Articles | Volume 16, issue 13
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3849-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3849-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model evaluation paper
| 
12 Jul 2023
Model evaluation paper |
| 12 Jul 2023
| 12 Jul 2023
The mixed-layer depth in the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (OMIP): impact of resolving mesoscale eddies
Anne Marie Treguier
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Laboratoire d'Océanographie Physique et Spatiale (LOPS), Univ. Brest, CNRS, IRD, Ifremer, IUEM, Brest, France
Clement de Boyer Montégut
Laboratoire d'Océanographie Physique et Spatiale (LOPS), Univ. Brest, CNRS, IRD, Ifremer, IUEM, Brest, France
Alexandra Bozec
Center for Ocean–Atmospheric Prediction Studies, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
Eric P. Chassignet
Center for Ocean–Atmospheric Prediction Studies, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
Baylor Fox-Kemper
Department of Earth, Environmental, and Planetary Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
Andy McC. Hogg
Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
Doroteaciro Iovino
Ocean Modeling and Data Assimilation Division, Fondazione Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici (CMCC), Bologna, Italy
Andrew E. Kiss
Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
Julien Le Sommer
CNRS, IRD, Grenoble INP, INRAE, IGE, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Pengfei Lin
State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Camille Lique
Laboratoire d'Océanographie Physique et Spatiale (LOPS), Univ. Brest, CNRS, IRD, Ifremer, IUEM, Brest, France
Hailong Liu
State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Guillaume Serazin
Laboratoire d'Océanographie Physique et Spatiale (LOPS), Univ. Brest, CNRS, IRD, Ifremer, IUEM, Brest, France
Dmitry Sidorenko
Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research (AWI), Bremerhaven, Germany
Qiang Wang
Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research (AWI), Bremerhaven, Germany
Xiaobio Xu
Center for Ocean–Atmospheric Prediction Studies, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
Steve Yeager
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 3,262 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 28 Feb 2023)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,682 | 1,524 | 56 | 3,262 | 66 | 55 |
- HTML: 1,682
- PDF: 1,524
- XML: 56
- Total: 3,262
- BibTeX: 66
- EndNote: 55
Total article views: 2,408 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 Jul 2023)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,107 | 1,260 | 41 | 2,408 | 56 | 47 |
- HTML: 1,107
- PDF: 1,260
- XML: 41
- Total: 2,408
- BibTeX: 56
- EndNote: 47
Total article views: 854 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 28 Feb 2023)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 575 | 264 | 15 | 854 | 10 | 8 |
- HTML: 575
- PDF: 264
- XML: 15
- Total: 854
- BibTeX: 10
- EndNote: 8
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,262 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,231 with geography defined
and 31 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,408 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,385 with geography defined
and 23 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 854 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 846 with geography defined
and 8 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
11 citations as recorded by crossref.
- New insights into the South China Sea throughflow and water budget seasonal cycle: evaluation and analysis of a high-resolution configuration of the ocean model SYMPHONIE version 2.4 N. Trinh et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-1831-2024
- Global ocean surface and subsurface temperature forecast skill over subseasonal to seasonal timescales G. Smith et al. 10.1071/ES23020
- Accelerating LASG/IAP climate system ocean model version 3 for performance portability using Kokkos J. Wei et al. 10.1016/j.future.2024.06.029
- Evaluation of the CMCC global eddying ocean model for the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (OMIP2) D. Iovino et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-6127-2023
- From nutrients to fish: Impacts of mesoscale processes in a global CESM-FEISTY eddying ocean model framework K. Krumhardt et al. 10.1016/j.pocean.2024.103314
- How Accurately Are MERMAID Seismograms Located? G. Nolet et al. 10.1785/0220230377
- Physical inconsistencies in the representation of the ocean heat-carbon nexus in simple climate models R. Séférian et al. 10.1038/s43247-024-01464-x
- Impact of increased resolution on Arctic Ocean simulations in Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2) Q. Wang et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-347-2024
- The mixed-layer depth in the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (OMIP): impact of resolving mesoscale eddies A. Treguier et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-3849-2023
- Anomalous Nutricline Drives Marked Biogeochemical Contrasts During the Kuroshio Large Meander H. Hayashida et al. 10.1029/2023JC019697
- Remote Versus Local Impacts of Energy Backscatter on the North Atlantic SST Biases in a Global Ocean Model C. Chang et al. 10.1029/2023GL105757
8 citations as recorded by crossref.
- New insights into the South China Sea throughflow and water budget seasonal cycle: evaluation and analysis of a high-resolution configuration of the ocean model SYMPHONIE version 2.4 N. Trinh et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-1831-2024
- Global ocean surface and subsurface temperature forecast skill over subseasonal to seasonal timescales G. Smith et al. 10.1071/ES23020
- Accelerating LASG/IAP climate system ocean model version 3 for performance portability using Kokkos J. Wei et al. 10.1016/j.future.2024.06.029
- Evaluation of the CMCC global eddying ocean model for the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (OMIP2) D. Iovino et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-6127-2023
- From nutrients to fish: Impacts of mesoscale processes in a global CESM-FEISTY eddying ocean model framework K. Krumhardt et al. 10.1016/j.pocean.2024.103314
- How Accurately Are MERMAID Seismograms Located? G. Nolet et al. 10.1785/0220230377
- Physical inconsistencies in the representation of the ocean heat-carbon nexus in simple climate models R. Séférian et al. 10.1038/s43247-024-01464-x
- Impact of increased resolution on Arctic Ocean simulations in Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2) Q. Wang et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-347-2024
3 citations as recorded by crossref.
- The mixed-layer depth in the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (OMIP): impact of resolving mesoscale eddies A. Treguier et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-3849-2023
- Anomalous Nutricline Drives Marked Biogeochemical Contrasts During the Kuroshio Large Meander H. Hayashida et al. 10.1029/2023JC019697
- Remote Versus Local Impacts of Energy Backscatter on the North Atlantic SST Biases in a Global Ocean Model C. Chang et al. 10.1029/2023GL105757
Latest update: 26 Jul 2024
Short summary
The ocean mixed layer is the interface between the ocean interior and the atmosphere and plays a key role in climate variability. We evaluate the performance of the new generation of ocean models for climate studies, designed to resolve
ocean eddies, which are the largest source of ocean variability and modulate the mixed-layer properties. We find that the mixed-layer depth is better represented in eddy-rich models but, unfortunately, not uniformly across the globe and not in all models.
The ocean mixed layer is the interface between the ocean interior and the atmosphere and plays a...
