Articles | Volume 13, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3839-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3839-2020
Model evaluation paper
 | 
31 Aug 2020
Model evaluation paper |  | 31 Aug 2020

Characterizing model errors in chemical transport modeling of methane: impact of model resolution in versions v9-02 of GEOS-Chem and v35j of its adjoint model

Ilya Stanevich, Dylan B. A. Jones, Kimberly Strong, Robert J. Parker, Hartmut Boesch, Debra Wunch, Justus Notholt, Christof Petri, Thorsten Warneke, Ralf Sussmann, Matthias Schneider, Frank Hase, Rigel Kivi, Nicholas M. Deutscher, Voltaire A. Velazco, Kaley A. Walker, and Feng Deng

Viewed

Total article views: 2,646 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,815 756 75 2,646 97 88
  • HTML: 1,815
  • PDF: 756
  • XML: 75
  • Total: 2,646
  • BibTeX: 97
  • EndNote: 88
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Nov 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Nov 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,646 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,362 with geography defined and 284 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 23 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
Systematic errors in atmospheric models pose a challenge for inverse modeling studies of methane (CH4) emissions. We evaluated the CH4 simulation in the GEOS-Chem model at the horizontal resolutions of 4° × 5° and 2° × 2.5°. Our analysis identified resolution-dependent biases in the model, which we attributed to discrepancies between the two model resolutions in vertical transport in the troposphere and in stratosphere–troposphere exchange.