Articles | Volume 18, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7781-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7781-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Coupling the TKE-ACM2 Planetary Boundary Layer Scheme with the Building Effect Parameterization Model
Wanliang Zhang
Division of Environment and Sustainability, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China
Chao Ren
Division of Landscape Architecture, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Edward Yan Yung Ng
School of Architecture, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin NT, Hong Kong, China
Michael Mau Fung Wong
Division of Environment and Sustainability, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China
Division of Environment and Sustainability, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China
Department of Mathematics, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China
Related authors
No articles found.
Xueying Liu, Yeqi Huang, Yao Chen, Xin Feng, Yang Xu, Yi Chen, Dasa Gu, Hao Sun, Zhi Ning, Jianzhen Yu, Wing Sze Chow, Changqing Lin, Yan Xiang, Tianshu Zhang, Claire Granier, Guy Brasseur, Zhe Wang, and Jimmy C. H. Fung
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3227, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3227, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) affect ozone formation and air quality. However, our understanding is limited due to insufficient measurements, especially for oxygenated VOCs. This study combines land, ship, and satellite data in Hong Kong, showing that oxygenated VOCs make up a significant portion of total VOCs. Despite their importance, many are underestimated in current models. These findings highlight the need to improve VOC representation in models to enhance air quality management.
Naveed Ahmad, Changqing Lin, Alexis K. H. Lau, Jhoon Kim, Tianshu Zhang, Fangqun Yu, Chengcai Li, Ying Li, Jimmy C. H. Fung, and Xiang Qian Lao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 9645–9665, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9645-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9645-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study developed a nested machine learning model to convert the GEMS NO2 column measurements into ground-level concentrations across China. The model directly incorporates the NO2 mixing height (NMH) into the methodological framework. The study underscores the importance of considering NMH when estimating ground-level NO2 from satellite column measurements and highlights the significant advantages of new-generation geostationary satellites in air quality monitoring.
Yiang Chen, Xingcheng Lu, and Jimmy C. H. Fung
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 8847–8864, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8847-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8847-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates the contribution of pollutants from different emitting periods to ozone episodes over the Greater Bay Area. The analysis reveals the variation in major spatiotemporal contributors to the O3 pollution under the influence of typhoons and subtropical high pressure. Through temporal contribution analysis, our work offers a new perspective on the evolution of O3 pollution and can aid in developing effective and timely control policies under unfavorable weather conditions.
Haochen Sun, Jimmy C. H. Fung, Yiang Chen, Zhenning Li, Dehao Yuan, Wanying Chen, and Xingcheng Lu
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8439–8452, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8439-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8439-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study developed a novel deep-learning layer, the broadcasting layer, to build an end-to-end LSTM-based deep-learning model for regional air pollution forecast. By combining the ground observation, WRF-CMAQ simulation, and the broadcasting LSTM deep-learning model, forecast accuracy has been significantly improved when compared to other methods. The broadcasting layer and its variants can also be applied in other research areas to supersede the traditional numerical interpolation methods.
Yun Fat Lam, Chi Chiu Cheung, Xuguo Zhang, Joshua S. Fu, and Jimmy Chi Hung Fung
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12895–12908, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12895-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12895-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In recent years, air pollution forecasting has become an important municipal service of the government. In this study, a new spatial allocation method based on satellite remote sensing and GIS techniques was developed to address the spatial deficiency of industrial source emissions in China, providing a substantial improvement on NO2 and PM2.5 forecast for the Pearl River Delta/Greater Bay Area.
Cited articles
Arregocés, H. A., Rojano, R., and Restrepo, G.: Sensitivity analysis of planetary boundary layer schemes using the WRF model in Northern Colombia during 2016 dry season, Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans, 96, 101261, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2021.101261, 2021. a
Ayotte, K., Sullivan, P., Andren, A., Doney, S., Holtslag, B., Large, W., McWilliams, J., Moeng, C.-H., Otte, M., Tribbia, J., and Wyngaard, J.: An Evaluation of Neutral and Convective Planetary Boundary-Layer Parameterizations Relative to Large Eddy Simulations, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 79, 131–175, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120078, 1996. a, b, c
Banks, R. F., Tiana-Alsina, J., Baldasano, J. M., Rocadenbosch, F., Papayannis, A., Solomos, S., and Tzanis, C. G.: Sensitivity of boundary-layer variables to PBL schemes in the WRF model based on surface meteorological observations, lidar, and radiosondes during the HygrA-CD campaign, Atmospheric Research, 176-177, 185–201, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.02.024, 2016. a
Bougeault, P. and Lacarrere, P.: Parameterization of Orography-Induced Turbulence in a Mesobeta–Scale Model, Monthly Weather Review, 117, 1872–1890, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<1872:POOITI>2.0.CO;2, 1989. a, b, c, d
Britter, R. E. and Hanna, S. R.: Flow and Dispersion in Urban Areas, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 35, 469–496, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.35.101101.161147, 2003. a
Businger, J. A., Wyngaard, J. C., Izumi, Y., and Bradley, E. F.: Flux-Profile Relationships in the Atmospheric Surface Layer, Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 28, 181–189, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028<0181:FPRITA>2.0.CO;2, 1971. a
Chen, F. and Dudhia, J.: Coupling an Advanced Land Surface–Hydrology Model with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 Modeling System. Part I: Model Implementation and Sensitivity, Monthly Weather Review, 129, 569–585, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0569:CAALSH>2.0.CO;2, 2001. a, b
Chen, F., Kusaka, H., Bornstein, R., Ching, J., Grimmond, C. S. B., Grossman-Clarke, S., Loridan, T., Manning, K. W., Martilli, A., Miao, S., Sailor, D., Salamanca, F. P., Taha, H., Tewari, M., Wang, X., Wyszogrodzki, A. A., and Zhang, C.: The integrated WRF/urban modelling system: development, evaluation, and applications to urban environmental problems, International Journal of Climatology, 31, 273–288, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2158, 2011. a
Chen, X., Bryan, G. H., Hazelton, A., Marks, F. D., and Fitzpatrick, P.: Evaluation and Improvement of a TKE-Based Eddy-Diffusivity Mass-Flux (EDMF) Planetary Boundary Layer Scheme in Hurricane Conditions, Weather and Forecasting, 37, 935 – 951, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-21-0168.1, 2022. a
Cleugh, H. and Grimmond, S.: Chapter 3 - Urban Climates and Global Climate Change, in: The Future of the World's Climate (Second Edition), edited by: Henderson-Sellers, A. and McGuffie, K., Elsevier, Boston, 47–76, ISBN 978-0-12-386917-3, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386917-3.00003-8, 2012. a
Coniglio, M. C., Correia, J., Marsh, P. T., and Kong, F.: Verification of Convection-Allowing WRF Model Forecasts of the Planetary Boundary Layer Using Sounding Observations, Weather and Forecasting, 28, 842–862, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-12-00103.1, 2013. a
Davenport, A., Grimmond, S., Oke, T., and Wieringa, J.: Estimating the roughness of cities and sheltered country, 15th conference on probability and statistics in the atmospheric sciences/12th conference on applied climatology, Ashville, NC, American Meteorological Society, 96–99, 2000. a
Demuzere, M., Kittner, J., Martilli, A., Mills, G., Moede, C., Stewart, I. D., van Vliet, J., and Bechtel, B.: A global map of local climate zones to support earth system modelling and urban-scale environmental science, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 3835–3873, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-3835-2022, 2022. a
Gall, R., Franklin, J., Marks, F., Rappaport, E. N., and Toepfer, F.: The Hurricane Forecast Improvement Project, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 94, 329–343, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00071.1, 2013. a, b
García-Díez, M., Fernández, J., Fita, L., and Yagüe, C.: Seasonal dependence of WRF model biases and sensitivity to PBL schemes over Europe, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 139, 501–514, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.1976, 2013. a
Hendricks, E. A., Knievel, J. C., and Wang, Y.: Addition of Multilayer Urban Canopy Models to a Nonlocal Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterization and Evaluation Using Ideal and Real Cases, Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 59, 1369 – 1392, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-19-0142.1, 2020. a
Hong, S.-Y., Dudhia, J., and Chen, S.-H.: A Revised Approach to Ice Microphysical Processes for the Bulk Parameterization of Clouds and Precipitation, Monthly Weather Review, 132, 103–120, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<0103:ARATIM>2.0.CO;2, 2004. a, b
Hong, S.-Y., Noh, Y., and Dudhia, J.: A New Vertical Diffusion Package with an Explicit Treatment of Entrainment Processes, Monthly Weather Review, 134, 2318–2341, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3199.1, 2006. a
Hu, X.-M., Nielsen-Gammon, J. W., and Zhang, F.: Evaluation of Three Planetary Boundary Layer Schemes in the WRF Model, Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 49, 1831–1844, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAMC2432.1, 2010. a
Iacono, M. J., Delamere, J. S., Mlawer, E. J., Shephard, M. W., Clough, S. A., and Collins, W. D.: Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 113, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009944, 2008. a, b, c
Janjić, Z. I.: The Step-Mountain Eta Coordinate Model: Further Developments of the Convection, Viscous Sublayer, and Turbulence Closure Schemes, Monthly Weather Review, 122, 927–945, 1994. a
Jiménez, P. A., Dudhia, J., González-Rouco, J. F., Navarro, J., Montávez, J. P., and García-Bustamante, E.: A Revised Scheme for the WRF Surface Layer Formulation, Monthly Weather Review, 140, 898–918, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00056.1, 2012. a
Karlický, J., Huszár, P., Halenka, T., Belda, M., Žák, M., Pišoft, P., and Mikšovský, J.: Multi-model comparison of urban heat island modelling approaches, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10655–10674, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10655-2018, 2018. a
Kusaka, H. and Kimura, F.: Coupling a Single-Layer Urban Canopy Model with a Simple Atmospheric Model: Impact on Urban Heat Island Simulation for an Idealized Case, Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, 82, 67–80, 2004. a
Kusaka, H., Kondo, H., Kikegawa, Y., and Kimura, F.: A Simple Single-Layer Urban Canopy Model For Atmospheric Models: Comparison With Multi-Layer And Slab Models, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 101, 329–358, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019207923078, 2001. a
Kwok, Y. T., De Munck, C., Schoetter, R., Ren, C., and Lau, K.: Refined dataset to describe the complex urban environment of Hong Kong for urban climate modelling studies at the mesoscale, Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 142, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03298-x, 2020. a, b
Li, D.: Turbulent Prandtl number in the atmospheric boundary layer - where are we now?, Atmospheric Research, 216, 86–105, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.09.015, 2019. a
Liu, Y., Chen, F., Warner, T., and Basara, J.: Verification of a Mesoscale Data-Assimilation and Forecasting System for the Oklahoma City Area during the Joint Urban 2003 Field Project, Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 45, 912–929, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2383.1, 2006. a, b
Lo, J. C. F., Lau, A. K. H., Chen, F., Fung, J. C. H., and Leung, K. K. M.: Urban Modification in a Mesoscale Model and the Effects on the Local Circulation in the Pearl River Delta Region, Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 46, 457–476, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2477.1, 2007. a
Louis, J.-F.: A parametric model of vertical eddy fluxes in the atmosphere, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 17, 187–202, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117978, 1979. a, b
Makedonas, A., Carpentieri, M., and Placidi, M.: Urban Boundary Layers Over Dense and Tall Canopies, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 181, 73–93, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-021-00635-z, 2021. a
Maronga, B., Gryschka, M., Heinze, R., Hoffmann, F., Kanani-Sühring, F., Keck, M., Ketelsen, K., Letzel, M. O., Sühring, M., and Raasch, S.: The Parallelized Large-Eddy Simulation Model (PALM) version 4.0 for atmospheric and oceanic flows: model formulation, recent developments, and future perspectives, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2515–2551, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2515-2015, 2015. a
Martilli, A., Grossman-Clarke, S., Tewari, M., and Manning, K. W.: Description of the Modifications Made in WRF.3.1 and Short User’s Manual of BEP, 2009. a
Nazarian, N., Krayenhoff, E. S., and Martilli, A.: A one-dimensional model of turbulent flow through “urban” canopies (MLUCM v2.0): updates based on large-eddy simulation, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 937–953, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-937-2020, 2020. a, b
Olson, J. B., Kenyon, J. S., Angevine, W. A., Brown, J. M., Pagowski, M., and Sušelj, K.: A Description of the MYNN-EDMF Scheme and the Coupling to Other Components in WRF–ARW, https://doi.org/10.25923/n9wm-be49, 2019. a
Pappaccogli, G., Giovannini, L., Zardi, D., and Martilli, A.: Assessing the Ability of WRF-BEP + BEM in Reproducing the Wintertime Building Energy Consumption of an Italian Alpine City, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 126, e2020JD033652, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033652, 2021. a
Pleim, J. E.: A Combined Local and Nonlocal Closure Model for the Atmospheric Boundary Layer. Part II: Application and Evaluation in a Mesoscale Meteorological Model, Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 46, 1396–1409, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2534.1, 2007a. a
Raasch, S. and Schröter, M.: PALM-A large-eddy simulation model performing on massively parallel computers, Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 10, 363–372, https://doi.org/10.1127/0941?2948/2001/0010?0363, 2001. a
Ribeiro, I., Martilli, A., Falls, M., Zonato, A., and Villalba, G.: Highly resolved WRF-BEP/BEM simulations over Barcelona urban area with LCZ, Atmospheric Research, 248, 105220, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105220, 2021. a, b, c
Rotach, M.: Turbulence close to a rough urban surface part I: Reynolds stress, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 65, 1–28, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708816, 1993. a
Rotach, M. W.: On the influence of the urban roughness sublayer on turbulence and dispersion, Atmospheric Environment, ISSN 1352-2310, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00141-7, 1999. a
Rotach, M. W.: Simulation Of Urban-Scale Dispersion Using A Lagrangian Stochastic Dispersion Model, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 99, 379–410, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018973813500, 2001. a
Roth, M.: Review of atmospheric turbulence over cities, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 126, 941–990, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712656409, 2000. a
Salamanca, F. and Martilli, A.: A new Building Energy Model coupled with an Urban Canopy Parameterization for urban climate simulations–part II. Validation with one dimension off-line simulations, Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 99, 345–356, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-009-0143-8, 2010. a
Schmidt, H. and Schumann, U.: Coherent structure of the convective boundary layer derived from large-eddy simulations, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 200, 511–562, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112089000753, 1989. a
Shen, C., Chen, X., Dai, W., Li, X., Wu, J., Fan, Q., Wang, X., Zhu, L., Chan, P., Hang, J., Fan, S., and Li, W.: Impacts of High-Resolution Urban Canopy Parameters within the WRF Model on Dynamical and Thermal Fields over Guangzhou, China, Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 58, 1155–1176, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-18-0114.1, 2019. a
Shin, H. H. and Dudhia, J.: Evaluation of PBL Parameterizations in WRF at Subkilometer Grid Spacings: Turbulence Statistics in the Dry Convective Boundary Layer, Monthly Weather Review, 144, 1161–1177, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0208.1, 2016. a, b
Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Liu, Z., Berner, J., Wang, W., Powers, J. G., Duda, M. G., and Barker, D. M.: A description of the advanced research WRF model version 4, National Center for Atmospheric Research: Boulder, CO, USA, 145, 550, https://doi.org/10.5065/1DFH-6P97, 2019. a
Sun, Y., Zhang, N., Miao, S., Kong, F., Zhang, Y., and Li, N.: Urban Morphological Parameters of the Main Cities in China and Their Application in the WRF Model, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 13, e2020MS002382, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002382, 2021. a
Wang, J. and Hu, X.-M.: Evaluating the Performance of WRF Urban Schemes and PBL Schemes over Dallas–Fort Worth during a Dry Summer and a Wet Summer, Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 60, 779–798, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-19-0195.1, 2021. a
Wang, Y., Di Sabatino, S., Martilli, A., Li, Y., Wong, M. S., Gutiérrez, E., and Chan, P. W.: Impact of land surface heterogeneity on urban heat island circulation and sea-land breeze circulation in Hong Kong, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 122, 4332–4352, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026702, 2017. a
Xie, B. and Fung, J. C. H.: A comparison of momentum mixing models for the planetary boundary layer, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 119, 2079–2091, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020273, 2014. a, b
Xie, B., Fung, J. C. H., Chan, A., and Lau, A.: Evaluation of nonlocal and local planetary boundary layer schemes in the WRF model, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 117, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017080, 2012. a, b
Zhang, W.: Supplementary, raw data, and model for manuscript titled Coupling the TKE-ACM2 Planetary Boundary Layer Scheme with the Building Effect Parameterization Model, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13959541, 2024. a, b, c, d
Zhang, W., Fung, J. C. H., and Wong, M. M. F.: An Improved Non-Local Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterization Scheme in Weather Forecasting and Research Model Based on a 1.5-Order Turbulence Closure Model, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 129, e2023JD040432, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD040432, 2024. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j
Zonato, A., Martilli, A., Jimenez, P. A., Dudhia, J., Zardi, D., and Giovannini, L.: A New K–epsilon Turbulence Parameterization for Mesoscale Meteorological Models, Monthly Weather Review, 150, 2157–2174, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-21-0299.1, 2022. a
Short summary
This study focuses on improving the accuracy of numerical weather prediction (NWP) model particularly in urbanized areas. We coupled a recently validated boundary layer model with a building effect model within an NWP. Validation has been performed under idealized atmospheric conditions by benchmarking the coupled model with a fine-scale numerical model. Subsequently, the improvements and limitations are investigated aided by observations in real case simulations.
This study focuses on improving the accuracy of numerical weather prediction (NWP) model...