Articles | Volume 16, issue 13
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3675-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3675-2023
Development and technical paper
 | 
06 Jul 2023
Development and technical paper |  | 06 Jul 2023

Data assimilation sensitivity experiments in the East Auckland Current system using 4D-Var

Rafael Santana, Helen Macdonald, Joanne O'Callaghan, Brian Powell, Sarah Wakes, and Sutara H. Suanda

Related authors

Overlapping turbulent boundary layers in an energetic coastal sea
Arnaud F. Valcarcel, Craig L. Stevens, Joanne M. O'Callaghan, and Sutara H. Suanda
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3311,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3311, 2024
Short summary
Moana Ocean Hindcast – a  > 25-year simulation for New Zealand waters using the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) v3.9 model
Joao Marcos Azevedo Correia de Souza, Sutara H. Suanda, Phellipe P. Couto, Robert O. Smith, Colette Kerry, and Moninya Roughan
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 211–231, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-211-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-211-2023, 2023
Short summary
Mesoscale simulation of typhoon-generated storm surge: methodology and Shanghai case study
Shuyun Dong, Wayne J. Stephenson, Sarah Wakes, Zhongyuan Chen, and Jianzhong Ge
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 931–945, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-931-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-931-2022, 2022
Short summary
Reanalysis of the PacIOOS Hawaiian Island Ocean Forecast System, an implementation of the Regional Ocean Modeling System v3.6
Dale Partridge, Tobias Friedrich, and Brian S. Powell
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 195–213, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-195-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-195-2019, 2019
Short summary
Different approaches to model the nearshore circulation in the south shore of O'ahu, Hawaii
Joao Marcos Azevedo Correia de Souza and Brian Powell
Ocean Sci., 13, 31–46, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-13-31-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/os-13-31-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Oceanography
sedInterFoam 1.0: a three-phase numerical model for sediment transport applications with free surfaces
Antoine Mathieu, Yeulwoo Kim, Tian-Jian Hsu, Cyrille Bonamy, and Julien Chauchat
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1561–1573, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1561-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1561-2025, 2025
Short summary
The Ross Sea and Amundsen Sea Ice–Sea Model (RAISE v1.0): a high-resolution ocean–sea ice–ice shelf coupling model for simulating the Dense Shelf Water and Antarctic Bottom Water in the Ross Sea, Antarctica
Zhaoru Zhang, Chuan Xie, Chuning Wang, Yuanjie Chen, Heng Hu, and Xiaoqiao Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1375–1393, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1375-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1375-2025, 2025
Short summary
Sensitivity of the tropical Atlantic to vertical mixing in two ocean models (ICON-O v2.6.6 and FESOM v2.5)
Swantje Bastin, Aleksei Koldunov, Florian Schütte, Oliver Gutjahr, Marta Agnieszka Mrozowska, Tim Fischer, Radomyra Shevchenko, Arjun Kumar, Nikolay Koldunov, Helmuth Haak, Nils Brüggemann, Rebecca Hummels, Mia Sophie Specht, Johann Jungclaus, Sergey Danilov, Marcus Dengler, and Markus Jochum
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1189–1220, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1189-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1189-2025, 2025
Short summary
HIDRA3: a deep-learning model for multipoint ensemble sea level forecasting in the presence of tide gauge sensor failures
Marko Rus, Hrvoje Mihanović, Matjaž Ličer, and Matej Kristan
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 605–620, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-605-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-605-2025, 2025
Short summary
A wave-resolving two-dimensional vertical Lagrangian approach to model microplastic transport in nearshore waters based on TrackMPD 3.0
Isabel Jalón-Rojas, Damien Sous, and Vincent Marieu
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 319–336, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-319-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-319-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Bannister, R.: A review of operational methods of variational and ensemble-variational data assimilation, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 607–633, 2017. a
Bowen, M. M., Wilkin, J. L., and Emery, W. J.: Variability and forcing of the East Australian Current, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 110, C03019, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JC002533, 2005. a
Casey, K. S., Brandon, T. B., Cornillon, P., and Evans, R.: The Past, Present, and Future of the AVHRR Pathfinder SST Program, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 273–287, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8681-5_16, 2010. a
Chapman, D. C.: Numerical treatment of cross-shelf open boundaries in a barotropic coastal ocean model, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 15, 1060–1075, 1985. a
Chassignet, E. P., Hurlburt, H. E., Metzger, E. J., Smedstad, O. M., Cummings, J. A., Halliwell, G. R., Bleck, R., Baraille, R., Wallcraft, A. J., Lozano, C., Tolman, H., Srinivasan, A., Hankin, S., Cornillon, P., Weisberg, R., Barth, A., He, R., Werner, F., and Wilkin, J.: US GODAE: global ocean prediction with the HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM), Oceanography, 22, 64–75, 2009. a, b
Download
Short summary
We show the importance of assimilating subsurface temperature and velocity data in a model of the East Auckland Current. Assimilation of velocity increased the representation of large oceanic vortexes. Assimilation of temperature is needed to correctly simulate temperatures around 100 m depth, which is the most difficult region to simulate in ocean models. Our simulations showed improved results in comparison to the US Navy global model and highlight the importance of regional models.
Share