Articles | Volume 14, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1841-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1841-2021
Model description paper
 | 
06 Apr 2021
Model description paper |  | 06 Apr 2021

Towards a model for structured mass movements: the OpenLISEM hazard model 2.0a

Bastian van den Bout, Theo van Asch, Wei Hu, Chenxiao X. Tang, Olga Mavrouli, Victor G. Jetten, and Cees J. van Westen

Related authors

Physically based modeling of co-seismic landslide, debris flow, and flood cascade
Bastian van den Bout, Chenxiao Tang, Cees van Westen, and Victor Jetten
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3183–3209, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3183-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3183-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Solid Earth
SubsurfaceBreaks v. 1.0: a supervised detection of fault-related structures on triangulated models of subsurface homoclinal interfaces
Michał P. Michalak, Christian Gerhards, and Peter Menzel
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4469–4481, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4469-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4469-2025, 2025
Short summary
Empirical modeling of tropospheric delays with uncertainty
Jungang Wang, Junping Chen, and Yize Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1487–1504, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1487-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1487-2025, 2025
Short summary
CitcomSVE-3.0: a three-dimensional finite-element software package for modeling load-induced deformation and glacial isostatic adjustment for an Earth with a viscoelastic and compressible mantle
Tao Yuan, Shijie Zhong, and Geruo A
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1445–1461, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1445-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1445-2025, 2025
Short summary
NSOAS24: a new global marine gravity model derived from multi-satellite sea surface slopes
Shengjun Zhang, Xu Chen, Runsheng Zhou, and Yongjun Jia
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1221–1239, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1221-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1221-2025, 2025
Short summary
GEOMAPLEARN 1.2: detecting structures from geological maps with machine learning – the case of geological folds
David Oakley, Christelle Loiselet, Thierry Coowar, Vincent Labbe, and Jean-Paul Callot
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 939–960, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-939-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-939-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Aaron, J. and Hungr, O.: Dynamic simulation of the motion of partially-coherent landslides, Eng. Geol., 205, 1–11, 2016. 
Abe, K. and Konagai, K.: Numerical simulation for runout process of debris flow using depth-averaged material point method, Soils Found., 56, 869–888, 2016. 
Alsalman, M., Myers, M., and Sharf-Aldin, M.: Comparison of multistage to single stage triaxial tests, in: 49th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Francisco, California, 28 June 2015, ARMA-2015-767, 2015. 
Bandara, S., Ferrari, A., and Laloui, L.: Modelling landslides in unsaturated slopes subjected to rainfall infiltration using material point method, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Met., 40, 1358–1380, 2016. 
Batcher, K. E.: Sorting networks and their applications, in: Proceedings of the spring joint computer conference, Atlantic City, New Jersey, 30 April–2 May 1968, 307–314, 1968. 
Download
Short summary
Landslides, debris flows and other types of dense gravity-driven flows threaten livelihoods around the globe. Understanding the mechanics of these flows can be crucial for predicting their behaviour and reducing disaster risk. Numerical models assume that the solids and fluids of the flow are unstructured. The newly presented model captures the internal structure during movement. This important step can lead to more accurate predictions of landslide movement.
Share