HTML: 2,548
- PDF: 1,784
- XML: 281
- Total: 4,613
- BibTeX: 303
- EndNote: 328
Total article views: 906 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Feb 2013, article published on 02 Nov 2010)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 255 | 618 | 33 | 906 | 24 | 5 |
- HTML: 255
- PDF: 618
- XML: 33
- Total: 906
- BibTeX: 24
- EndNote: 5
Cited
43 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Examining the relationship between shale gas production and carbon capture and storage under CO2 taxes based on the social cost of carbon C. Nichols & N. Victor https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2015.03.005
- Economic and environmental evaluation of coal-and-biomass-to-liquids-and-electricity plants equipped with carbon capture and storage M. Aitken et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-1020-z
- Strategic responses to CO2 emission reduction targets drive shift in U.S. electric sector water use C. Cameron et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2014.07.003
- Large-Scale Carbon Removal Will Create Public Health, Economic, and Climate Trade-Offs P. Javadi et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c17950
- Key findings from the core North American scenarios in the EMF34 intermodel comparison H. Huntington et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111599
- ESP v2.0: enhanced method for exploring emission impacts of future scenarios in the United States – addressing spatial allocation L. Ran et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1775-2015
- Analysis of alternative pathways for reducing nitrogen oxide emissions D. Loughlin et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2015.1062440
- How accounting for climate and health impacts of emissions could change the US energy system K. Brown et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.052
- Air quality co-benefits of subnational carbon policies T. Thompson et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2016.1192071
- California end-use electrification impacts on carbon neutrality and clean air S. Ebrahimi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.050
- Integration of agricultural and energy system models for biofuel assessment A. Elobeid et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.05.007
- Linking Electricity and Air Quality Models by Downscaling: Weather-Informed Hourly Dispatch of Generation Accounting for Renewable and Load Temporal Variability Scenarios S. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c08060
- Potential impact of a US climate policy and air quality regulations on future air quality and climate change Y. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5323-2016
- Impacts of Potential CO2-Reduction Policies on Air Quality in the United States M. Trail et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00473
- The Detailed Emissions Scaling, Isolation, and Diagnostic (DESID) module in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 5.3.2 B. Murphy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3407-2021
- Health and air pollutant emission impacts of net zero CO2 by 2050 scenarios from the energy modeling forum 37 study D. Loughlin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2024.100165
- Could congressionally mandated incentives lead to deployment of large-scale CO2 capture, facilities for enhanced oil recovery CO2 markets and geologic CO2 storage? J. Edmonds et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111775
- Impact of carbon dioxide removal technologies on deep decarbonization: EMF37 MARKAL–NETL modeling results N. Victor & C. Nichols https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2024.100143
- Reforestation and crop land conversion impacts on future regional air quality in the Southeastern U.S. M. Trail et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.05.001
- Linking energy sector and air quality models through downscaling: Long-run siting of electricity generators to account for spatial variability and technological innovation S. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145504
- Comprehensively assessing the drivers of future air quality in California S. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.02.007
- Enhanced Integration of Health, Climate, and Air Quality Management Planning at the Urban Scale G. Kleiman et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2022.934672
- Regional Air Quality Management Aspects of Climate Change: Impact of Climate Mitigation Options on Regional Air Emissions J. Rudokas et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es505159z
- Role of future scenarios in understanding deep uncertainty in long-term air quality management J. Gamas et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2015.1084783
- Accounting for Climate and Air Quality Damages in Future U.S. Electricity Generation Scenarios K. Brown et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es304281g
- Assessment of environmental and ergonomic hazard associated to printing and photocopying: a review A. Nandan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-018-0205-x
- GLIMPSE: A Rapid Decision Framework for Energy and Environmental Policy F. Akhtar et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es402283j
- Future of hydrogen in the U.S. energy sector: MARKAL modeling results N. Victor & C. Nichols https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaecs.2024.100259
- The effects of global change upon United States air quality R. Gonzalez-Abraham et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12645-2015
- The impacts of shale gas supply and climate policies on energy security: The U.S. energy system analysis based on MARKAL model N. Victor et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2014.10.008
- Estimating criteria pollutant emissions using the California Regional Multisector Air Quality Emissions (CA-REMARQUE) model v1.0 C. Zapata et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1293-2018
- Sensitivity of air quality to potential future climate change and emissions in the United States and major cities M. Trail et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.05.079
- The U.S. power sector decarbonization: Investigating technology options with MARKAL nine-region model N. Victor et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.03.021
- Modeling Air Pollutant Emissions in the Provincial Level Road Transportation Sector in Korea: A Case Study of the Zero-Emission Vehicle Subsidy M. Roh et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13153999
- Methodology for examining potential technology breakthroughs for mitigating CO2 and application to centralized solar photovoltaics D. Loughlin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-012-0478-1
- Considering future regional air quality impacts of the transportation sector M. Kinnon et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.09.011
- Air quality impacts of fuel cell electric hydrogen vehicles with high levels of renewable power generation M. Mac Kinnon et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.07.054
- Emissions Implications of Future Natural Gas Production and Use in the U.S. and in the Rocky Mountain Region J. McLeod et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es5029537
- Comparing health benefit calculations for alternative energy futures K. Brown et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00840-8
- Evaluating the effects of climate change on summertime ozone using a relative response factor approach for policymakers J. Avise et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2012.696531
- Bridging existing energy and chemical transport models to enhance air quality policy assessment S. Ngo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106218
- Modeling the Air Quality Impacts of Future Energy Scenarios U. Shankar et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00175
- Projecting state-level air pollutant emissions using an integrated assessment model: GCAM-USA W. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.122
43 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Examining the relationship between shale gas production and carbon capture and storage under CO2 taxes based on the social cost of carbon C. Nichols & N. Victor https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2015.03.005
- Economic and environmental evaluation of coal-and-biomass-to-liquids-and-electricity plants equipped with carbon capture and storage M. Aitken et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-1020-z
- Strategic responses to CO2 emission reduction targets drive shift in U.S. electric sector water use C. Cameron et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2014.07.003
- Large-Scale Carbon Removal Will Create Public Health, Economic, and Climate Trade-Offs P. Javadi et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c17950
- Key findings from the core North American scenarios in the EMF34 intermodel comparison H. Huntington et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111599
- ESP v2.0: enhanced method for exploring emission impacts of future scenarios in the United States – addressing spatial allocation L. Ran et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1775-2015
- Analysis of alternative pathways for reducing nitrogen oxide emissions D. Loughlin et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2015.1062440
- How accounting for climate and health impacts of emissions could change the US energy system K. Brown et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.052
- Air quality co-benefits of subnational carbon policies T. Thompson et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2016.1192071
- California end-use electrification impacts on carbon neutrality and clean air S. Ebrahimi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.050
- Integration of agricultural and energy system models for biofuel assessment A. Elobeid et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.05.007
- Linking Electricity and Air Quality Models by Downscaling: Weather-Informed Hourly Dispatch of Generation Accounting for Renewable and Load Temporal Variability Scenarios S. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c08060
- Potential impact of a US climate policy and air quality regulations on future air quality and climate change Y. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5323-2016
- Impacts of Potential CO2-Reduction Policies on Air Quality in the United States M. Trail et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00473
- The Detailed Emissions Scaling, Isolation, and Diagnostic (DESID) module in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 5.3.2 B. Murphy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3407-2021
- Health and air pollutant emission impacts of net zero CO2 by 2050 scenarios from the energy modeling forum 37 study D. Loughlin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2024.100165
- Could congressionally mandated incentives lead to deployment of large-scale CO2 capture, facilities for enhanced oil recovery CO2 markets and geologic CO2 storage? J. Edmonds et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111775
- Impact of carbon dioxide removal technologies on deep decarbonization: EMF37 MARKAL–NETL modeling results N. Victor & C. Nichols https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2024.100143
- Reforestation and crop land conversion impacts on future regional air quality in the Southeastern U.S. M. Trail et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.05.001
- Linking energy sector and air quality models through downscaling: Long-run siting of electricity generators to account for spatial variability and technological innovation S. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145504
- Comprehensively assessing the drivers of future air quality in California S. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.02.007
- Enhanced Integration of Health, Climate, and Air Quality Management Planning at the Urban Scale G. Kleiman et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2022.934672
- Regional Air Quality Management Aspects of Climate Change: Impact of Climate Mitigation Options on Regional Air Emissions J. Rudokas et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es505159z
- Role of future scenarios in understanding deep uncertainty in long-term air quality management J. Gamas et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2015.1084783
- Accounting for Climate and Air Quality Damages in Future U.S. Electricity Generation Scenarios K. Brown et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es304281g
- Assessment of environmental and ergonomic hazard associated to printing and photocopying: a review A. Nandan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-018-0205-x
- GLIMPSE: A Rapid Decision Framework for Energy and Environmental Policy F. Akhtar et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es402283j
- Future of hydrogen in the U.S. energy sector: MARKAL modeling results N. Victor & C. Nichols https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaecs.2024.100259
- The effects of global change upon United States air quality R. Gonzalez-Abraham et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12645-2015
- The impacts of shale gas supply and climate policies on energy security: The U.S. energy system analysis based on MARKAL model N. Victor et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2014.10.008
- Estimating criteria pollutant emissions using the California Regional Multisector Air Quality Emissions (CA-REMARQUE) model v1.0 C. Zapata et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1293-2018
- Sensitivity of air quality to potential future climate change and emissions in the United States and major cities M. Trail et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.05.079
- The U.S. power sector decarbonization: Investigating technology options with MARKAL nine-region model N. Victor et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.03.021
- Modeling Air Pollutant Emissions in the Provincial Level Road Transportation Sector in Korea: A Case Study of the Zero-Emission Vehicle Subsidy M. Roh et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13153999
- Methodology for examining potential technology breakthroughs for mitigating CO2 and application to centralized solar photovoltaics D. Loughlin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-012-0478-1
- Considering future regional air quality impacts of the transportation sector M. Kinnon et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.09.011
- Air quality impacts of fuel cell electric hydrogen vehicles with high levels of renewable power generation M. Mac Kinnon et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.07.054
- Emissions Implications of Future Natural Gas Production and Use in the U.S. and in the Rocky Mountain Region J. McLeod et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es5029537
- Comparing health benefit calculations for alternative energy futures K. Brown et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00840-8
- Evaluating the effects of climate change on summertime ozone using a relative response factor approach for policymakers J. Avise et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2012.696531
- Bridging existing energy and chemical transport models to enhance air quality policy assessment S. Ngo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106218
- Modeling the Air Quality Impacts of Future Energy Scenarios U. Shankar et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00175
- Projecting state-level air pollutant emissions using an integrated assessment model: GCAM-USA W. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.122
Saved (final revised paper)
Latest update: 10 Nov 2026
