Articles | Volume 15, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1079-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1079-2022
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
04 Feb 2022
Methods for assessment of models |  | 04 Feb 2022

Integration-based extraction and visualization of jet stream cores

Lukas Bösiger, Michael Sprenger, Maxi Boettcher, Hanna Joos, and Tobias Günther

Related authors

psit 1.0: A System to Compress Lagrangian Flows
Alexander Pietak, Langwen Huang, Luigi Fusco, Michael Sprenger, Sebastian Schemm, and Torsten Hoefler
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-793,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-793, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Insights from hailstorm track analysis in European climate change simulations
Killian P. Brennan, Iris Thurnherr, Michael Sprenger, and Heini Wernli
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-918,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-918, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).
Short summary
Synoptic perspective on the conversion and maintenance of local available potential energy in extratropical cyclones
Marc Federer, Lukas Papritz, Michael Sprenger, and Christian M. Grams
Weather Clim. Dynam., 6, 211–230, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-211-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-211-2025, 2025
Short summary
Revealing the dynamics of a local Alpine windstorm using large-eddy simulations
Nicolai Krieger, Heini Wernli, Michael Sprenger, and Christian Kühnlein
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3461,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3461, 2024
Short summary
The impact of synoptic storm likelihood on European subseasonal forecast uncertainty and their modulation by the stratosphere
Philip Rupp, Jonas Spaeth, Hilla Afargan-Gerstman, Dominik Büeler, Michael Sprenger, and Thomas Birner
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 1287–1298, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1287-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1287-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
A Bayesian method for predicting background radiation at environmental monitoring stations in local-scale networks
Jens Peter Karolus Wenceslaus Frankemölle, Johan Camps, Pieter De Meutter, and Johan Meyers
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1989–2003, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1989-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1989-2025, 2025
Short summary
Inclusion of the ECMWF ecRad radiation scheme (v1.5.0) in the MAR (v3.14), regional evaluation for Belgium, and assessment of surface shortwave spectral fluxes at Uccle
Jean-François Grailet, Robin J. Hogan, Nicolas Ghilain, David Bolsée, Xavier Fettweis, and Marilaure Grégoire
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1965–1988, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1965-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1965-2025, 2025
Short summary
Development of a fast radiative transfer model for ground-based microwave radiometers (ARMS-gb v1.0): validation and comparison to RTTOV-gb
Yi-Ning Shi, Jun Yang, Wei Han, Lujie Han, Jiajia Mao, Wanlin Kan, and Fuzhong Weng
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1947–1964, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1947-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1947-2025, 2025
Short summary
Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology (IITM) High-Resolution Global Forecast Model version 1: an attempt to resolve monsoon prediction deadlock
R. Phani Murali Krishna, Siddharth Kumar, A. Gopinathan Prajeesh, Peter Bechtold, Nils Wedi, Kumar Roy, Malay Ganai, B. Revanth Reddy, Snehlata Tirkey, Tanmoy Goswami, Radhika Kanase, Sahadat Sarkar, Medha Deshpande, and Parthasarathi Mukhopadhyay
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1879–1894, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1879-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1879-2025, 2025
Short summary
Cell-tracking-based framework for assessing nowcasting model skill in reproducing growth and decay of convective rainfall
Jenna Ritvanen, Seppo Pulkkinen, Dmitri Moisseev, and Daniele Nerini
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1851–1878, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1851-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1851-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Ahrens, C. D. and Henson, R.: Meteorology Today: An Introduction to Weather, Climate and the Environment, Cengage Learning, Boston, MA, USA, 2021. a, b, c
Akritidis, D., Pozzer, A., Zanis, P., Tyrlis, E., Škerlak, B., Sprenger, M., and Lelieveld, J.: On the role of tropopause folds in summertime tropospheric ozone over the eastern Mediterranean and the Middle East, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 14025–14039, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14025-2016, 2016. a
Archer, C. L. and Caldeira, K.: Historical trends in the jet streams, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033614, 2008. a
Bader, R., Sprenger, M., Ban, N., Rüdisühli, S., Schär, C., and Günther, T.: Extraction and Visual Analysis of Potential Vorticity Banners around the Alps, IEEE T. Vis. Comput. Gr., 26, 259–269, https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934310, 2020. a, b
Banks, D. and Singer, B.: Vortex tubes in turbulent flows: identification, representation, reconstruction, in: Proceedings Visualization '94, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 21 October 1994, 132–139, https://doi.org/10.1109/VISUAL.1994.346327, 1994. a, b, c, d
Download
Short summary
Jet streams are coherent air flows that interact with atmospheric structures such as warm conveyor belts (WCBs) and the tropopause. Individually, these structures have a significant impact on the weather evolution. A first step towards a deeper understanding of the meteorological processes is to extract jet stream core lines, for which we develop a novel feature extraction algorithm. Based on the line geometry, we automatically detect and visualize potential interactions between WCBs and jets.
Share