Articles | Volume 12, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4075-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4075-2019
Model evaluation paper
 | 
20 Sep 2019
Model evaluation paper |  | 20 Sep 2019

Parameter calibration and stomatal conductance formulation comparison for boreal forests with adaptive population importance sampler in the land surface model JSBACH

Jarmo Mäkelä, Jürgen Knauer, Mika Aurela, Andrew Black, Martin Heimann, Hideki Kobayashi, Annalea Lohila, Ivan Mammarella, Hank Margolis, Tiina Markkanen, Jouni Susiluoto, Tea Thum, Toni Viskari, Sönke Zaehle, and Tuula Aalto

Viewed

Total article views: 3,166 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,235 857 74 3,166 188 96 84
  • HTML: 2,235
  • PDF: 857
  • XML: 74
  • Total: 3,166
  • Supplement: 188
  • BibTeX: 96
  • EndNote: 84
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Feb 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Feb 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,166 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,778 with geography defined and 388 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 28 May 2024
Download
Short summary
We assess the differences of six stomatal conductance formulations, embedded into a land–vegetation model JSBACH, on 10 boreal coniferous evergreen forest sites. We calibrate the model parameters using all six functions in a multi-year experiment, as well as for a separate drought event at one of the sites, using the adaptive population importance sampler. The analysis reveals weaknesses in the stomatal conductance formulation-dependent model behaviour that we are able to partially amend.