Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 12, issue 9
Articles | Volume 12, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4075-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4075-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 12, issue 9
Model evaluation paper
 | 
20 Sep 2019
Model evaluation paper |  | 20 Sep 2019

Parameter calibration and stomatal conductance formulation comparison for boreal forests with adaptive population importance sampler in the land surface model JSBACH

Jarmo Mäkelä, Jürgen Knauer, Mika Aurela, Andrew Black, Martin Heimann, Hideki Kobayashi, Annalea Lohila, Ivan Mammarella, Hank Margolis, Tiina Markkanen, Jouni Susiluoto, Tea Thum, Toni Viskari, Sönke Zaehle, and Tuula Aalto

Viewed

Total article views: 4,176 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,978 1,094 104 4,176 251 159 206
  • HTML: 2,978
  • PDF: 1,094
  • XML: 104
  • Total: 4,176
  • Supplement: 251
  • BibTeX: 159
  • EndNote: 206
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Feb 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Feb 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,176 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,815 with geography defined and 361 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 25 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
We assess the differences of six stomatal conductance formulations, embedded into a land–vegetation model JSBACH, on 10 boreal coniferous evergreen forest sites. We calibrate the model parameters using all six functions in a multi-year experiment, as well as for a separate drought event at one of the sites, using the adaptive population importance sampler. The analysis reveals weaknesses in the stomatal conductance formulation-dependent model behaviour that we are able to partially amend.
Read more
Share