The global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6.3–HAM2.3  – Part 1: Aerosol evaluation

Tegen, Ina; Neubauer, David; Ferrachat, Sylvaine; Siegenthaler-Le Drian, Colombe; Bey, Isabelle; Schutgens, Nick; Stier, Philip; Watson-Parris, Duncan; Stanelle, Tanja; Schmidt, Hauke; Rast, Sebastian; Kokkola, Harri; Schultz, Martin; Schroeder, Sabine; Daskalakis, Nikos; Barthel, Stefan; Heinold, Bernd; Lohmann, Ulrike

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1643-2019

Articles | Volume 12, issue 4

https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1643-2019

© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1643-2019

© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Articles | Volume 12, issue 4

Model evaluation paper

|

24 Apr 2019

Model evaluation paper |

| 24 Apr 2019

The global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6.3–HAM2.3 – Part 1: Aerosol evaluation

Ina Tegen, David Neubauer, Sylvaine Ferrachat, Colombe Siegenthaler-Le Drian, Isabelle Bey, Nick Schutgens, Philip Stier, Duncan Watson-Parris, Tanja Stanelle, Hauke Schmidt, Sebastian Rast, Harri Kokkola, Martin Schultz, Sabine Schroeder, Nikos Daskalakis, Stefan Barthel, Bernd Heinold, and Ulrike Lohmann

Download

Final revised paper (published on 24 Apr 2019)
Preprint (discussion started on 11 Oct 2018)

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

RC1: 'Comment on " The aerosol-climate model ECHAM6.3-HAM2.3: Aerosol evaluation"', Anonymous Referee #1, 19 Nov 2018
RC2: 'Review of "The aerosol-climate model ECHAM6.3-HAM2.3: Aerosol evaluation"', Anonymous Referee #2, 22 Nov 2018
RC3: 'review', R. L. Miller, 30 Nov 2018
AC1: 'Final author comments', Ina Tegen, 23 Jan 2019

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

AR by Ina Tegen on behalf of the Authors (23 Jan 2019) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Publish as is (07 Feb 2019) by Samuel Remy

Short summary

We describe a new version of the aerosol–climate model ECHAM–HAM and show tests of the model performance by comparing different aspects of the aerosol distribution with different datasets. The updated version of HAM contains improved descriptions of aerosol processes, including updated emission fields and cloud processes. While there are regional deviations between the model and observations, the model performs well overall.