Articles | Volume 14, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6113-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6113-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model evaluation paper
| 
12 Oct 2021
Model evaluation paper |
| 12 Oct 2021
| 12 Oct 2021
Effect of horizontal resolution on the simulation of tropical cyclones in the Chinese Academy of Sciences FGOALS-f3 climate system model
Jinxiao Li
State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences
and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese
Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
Qing Bao
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences
and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese
Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
Yimin Liu
State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences
and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese
Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
Lei Wang
State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences
and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese
Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Jing Yang
State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology,
Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875,
China
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory,
Guangzhou 511458, China
Guoxiong Wu
State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences
and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese
Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
Xiaofei Wu
School of Atmospheric Sciences/Plateau Atmosphere and Environment Key
Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University of Information
Technology, Chengdu 610225, China
Bian He
State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences
and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese
Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
Xiaocong Wang
State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences
and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese
Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
Xiaoqi Zhang
School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University of Information
Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences
and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese
Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
Yaoxian Yang
State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences
and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese
Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
Zili Shen
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of
Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information Science and
Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences
and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese
Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
Related authors
No articles found.
Yangke Liu, Qing Bao, Bian He, Xiaofei Wu, Jing Yang, Yimin Liu, Guoxiong Wu, Tao Zhu, Siyuan Zhou, Yao Tang, Ankang Qu, Yalan Fan, Anling Liu, Dandan Chen, Zhaoming Luo, Xing Hu, and Tongwen Wu
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This article gives an overview introduction of the IAP-CAS S2S (sub-seasonal to seasonal) ensemble forecasting system and MJO forecast evaluation of the system. Compared to other S2S models, the IAP-CAS model has its advantages but also exhibits some biases, including underdispersive ensemble, overestimated amplitude and faster propagation speed when forecasting MJO. We also provide the explanation towards these biases and prospects for further improvement of this system in the future.
Maoshan Li, Wei Fu, Na Chang, Ming Gong, Pei Xu, Yaoming Ma, Zeyong Hu, Yaoxian Yang, and Fanglin Sun
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-257, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-257, 2022
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
Compared with the plain area, the land-atmosphere interaction on the Tibetan Plateau (TP) is intense and complex, which affects the structure of the boundary layer. The observed height of the convective boundary layer on the TP under the influence of the southern branch of the westerly wind was higher than that during the Asian monsoon season. The height of the boundary layer was positively correlated with the sensible heat flux and negatively correlated with latent heat flux.
Yongkang Xue, Tandong Yao, Aaron A. Boone, Ismaila Diallo, Ye Liu, Xubin Zeng, William K. M. Lau, Shiori Sugimoto, Qi Tang, Xiaoduo Pan, Peter J. van Oevelen, Daniel Klocke, Myung-Seo Koo, Tomonori Sato, Zhaohui Lin, Yuhei Takaya, Constantin Ardilouze, Stefano Materia, Subodh K. Saha, Retish Senan, Tetsu Nakamura, Hailan Wang, Jing Yang, Hongliang Zhang, Mei Zhao, Xin-Zhong Liang, J. David Neelin, Frederic Vitart, Xin Li, Ping Zhao, Chunxiang Shi, Weidong Guo, Jianping Tang, Miao Yu, Yun Qian, Samuel S. P. Shen, Yang Zhang, Kun Yang, Ruby Leung, Yuan Qiu, Daniele Peano, Xin Qi, Yanling Zhan, Michael A. Brunke, Sin Chan Chou, Michael Ek, Tianyi Fan, Hong Guan, Hai Lin, Shunlin Liang, Helin Wei, Shaocheng Xie, Haoran Xu, Weiping Li, Xueli Shi, Paulo Nobre, Yan Pan, Yi Qin, Jeff Dozier, Craig R. Ferguson, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Qing Bao, Jinming Feng, Jinkyu Hong, Songyou Hong, Huilin Huang, Duoying Ji, Zhenming Ji, Shichang Kang, Yanluan Lin, Weiguang Liu, Ryan Muncaster, Patricia de Rosnay, Hiroshi G. Takahashi, Guiling Wang, Shuyu Wang, Weicai Wang, Xu Zhou, and Yuejian Zhu
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4465–4494, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4465-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4465-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The subseasonal prediction of extreme hydroclimate events such as droughts/floods has remained stubbornly low for years. This paper presents a new international initiative which, for the first time, introduces spring land surface temperature anomalies over high mountains to improve precipitation prediction through remote effects of land–atmosphere interactions. More than 40 institutions worldwide are participating in this effort. The experimental protocol and preliminary results are presented.
Siyuan Zhou, Jing Yang, Wei-Chyung Wang, Chuanfeng Zhao, Daoyi Gong, and Peijun Shi
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 5211–5229, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5211-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5211-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol–cloud–precipitation interaction is a challenging problem in regional climate. Our study contrasted the observed diurnal variation of heavy rainfall and associated clouds over Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei between clean and polluted days during the 2002–2012 summers. We found the heavy rainfall under pollution has earlier start time, earlier peak time and longer duration, and further found the absorbing aerosols and scattering aerosols play different roles in the heavy rainfall diurnal variation.
Jiahui Zhang, Dao-Yi Gong, Rui Mao, Jing Yang, Ziyin Zhang, and Yun Qian
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 16775–16791, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16775-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16775-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The Chinese Spring Festival (also known as the Chinese New Year or Lunar New Year) is the most important festival in China. This paper reports that during the Chinese Spring Festival, the precipitation over southern China has been significantly reduced. The precipitation reduction is due to anomalous northerly winds. We suppose that anomalous atmospheric circulation is likely related to the human activity during holidays. It is an interesting phenomenon.
Reindert J. Haarsma, Malcolm J. Roberts, Pier Luigi Vidale, Catherine A. Senior, Alessio Bellucci, Qing Bao, Ping Chang, Susanna Corti, Neven S. Fučkar, Virginie Guemas, Jost von Hardenberg, Wilco Hazeleger, Chihiro Kodama, Torben Koenigk, L. Ruby Leung, Jian Lu, Jing-Jia Luo, Jiafu Mao, Matthew S. Mizielinski, Ryo Mizuta, Paulo Nobre, Masaki Satoh, Enrico Scoccimarro, Tido Semmler, Justin Small, and Jin-Song von Storch
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 4185–4208, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4185-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4185-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Recent progress in computing power has enabled climate models to simulate more processes in detail and on a smaller scale. Here we present a common protocol for these high-resolution runs that will foster the analysis and understanding of the impact of model resolution on the simulated climate. These runs will also serve as a more reliable source for assessing climate risks that are associated with small-scale weather phenomena such as tropical cyclones.
Tianjun Zhou, Andrew G. Turner, James L. Kinter, Bin Wang, Yun Qian, Xiaolong Chen, Bo Wu, Bin Wang, Bo Liu, Liwei Zou, and Bian He
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3589–3604, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3589-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3589-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
This paper tells why to launch the Global Monsoons Model Inter-comparison Project (GMMIP) and how to achieve its scientific goals on monsoon variability. It addresses the scientific questions to be answered, describes three tiered experiments comprehensively and proposes a basic analysis framework to guide future research. It will help the monsoon research communities to understand the objectives of the GMMIP and the modelling groups involved in the GMMIP conduct the experiments successfully.
Kai Zhang, Rong Fu, Tao Wang, and Yimin Liu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7825–7835, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7825-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7825-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Based on observations and trajectory model, we show that the geographic variation of dehydration center associated with that of convection has a significant influence on locations where air mass is dehydrated, and thus water vapor enters the lower stratosphere, in summer over the Asian monsoon region. Specifically, a westward shift of dehydration center toward the area of warmer tropopause temperatures tends to moisten the lower stratosphere.
Related subject area
Climate and Earth system modeling
Assessment of a tiling energy budget approach in a land surface model, ORCHIDEE-MICT (r8205)
Multivariate adjustment of drizzle bias using machine learning in European climate projections
Development and evaluation of the interactive Model for Air Pollution and Land Ecosystems (iMAPLE) version 1.0
A perspective on the next generation of Earth system model scenarios: towards representative emission pathways (REPs)
Parallel SnowModel (v1.0): a parallel implementation of a distributed snow-evolution modeling system (SnowModel)
LB-SCAM: a learning-based method for efficient large-scale sensitivity analysis and tuning of the Single Column Atmosphere Model (SCAM)
Quantifying the impact of SST feedback frequency on Madden–Julian oscillation simulations
Systematic and objective evaluation of Earth system models: PCMDI Metrics Package (PMP) version 3
A revised model of global silicate weathering considering the influence of vegetation cover on erosion rate
A radiative–convective model computing precipitation with the maximum entropy production hypothesis
Leveraging regional mesh refinement to simulate future climate projections for California using the Simplified Convection-Permitting E3SM Atmosphere Model Version 0
Machine learning parameterization of the multi-scale Kain–Fritsch (MSKF) convection scheme and stable simulation coupled in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model using WRF–ML v1.0
Impacts of spatial heterogeneity of anthropogenic aerosol emissions in a regionally refined global aerosol–climate model
cfr (v2024.1.26): a Python package for climate field reconstruction
NEWTS1.0: Numerical model of coastal Erosion by Waves and Transgressive Scarps
Evaluation of isoprene emissions from the coupled model SURFEX–MEGANv2.1
A comprehensive Earth system model (AWI-ESM2.1) with interactive icebergs: effects on surface and deep-ocean characteristics
The regional climate–chemistry–ecology coupling model RegCM-Chem (v4.6)–YIBs (v1.0): development and application
An overview of cloud–radiation denial experiments for the Energy Exascale Earth System Model version 1
The computational and energy cost of simulation and storage for climate science: lessons from CMIP6
Subgrid-scale variability of cloud ice in the ICON-AES 1.3.00
INFERNO-peat v1.0.0: a representation of northern high-latitude peat fires in the JULES-INFERNO global fire model
The 4DEnVar-based weakly coupled land data assimilation system for E3SM version 2
Continental-scale bias-corrected climate and hydrological projections for Australia
G6-1.5K-SAI: a new Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) experiment integrating recent advances in solar radiation modification studies
Modeling the effects of tropospheric ozone on the growth and yield of global staple crops with DSSAT v4.8.0
A one-dimensional urban flow model with an eddy-diffusivity mass-flux (EDMF) scheme and refined turbulent transport (MLUCM v3.0)
DCMIP2016: the tropical cyclone test case
Interactions between atmospheric composition and climate change – progress in understanding and future opportunities from AerChemMIP, PDRMIP, and RFMIP
CD-type discretization for sea ice dynamics in FESOM version 2
Dynamic MJO forecasts using an ensemble subseasonal-to-seasonal forecast system of IAP-CAS model
CSDMS Data Components: data–model integration tools for Earth surface processes modeling
A generic algorithm to automatically classify urban fabric according to the local climate zone system: implementation in GeoClimate 0.0.1 and application to French cities
Modelling water isotopologues (1H2H16O, 1H217O) in the coupled numerical climate model iLOVECLIM (version 1.1.5)
Localized injections of interactive volcanic aerosols and their climate impacts in a simple general circulation model
Accurate assessment of land–atmosphere coupling in climate models requires high-frequency data output
Towards variance-conserving reconstructions of climate indices with Gaussian process regression in an embedding space
A diatom extension to the cGEnIE Earth system model – EcoGEnIE 1.1
Carbon isotopes in the marine biogeochemistry model FESOM2.1-REcoM3
Flux coupling approach on an exchange grid for the IOW Earth System Model (version 1.04.00) of the Baltic Sea region
Using EUREC4A/ATOMIC field campaign data to improve trade wind regimes in the Community Atmosphere Model
New model ensemble reveals how forcing uncertainty and model structure alter climate simulated across CMIP generations of the Community Earth System Model
Quantifying wildfire drivers and predictability in boreal peatlands using a two-step error-correcting machine learning framework in TeFire v1.0
Benchmarking GOCART-2G in the Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS)
Energy-conserving physics for nonhydrostatic dynamics in mass coordinate models
Evaluation and optimisation of the soil carbon turnover routine in the MONICA model (version 3.3.1)
Assessing the sensitivity of aerosol mass budget and effective radiative forcing to horizontal grid spacing in E3SMv1 using a regional refinement approach
Towards the definition of a solar forcing dataset for CMIP7
ibicus: a new open-source Python package and comprehensive interface for statistical bias adjustment and evaluation in climate modelling (v1.0.1)
Disentangling the hydrological and hydraulic controls on streamflow variability in Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) V2 – a case study in the Pantanal region
Yi Xi, Chunjing Qiu, Yuan Zhang, Dan Zhu, Shushi Peng, Gustaf Hugelius, Jinfeng Chang, Elodie Salmon, and Philippe Ciais
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4727–4754, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4727-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4727-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The ORCHIDEE-MICT model can simulate the carbon cycle and hydrology at a sub-grid scale but energy budgets only at a grid scale. This paper assessed the implementation of a multi-tiling energy budget approach in ORCHIDEE-MICT and found warmer surface and soil temperatures, higher soil moisture, and more soil organic carbon across the Northern Hemisphere compared with the original version.
Georgia Lazoglou, Theo Economou, Christina Anagnostopoulou, George Zittis, Anna Tzyrkalli, Pantelis Georgiades, and Jos Lelieveld
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4689–4703, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4689-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4689-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study focuses on the important issue of the drizzle bias effect in regional climate models, described by an over-prediction of the number of rainy days while underestimating associated precipitation amounts. For this purpose, two distinct methodologies are applied and rigorously evaluated. These results are encouraging for using the multivariate machine learning method random forest to increase the accuracy of climate models concerning the projection of the number of wet days.
Xu Yue, Hao Zhou, Chenguang Tian, Yimian Ma, Yihan Hu, Cheng Gong, Hui Zheng, and Hong Liao
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4621–4642, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4621-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4621-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We develop the interactive Model for Air Pollution and Land Ecosystems (iMAPLE). The model considers the full coupling between carbon and water cycles, dynamic fire emissions, wetland methane emissions, biogenic volatile organic compound emissions, and trait-based ozone vegetation damage. Evaluations show that iMAPLE is a useful tool for the study of the interactions among climate, chemistry, and ecosystems.
Malte Meinshausen, Carl-Friedrich Schleussner, Kathleen Beyer, Greg Bodeker, Olivier Boucher, Josep G. Canadell, John S. Daniel, Aïda Diongue-Niang, Fatima Driouech, Erich Fischer, Piers Forster, Michael Grose, Gerrit Hansen, Zeke Hausfather, Tatiana Ilyina, Jarmo S. Kikstra, Joyce Kimutai, Andrew D. King, June-Yi Lee, Chris Lennard, Tabea Lissner, Alexander Nauels, Glen P. Peters, Anna Pirani, Gian-Kasper Plattner, Hans Pörtner, Joeri Rogelj, Maisa Rojas, Joyashree Roy, Bjørn H. Samset, Benjamin M. Sanderson, Roland Séférian, Sonia Seneviratne, Christopher J. Smith, Sophie Szopa, Adelle Thomas, Diana Urge-Vorsatz, Guus J. M. Velders, Tokuta Yokohata, Tilo Ziehn, and Zebedee Nicholls
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4533–4559, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4533-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4533-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The scientific community is considering new scenarios to succeed RCPs and SSPs for the next generation of Earth system model runs to project future climate change. To contribute to that effort, we reflect on relevant policy and scientific research questions and suggest categories for representative emission pathways. These categories are tailored to the Paris Agreement long-term temperature goal, high-risk outcomes in the absence of further climate policy and worlds “that could have been”.
Ross Mower, Ethan D. Gutmann, Glen E. Liston, Jessica Lundquist, and Soren Rasmussen
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4135–4154, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4135-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4135-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Higher-resolution model simulations are better at capturing winter snowpack changes across space and time. However, increasing resolution also increases the computational requirements. This work provides an overview of changes made to a distributed snow-evolution modeling system (SnowModel) to allow it to leverage high-performance computing resources. Continental simulations that were previously estimated to take 120 d can now be performed in 5 h.
Jiaxu Guo, Juepeng Zheng, Yidan Xu, Haohuan Fu, Wei Xue, Lanning Wang, Lin Gan, Ping Gao, Wubing Wan, Xianwei Wu, Zhitao Zhang, Liang Hu, Gaochao Xu, and Xilong Che
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3975–3992, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3975-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3975-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
To enhance the efficiency of experiments using SCAM, we train a learning-based surrogate model to facilitate large-scale sensitivity analysis and tuning of combinations of multiple parameters. Employing a hybrid method, we investigate the joint sensitivity of multi-parameter combinations across typical cases, identifying the most sensitive three-parameter combination out of 11. Subsequently, we conduct a tuning process aimed at reducing output errors in these cases.
Yung-Yao Lan, Huang-Hsiung Hsu, and Wan-Ling Tseng
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3897–3918, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3897-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3897-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study uses the CAM5–SIT coupled model to investigate the effects of SST feedback frequency on the MJO simulations with intervals at 30 min, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 d. The simulations become increasingly unrealistic as the frequency of the SST feedback decreases. Our results suggest that more spontaneous air--sea interaction (e.g., ocean response within 3 d in this study) with high vertical resolution in the ocean model is key to the realistic simulation of the MJO.
Jiwoo Lee, Peter J. Gleckler, Min-Seop Ahn, Ana Ordonez, Paul A. Ullrich, Kenneth R. Sperber, Karl E. Taylor, Yann Y. Planton, Eric Guilyardi, Paul Durack, Celine Bonfils, Mark D. Zelinka, Li-Wei Chao, Bo Dong, Charles Doutriaux, Chengzhu Zhang, Tom Vo, Jason Boutte, Michael F. Wehner, Angeline G. Pendergrass, Daehyun Kim, Zeyu Xue, Andrew T. Wittenberg, and John Krasting
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3919–3948, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3919-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3919-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce an open-source software, the PCMDI Metrics Package (PMP), developed for a comprehensive comparison of Earth system models (ESMs) with real-world observations. Using diverse metrics evaluating climatology, variability, and extremes simulated in thousands of simulations from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP), PMP aids in benchmarking model improvements across generations. PMP also enables efficient tracking of performance evolutions during ESM developments.
Haoyue Zuo, Yonggang Liu, Gaojun Li, Zhifang Xu, Liang Zhao, Zhengtang Guo, and Yongyun Hu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3949–3974, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3949-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3949-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Compared to the silicate weathering fluxes measured at large river basins, the current models tend to systematically overestimate the fluxes over the tropical region, which leads to an overestimation of the global total weathering flux. The most possible cause of such bias is found to be the overestimation of tropical surface erosion, which indicates that the tropical vegetation likely slows down physical erosion significantly. We propose a way of taking this effect into account in models.
Quentin Pikeroen, Didier Paillard, and Karine Watrin
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3801–3814, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3801-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3801-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
All accurate climate models use equations with poorly defined parameters, where knobs for the parameters are turned to fit the observations. This process is called tuning. In this article, we use another paradigm. We use a thermodynamic hypothesis, the maximum entropy production, to compute temperatures, energy fluxes, and precipitation, where tuning is impossible. For now, the 1D vertical model is used for a tropical atmosphere. The correct order of magnitude of precipitation is computed.
Jishi Zhang, Peter Bogenschutz, Qi Tang, Philip Cameron-smith, and Chengzhu Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3687–3731, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3687-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3687-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a regionally refined climate model that allows resolved convection and performed a 20-year projection to the end of the century. The model has a resolution of 3.25 km in California, which allows us to predict climate with unprecedented accuracy, and a resolution of 100 km for the rest of the globe to achieve efficient, self-consistent simulations. The model produces superior results in reproducing climate patterns over California that typical modern climate models cannot resolve.
Xiaohui Zhong, Xing Yu, and Hao Li
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3667–3685, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3667-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3667-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In order to forecast localized warm-sector rainfall in the south China region, numerical weather prediction models are being run with finer grid spacing. The conventional convection parameterization (CP) performs poorly in the gray zone, necessitating the development of a scale-aware scheme. We propose a machine learning (ML) model to replace the scale-aware CP scheme. Evaluation against the original CP scheme has shown that the ML-based CP scheme can provide accurate and reliable predictions.
Taufiq Hassan, Kai Zhang, Jianfeng Li, Balwinder Singh, Shixuan Zhang, Hailong Wang, and Po-Lun Ma
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3507–3532, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3507-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3507-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Anthropogenic aerosol emissions are an essential part of global aerosol models. Significant errors can exist from the loss of emission heterogeneity. We introduced an emission treatment that significantly improved aerosol emission heterogeneity in high-resolution model simulations, with improvements in simulated aerosol surface concentrations. The emission treatment will provide a more accurate representation of aerosol emissions and their effects on climate.
Feng Zhu, Julien Emile-Geay, Gregory J. Hakim, Dominique Guillot, Deborah Khider, Robert Tardif, and Walter A. Perkins
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3409–3431, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3409-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3409-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Climate field reconstruction encompasses methods that estimate the evolution of climate in space and time based on natural archives. It is useful to investigate climate variations and validate climate models, but its implementation and use can be difficult for non-experts. This paper introduces a user-friendly Python package called cfr to make these methods more accessible, thanks to the computational and visualization tools that facilitate efficient and reproducible research on past climates.
Rose V. Palermo, J. Taylor Perron, Jason M. Soderblom, Samuel P. D. Birch, Alexander G. Hayes, and Andrew D. Ashton
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3433–3445, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3433-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3433-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Models of rocky coastal erosion help us understand the controls on coastal morphology and evolution. In this paper, we present a simplified model of coastline erosion driven by either uniform erosion where coastline erosion is constant or wave-driven erosion where coastline erosion is a function of the wave power. This model can be used to evaluate how coastline changes reflect climate, sea-level history, material properties, and the relative influence of different erosional processes.
Safae Oumami, Joaquim Arteta, Vincent Guidard, Pierre Tulet, and Paul David Hamer
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3385–3408, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3385-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3385-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we coupled the SURFEX and MEGAN models. The aim of this coupling is to improve the estimation of biogenic fluxes by using the SURFEX canopy environment model. The coupled model results were validated and several sensitivity tests were performed. The coupled-model total annual isoprene flux is 442 Tg; this value is within the range of other isoprene estimates reported. The ultimate aim of this coupling is to predict the impact of climate change on biogenic emissions.
Lars Ackermann, Thomas Rackow, Kai Himstedt, Paul Gierz, Gregor Knorr, and Gerrit Lohmann
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3279–3301, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3279-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3279-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present long-term simulations with interactive icebergs in the Southern Ocean. By melting, icebergs reduce the temperature and salinity of the surrounding ocean. In our simulations, we find that this cooling effect of iceberg melting is not limited to the surface ocean but also reaches the deep ocean and propagates northward into all ocean basins. Additionally, the formation of deep-water masses in the Southern Ocean is enhanced.
Nanhong Xie, Tijian Wang, Xiaodong Xie, Xu Yue, Filippo Giorgi, Qian Zhang, Danyang Ma, Rong Song, Beiyao Xu, Shu Li, Bingliang Zhuang, Mengmeng Li, Min Xie, Natalya Andreeva Kilifarska, Georgi Gadzhev, and Reneta Dimitrova
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3259–3277, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3259-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3259-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
For the first time, we coupled a regional climate chemistry model, RegCM-Chem, with a dynamic vegetation model, YIBs, to create a regional climate–chemistry–ecology model, RegCM-Chem–YIBs. We applied it to simulate climatic, chemical, and ecological parameters in East Asia and fully validated it on a variety of observational data. Results show that RegCM-Chem–YIBs model is a valuable tool for studying the terrestrial carbon cycle, atmospheric chemistry, and climate change on a regional scale.
Bryce E. Harrop, Jian Lu, L. Ruby Leung, William K. M. Lau, Kyu-Myong Kim, Brian Medeiros, Brian J. Soden, Gabriel A. Vecchi, Bosong Zhang, and Balwinder Singh
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3111–3135, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3111-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3111-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Seven new experimental setups designed to interfere with cloud radiative heating have been added to the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM). These experiments include both those that test the mean impact of cloud radiative heating and those examining its covariance with circulations. This paper documents the code changes and steps needed to run these experiments. Results corroborate prior findings for how cloud radiative heating impacts circulations and rainfall patterns.
Mario C. Acosta, Sergi Palomas, Stella V. Paronuzzi Ticco, Gladys Utrera, Joachim Biercamp, Pierre-Antoine Bretonniere, Reinhard Budich, Miguel Castrillo, Arnaud Caubel, Francisco Doblas-Reyes, Italo Epicoco, Uwe Fladrich, Sylvie Joussaume, Alok Kumar Gupta, Bryan Lawrence, Philippe Le Sager, Grenville Lister, Marie-Pierre Moine, Jean-Christophe Rioual, Sophie Valcke, Niki Zadeh, and Venkatramani Balaji
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3081–3098, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3081-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3081-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present a collection of performance metrics gathered during the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), a worldwide initiative to study climate change. We analyse the metrics that resulted from collaboration efforts among many partners and models and describe our findings to demonstrate the utility of our study for the scientific community. The research contributes to understanding climate modelling performance on the current high-performance computing (HPC) architectures.
Sabine Doktorowski, Jan Kretzschmar, Johannes Quaas, Marc Salzmann, and Odran Sourdeval
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3099–3110, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3099-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3099-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Especially over the midlatitudes, precipitation is mainly formed via the ice phase. In this study we focus on the initial snow formation process in the ICON-AES, the aggregation process. We use a stochastical approach for the aggregation parameterization and investigate the influence in the ICON-AES. Therefore, a distribution function of cloud ice is created, which is evaluated with satellite data. The new approach leads to cloud ice loss and an improvement in the process rate bias.
Katie R. Blackford, Matthew Kasoar, Chantelle Burton, Eleanor Burke, Iain Colin Prentice, and Apostolos Voulgarakis
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3063–3079, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3063-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3063-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Peatlands are globally important stores of carbon which are being increasingly threatened by wildfires with knock-on effects on the climate system. Here we introduce a novel peat fire parameterization in the northern high latitudes to the INFERNO global fire model. Representing peat fires increases annual burnt area across the high latitudes, alongside improvements in how we capture year-to-year variation in burning and emissions.
Pengfei Shi, L. Ruby Leung, Bin Wang, Kai Zhang, Samson M. Hagos, and Shixuan Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3025–3040, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3025-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3025-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Improving climate predictions have profound socio-economic impacts. This study introduces a new weakly coupled land data assimilation (WCLDA) system for a coupled climate model. We demonstrate improved simulation of soil moisture and temperature in many global regions and throughout the soil layers. Furthermore, significant improvements are also found in reproducing the time evolution of the 2012 US Midwest drought. The WCLDA system provides the groundwork for future predictability studies.
Justin Peter, Elisabeth Vogel, Wendy Sharples, Ulrike Bende-Michl, Louise Wilson, Pandora Hope, Andrew Dowdy, Greg Kociuba, Sri Srikanthan, Vi Co Duong, Jake Roussis, Vjekoslav Matic, Zaved Khan, Alison Oke, Margot Turner, Stuart Baron-Hay, Fiona Johnson, Raj Mehrotra, Ashish Sharma, Marcus Thatcher, Ali Azarvinand, Steven Thomas, Ghyslaine Boschat, Chantal Donnelly, and Robert Argent
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2755–2781, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2755-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2755-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We detail the production of datasets and communication to end users of high-resolution projections of rainfall, runoff, and soil moisture for the entire Australian continent. This is important as previous projections for Australia were for small regions and used differing techniques for their projections, making comparisons difficult across Australia's varied climate zones. The data will be beneficial for research purposes and to aid adaptation to climate change.
Daniele Visioni, Alan Robock, Jim Haywood, Matthew Henry, Simone Tilmes, Douglas G. MacMartin, Ben Kravitz, Sarah J. Doherty, John Moore, Chris Lennard, Shingo Watanabe, Helene Muri, Ulrike Niemeier, Olivier Boucher, Abu Syed, Temitope S. Egbebiyi, Roland Séférian, and Ilaria Quaglia
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2583–2596, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2583-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2583-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes a new experimental protocol for the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP). In it, we describe the details of a new simulation of sunlight reflection using the stratospheric aerosols that climate models are supposed to run, and we explain the reasons behind each choice we made when defining the protocol.
Jose Rafael Guarin, Jonas Jägermeyr, Elizabeth A. Ainsworth, Fabio A. A. Oliveira, Senthold Asseng, Kenneth Boote, Joshua Elliott, Lisa Emberson, Ian Foster, Gerrit Hoogenboom, David Kelly, Alex C. Ruane, and Katrina Sharps
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2547–2567, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2547-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2547-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The effects of ozone (O3) stress on crop photosynthesis and leaf senescence were added to maize, rice, soybean, and wheat crop models. The modified models reproduced growth and yields under different O3 levels measured in field experiments and reported in the literature. The combined interactions between O3 and additional stresses were reproduced with the new models. These updated crop models can be used to simulate impacts of O3 stress under future climate change and air pollution scenarios.
Jiachen Lu, Negin Nazarian, Melissa Anne Hart, E. Scott Krayenhoff, and Alberto Martilli
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2525–2545, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2525-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2525-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study enhances urban canopy models by refining key assumptions. Simulations for various urban scenarios indicate discrepancies in turbulent transport efficiency for flow properties. We propose two modifications that involve characterizing diffusion coefficients for momentum and turbulent kinetic energy separately and introducing a physics-based
mass-fluxterm. These adjustments enhance the model's performance, offering more reliable temperature and surface flux estimates.
Justin L. Willson, Kevin A. Reed, Christiane Jablonowski, James Kent, Peter H. Lauritzen, Ramachandran Nair, Mark A. Taylor, Paul A. Ullrich, Colin M. Zarzycki, David M. Hall, Don Dazlich, Ross Heikes, Celal Konor, David Randall, Thomas Dubos, Yann Meurdesoif, Xi Chen, Lucas Harris, Christian Kühnlein, Vivian Lee, Abdessamad Qaddouri, Claude Girard, Marco Giorgetta, Daniel Reinert, Hiroaki Miura, Tomoki Ohno, and Ryuji Yoshida
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2493–2507, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2493-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2493-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate simulation of tropical cyclones (TCs) is essential to understanding their behavior in a changing climate. One way this is accomplished is through model intercomparison projects, where results from multiple climate models are analyzed to provide benchmark solutions for the wider climate modeling community. This study describes and analyzes the previously developed TC test case for nine climate models in an intercomparison project, providing solutions that aid in model development.
Stephanie Fiedler, Vaishali Naik, Fiona M. O'Connor, Christopher J. Smith, Paul Griffiths, Ryan J. Kramer, Toshihiko Takemura, Robert J. Allen, Ulas Im, Matthew Kasoar, Angshuman Modak, Steven Turnock, Apostolos Voulgarakis, Duncan Watson-Parris, Daniel M. Westervelt, Laura J. Wilcox, Alcide Zhao, William J. Collins, Michael Schulz, Gunnar Myhre, and Piers M. Forster
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2387–2417, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2387-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2387-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Climate scientists want to better understand modern climate change. Thus, climate model experiments are performed and compared. The results of climate model experiments differ, as assessed in the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessment report. This article gives insights into the challenges and outlines opportunities for further improving the understanding of climate change. It is based on views of a group of experts in atmospheric composition–climate interactions.
Sergey Danilov, Carolin Mehlmann, Dmitry Sidorenko, and Qiang Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2287–2297, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2287-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2287-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Sea ice models are a necessary component of climate models. At very high resolution they are capable of simulating linear kinematic features, such as leads, which are important for better prediction of heat exchanges between the ocean and atmosphere. Two new discretizations are described which improve the sea ice component of the Finite volumE Sea ice–Ocean Model (FESOM version 2) by allowing simulations of finer scales.
Yangke Liu, Qing Bao, Bian He, Xiaofei Wu, Jing Yang, Yimin Liu, Guoxiong Wu, Tao Zhu, Siyuan Zhou, Yao Tang, Ankang Qu, Yalan Fan, Anling Liu, Dandan Chen, Zhaoming Luo, Xing Hu, and Tongwen Wu
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This article gives an overview introduction of the IAP-CAS S2S (sub-seasonal to seasonal) ensemble forecasting system and MJO forecast evaluation of the system. Compared to other S2S models, the IAP-CAS model has its advantages but also exhibits some biases, including underdispersive ensemble, overestimated amplitude and faster propagation speed when forecasting MJO. We also provide the explanation towards these biases and prospects for further improvement of this system in the future.
Tian Gan, Gregory E. Tucker, Eric W. H. Hutton, Mark D. Piper, Irina Overeem, Albert J. Kettner, Benjamin Campforts, Julia M. Moriarty, Brianna Undzis, Ethan Pierce, and Lynn McCready
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2165–2185, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2165-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2165-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents the design, implementation, and application of the CSDMS Data Components. The case studies demonstrate that the Data Components provide a consistent way to access heterogeneous datasets from multiple sources, and to seamlessly integrate them with various models for Earth surface process modeling. The Data Components support the creation of open data–model integration workflows to improve the research transparency and reproducibility.
Jérémy Bernard, Erwan Bocher, Matthieu Gousseff, François Leconte, and Elisabeth Le Saux Wiederhold
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2077–2116, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2077-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2077-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Geographical features may have a considerable effect on local climate. The local climate zone (LCZ) system proposed by Stewart and Oke (2012) is seen as a standard approach for classifying any zone according to a set of geographic indicators. While many methods already exist to map the LCZ, only a few tools are openly and freely available. We present the algorithm implemented in GeoClimate software to identify the LCZ of any place in the world using OpenStreetMap data.
Thomas Extier, Thibaut Caley, and Didier M. Roche
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2117–2139, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2117-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2117-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Stable water isotopes are used to infer changes in the hydrological cycle for different time periods in climatic archive and climate models. We present the implementation of the δ2H and δ17O water isotopes in the coupled climate model iLOVECLIM and calculate the d- and 17O-excess. Results of a simulation under preindustrial conditions show that the model correctly reproduces the water isotope distribution in the atmosphere and ocean in comparison to data and other global circulation models.
Joseph P. Hollowed, Christiane Jablonowski, Hunter Y. Brown, Benjamin R. Hillman, Diana L. Bull, and Joseph L. Hart
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-335, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-335, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Large volcanic eruptions deposit material into the upper-atmosphere, which is capable of altering temperature and wind patterns of the Earth's atmosphere for years following. This research describes a new method of simulating these effects in an idealized, efficient atmospheric model. A volcanic eruption of sulfur dioxide is described with a simplified set of physical rules, which eventually cools the planetary surface. This model has been designed as a testbed for climate attribution studies.
Kirsten L. Findell, Zun Yin, Eunkyo Seo, Paul A. Dirmeyer, Nathan P. Arnold, Nathaniel Chaney, Megan D. Fowler, Meng Huang, David M. Lawrence, Po-Lun Ma, and Joseph A. Santanello Jr.
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1869–1883, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1869-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1869-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We outline a request for sub-daily data to accurately capture the process-level connections between land states, surface fluxes, and the boundary layer response. This high-frequency model output will allow for more direct comparison with observational field campaigns on process-relevant timescales, enable demonstration of inter-model spread in land–atmosphere coupling processes, and aid in targeted identification of sources of deficiencies and opportunities for improvement of the models.
Marlene Klockmann, Udo von Toussaint, and Eduardo Zorita
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1765–1787, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1765-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1765-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Reconstructions of climate variability before the observational period rely on climate proxies and sophisticated statistical models to link the proxy information and climate variability. Existing models tend to underestimate the true magnitude of variability, especially if the proxies contain non-climatic noise. We present and test a promising new framework for climate-index reconstructions, based on Gaussian processes, which reconstructs robust variability estimates from noisy and sparse data.
Aaron A. Naidoo-Bagwell, Fanny M. Monteiro, Katharine R. Hendry, Scott Burgan, Jamie D. Wilson, Ben A. Ward, Andy Ridgwell, and Daniel J. Conley
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1729–1748, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1729-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1729-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
As an extension to the EcoGEnIE 1.0 Earth system model that features a diverse plankton community, EcoGEnIE 1.1 includes siliceous plankton diatoms and also considers their impact on biogeochemical cycles. With updates to existing nutrient cycles and the introduction of the silicon cycle, we see improved model performance relative to observational data. Through a more functionally diverse plankton community, the new model enables more comprehensive future study of ocean ecology.
Martin Butzin, Ying Ye, Christoph Völker, Özgür Gürses, Judith Hauck, and Peter Köhler
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1709–1727, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1709-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1709-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper we describe the implementation of the carbon isotopes 13C and 14C into the marine biogeochemistry model FESOM2.1-REcoM3 and present results of long-term test simulations. Our model results are largely consistent with marine carbon isotope reconstructions for the pre-anthropogenic period, but also exhibit some discrepancies.
Sven Karsten, Hagen Radtke, Matthias Gröger, Ha T. M. Ho-Hagemann, Hossein Mashayekh, Thomas Neumann, and H. E. Markus Meier
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1689–1708, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1689-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1689-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes the development of a regional Earth System Model for the Baltic Sea region. In contrast to conventional coupling approaches, the presented model includes a flux calculator operating on a common exchange grid. This approach automatically ensures a locally consistent treatment of fluxes and simplifies the exchange of model components. The presented model can be used for various scientific questions, such as studies of natural variability and ocean–atmosphere interactions.
Skyler Graap and Colin M. Zarzycki
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1627–1650, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1627-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1627-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A key target for improving climate models is how low, bright clouds are predicted over tropical oceans, since they have important consequences for the Earth's energy budget. A climate model has been updated to improve the physical realism of the treatment of how momentum is moved up and down in the atmosphere. By comparing this updated model to real-world observations from balloon launches, it can be shown to more accurately depict atmospheric structure in trade-wind areas close to the Equator.
Marika M. Holland, Cecile Hannay, John Fasullo, Alexandra Jahn, Jennifer E. Kay, Michael Mills, Isla R. Simpson, William Wieder, Peter Lawrence, Erik Kluzek, and David Bailey
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1585–1602, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1585-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1585-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Climate evolves in response to changing forcings, as prescribed in simulations. Models and forcings are updated over time to reflect new understanding. This makes it difficult to attribute simulation differences to either model or forcing changes. Here we present new simulations which enable the separation of model structure and forcing influence between two widely used simulation sets. Results indicate a strong influence of aerosol emission uncertainty on historical climate.
Rongyun Tang, Mingzhou Jin, Jiafu Mao, Daniel M. Ricciuto, Anping Chen, and Yulong Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1525–1542, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1525-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1525-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Carbon-rich boreal peatlands are at risk of burning. The reproducibility and predictability of rare peatland fire events are investigated by constructing a two-step error-correcting machine learning framework to tackle such complex systems. Fire occurrence and impacts are highly predictable with our approach. Factor-controlling simulations revealed that temperature, moisture, and freeze–thaw cycles control boreal peatland fires, indicating thermal impacts on causing peat fires.
Allison B. Collow, Peter R. Colarco, Arlindo M. da Silva, Virginie Buchard, Huisheng Bian, Mian Chin, Sampa Das, Ravi Govindaraju, Dongchul Kim, and Valentina Aquila
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1443–1468, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1443-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1443-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The GOCART aerosol module within the Goddard Earth Observing System recently underwent a major refactoring and update to the representation of physical processes. Code changes that were included in GOCART Second Generation (GOCART-2G) are documented, and we establish a benchmark simulation that is to be used for future development of the system. The 4-year benchmark simulation was evaluated using in situ and spaceborne measurements to develop a baseline and prioritize future development.
Oksana Guba, Mark A. Taylor, Peter A. Bosler, Christopher Eldred, and Peter H. Lauritzen
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1429–1442, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1429-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1429-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We want to reduce errors in the moist energy budget in numerical atmospheric models. We study a few common assumptions and mechanisms that are used for the moist physics. Some mechanisms are more consistent with the underlying equations. Separately, we study how assumptions about models' thermodynamics affect the modeled energy of precipitation. We also explain how to conserve energy in the moist physics for nonhydrostatic models.
Konstantin Aiteew, Jarno Rouhiainen, Claas Nendel, and René Dechow
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1349–1385, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1349-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1349-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study evaluated the biogeochemical model MONICA and its performance in simulating soil organic carbon changes. MONICA can reproduce plant growth, carbon and nitrogen dynamics, soil water and temperature. The model results were compared with five established carbon turnover models. With the exception of certain sites, adequate reproduction of soil organic carbon stock change rates was achieved. The MONICA model was capable of performing similar to or even better than the other models.
Jianfeng Li, Kai Zhang, Taufiq Hassan, Shixuan Zhang, Po-Lun Ma, Balwinder Singh, Qiyang Yan, and Huilin Huang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1327–1347, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1327-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1327-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
By comparing E3SM simulations with and without regional refinement, we find that model horizontal grid spacing considerably affects the simulated aerosol mass budget, aerosol–cloud interactions, and the effective radiative forcing of anthropogenic aerosols. The study identifies the critical physical processes strongly influenced by model resolution. It also highlights the benefit of applying regional refinement in future modeling studies at higher or even convection-permitting resolutions.
Bernd Funke, Thierry Dudok de Wit, Ilaria Ermolli, Margit Haberreiter, Doug Kinnison, Daniel Marsh, Hilde Nesse, Annika Seppälä, Miriam Sinnhuber, and Ilya Usoskin
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1217–1227, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1217-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1217-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We outline a road map for the preparation of a solar forcing dataset for the upcoming Phase 7 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP7), considering the latest scientific advances made in the reconstruction of solar forcing and in the understanding of climate response while also addressing the issues that were raised during CMIP6.
Fiona Raphaela Spuler, Jakob Benjamin Wessel, Edward Comyn-Platt, James Varndell, and Chiara Cagnazzo
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1249–1269, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1249-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1249-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Before using climate models to study the impacts of climate change, bias adjustment is commonly applied to the models to ensure that they correspond with observations at a local scale. However, this can introduce undesirable distortions into the climate model. In this paper, we present an open-source python package called ibicus to enable the comparison and detailed evaluation of bias adjustment methods, facilitating their transparent and rigorous application.
Donghui Xu, Gautam Bisht, Zeli Tan, Chang Liao, Tian Zhou, Hong-Yi Li, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1197–1215, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1197-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1197-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We aim to disentangle the hydrological and hydraulic controls on streamflow variability in a fully coupled earth system model. We found that calibrating only one process (i.e., traditional calibration procedure) will result in unrealistic parameter values and poor performance of the water cycle, while the simulated streamflow is improved. To address this issue, we further proposed a two-step calibration procedure to reconcile the impacts from hydrological and hydraulic processes on streamflow.
Cited articles
Bacmeister, J. T., Wehner, M. F., Neale, R. B., Gettelman, A., Hannay, C.,
Lauritzen P. H., Caron, J. M., and Truesdale, J. E.: Exploratory
high-resolution climate simulations using the Community Atmosphere Model
(CAM), J. Climate, 27, 3073–3099, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00387.1, 2014.
Balaguru, K., Leung, L., R., Van Roekel, L., P., Golaz, J., C., Ullrich, P.,
A., Caldwell, P., M., Hagos, S., M., Harrop, B., E., and Mametjanov, A.:
Characterizing tropical cyclones in the energy exascale earth system model
Version 1, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2019MS002024, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS002024, 2020.
Bao, Q. and He, B.: CAS FGOALS-f3-H model output prepared for CMIP6 HighResMIP highresSST-present, Earth System Grid Federation [data set], https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.3312, 2019a.
Bao, Q. and He, B.: CAS FGOALS-f3-L model output prepared for CMIP6 HighResMIP highresSST-present, Earth System Grid Federation [data set], https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.12009, 2019b.
Bao, Q. and Li, J.: Progress in climate modeling of precipitation over the
Tibetan Plateau, Natl. Sci. Rev., 7, 486–487, https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa006, 2020.
Bao, Q., Wu, G., Liu, Y., Yang, J., Wang, Z., and Zhou, T.: An introduction
to the coupled model FGOALS1. 1-s and its performance in East Asia, Adv.
Atmos. Sci., 27, 1131–1142, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-010-9177-1, 2010.
Bao, Q., Lin, P., Zhou, T., Liu, Y., Yu, Y., Wu, G., He, B., He, J., Li, L.,
and Li, J.: The flexible global ocean-atmosphere-land system model, spectral
version 2: FGOALS-s2, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 30, 561–576, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-012-2113-9, 2013.
Bao, Q., Wu, X., Li, J., Wang, L., He, B., Wang, X., Liu, Y., and Wu, G.:
Outlook for El Niño and the Indian Ocean Dipole in autumn-winter
2018–2019, Chinese Sci. Bull., 64, 73–78, 2018.
Bell, G. and Chelliah, M.: The 1999 North Atlantic and eastern North Pacific
hurricane season [in “Climate Assessment for 1999”], B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 81, S19–S22, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477-80.5s.S1,
2000.
Bell, R., Hodges, K., Vidale, P. L., Strachan, J., and Roberts, M.:
Simulation of the global ENSO–tropical cyclone teleconnection by a
high-resolution coupled general circulation model, J. Climate, 27,
6404–6422, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00559.1, 2014.
Benfield, A.: Global economic losses. Weather, climate & catastrophe insight: 2017 annual report, Aon Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre Rep.,
2–5, available at: http://thoughtleadership.aonbenfield.com/Documents/20180124-abif-annual-report-weather-climate-2017.pdfTS47 (last access: 8 October 2021), 2018.
Bengtsson, L., Böttger, H., and Kanamitsu, M.: Simulation of
hurricane-type vortices in a general circulation model, Tellus, 34, 440–457,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1982.tb01833.x, 1982.
Boucher, O., Denvil, S., Levavasseur, G., Cozic, A., Caubel, A., Foujols, M. A., Meurdesoif, Y., and Ghattas, J.: IPSL IPSL-CM6A-LR model output prepared for CMIP6 HighResMIP highresSST-present, Earth System Grid Federation [data set], https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.13810, 2019a.
Boucher, O., Denvil, S., Levavasseur, G., Cozic, A., Caubel, A., Foujols, M. A., Meurdesoif, Y., and Ghattas, J.: IPSL IPSL-CM6A-ATM-HR model output prepared for CMIP6 HighResMIP highresSST-present, Earth System Grid Federation [data set], https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.5185, 2019b.
Boucher, O., Servonnat, J., Albright, A. L., Aumont, O., Balkanski, Y., Bastrikov, V., Bekki, S., Bonnet, R., Bony, S., Bopp, L., Braconnot, P., Brockmann, P., Cadule, P., Caubel, A., Cheruy, F., Codron, F., Cozic, A., Cugnet, D., D’Andrea, F., Davini, P., de Lavergne, C., Denvil, S., Deshayes, J., Devilliers, M., Ducharne, A., Dufresne, J.-L., Dupont, E., Éthé, C., Fairhead, L., Falletti, L., Flavoni, S., Foujols, M.- A., Gardoll, S., Gastineau, G., Ghattas, J., Grandpeix, J.-Y., Guenet, B., Guez, L.E., Guilyardi, E., Guimberteau, M., Hauglustaine, D., Hourdin, F., Idelkadi, A., Joussaume, S., Kageyama, M., Khodri, M., Krinner, G., Lebas, N., Levavasseur, G., Lévy, C., Li, L., Lott, F., Lurton, T., Luyssaert, S., Madec, G., Madeleine, J.-B., Maignan, F., Marchand, M., Marti, O., Mellul, L., Meurdesoif, Y., Mignot, J., Musat, I., Ottlé, C., Peylin, P., Planton, Y., Polcher, J., Rio, C., Rochetin, N., Rousset, C., Sepulchre, P., Sima, A., Swingedouw, D., Thiéblemont, R., Traore, A. K., Vancoppenolle, M., Vial, J., Vialard, J., Viovy, N., and Vuichard, N.: Presentation and
evaluation of the IPSL-CM6A-LR climate model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy.,
2020, 12, e2019MS002010, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS002010,
2020.
Camargo, S. J.: Global and regional aspects of tropical cyclone activity in
the CMIP5 models, J. Climate, 26, 9880–9902, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00549.1, 2013.
Camargo, S. J. and Sobel, A. H.: Western North Pacific tropical cyclone
intensity and ENSO, J. Climate, 18, 2996–3006,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3457.1, 2005.
Camargo, S. J. and Wing, A. A.: Tropical cyclones in climate models, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change, 7, 211–237, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.373,
2016.
Camargo, S. J., Emanuel, K. A., and Sobel, A. H.: Use of a genesis potential
index to diagnose ENSO effects on tropical cyclone genesis, J. Climate, 20,
4819–4834, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4282.1, 2007.
Camargo, S. J., Robertson, A. W., Barnston, A. G., and Ghil, M.: Clustering
of eastern North Pacific tropical cyclone tracks: ENSO and MJO effects,
Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 9, 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GC001861, 2008.
Camargo, S. J., Wheeler, M. C., and Sobel, A. H.: Diagnosis of the MJO
modulation of tropical cyclogenesis using an empirical index, J. Atmos.
Sci., 66, 3061–3074, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS3101.1,
2009.
Camp, J., Roberts, M. J., Comer, R. E., Wu, P., MacLachlan, C., Bett, P. E.,
Golding, N., Toumi, R., and Chan, J. C.: The western Pacific subtropical
high and tropical cyclone landfall: Seasonal forecasts using the Met Office
GloSea5 system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 145, 105–116, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3407, 2019.
Chen, J.-H. and Lin, S.-J.: Seasonal predictions of tropical cyclones using
a 25-km-resolution general circulation model, J. Climate, 26, 380–398,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00061.1, 2013.
Chen, S., Knaff, J. A., and Marks, F. D.: Effects of vertical wind shear and
storm motion on tropical cyclone rainfall asymmetries deduced from
TRMM, Mon. Weather Rev., 13, 3190–3208, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3245.1, 2006.
Chutia, L., Pathak, B., Parottil, A., and Bhuyan, P. K.: Impact of
microphysics parameterizations and horizontal resolutions on simulation of
“MORA” tropical cyclone over Bay of Bengal using Numerical Weather
Prediction Model, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 131, 1483–1495,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-018-0651-0, 2019.
Clough, S., Shephard, M., Mlawer, E., Delamere, J., Iacono, M.,
Cady-Pereira, K., Boukabara, S., and Brown, P.: Atmospheric radiative
transfer modeling: a summary of the AER codes, J. Quant. Spectrosc. RA., 91,
233–244, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2004.05.058, 2005.
Craig, A. P., Vertenstein, M., and Jacob, R.: A new flexible coupler for
earth system modeling developed for CCSM4 and CESM1, Int. J. High Perform.
C., 26, 31–42, https://doi.org/10.1177/1094342011428141, 2012.
Dee, D. P., Uppala, S., Simmons, A., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi,
S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M., Balsamo, G., and Bauer, d. P.: The
ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data
assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553–597, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828, 2011.
Delworth, T. L., Cooke, W. F., Adcroft, A., Bushuk, M., Chen, J. H., Dunne,
K. A., Ginoux, P., Gudgel, R., Hallberg, R. W., and Harris, L.: SPEAR: The
Next Generation GFDL Modeling System for Seasonal to Multidecadal Prediction
and Projection, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2019MS001895, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001895, 2020.
EC-Earth Consortium: EC-Earth-Consortium EC-Earth3P model output prepared for CMIP6 HighResMIP highresSST-present, Earth System Grid Federation [data set], https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.4674, 2017a.
EC-Earth Consortium: EC-Earth-Consortium EC-Earth3P-HR model output prepared for CMIP6 HighResMIP highresSST-present, Earth System Grid Federation [data set], https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.4675, 2017b.
Emanuel, K.: Sensitivity of tropical cyclones to surface exchange
coefficients and a revised steady-state model incorporating eye dynamics, J.
Atmos. Sci., 52, 3969–3976, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<3969:SOTCTS>2.0.CO;2, 1995.
Emanuel, K.: Downscaling CMIP5 climate models shows increased tropical
cyclone activity over the 21st century, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110,
12219–12224, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1301293110, 2013.
Emanuel, K.: Assessing the present and future probability of Hurricane
Harvey's rainfall, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 12681–12684, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1716222114, 2017.
Emanuel, K. and Sobel, A.: Response of tropical sea surface temperature,
precipitation, and tropical cyclone-related variables to changes in global
and local forcing, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 5, 447–458, https://doi.org/10.1002/jame.20032, 2013.
Emanuel, K., DesAutels, C., Holloway, C., and Korty, R.: Environmental
control of tropical cyclone intensity, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 843–858,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<0843:ECOTCI>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R. J., and Taylor, K. E.: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1937–1958, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016, 2016.
Gray, W. M.: Global view of the origin of tropical disturbances and storm,
Mon. Weather Rev., 96, 669–700, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1968)096<0669:GVOTOO>2.0.CO;2, 1968.
Gray, W. M.: Atlantic seasonal hurricane frequency. Part I: El Niño and
30 mb quasi-biennial oscillation influences, Mon. Weather Rev., 112.9,
1649–1668, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1984)112<1649:ASHFPI>2.0.CO;2, 1984.
Gutjahr, O., Putrasahan, D., Lohmann, K., Jungclaus, J. H., von Storch, J.-S., Brüggemann, N., Haak, H., and Stössel, A.: Max Planck Institute Earth System Model (MPI-ESM1.2) for the High-Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP), Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3241–3281, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3241-2019, 2019.
Haarsma, R., Acosta, M., Bakhshi, R., Bretonnière, P.-A., Caron, L.-P., Castrillo, M., Corti, S., Davini, P., Exarchou, E., Fabiano, F., Fladrich, U., Fuentes Franco, R., García-Serrano, J., von Hardenberg, J., Koenigk, T., Levine, X., Meccia, V. L., van Noije, T., van den Oord, G., Palmeiro, F. M., Rodrigo, M., Ruprich-Robert, Y., Le Sager, P., Tourigny, E., Wang, S., van Weele, M., and Wyser, K.: HighResMIP versions of EC-Earth: EC-Earth3P and EC-Earth3P-HR – description, model computational performance and basic validation, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3507–3527, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3507-2020, 2020.
Haarsma, R. J., Mitchell, J. F., and Senior, C.: Tropical disturbances in a
GCM, Clim. Dynam., 8, 247–257, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00198619, 1993.
Haarsma, R. J., Roberts, M. J., Vidale, P. L., Senior, C. A., Bellucci, A., Bao, Q., Chang, P., Corti, S., Fučkar, N. S., Guemas, V., von Hardenberg, J., Hazeleger, W., Kodama, C., Koenigk, T., Leung, L. R., Lu, J., Luo, J.-J., Mao, J., Mizielinski, M. S., Mizuta, R., Nobre, P., Satoh, M., Scoccimarro, E., Semmler, T., Small, J., and von Storch, J.-S.: High Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP v1.0) for CMIP6, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 4185–4208, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4185-2016, 2016.
Hall, J. D., Matthews, A. J., and Karoly, D. J.: The modulation of tropical
cyclone activity in the Australian region by the Madden–Julian oscillation,
Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 2970–2982, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<2970:TMOTCA>2.0.CO;2, 2001.
He, B., Bao, Q., Wang, X., Zhou, L., Wu, X., Liu, Y., Wu, G., Chen, K., He,
S., Hu, W., Li, J., Li, J., Nian, G., Wang, L., Yang, J., Zhang, M., and
Zhang, X.: CAS FGOALS-f3-L model datasets for CMIP6 historical atmospheric
model Intercomparison project simulation, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 36, 771–778,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-019-9027-8, 2019..
He, B., Liu, Y., Wu, G., Bao, Q., Zhou, T., Wu, X., Wang, L., Li, J., Wang,
X., and Li, J.: CAS FGOALS-f3-L Model Datasets for CMIP6 GMMIP Tier-1 and
Tier-3 Experiments, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 37, 18–28, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-019-9085-y, 2020.
Hodges, K., Cobb, A., and Vidale, P. L.: How well are tropical cyclones
represented in reanalysis datasets?, J. Climate, 30, 5243–5264,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0557.1, 2017.
Hou, A. Y., Kakar, R. K., Neeck, S., Azarbarzin, A. A., Kummerow, C. D.,
Kojima, M., Oki, R., Nakamura, K., and Iguchi, T.: The global precipitation
measurement mission, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 95, 701–722, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00164.1, 2014.
Hunke, E. C. and Lipscomb, W. H.: CICE: The Los Alamos Sea Ice Model, Documentation and Software User’s Manual, Version 4.1, Tech. Rep. LA-CC-06-012, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, available at: http://oceans11.lanl.gov/trac/CICE (last access: 8 October 2021), 2010.
Hunke, E. C., Lipscomb, W. H., Turner, A., Jeffery, N., and Elliott, S.:
CICE: the Los Alamos sea ice model documentation and software user's manual,
T-3 Fluid Dynamics Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM,
87545, 2008.
Klotzbach, P. J.: The Madden–Julian oscillation's impacts on worldwide
tropical cyclone activity, J. Climate, 27, 2317–2330, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00483.1, 2014.
Kim, D., Ho, C. H., Park, D. S., Chan, J. C. L., and Jung, Y.: The Relationship
between Tropical Cyclone Rainfall Area and Environmental Conditions over the
Subtropical Oceans, J. Climate, 31, 4605–4616, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0712.1, 2018.
Kim, H., M., Webster, P. J., and Curry, J. A.: Modulation of North Pacific
tropical cyclone activity by three phases of ENSO, J. Climate, 24,
1839–1849, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3939.1, 2011.
Kim, H. S., Vecchi, G. A., Knutson, T. R., Anderson, W. G., Delworth, T. L.,
Rosati, A., Zeng, F., and Zhao, M.: Tropical cyclone simulation and response
to CO2 doubling in the GFDL CM2.5 high-resolution coupled climate
model, J. Climate, 27, 8034–8054, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00475.1, 2014.
Knapp, K. R., Kruk, M. C., Levinson, D. H., Diamond, H. J., and Neumann, C.
J.: The international best track archive for climate stewardship (IBTrACS)
unifying tropical cyclone data, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91, 363–376,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2755.1, 2010.
Knutson, T., Camargo, S. J., Chan, J. C., Emanuel, K., Ho, C.-H., Kossin,
J., Mohapatra, M., Satoh, M., Sugi, M., and Walsh, K.: Tropical Cyclones and
Climate Change Assessment: Part I: Detection and Attribution, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 100, 1987–2007, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0189.1, 2019.
Knutson, T., Camargo, S. J., Chan, J. C., Emanuel, K., Ho, C.-H., Kossin,
J., Mohapatra, M., Satoh, M., Sugi, M., and Walsh, K.: Tropical cyclones and
climate change assessment: Part II: Projected response to anthropogenic
warming, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 101, E303–E322, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0194.1, 2020.
Knutson, T. R., Manabe, S., and Gu, D.: Simulated ENSO in a global coupled
ocean–atmosphere model: Multidecadal amplitude modulation and CO2
sensitivity, J. Climate, 10, 138–161, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1997)010<0138:SEIAGC>2.0.CO;2, 1997.
Knutson, T. R., Sirutis, J. J., Garner, S. T., Held, I. M., and Tuleya, R.
E.: Simulation of the recent multidecadal increase of Atlantic hurricane
activity using an 18-km-grid regional model, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 88,
1549–1565, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-88-10-1549, 2007.
Krishnamurthy, L., Vecchi, G. A., Msadek, R., Murakami, H., Wittenberg, A.,
and Zeng, F.: Impact of strong ENSO on regional tropical cyclone activity in
a high-resolution climate model in the North Pacific and North Atlantic
Oceans, J. Climate, 29, 2375–2394, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0468.1, 2016.
Krishnamurti, T. N. and Oosterhof, D.: Prediction of the life cycle of a
supertyphoon with a high-resolution global model, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 70,
1218–1230, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1989)070<1218:POTLCO>2.0.CO;2, 1989.
Larson, S. and Kirtman, B.: The Pacific Meridional Mode as a trigger for
ENSO in a high-resolution coupled model, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc. B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 40, 3189–3194, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50571, 2013.
Lawrence, D. M., Oleson, K. W., Flanner, M. G., Thornton, P. E., Swenson, S.
C., Lawrence, P. J., Zeng, X., Yang, Z. L., Levis, S., and Sakaguchi, K.:
Parameterization improvements and functional and structural advances in
version 4 of the Community Land Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 3, 1–27, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011MS00045, 2011.
Li, H. and Sriver, R. L.: Tropical cyclone activity in the high-resolution community earth system model and the impact of ocean coupling, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 10, 165–186, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS001199, 2018.
Li, J.: The code of FGOALS-f3 (V1.0), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4588109, 2021.
Li, J., Bao, Q., Liu, Y., and Wu, G.: Evaluation of the computational
performance of the finite-volume atmospheric model of the IAP/LASG (FAMIL)
on a high-performance computer, Atmos. Oceanic Sci. Lett., 10, 329–336,
https://doi.org/10.1080/16742834.2017.1331111, 2017.
Li, J., Bao, Q., Liu, Y., Wu, G., Wang, L., He, B., Wang, X., and Li, J.:
Evaluation of FAMIL2 in simulating the climatology and
seasonal-to-interannual variability of tropical cyclone characteristics, J.
Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 1117–1136, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001506, 2019.
Liebmann, B., Hendon, H. H., and Glick, J. D.: The relationship between
tropical cyclones of the western Pacific and Indian Oceans and the
Madden-Julian oscillation, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 72, 401–412, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1965.72.3_401, 1994.
Lim, Y. K., Schubert, S. D., Reale, O., Lee, M, I., Molod, A. M., and
Suarez, M. J.: Sensitivity of tropical cyclones to parameterized convection
in the NASA GEOS-5 mode, J. Climate, 28, 551–573,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00104.1, 2015.
Lin, S.-J.: A “vertically Lagrangian” finite-volume dynamical core for
global models, Mon. Weather Rev., 132, 2293–2307, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<2293:AVLFDC>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Liu, H., Lin, P., Yu, Y., and Zhang, X.: The baseline evaluation of LASG/IAP
climate system ocean model (LICOM) version 2, Acta Meteorol. Sin., 26,
318–329, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-012-0305-y, 2012.
Ma, Y., Davidson, N. E., Xiao, Y., and Bao, J. W.: Revised parameterization
of air–sea exchanges in high winds for operational numerical prediction:
Impact on tropical cyclone track, intensity, and rapid intensification,
Weather Forecast., 32, 821–848, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-15-0109.1, 2017.
Manabe, S. and Broccoli, A.: Mountains and arid climates of middle
latitudes, Science, 247, 192–195, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.247.4939.192, 1990.
Manabe, S., Holloway Jr., J. L., and Stone, H. M.: Tropical circulation in a
time-integration of a global model of the atmosphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 27,
580–613, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1970)027<0580:TCIATI>2.0.CO;2, 1970.
Manganello, J. V., Hodges, K. I., Kinter III, J. L., Cash, B. A., Marx, L.,
Jung, T., Achuthavarier, D., Adams, J. M., Altshuler, E. L., and Huang, B.:
Tropical cyclone climatology in a 10-km global atmospheric GCM: toward
weather-resolving climate modeling, J. Climate, 25, 3867–3893, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00346.1, 2012.
Manganello, J. V., Hodges, K. I., Cash, B. A., Kinter III, J. L., Altshuler,
E. L., Fennessy, M. J., Vitart, F., Molteni, F., and Towers, P.: Seasonal
forecasts of tropical cyclone activity in a high-atmospheric-resolution
coupled prediction system, J. Climate, 29, 1179–1200, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0531.1, 2016.
Masson, S., Terray, P., Madec, G., Luo, J.-J., Yamagata, T., and Takahashi,
K.: Impact of intra-daily SST variability on ENSO characteristics in a
coupled model, Clim. Dynam., 39, 681–707, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1247-2, 2012.
Matsuura, T., Yumoto, M., Iizuka, S., and Kawamura, R.: Typhoon and ENSO
simulation using a high-resolution coupled GCM, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26,
1755–1758, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL900329, 1999.
Meehl, G. A., Shields, C., Arblaster, J. M., Annamalai, H., and Neale, R.:
Intraseasonal, seasonal, and interannual characteristics of regional monsoon
simulations in CESM2, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2019MS001962,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001962, 2020.
Mendelsohn, R., Emanuel, K., Chonabayashi, S., and Bakkensen, L.: The impact
of climate change on global tropical cyclone damage, Nat. Clim. Change, 2,
205–209, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1357, 2012.
Mizuta, R., Yoshimura, H., Murakami, H., Matsueda, M., Endo, H., Ose, T.,
Kamiguchi, K., Hosaka, M., Sugi, M., Yukimoto, S., Kusunoki, S., and Kitoh,
A.: Climate simulations using MRI-AGCM3. 2 with 20-km grid, J. Meteorol.
Soc. Jpn., 90, 233–258, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2012-A12,
2012.
Mizuta, R., Yoshimura, H., Ose, T., Hosaka, M., and Yukimoto, S.: MRI MRI-AGCM3-2-H model output prepared for CMIP6 HighResMIP highresSST-present, Earth System Grid Federation [data set], https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.10974, 2019a.
Mizuta, R., Yoshimura, H., Ose, T., Hosaka, M., and Yukimoto, S.: MRI MRI-AGCM3-2-S model output prepared for CMIP6 HighResMIP highresSST-present, Earth System Grid Federation [data set], https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.6942, 2019b.
Müller, W. A., Jungclaus, J. H., Mauritsen, T., Mauritsen, T., Baehr,
J., Bittner, M., Budich, R., Bunzel, F., Esch, M., Ghosh, R., Haak, H.,
Ilyina, T., Kleine, T., Kornblueh, L., Li, H., Modali, K., Notz, D.,
Pohlmann, H., Roeckner, E., Stemmler, I., Tian, F., and Marotzke, J.: A
Higher-resolution Version of the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model
(MPI-ESM1. 2-HR), J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 10, 1383–1413, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017MS001217, 2018.
Murakami, H., Wang, Y., Yoshimura, H., Mizuta, R., Sugi, M., Shindo, E.,
Adachi, Y., Yukimoto, S., Hosaka, M., and Kusunoki, S.: Future changes in
tropical cyclone activity projected by the new high-resolution MRI-AGCM, J.
Climate, 25, 3237–3260, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1407-z, 2012.
Murakami, H., Sugi, M., and Kitoh, A.: Future changes in tropical cyclone
activity in the North Indian Ocean projected by high-resolution MRI-AGCMs,
Clim. Dynam., 40, 1949–1968, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1407-z, 2013.
Murakami, H., Vecchi, G. A., Villarini, G., Delworth, T. L., Gudgel, R.,
Underwood, S., Yang, X., Zhang, W., and Lin, S.-J.: Seasonal forecasts of
major hurricanes and landfalling tropical cyclones using a high-resolution
GFDL coupled climate model, J. Climate, 29, 7977–7989, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0233.1, 2016.
Oleson, K. W., Lawrence, D. M., Bonan, G. B., Flanner, M. G., Kluzek, E., Lawrence, P. J., Levis, S., Swenson, S. C., Thornton, P. E., Dai, A., Decker, M., Dickinson, R., Feddema, J., Heald, C. L., Hoffman, F., Lamarque, J.-F., Mahowald, N., Niu, G.-Y., Qian, T., Randerson, J., Running, S., Sakaguchi, K., Slater, A., Stockli, R., Wang, A., Yang, Z.-L., Zeng, X., and Zeng, X.: Technical Description of version 4.0 of the Community Land Model (CLM), Tech. Rep. NCAR/TN-478+STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA, 2010.
Oouchi, K., Yoshimura, J., Yoshimura, H., Mizuta, R., Kusunoki, S., and
Noda, A.: Tropical cyclone climatology in a global-warming climate as
simulated in a 20 km-mesh global atmospheric model: Frequency and wind
intensity analyses, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 84, 259–276, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.84.259, 2006.
Palmer, T., Shutts, G., and Swinbank, R.: Alleviation of a systematic
westerly bias in general circulation and numerical weather prediction models
through an orographic gravity wave drag parametrization, Q. J. Roy. Meteor.
Soc., 112, 1001–1039, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711247406,
1986.
Park, S. and Bretherton, C. S.: The University of Washington shallow
convection and moist turbulence schemes and their impact on climate
simulations with the Community Atmosphere Model, J. Climate, 22, 3449–3469,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2557.1, 2009.
Philander, S., Pacanowski, R., Lau, N.-C., and Nath, M.: Simulation of ENSO
with a global atmospheric GCM coupled to a high-resolution, tropical Pacific
Ocean GCM, J. Climate, 5, 308–329, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1992)005<0308:SOEWAG>2.0.CO;2, 1992.
Putman, W. M. and Lin, S.-J.: Finite-volume transport on various
cubed-sphere grids, J. Comput. Phys., 227, 55–78, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007.07.022, 2007.
Roberts, C. D., Senan, R., Molteni, F., Boussetta, S., and Keeley, S.: ECMWF ECMWF-IFS-LR model output prepared for CMIP6 HighResMIP highresSST-present, Earth System Grid Federation [data set], https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.4976, 2017a.
Roberts, C. D., Senan, R., Molteni, F., Boussetta, S., and Keeley, S.: ECMWF ECMWF-IFS-HR model output prepared for CMIP6 HighResMIP highresSST-present, Earth System Grid Federation [data set], https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.4975, 2017b.
Roberts, C. D., Senan, R., Molteni, F., Boussetta, S., Mayer, M., and Keeley, S. P. E.: Climate model configurations of the ECMWF Integrated Forecasting System (ECMWF-IFS cycle 43r1) for HighResMIP, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3681–3712, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3681-2018, 2018.
Roberts, M.: MOHC HadGEM3-GC31-LM model output prepared for CMIP6 HighResMIP highresSST-present, Earth System Grid Federation [data set], https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.6027, 2017a.
Roberts, M.: MOHC HadGEM3-GC31-HM model output prepared for CMIP6 HighResMIP highresSST-present, Earth System Grid Federation [data set], https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.6024, 2017b.
Roberts, M. J., Camp, J., Seddon, J., Vidale, P. L., Hodges, K., Vanniere,
B., Mecking, J., Haarsma, R., Bellucci, A., and Scoccimarro, E.: Impact of
Model Resolution on Tropical Cyclone Simulation Using the
HighResMIP–PRIMAVERA Multimodel Ensemble, J. Climate, 33, 2557–2583,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0639.1, 2020.
Sakradzija, M., Seifert, A., and Dipankar, A.: A stochastic scale-aware
parameterization of shallow cumulus convection across the convective gray
zone, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 8, 786–812, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000634, 2016.
Schneider, E. K., Kirtman, B. P., DeWitt, D. G., Rosati, A., Ji, L., and
Tribbia, J. J.: Retrospective ENSO forecasts: sensitivity to atmospheric
model and ocean resolution, Mon. Weather Rev., 131, 3038–3060, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131<3038:REFSTA>2.0.CO;2, 2003.
Scoccimarro, E., Fogli, P. G., Reed, K. A., Gualdi, S., Masina, S., and
Navarra, A.: Tropical cyclone interaction with the ocean: The role of
high-frequency (subdaily) coupled processes, J. Climate, 30, 145–162,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0292.1, 2017.
Simpson, R. H. and Saffir, H.: The hurricane disaster potential scale,
Weatherwise, 27, 169–186, https://doi.org/10.1080/00431672.1974.9931702, 1974.
Small, R. J., Bacmeister, J., Bailey, D. A., Baker, A., Bishop, S., Bryan, F. O., Caron, J., Dennis, J., Gent, P. R., Hsu, H.-M., Jochum, M., Lawrence, D. M., Munoz Acevedo, E., diNezio, P., Scheitlin, T., Tomas, R., Tribbia, J., Tseng, Y., and Vertenstein, M.: A new synoptic scale resolving global climate simulation using the
Community Earth System Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy, 6, 1065–1094,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014MS000363, 2014.
Strachan, J., Vidale, P. L., Hodges, K., Roberts, M., and Demory, M.-E.:
Investigating global tropical cyclone activity with a hierarchy of AGCMs:
The role of model resolution, J. Climate, 26, 133–152, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00012.1, 2013.
Ullrich, P. A. and Zarzycki, C. M.: TempestExtremes: a framework for scale-insensitive pointwise feature tracking on unstructured grids, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1069–1090, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1069-2017, 2017.
Ullrich, P. A., Zarzycki, C. M., McClenny, E. E., Pinheiro, M. C., Stansfield, A. M., and Reed, K. A.: TempestExtremes v2.1: a community framework for feature detection, tracking, and analysis in large datasets, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5023–5048, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5023-2021, 2021.
Vitart, F. and Robertson, A. W.: The sub-seasonal to seasonal prediction
project (S2S) and the prediction of extreme events, Npj Clim. Atmos. Sci.,
1, 3, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0013-0, 2018.
Vitart, F., Ardilouze, C., Bonet, A., Brookshaw, A., Chen, M., Codorean, C.,
Déqué, M., Ferranti, L., Fucile, E., and Fuentes, M.: The
subseasonal to seasonal (S2S) prediction project database, B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 98, 163–173, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0017.1,
2017.
Voldoire, A.: CNRM-CERFACS CNRM-CM6-1 model output prepared for CMIP6 HighResMIP highresSST-present, Earth System Grid Federation [data set], https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.4035, 2019a.
Voldoire, A.: CNRM-CERFACS CNRM-CM6-1-HR model output prepared for CMIP6 HighResMIP highresSST-present, Earth System Grid Federation [data set], https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.4036, 2019b.
Voldoire, A., Saint-Martin, D., Sénési, S., Decharme, B., Alias, A., Chevallier, M., Colin, J., Guérémy, J.-F., Michou, M., Moine, M.- P., Nabat, P., Roehrig, R., Salas y Mélia, D., Séférian, R., Valcke, S., Beau, I., Belamari, S., Berthet, S., Cassou, C., Cattiaux, J., Deshayes, J., Douville, H., Franchisteguy, L., Ethé, C., Geoffroy, O., Lévy, C., Madec, G., Meurdesoif, Y., Msadek, R., Ribes, A., Sanchez-Gomez, E., and Terray, L.: Evaluation of
CMIP6 deck experiments with CNRM-CM6-1, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11,
2177–2213, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001683, 2019.
von Storch, J. S., Putrasahan, D., Lohmann, K., Gutjahr, O., Jungclaus, J., Bittner, M., Haak, H., Wieners, K. H., Giorgetta, M., Reick, C., Esch, M., Gayler, V., de Vrese, P., Raddatz, T., Mauritsen, T., Behrens, J., Brovkin, V., Claussen, M., Crueger, T., Fast, I., Fiedler, S., Hagemann, S., Hohenegger, C., Jahns, T., Kloster, S., Kinne, S., Lasslop, G., Kornblueh, L., Marotzke, J., Matei, D., Meraner, K., Mikolajewicz, U., Modali, K., Müller, W., Nabel, J., Notz, D., Peters-von Gehlen, K., Pincus, R., Pohlmann, H., Pongratz, J., Rast, S., Schmidt, H., Schnur, R., Schulzweida, U., Six, K., Stevens, B., Voigt, A., and Roeckner, E.: MPI-M MPI-ESM1.2-HR model output prepared for CMIP6 HighResMIP highresSST-present, Earth System Grid Federation [data set], https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.6584, 2017a.
von Storch, J. S., Putrasahan, D., Lohmann, K., Gutjahr, O., Jungclaus, J., Bittner, M., Haak, H., Wieners, K. H., Giorgetta, M., Reick, C., Esch, M., Gayler, V., de Vrese, P., Raddatz, T., Mauritsen, T., Behrens, J., Brovkin, V., Claussen, M., Crueger, T., Fast, I., Fiedler, S., Hagemann, S., Hohenegger, C., Jahns, T., Kloster, S., Kinne, S., Lasslop, G., Kornblueh, L., Marotzke, J., Matei, D., Meraner, K., Mikolajewicz, U., Modali, K., Müller, W., Nabel, J., Notz, D., Peters-von Gehlen, K., Pincus, R., Pohlmann, H., Pongratz, J., Rast, S., Schmidt, H., Schnur, R., Schulzweida, U., Six, K., Stevens, B., Voigt, A., and Roeckner, E.: MPI-M MPI-ESM1.2-XR model output prepared for CMIP6 HighResMIP highresSST-present, Earth System Grid Federation [data set], https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.10305, 2017b.
Voosen, P.: The weather master, Science, 356, 128–131, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.356.6334.128, 2017.
Walsh, K., Fiorino, M., Landsea, C., and McInnes, K.: Objectively determined
resolution-dependent threshold criteria for the detection of tropical
cyclones in climate models and reanalyses, J. Climate, 20, 2307–2314,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4074.1, 2007.
Walsh, K., Lavender, S., Scoccimarro, E., and Murakami, H.: Resolution
dependence of tropical cyclone formation in CMIP3 and finer resolution
models, Clim. Dynam., 40, 585–599, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1298-z, 2013.
Walsh, K. J., Camargo, S. J., Vecchi, G. A., Daloz, A. S., Elsner, J.,
Emanuel, K., Horn, M., Lim, Y.-K., Roberts, M., and Patricola, C.:
Hurricanes and climate: the US CLIVAR working group on hurricanes, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 96, 997–1017, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00242.1, 2015.
Walsh, K. J., McBride, J. L., Klotzbach, P. J., Balachandran, S., Camargo,
S. J., Holland, G., Knutson, T. R., Kossin, J. P., Lee, T. C., and Sobel,
A.: Tropical cyclones and climate change, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change, 7, 65–89,
https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.371, 2016.
Williams, K. D., Copsey, D., Blockley, E. W., Bodas-Salcedo, A., Calvert, D., Comer, R., Davis, P., Graham, T., Hewitt, H. T., Hill, R., Hyder, P., Ineson, S., Johns, T. C., Keen, A. B., Lee, R. W., Megann, A., Milton, S. F., Rae, J. G. L., Roberts, M. J., Scaife, A. A., Schiemann, R., Storkey, D., Thorpe, L., Watterson, I. G., Walters, D. N., West, A., Wood, R. A., Woollings, T., and Xavier, P. K.: The Met Office global
coupled model 3.0 and 3.1 (GC3. 0 and GC3. 1) configurations, J. Adv. Model.
Earth Sy., 10, 357–380, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS001115,
2018.
Wong, M. L. M. and Chan, J. C. L.: Tropical cyclone intensity in vertical wind
shear, J. Atmos. Sci, 61, 1859–1876, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<1859:TCIIVW>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Wu, G. and Lau, N.-C.: A GCM simulation of the relationship between
tropical-storm formation and ENSO, Mon. Weather Rev., 120, 958–977,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1992)120<0958:AGSOTR>2.0.CO;2, 1992.
Wu, G., Liu, H., Zhao, Y., and Li, W.: A nine-layer atmospheric general
circulation model and its performance, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 13, 1–18,
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02657024, 1996.
Xiang, B., Lin, S.-J., Zhao, M., Zhang, S., Vecchi, G., Li, T., Jiang, X.,
Harris, L., and Chen, J.-H.: Beyond weather time-scale prediction for
Hurricane Sandy and Super Typhoon Haiyan in a global climate model, Mon.
Weather Rev., 143, 524–535, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-14-00227.1, 2015.
Xu, K.-M. and Randall, D. A.: A semiempirical cloudiness parameterization
for use in climate models, J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 3084–3102, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053<3084:ASCPFU>2.0.CO;2, 1996.
Ying, M., Zhang, W., Yu, H., Lu, X., Feng, J., Fan, Y., Zhu, Y., and Chen,
D.: An overview of the China Meteorological Administration tropical cyclone
database, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 31, 287–301, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00119.1, 2014.
Yu, Y., Tang, S., Liu, H., Lin, P., and Li, X.: Development and evaluation
of the dynamic framework of an ocean general circulation model with
arbitrary orthogonal curvilinear coordinate, Chinese Journal of Atmospheric
Sciences, 42, 877–889, https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.1805.17284, 2018.
Zarzycki, C. M. and Jablonowski, C.: Experimental tropical cyclone forecasts
using a variable-resolution global model, Mon. Weather Rev., 143, 4012–4037,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0159.1, 2015.
Zhang, C.: Madden–Julian oscillation: Bridging weather and climate, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 94, 1849–1870, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00026.1, 2013.
Zhang, J. A., Rogers, R. F., and Tallapragada, V.: Impact of parameterized
boundary layer structure on tropical cyclone rapid intensification forecasts
in HWRF, Mon. Weather Rev., 145, 1413–1426, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0129.1, 2017.
Zhang, W., Vecchi, G. A., Murakami, H., Delworth, T., Wittenberg, A. T.,
Rosati, A., Underwood, S., Anderson, W., Harris, L., and Gudgel, R.:
Improved simulation of tropical cyclone responses to ENSO in the western
North Pacific in the high-resolution GFDL HiFLOR coupled climate model, J.
Climate, 29, 1391–1415, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0475.1, 2016.
Zhao, M., Held, I. M., Lin, S.-J., and Vecchi, G. A.: Simulations of global
hurricane climatology, interannual variability, and response to global
warming using a 50-km resolution GCM, J. Climate, 22, 6653–6678, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI3049.1, 2009.
Zhao, M., Held, I. M., and Lin, S. J.: Some counterintuitive dependencies of tropical cyclone frequency on parameters in a GCM, J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 2272–2283, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-0238.1, 2012.
Zhou, L., Bao, Q., Liu, Y., Wu, G., Wang, W. C., Wang, X., He, B., Yu, H.,
and Li, J.: Global energy and water balance: Characteristics from
Finite-volume Atmospheric Model of the IAP/LASG (FAMIL1), J. Adv. Model.
Earth Sy., 7, 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014MS000349, 2015.
Zhou, L., Lin, S. J., Chen, J. H., Harris, L. M., Chen, X., and Rees, S. L.:
Toward Convective-Scale Prediction within the Next Generation Global
Prediction System, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 100, 1225–1243, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0246.1, 2019.
Zhou, T., Turner, A. G., Kinter, J. L., Wang, B., Qian, Y., Chen, X., Wu, B., Wang, B., Liu, B., Zou, L., and He, B.: GMMIP (v1.0) contribution to CMIP6: Global Monsoons Model Inter-comparison Project, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3589–3604, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3589-2016, 2016.
Short summary
The configuration and simulated performance of tropical cyclones (TCs) in FGOALS-f3-L/H will be introduced firstly. The results indicate that the simulated performance of TC activities is improved globally with the increased horizontal resolution especially in TC counts, seasonal cycle, interannual variabilities and intensity aspects. It is worth establishing a high-resolution coupled dynamic prediction system based on FGOALS-f3-H (~ 25 km) to improve the prediction skill of TCs.
The configuration and simulated performance of tropical cyclones (TCs) in FGOALS-f3-L/H will be...
