Articles | Volume 16, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-779-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-779-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
ICON-Sapphire: simulating the components of the Earth system and their interactions at kilometer and subkilometer scales
Cathy Hohenegger
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Peter Korn
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Leonidas Linardakis
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
René Redler
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Reiner Schnur
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Panagiotis Adamidis
Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum, Hamburg, Germany
Jiawei Bao
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Swantje Bastin
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Milad Behravesh
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Martin Bergemann
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum, Hamburg, Germany
Joachim Biercamp
Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum, Hamburg, Germany
Hendryk Bockelmann
Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum, Hamburg, Germany
Renate Brokopf
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Nils Brüggemann
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Institut für Meereskunde, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Lucas Casaroli
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Fatemeh Chegini
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
George Datseris
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Monika Esch
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Geet George
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Marco Giorgetta
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Oliver Gutjahr
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Institut für Meereskunde, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Helmuth Haak
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Moritz Hanke
Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum, Hamburg, Germany
Tatiana Ilyina
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Thomas Jahns
Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum, Hamburg, Germany
Johann Jungclaus
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Marcel Kern
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Daniel Klocke
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Lukas Kluft
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Tobias Kölling
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Luis Kornblueh
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Sergey Kosukhin
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Clarissa Kroll
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Junhong Lee
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Thorsten Mauritsen
Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Carolin Mehlmann
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Theresa Mieslinger
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Ann Kristin Naumann
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability (CEN), Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Laura Paccini
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Angel Peinado
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Divya Sri Praturi
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Dian Putrasahan
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Sebastian Rast
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Thomas Riddick
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Niklas Roeber
Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum, Hamburg, Germany
Hauke Schmidt
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Uwe Schulzweida
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Florian Schütte
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Hans Segura
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Radomyra Shevchenko
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Vikram Singh
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Mia Specht
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Claudia Christine Stephan
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Jin-Song von Storch
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability (CEN), Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Raphaela Vogel
LMD/IPSL, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Paris, France
Christian Wengel
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Marius Winkler
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Florian Ziemen
Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum, Hamburg, Germany
Jochem Marotzke
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability (CEN), Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Bjorn Stevens
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Viewed
Total article views: 13,708 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 21 Jul 2022)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9,991 | 3,566 | 151 | 13,708 | 309 | 264 |
- HTML: 9,991
- PDF: 3,566
- XML: 151
- Total: 13,708
- BibTeX: 309
- EndNote: 264
Total article views: 10,283 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 31 Jan 2023)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7,968 | 2,183 | 132 | 10,283 | 256 | 240 |
- HTML: 7,968
- PDF: 2,183
- XML: 132
- Total: 10,283
- BibTeX: 256
- EndNote: 240
Total article views: 3,425 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 21 Jul 2022)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,023 | 1,383 | 19 | 3,425 | 53 | 24 |
- HTML: 2,023
- PDF: 1,383
- XML: 19
- Total: 3,425
- BibTeX: 53
- EndNote: 24
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 13,708 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 13,313 with geography defined
and 395 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 10,283 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 10,101 with geography defined
and 182 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,425 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,212 with geography defined
and 213 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
97 citations as recorded by crossref.
- ORCESTRA: Organized Convection and EarthCARE Studies Over the Tropical Atlantic B. Stevens et al. https://doi.org/10.16993/tellus.4123
- The June 2012 North American Derecho: A Testbed for Evaluating Regional and Global Climate Modeling Systems at Cloud‐Resolving Scales W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022MS003358
- Dynamical imprints on precipitation cluster statistics across a hierarchy of high-resolution simulations C. Stephan & B. Stevens https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1209-2025
- A novel framework for studying oceanic freshwater transports, and its application in discerning the modelled fate of freshwater around the coast of Greenland F. Goldsworth https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2025.102599
- Can rime splintering explain the ice production in Arctic mixed-phase clouds? T. Raatikainen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-5019-2026
- Opinion: Optimizing climate models with process knowledge, resolution, and artificial intelligence T. Schneider et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7041-2024
- Best practices in software development for robust and reproducible geoscientific models based on insights from the Global Carbon Budget's dynamic vegetation models K. Gregor et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2407-2026
- Major Advances in Aerospace Transition Zone Atmospheric Dynamics Research Z. SHENG et al. https://doi.org/10.11728/cjss2025.04.2025-yg01
- The real challenges for climate and weather modelling on its way to sustained exascale performance: a case study using ICON (v2.6.6) P. Adamidis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-905-2025
- Digital twins of the earth can take energy systems modeling to the next level B. Schyska et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2026.103231
- Weaker land–atmosphere coupling in global storm-resolving simulation J. Lee & C. Hohenegger https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2314265121
- The impact of grid resolution, turbulence schemes and soil initialization over performances of ICON model with TERRA-URB at hectometric scale D. Cinquegrana et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-025-01103-w
- Km-scale coupled simulation and model–observation SST trend discrepancy S. Kang et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2522161123
- Kilometre-scale Earth system models to support the renewable energy transition: a combination of storyline methodologies E. Baulenas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104513
- CloudViT: exploring cloud type classification with vision transformers in global satellite data J. Lenhardt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-5447-2026
- Spatial and temporal preferences for afternoon precipitation over morning soil moisture in global storm-resolving simulations J. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-026-00461-6
- The Destination Earth digital twin for climate change adaptation F. Doblas-Reyes et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2821-2026
- Extreme events in the Amazon after deforestation A. Yoon et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-167-2026
- ROMSOC: a regional atmosphere–ocean coupled model for CPU–GPU hybrid system architectures G. Eirund et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-6255-2025
- Regional variability of aerosol impacts on clouds and radiation in global kilometer-scale simulations R. Herbert et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7789-2025
- Climate nowcasting A. Gettelman et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/adc327
- RCEMIP-II: mock-Walker simulations as phase II of the radiative–convective equilibrium model intercomparison project A. Wing et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6195-2024
- nextGEMS: entering the era of kilometer-scale Earth system modeling H. Segura et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7735-2025
- Leveraging regional mesh refinement to simulate future climate projections for California using the Simplified Convection-Permitting E3SM Atmosphere Model Version 0 J. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3687-2024
- Wind Power Input to Ocean Near‐Inertial Waves Diagnosed From a 5‐km Global Coupled Atmosphere‐Ocean General Circulation Model J. von Storch & V. Lüschow https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JC019111
- Turbulent mesoscale convection in the Boussinesq limit and beyond S. Alam et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2025.109856
- Assessing resolution sensitivity in coupled climate simulations with AWI-CM3 M. Zapponini et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-3395-2026
- On the meridional asymmetry of the poleward‐displaced intertropical convergence zone D. Praturi & B. Stevens https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.70043
- Accuracy and stability analysis of horizontal discretizations used in unstructured grid ocean models F. Rodrigues Lapolli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2024.102335
- Effects of land surface model resolution on fluxes and soil state in the Arctic M. Schickhoff et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad6019
- Marine particles and their remineralization buffer future ocean biogeochemistry response to climate warming J. Maerz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-1897-2026
- The third Met Office Unified Model–JULES Regional Atmosphere and Land Configuration, RAL3 M. Bush et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3819-2025
- Resolved tropical cyclones trigger CO 2 uptake and phytoplankton bloom in an Earth system model simulation D. Nielsen et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2506103122
- The very-high-resolution configuration of the EC-Earth global model for HighResMIP E. Moreno-Chamarro et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-461-2025
- Climate Change Response of Tropical Atlantic Clouds in a Kilometer‐Resolution Model C. Heim & C. Schär https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD038947
- Statistical summaries for streamed data from climate simulations: one-pass algorithms K. Grayson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5873-2025
- Climate-informed engineering for subsurface management: Concept, framework, and applications N. Shokri et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ees.2026.100055
- Multi-year simulations at kilometre scale with the Integrated Forecasting System coupled to FESOM2.5 and NEMOv3.4 T. Rackow et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-33-2025
- Too cold, too saturated? Evaluating climate models at the gateway to the Arctic F. Pithan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3269-2025
- Stratospheric Gravity Waves Impact on Infrasound Transmission Losses Across the International Monitoring System C. Listowski et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-024-03467-3
- Investigating the sign of stratocumulus adjustments to aerosols in the ICON global storm-resolving model E. Fons et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8653-2024
- swLICOM: the multi-core version of an ocean general circulation model on the new generation Sunway supercomputer and its kilometer-scale application K. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-3317-2026
- How the representation of microphysical processes affects tropical condensate in the global storm-resolving model ICON A. Naumann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6429-2025
- How sensitive are Sahelian mesoscale convective systems to cold‐pool suppression? B. Maybee et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.5032
- The impact of stratospheric aerosol heating on the frozen hydrometeor transport pathways in the tropical tropopause layer C. Kroll et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad33d0
- Uncertainties in cloud-radiative heating within an idealized extratropical cyclone B. Keshtgar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4751-2024
- How Do the Tropics Precipitate? Daily Variations in Precipitation and Cloud Distribution H. SEGURA & C. HOHENEGGER https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2024-028
- Parameterization adaption needed to unlock the benefits of increased resolution for the ITCZ in ICON C. Kroll et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-16915-2025
- Open-ocean tides simulated by ICON-O, version icon-2.6.6 J. von Storch et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5179-2023
- A protocol and analysis of year-long simulations of global storm-resolving models and beyond D. Takasuka et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-024-00668-1
- Machine learning for the physics of climate A. Bracco et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-024-00776-3
- Confronting Earth System Model trends with observations I. Simpson et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adt8035
- A 1-km resolution global ocean simulation promises to unveil oceanic multi-scale dynamics and climate impacts J. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2025.100843
- A global perspective on the spatial representation of climate extremes from km-scale models L. Brunner et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ade1ef
- The simulation of the South China Sea by the variable resolution version of the global ocean general circulation model LICOM3.0 J. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2025.102549
- Toward exascale climate modelling: a python DSL approach to ICON's (icosahedral non-hydrostatic) dynamical core (icon-exclaim v0.2.0) A. Dipankar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-713-2026
- Effects of vertical grid spacing on the climate simulated in the ICON-Sapphire global storm-resolving model H. Schmidt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1563-2024
- Three decades of simulating global temperature patterns with coupled global climate models L. Brunner et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03497-w
- Improving scalability of Earth system models through coarse-grained component concurrency – a case study with the ICON v2.6.5 modelling system L. Linardakis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-9157-2022
- Detecting changes in large-scale metrics of climate in short integrations of a global storm-resolving model of the atmosphere I. Guendelman et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/add615
- Resolution dependence of the turbulent atmospheric boundary layer in global storm‐resolving climate simulations L. Huusko et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4940
- ICON-HAM-lite 1.0: simulating the Earth system with interactive aerosols at kilometer scales P. Weiss et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3877-2025
- Opinion: Recent developments and future directions in studying the mesosphere and lower thermosphere J. Plane et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13255-2023
- Escalating tropical cyclone precipitation extremes and landslide hazards in South China under global warming X. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-024-00654-w
- Advancing high-resolution modeling to unravel the interplay between extreme weather events and air pollution under global warming Y. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-025-2020-9
- Earth system modeling on modular supercomputing architecture: coupled atmosphere–ocean simulations with ICON 2.6.6-rc A. Bishnoi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-261-2024
- Transforming climate services with LLMs and multi-source data integration I. Kuznetsov et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-025-00300-y
- Advancing Our Understanding of Eddy-driven Jet Stream Responses to Climate Change – A Roadmap A. Ossó et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-024-00199-3
- A non-stationary climate-informed weather generator for assessing future flood risks V. Nguyen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-10-195-2024
- Implementing digital twin technology of the earth system in Destination Earth N. Wedi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemets.2025.100015
- Representing subgrid-scale cloud effects in a radiation parameterization using machine learning: MLe-radiation v1.0 K. Hafner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-3875-2026
- Baseline Climate Variables for Earth System Modelling M. Juckes et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2639-2025
- The ICON-based Earth System Model for climate predictions and projections (ICON XPP v1.0) W. Müller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-9385-2025
- Residual corrective diffusion modeling for km-scale atmospheric downscaling M. Mardani et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02042-5
- Interactions between atmospheric composition and climate change – progress in understanding and future opportunities from AerChemMIP, PDRMIP, and RFMIP S. Fiedler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2387-2024
- Developing Guidelines for working with Multi-Model Ensembles in CMIP A. Katzenberger et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-495-2026
- What if? Numerical weather prediction at the crossroads P. Bauer https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemets.2024.100002
- Uncovering the Drivers of the Equatorial Ocean Surface Winds M. Winkler et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4998
- ESM data downscaling: a comparison of super-resolution deep learning models N. Pawar et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-024-01357-9
- Potential-based thermodynamics with consistent conservative cascade transport for implicit large eddy simulation: PTerodaC3TILES version 1.0 J. Thuburn https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3331-2025
- A Bibliometric Analysis of Convection-Permitting Model Research X. Lyu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15121417
- Land Surface Heterogeneity Captured by Topography‐Based Subgrid Structures in Grid‐Based and Watershed‐Based Computational Units T. Tesfa et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025MS005101
- Dynamic deep learning based super-resolution for the shallow water equations M. Witte et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ada19f
- FINAM is not a model (v1.0): a new Python-based model coupling framework S. Müller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4483-2025
- Least travel time ray tracer version 2 (LTT v2) adapted to the grid geometry of the OpenIFS atmospheric model M. Vasiuta et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5015-2025
- Identifying climate models based on their daily output using machine learning L. Brunner & S. Sippel https://doi.org/10.1017/eds.2023.23
- Theory and the future of land-climate science M. Byrne et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-024-01553-8
- Convective controls on anvil cloud evolution in the ICON km-scale global climate model M. Ritman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-7105-2026
- Bringing it all together: science priorities for improved understanding of Earth system change and to support international climate policy C. Jones et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1319-2024
- From theory to RAPID AMOC observations: a personal voyage of discovery J. Marotzke https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2022.0192
- Diagnosing drivers of tropical precipitation biases in coupled climate model simulations M. Respati et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-024-07355-3
- Struggling over water, losing it through evaporation: The case of Afghanistan and Iran H. Nevermann et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124319
- A physics-informed machine learning parameterization for cloud microphysics in ICON E. Sarauer et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/eds.2025.10016
- The impact of the mesh size and microphysics scheme on the representation of mid-level clouds in the ICON model in hilly and complex terrain N. Omanovic et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-14145-2024
- Earth's future climate and its variability simulated at 9 km global resolution J. Moon et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1103-2025
- Kilometer-scale climate data provide no added value for regional photovoltaic energy analysis K. Haslehner & A. Voigt https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2026.125891
- Impact of Diurnal Warm Layers on Atmospheric Convection R. Shevchenko et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038473
97 citations as recorded by crossref.
- ORCESTRA: Organized Convection and EarthCARE Studies Over the Tropical Atlantic B. Stevens et al. https://doi.org/10.16993/tellus.4123
- The June 2012 North American Derecho: A Testbed for Evaluating Regional and Global Climate Modeling Systems at Cloud‐Resolving Scales W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022MS003358
- Dynamical imprints on precipitation cluster statistics across a hierarchy of high-resolution simulations C. Stephan & B. Stevens https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1209-2025
- A novel framework for studying oceanic freshwater transports, and its application in discerning the modelled fate of freshwater around the coast of Greenland F. Goldsworth https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2025.102599
- Can rime splintering explain the ice production in Arctic mixed-phase clouds? T. Raatikainen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-5019-2026
- Opinion: Optimizing climate models with process knowledge, resolution, and artificial intelligence T. Schneider et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7041-2024
- Best practices in software development for robust and reproducible geoscientific models based on insights from the Global Carbon Budget's dynamic vegetation models K. Gregor et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2407-2026
- Major Advances in Aerospace Transition Zone Atmospheric Dynamics Research Z. SHENG et al. https://doi.org/10.11728/cjss2025.04.2025-yg01
- The real challenges for climate and weather modelling on its way to sustained exascale performance: a case study using ICON (v2.6.6) P. Adamidis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-905-2025
- Digital twins of the earth can take energy systems modeling to the next level B. Schyska et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2026.103231
- Weaker land–atmosphere coupling in global storm-resolving simulation J. Lee & C. Hohenegger https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2314265121
- The impact of grid resolution, turbulence schemes and soil initialization over performances of ICON model with TERRA-URB at hectometric scale D. Cinquegrana et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-025-01103-w
- Km-scale coupled simulation and model–observation SST trend discrepancy S. Kang et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2522161123
- Kilometre-scale Earth system models to support the renewable energy transition: a combination of storyline methodologies E. Baulenas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104513
- CloudViT: exploring cloud type classification with vision transformers in global satellite data J. Lenhardt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-5447-2026
- Spatial and temporal preferences for afternoon precipitation over morning soil moisture in global storm-resolving simulations J. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-026-00461-6
- The Destination Earth digital twin for climate change adaptation F. Doblas-Reyes et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2821-2026
- Extreme events in the Amazon after deforestation A. Yoon et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-167-2026
- ROMSOC: a regional atmosphere–ocean coupled model for CPU–GPU hybrid system architectures G. Eirund et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-6255-2025
- Regional variability of aerosol impacts on clouds and radiation in global kilometer-scale simulations R. Herbert et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7789-2025
- Climate nowcasting A. Gettelman et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/adc327
- RCEMIP-II: mock-Walker simulations as phase II of the radiative–convective equilibrium model intercomparison project A. Wing et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6195-2024
- nextGEMS: entering the era of kilometer-scale Earth system modeling H. Segura et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7735-2025
- Leveraging regional mesh refinement to simulate future climate projections for California using the Simplified Convection-Permitting E3SM Atmosphere Model Version 0 J. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3687-2024
- Wind Power Input to Ocean Near‐Inertial Waves Diagnosed From a 5‐km Global Coupled Atmosphere‐Ocean General Circulation Model J. von Storch & V. Lüschow https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JC019111
- Turbulent mesoscale convection in the Boussinesq limit and beyond S. Alam et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2025.109856
- Assessing resolution sensitivity in coupled climate simulations with AWI-CM3 M. Zapponini et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-3395-2026
- On the meridional asymmetry of the poleward‐displaced intertropical convergence zone D. Praturi & B. Stevens https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.70043
- Accuracy and stability analysis of horizontal discretizations used in unstructured grid ocean models F. Rodrigues Lapolli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2024.102335
- Effects of land surface model resolution on fluxes and soil state in the Arctic M. Schickhoff et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad6019
- Marine particles and their remineralization buffer future ocean biogeochemistry response to climate warming J. Maerz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-1897-2026
- The third Met Office Unified Model–JULES Regional Atmosphere and Land Configuration, RAL3 M. Bush et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3819-2025
- Resolved tropical cyclones trigger CO 2 uptake and phytoplankton bloom in an Earth system model simulation D. Nielsen et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2506103122
- The very-high-resolution configuration of the EC-Earth global model for HighResMIP E. Moreno-Chamarro et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-461-2025
- Climate Change Response of Tropical Atlantic Clouds in a Kilometer‐Resolution Model C. Heim & C. Schär https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD038947
- Statistical summaries for streamed data from climate simulations: one-pass algorithms K. Grayson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5873-2025
- Climate-informed engineering for subsurface management: Concept, framework, and applications N. Shokri et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ees.2026.100055
- Multi-year simulations at kilometre scale with the Integrated Forecasting System coupled to FESOM2.5 and NEMOv3.4 T. Rackow et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-33-2025
- Too cold, too saturated? Evaluating climate models at the gateway to the Arctic F. Pithan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3269-2025
- Stratospheric Gravity Waves Impact on Infrasound Transmission Losses Across the International Monitoring System C. Listowski et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-024-03467-3
- Investigating the sign of stratocumulus adjustments to aerosols in the ICON global storm-resolving model E. Fons et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8653-2024
- swLICOM: the multi-core version of an ocean general circulation model on the new generation Sunway supercomputer and its kilometer-scale application K. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-3317-2026
- How the representation of microphysical processes affects tropical condensate in the global storm-resolving model ICON A. Naumann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6429-2025
- How sensitive are Sahelian mesoscale convective systems to cold‐pool suppression? B. Maybee et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.5032
- The impact of stratospheric aerosol heating on the frozen hydrometeor transport pathways in the tropical tropopause layer C. Kroll et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad33d0
- Uncertainties in cloud-radiative heating within an idealized extratropical cyclone B. Keshtgar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4751-2024
- How Do the Tropics Precipitate? Daily Variations in Precipitation and Cloud Distribution H. SEGURA & C. HOHENEGGER https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2024-028
- Parameterization adaption needed to unlock the benefits of increased resolution for the ITCZ in ICON C. Kroll et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-16915-2025
- Open-ocean tides simulated by ICON-O, version icon-2.6.6 J. von Storch et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5179-2023
- A protocol and analysis of year-long simulations of global storm-resolving models and beyond D. Takasuka et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-024-00668-1
- Machine learning for the physics of climate A. Bracco et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-024-00776-3
- Confronting Earth System Model trends with observations I. Simpson et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adt8035
- A 1-km resolution global ocean simulation promises to unveil oceanic multi-scale dynamics and climate impacts J. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2025.100843
- A global perspective on the spatial representation of climate extremes from km-scale models L. Brunner et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ade1ef
- The simulation of the South China Sea by the variable resolution version of the global ocean general circulation model LICOM3.0 J. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2025.102549
- Toward exascale climate modelling: a python DSL approach to ICON's (icosahedral non-hydrostatic) dynamical core (icon-exclaim v0.2.0) A. Dipankar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-713-2026
- Effects of vertical grid spacing on the climate simulated in the ICON-Sapphire global storm-resolving model H. Schmidt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1563-2024
- Three decades of simulating global temperature patterns with coupled global climate models L. Brunner et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03497-w
- Improving scalability of Earth system models through coarse-grained component concurrency – a case study with the ICON v2.6.5 modelling system L. Linardakis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-9157-2022
- Detecting changes in large-scale metrics of climate in short integrations of a global storm-resolving model of the atmosphere I. Guendelman et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/add615
- Resolution dependence of the turbulent atmospheric boundary layer in global storm‐resolving climate simulations L. Huusko et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4940
- ICON-HAM-lite 1.0: simulating the Earth system with interactive aerosols at kilometer scales P. Weiss et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3877-2025
- Opinion: Recent developments and future directions in studying the mesosphere and lower thermosphere J. Plane et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13255-2023
- Escalating tropical cyclone precipitation extremes and landslide hazards in South China under global warming X. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-024-00654-w
- Advancing high-resolution modeling to unravel the interplay between extreme weather events and air pollution under global warming Y. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-025-2020-9
- Earth system modeling on modular supercomputing architecture: coupled atmosphere–ocean simulations with ICON 2.6.6-rc A. Bishnoi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-261-2024
- Transforming climate services with LLMs and multi-source data integration I. Kuznetsov et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-025-00300-y
- Advancing Our Understanding of Eddy-driven Jet Stream Responses to Climate Change – A Roadmap A. Ossó et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-024-00199-3
- A non-stationary climate-informed weather generator for assessing future flood risks V. Nguyen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-10-195-2024
- Implementing digital twin technology of the earth system in Destination Earth N. Wedi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemets.2025.100015
- Representing subgrid-scale cloud effects in a radiation parameterization using machine learning: MLe-radiation v1.0 K. Hafner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-3875-2026
- Baseline Climate Variables for Earth System Modelling M. Juckes et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2639-2025
- The ICON-based Earth System Model for climate predictions and projections (ICON XPP v1.0) W. Müller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-9385-2025
- Residual corrective diffusion modeling for km-scale atmospheric downscaling M. Mardani et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02042-5
- Interactions between atmospheric composition and climate change – progress in understanding and future opportunities from AerChemMIP, PDRMIP, and RFMIP S. Fiedler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2387-2024
- Developing Guidelines for working with Multi-Model Ensembles in CMIP A. Katzenberger et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-495-2026
- What if? Numerical weather prediction at the crossroads P. Bauer https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemets.2024.100002
- Uncovering the Drivers of the Equatorial Ocean Surface Winds M. Winkler et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4998
- ESM data downscaling: a comparison of super-resolution deep learning models N. Pawar et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-024-01357-9
- Potential-based thermodynamics with consistent conservative cascade transport for implicit large eddy simulation: PTerodaC3TILES version 1.0 J. Thuburn https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3331-2025
- A Bibliometric Analysis of Convection-Permitting Model Research X. Lyu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15121417
- Land Surface Heterogeneity Captured by Topography‐Based Subgrid Structures in Grid‐Based and Watershed‐Based Computational Units T. Tesfa et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025MS005101
- Dynamic deep learning based super-resolution for the shallow water equations M. Witte et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ada19f
- FINAM is not a model (v1.0): a new Python-based model coupling framework S. Müller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4483-2025
- Least travel time ray tracer version 2 (LTT v2) adapted to the grid geometry of the OpenIFS atmospheric model M. Vasiuta et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5015-2025
- Identifying climate models based on their daily output using machine learning L. Brunner & S. Sippel https://doi.org/10.1017/eds.2023.23
- Theory and the future of land-climate science M. Byrne et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-024-01553-8
- Convective controls on anvil cloud evolution in the ICON km-scale global climate model M. Ritman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-7105-2026
- Bringing it all together: science priorities for improved understanding of Earth system change and to support international climate policy C. Jones et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1319-2024
- From theory to RAPID AMOC observations: a personal voyage of discovery J. Marotzke https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2022.0192
- Diagnosing drivers of tropical precipitation biases in coupled climate model simulations M. Respati et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-024-07355-3
- Struggling over water, losing it through evaporation: The case of Afghanistan and Iran H. Nevermann et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124319
- A physics-informed machine learning parameterization for cloud microphysics in ICON E. Sarauer et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/eds.2025.10016
- The impact of the mesh size and microphysics scheme on the representation of mid-level clouds in the ICON model in hilly and complex terrain N. Omanovic et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-14145-2024
- Earth's future climate and its variability simulated at 9 km global resolution J. Moon et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1103-2025
- Kilometer-scale climate data provide no added value for regional photovoltaic energy analysis K. Haslehner & A. Voigt https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2026.125891
- Impact of Diurnal Warm Layers on Atmospheric Convection R. Shevchenko et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038473
Saved (final revised paper)
Latest update: 07 Jun 2026
Short summary
Models of the Earth system used to understand climate and predict its change typically employ a grid spacing of about 100 km. Yet, many atmospheric and oceanic processes occur on much smaller scales. In this study, we present a new model configuration designed for the simulation of the components of the Earth system and their interactions at kilometer and smaller scales, allowing an explicit representation of the main drivers of the flow of energy and matter by solving the underlying equations.
Models of the Earth system used to understand climate and predict its change typically employ a...