39 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Examining the relationship between shale gas production and carbon capture and storage under CO2 taxes based on the social cost of carbon C. Nichols & N. Victor 10.1016/j.esr.2015.03.005
2. Economic and environmental evaluation of coal-and-biomass-to-liquids-and-electricity plants equipped with carbon capture and storage M. Aitken et al. 10.1007/s10098-015-1020-z
3. Strategic responses to CO2 emission reduction targets drive shift in U.S. electric sector water use C. Cameron et al. 10.1016/j.esr.2014.07.003
4. Key findings from the core North American scenarios in the EMF34 intermodel comparison H. Huntington et al. 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111599
5. ESP v2.0: enhanced method for exploring emission impacts of future scenarios in the United States – addressing spatial allocation L. Ran et al. 10.5194/gmd-8-1775-2015
6. Analysis of alternative pathways for reducing nitrogen oxide emissions D. Loughlin et al. 10.1080/10962247.2015.1062440
7. How accounting for climate and health impacts of emissions could change the US energy system K. Brown et al. 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.052
8. Air quality co-benefits of subnational carbon policies T. Thompson et al. 10.1080/10962247.2016.1192071
9. California end-use electrification impacts on carbon neutrality and clean air S. Ebrahimi et al. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.050
10. Integration of agricultural and energy system models for biofuel assessment A. Elobeid et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.05.007
11. Potential impact of a US climate policy and air quality regulations on future air quality and climate change Y. Lee et al. 10.5194/acp-16-5323-2016
12. Impacts of Potential CO2-Reduction Policies on Air Quality in the United States M. Trail et al. 10.1021/acs.est.5b00473
13. The Detailed Emissions Scaling, Isolation, and Diagnostic (DESID) module in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 5.3.2 B. Murphy et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-3407-2021
14. Could congressionally mandated incentives lead to deployment of large-scale CO2 capture, facilities for enhanced oil recovery CO2 markets and geologic CO2 storage? J. Edmonds et al. 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111775
15. Reforestation and crop land conversion impacts on future regional air quality in the Southeastern U.S. M. Trail et al. 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.05.001
16. Linking energy sector and air quality models through downscaling: Long-run siting of electricity generators to account for spatial variability and technological innovation S. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145504
17. Comprehensively assessing the drivers of future air quality in California S. Zhu et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2019.02.007
18. Enhanced Integration of Health, Climate, and Air Quality Management Planning at the Urban Scale G. Kleiman et al. 10.3389/frsc.2022.934672
19. Regional Air Quality Management Aspects of Climate Change: Impact of Climate Mitigation Options on Regional Air Emissions J. Rudokas et al. 10.1021/es505159z
20. Role of future scenarios in understanding deep uncertainty in long-term air quality management J. Gamas et al. 10.1080/10962247.2015.1084783
21. Accounting for Climate and Air Quality Damages in Future U.S. Electricity Generation Scenarios K. Brown et al. 10.1021/es304281g
22. Assessment of environmental and ergonomic hazard associated to printing and photocopying: a review A. Nandan et al. 10.1007/s10653-018-0205-x
23. GLIMPSE: A Rapid Decision Framework for Energy and Environmental Policy F. Akhtar et al. 10.1021/es402283j
24. Future of hydrogen in the U.S. energy sector: MARKAL modeling results N. Victor & C. Nichols 10.1016/j.jaecs.2024.100259
25. The effects of global change upon United States air quality R. Gonzalez-Abraham et al. 10.5194/acp-15-12645-2015
26. The impacts of shale gas supply and climate policies on energy security: The U.S. energy system analysis based on MARKAL model N. Victor et al. 10.1016/j.esr.2014.10.008
27. Estimating criteria pollutant emissions using the California Regional Multisector Air Quality Emissions (CA-REMARQUE) model v1.0 C. Zapata et al. 10.5194/gmd-11-1293-2018
28. Sensitivity of air quality to potential future climate change and emissions in the United States and major cities M. Trail et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.05.079
29. The U.S. power sector decarbonization: Investigating technology options with MARKAL nine-region model N. Victor et al. 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.03.021
30. Modeling Air Pollutant Emissions in the Provincial Level Road Transportation Sector in Korea: A Case Study of the Zero-Emission Vehicle Subsidy M. Roh et al. 10.3390/en13153999
31. Methodology for examining potential technology breakthroughs for mitigating CO2 and application to centralized solar photovoltaics D. Loughlin et al. 10.1007/s10098-012-0478-1
32. Considering future regional air quality impacts of the transportation sector M. Kinnon et al. 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.09.011
33. Air quality impacts of fuel cell electric hydrogen vehicles with high levels of renewable power generation M. Mac Kinnon et al. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.07.054
34. Emissions Implications of Future Natural Gas Production and Use in the U.S. and in the Rocky Mountain Region J. McLeod et al. 10.1021/es5029537
35. Comparing health benefit calculations for alternative energy futures K. Brown et al. 10.1007/s11869-020-00840-8
36. Evaluating the effects of climate change on summertime ozone using a relative response factor approach for policymakers J. Avise et al. 10.1080/10962247.2012.696531
37. Projecting state-level air pollutant emissions using an integrated assessment model: GCAM-USA W. Shi et al. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.122
38. Mathematical properties and constraints representation for bottom-up approaches to the evaluation of GHG mitigation policies H. Kim et al. 10.1016/j.trd.2014.07.004
39. Mathematical Constraints Representation for Bottom-Up Approaches to Climate Policy Modeling H. Kim et al. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.734-737.3133