Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 13, issue 5
Articles | Volume 13, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2259-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2259-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 13, issue 5
Model evaluation paper
 | 
13 May 2020
Model evaluation paper |  | 13 May 2020

Evaluating integrated surface/subsurface permafrost thermal hydrology models in ATS (v0.88) against observations from a polygonal tundra site

Ahmad Jan, Ethan T. Coon, and Scott L. Painter

Viewed

Total article views: 4,454 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
3,137 1,220 97 4,454 204 127 193
  • HTML: 3,137
  • PDF: 1,220
  • XML: 97
  • Total: 4,454
  • Supplement: 204
  • BibTeX: 127
  • EndNote: 193
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Nov 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Nov 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,454 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,854 with geography defined and 600 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 24 Dec 2025
Download
Short summary
Computer simulations are important tools for understanding the response of Arctic permafrost to a warming climate. To build confidence in an emerging class of permafrost simulators, we evaluated the Advanced Terrestrial Simulator against field observations from a frozen tundra site near Utqiaġvik (formerly Barrow), Alaska. The 3-year simulations agree well with observations of snow depth, summer water table, soil temperature at multiple locations, and spatially averaged evaporation.
Read more
Share