Articles | Volume 16, issue 1
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed underthe Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Combining regional mesh refinement with vertically enhanced physics to target marine stratocumulus biases as demonstrated in the Energy Exascale Earth System Model version 1
- Final revised paper (published on 12 Jan 2023)
- Preprint (discussion started on 17 Aug 2022)
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor |
: Report abuse
CEC1: 'Comment on gmd-2022-175', Astrid Kerkweg, 18 Aug 2022
- AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Peter Bogenschutz, 21 Nov 2022
RC1: 'Comment on gmd-2022-175', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 Sep 2022
- AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Peter Bogenschutz, 21 Nov 2022
RC2: 'Comment on gmd-2022-175', Anonymous Referee #2, 01 Nov 2022
- AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Peter Bogenschutz, 21 Nov 2022
Peer review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Peter Bogenschutz on behalf of the Authors (01 Dec 2022)  Author's response Author's tracked changes Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (14 Dec 2022) by Axel Lauer
in my role as Executive editor of GMD, I would like to bring to your attention our Editorial version 1.2: https://www.geosci-model-dev.net/12/2215/2019/
This highlights some requirements of papers published in GMD, which is also available on the GMD website in the ‘Manuscript Types’ section: http://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/submission/manuscript_types.html
In particular, please note that for your paper, the following requirements have not been met in the Discussions paper:
So E3SM-FIVE including a version number / identifier should be added to the title of the article. Please add this change when submitting the revised version of the manuscript.
Additionally, the GMD editorial states about Model experiment description papers: "The primary purpose of these papers is to enable modelling communities to perform the same experiments. Therefore, everything required to run the experiment must be provided, apart from the model itself." (GMD Editorial main text, see also appendix B4)
I do not see that your article is about a model experiment which is performed by a larger community with different models. Therefore, your paper fits better the "Technical and development paper" type and I will ask the editorial office to apply this type to your article.
Yours, Astrid Kerkweg