Articles | Volume 11, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2273-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2273-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
FAIR v1.3: a simple emissions-based impulse response and carbon cycle model
Christopher J. Smith
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Piers M. Forster
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Myles Allen
Atmospheric Physics Department, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Nicholas Leach
Atmospheric Physics Department, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Richard J. Millar
College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Giovanni A. Passerello
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Leighton A. Regayre
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Viewed
Total article views: 15,922 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 07 Dec 2017)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11,624 | 4,131 | 167 | 15,922 | 619 | 232 | 239 |
- HTML: 11,624
- PDF: 4,131
- XML: 167
- Total: 15,922
- Supplement: 619
- BibTeX: 232
- EndNote: 239
Total article views: 13,979 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 18 Jun 2018)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10,934 | 2,901 | 144 | 13,979 | 619 | 222 | 212 |
- HTML: 10,934
- PDF: 2,901
- XML: 144
- Total: 13,979
- Supplement: 619
- BibTeX: 222
- EndNote: 212
Total article views: 1,943 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 07 Dec 2017)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
690 | 1,230 | 23 | 1,943 | 10 | 27 |
- HTML: 690
- PDF: 1,230
- XML: 23
- Total: 1,943
- BibTeX: 10
- EndNote: 27
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 15,922 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 14,401 with geography defined
and 1,521 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 13,979 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 12,591 with geography defined
and 1,388 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,943 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,810 with geography defined
and 133 with unknown origin.
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
131 citations as recorded by crossref.
- The social costs of hydrofluorocarbons and the benefits from their expedited phase-down T. Tan et al. 10.1038/s41558-023-01898-9
- Impacts of reductions in non-methane short-lived climate forcers on future climate extremes and the resulting population exposure risks in eastern and southern Asia Y. Li et al. 10.5194/acp-23-2499-2023
- Current and future global climate impacts resulting from COVID-19 P. Forster et al. 10.1038/s41558-020-0883-0
- HIRM v1.0: a hybrid impulse response model for climate modeling and uncertainty analyses K. Dorheim et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-365-2021
- Quantifying negative radiative forcing of non-permanent and permanent soil carbon sinks J. Leifeld & S. Keel 10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115971
- Estimating a social cost of carbon for global energy consumption A. Rode et al. 10.1038/s41586-021-03883-8
- Climate economics support for the UN climate targets M. Hänsel et al. 10.1038/s41558-020-0833-x
- Optimal Strategies for Climate Change Mitigation M. Arrighini et al. 10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.07.095
- Arctic Oceanic Carbon Cycle: A Comprehensive Review of Mechanisms, Regulations, and Models X. Ye et al. 10.3390/w16121667
- Estimating Remaining Carbon Budgets Using Temperature Responses Informed by CMIP6 M. Rypdal et al. 10.3389/fclim.2021.686058
- Strong control of effective radiative forcing by the spatial pattern of absorbing aerosol A. Williams et al. 10.1038/s41558-022-01415-4
- The effect of uncertainties in natural forcing records on simulated temperature during the last millennium L. Lücke et al. 10.5194/cp-19-959-2023
- FROT: A Framework to comprehensively describe radiative contributions to temperature responses E. Monteiro et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad8807
- FaIRv2.0.0: a generalized impulse response model for climate uncertainty and future scenario exploration N. Leach et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-3007-2021
- The evolution of UK sea-level projections J. Weeks et al. 10.1088/2515-7620/acc020
- Estimating the timing of geophysical commitment to 1.5 and 2.0 °C of global warming M. Dvorak et al. 10.1038/s41558-022-01372-y
- Path analysis for controlling climate change in global aviation Q. Cui et al. 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110126
- Energy Budget Constraints on the Time History of Aerosol Forcing and Climate Sensitivity C. Smith et al. 10.1029/2020JD033622
- Equilibrium- and Transient-State Dependencies of Climate Sensitivity: Are They Important for Climate Projections? O. Geoffroy & D. Saint-Martin 10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0248.1
- Climate Impacts of COVID‐19 Induced Emission Changes A. Gettelman et al. 10.1029/2020GL091805
- OpenSCM Two Layer Model: A Python implementation of the two-layer climate model Z. Nicholls & J. Lewis 10.21105/joss.02766
- Past warming trend constrains future warming in CMIP6 models K. Tokarska et al. 10.1126/sciadv.aaz9549
- DICE and the Carbon Budget for Ambitious Climate Targets C. Azar & D. Johansson 10.1029/2021EF002041
- The role of prior assumptions in carbon budget calculations B. Sanderson 10.5194/esd-11-563-2020
- Delayed emergence of a global temperature response after emission mitigation B. Samset et al. 10.1038/s41467-020-17001-1
- Quantifying airborne fraction trends and the destination of anthropogenic CO2 by tracking carbon flows in a simple climate model L. Pressburger et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acca35
- The historical social cost of fossil and industrial CO2 emissions W. Rickels et al. 10.1038/s41558-023-01709-1
- STITCHES: a Python package to amalgamate existing Earth system model output into new scenario realizations A. Snyder et al. 10.21105/joss.05525
- Reckoning with the Rocky Relationship Between Eruption Size and Climate Response: Toward a Volcano-Climate Index A. Schmidt & B. Black 10.1146/annurev-earth-080921-052816
- Implications of non-linearities between cumulative CO2 emissions and CO2-induced warming for assessing the remaining carbon budget Z. Nicholls et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab83af
- The Multi‐Decadal Response to Net Zero CO2 Emissions and Implications for Emissions Policy S. Jenkins et al. 10.1029/2022GL101047
- National attribution of historical climate damages C. Callahan & J. Mankin 10.1007/s10584-022-03387-y
- The Framework for Assessing Changes To Sea-level (FACTS) v1.0: a platform for characterizing parametric and structural uncertainty in future global, relative, and extreme sea-level change R. Kopp et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-7461-2023
- Model calibration using ESEm v1.1.0 – an open, scalable Earth system emulator D. Watson-Parris et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-7659-2021
- U.S. manure methane emissions represent a greater contributor to implied climate warming than enteric methane emissions using the global warming potential* methodology M. Beck et al. 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1209541
- Achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions critical to limit climate tipping risks T. Möller et al. 10.1038/s41467-024-49863-0
- Probability of committed warming exceeding 1.5 ∘C and 2.0 ∘C Paris targets S. Sherwood et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac6ff6
- Effect of aerosol radiative forcing uncertainty on projected exceedance year of a 1.5 °C global temperature rise A. Peace et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/aba20c
- IPCC and the effectiveness of carbon sinks C. Azar & D. Johansson 10.1088/1748-9326/ac5bb2
- The role of negative carbon emissions in reaching the Paris climate targets: The impact of target formulation in integrated assessment models D. Johansson et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/abc3f0
- The key role of propane in a sustainable cooling sector P. Purohit et al. 10.1073/pnas.2206131119
- Latest climate models confirm need for urgent mitigation P. Forster et al. 10.1038/s41558-019-0660-0
- The fractional energy balance equation for climate projections through 2100 R. Procyk et al. 10.5194/esd-13-81-2022
- Implications of temperature overshoot dynamics for climate and carbon dioxide removal policies in the DICE model W. Rickels & J. Schwinger 10.1088/1748-9326/ac22c0
- Large uncertainty in future warming due to aerosol forcing D. Watson-Parris & C. Smith 10.1038/s41558-022-01516-0
- Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO2 K. Rennert et al. 10.1038/s41586-022-05224-9
- Adjusting 1.5 degree C climate change mitigation pathways in light of adverse new information A. Gambhir et al. 10.1038/s41467-023-40673-4
- Reducing Planetary Health Risks Through Short‐Lived Climate Forcer Mitigation Y. Zheng & N. Unger 10.1029/2021GH000422
- Post COP26: does the 1.5°C climate target remain alive? A. Wiltshire et al. 10.1002/wea.4331
- Credibility gap in net-zero climate targets leaves world at high risk J. Rogelj et al. 10.1126/science.adg6248
- Accelerated increases in global and Asian summer monsoon precipitation from future aerosol reductions L. Wilcox et al. 10.5194/acp-20-11955-2020
- The Transient Sea Level Response to External Forcing in CMIP6 Models A. Grinsted et al. 10.1029/2022EF002696
- Suppressed Late‐20th Century Warming in CMIP6 Models Explained by Forcing and Feedbacks C. Smith & P. Forster 10.1029/2021GL094948
- A theoretical basis for the equivalence between physical and economic climate metrics and implications for the choice of Global Warming Potential time horizon D. Mallapragada & B. Mignone 10.1007/s10584-019-02486-7
- Paris Agreement's Ambiguity About Aerosols Drives Uncertain Health and Climate Outcomes P. Polonik et al. 10.1029/2020EF001787
- Scaling up gas and electric cooking in low- and middle-income countries: climate threat or mitigation strategy with co-benefits? E. Floess et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acb501
- Uncertainty in carbon budget estimates due to internal climate variability K. Tokarska et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/abaf1b
- A multimodel analysis of post-Glasgow climate targets and feasibility challenges D. van de Ven et al. 10.1038/s41558-023-01661-0
- Consequences of equivalency metric design for energy transitions and climate change M. Edwards & J. Trancik 10.1007/s10584-022-03442-8
- Climate uncertainty impacts on optimal mitigation pathways and social cost of carbon C. Smith et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acedc6
- Large Variations in Volcanic Aerosol Forcing Efficiency Due to Eruption Source Parameters and Rapid Adjustments L. Marshall et al. 10.1029/2020GL090241
- Relating climate sensitivity indices to projection uncertainty B. Sanderson 10.5194/esd-11-721-2020
- Regionally aggregated, stitched and de‐drifted CMIP‐climate data, processed with netCDF‐SCM v2.0.0 Z. Nicholls et al. 10.1002/gdj3.113
- Unknown Eruption Source Parameters Cause Large Uncertainty in Historical Volcanic Radiative Forcing Reconstructions L. Marshall et al. 10.1029/2020JD033578
- Assessing the economic implications of carbon emissions on climate change: Estimating the impact using methane-adjusted DICE model S. Aleshina et al. 10.1016/j.strueco.2024.06.001
- Physical inconsistencies in the representation of the ocean heat-carbon nexus in simple climate models R. Séférian et al. 10.1038/s43247-024-01464-x
- Overconfidence in climate overshoot C. Schleussner et al. 10.1038/s41586-024-08020-9
- Credibility gap in net-zero climate targets leaves world at high risk J. Rogelj et al. 10.1126/science.adg6428
- Matilda v1.0: An R package for probabilistic climate projections using a reduced complexity climate model J. Brown et al. 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000295
- Quantifying aviation’s contribution to global warming M. Klöwer et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac286e
- Institutional decarbonization scenarios evaluated against the Paris Agreement 1.5 °C goal R. Brecha et al. 10.1038/s41467-022-31734-1
- Advancing the estimation of future climate impacts within the United States C. Hartin et al. 10.5194/esd-14-1015-2023
- The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report WGIII climate assessment of mitigation pathways: from emissions to global temperatures J. Kikstra et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-9075-2022
- Temperature neutrality and Irish methane policy J. Wheatley 10.1080/14693062.2023.2191921
- Demonstrating GWP*: a means of reporting warming-equivalent emissions that captures the contrasting impacts of short- and long-lived climate pollutants J. Lynch et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6d7e
- Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project Phase 2: Synthesizing Earth System Knowledge for Probabilistic Climate Projections Z. Nicholls et al. 10.1029/2020EF001900
- Improving statistical projections of ocean dynamic sea-level change using pattern recognition techniques V. Malagón-Santos et al. 10.5194/os-19-499-2023
- Agriculture's Contribution to Climate Change and Role in Mitigation Is Distinct From Predominantly Fossil CO2-Emitting Sectors J. Lynch et al. 10.3389/fsufs.2020.518039
- Physically based equation representing the forcing-driven precipitation in climate models D. Lee et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acf50f
- Durability of carbon dioxide removal is critical for Paris climate goals C. Brunner et al. 10.1038/s43247-024-01808-7
- Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project Phase 1: introduction and evaluation of global-mean temperature response Z. Nicholls et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-5175-2020
- Self‐Adaptive Multi‐Objective Climate Policies Align Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies A. Carlino et al. 10.1029/2022EF002767
- Potential impacts of rapidly changing european use of fossil fuels on global warming C. Huntingford et al. 10.1088/2515-7620/acf3d7
- Radiative forcing of climate change from the Copernicus reanalysis of atmospheric composition N. Bellouin et al. 10.5194/essd-12-1649-2020
- Climate change modulates the stratospheric volcanic sulfate aerosol lifecycle and radiative forcing from tropical eruptions T. Aubry et al. 10.1038/s41467-021-24943-7
- Methane emissions from California dairies estimated using novel climate metric Global Warming Potential Star show improved agreement with modeled warming dynamics E. Pressman et al. 10.3389/fsufs.2022.1072805
- Evaluation of the University of Victoria Earth System Climate Model version 2.10 (UVic ESCM 2.10) N. Mengis et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-4183-2020
- Improved calculation of warming-equivalent emissions for short-lived climate pollutants M. Cain et al. 10.1038/s41612-019-0086-4
- CMIP6 simulations with the compact Earth system model OSCAR v3.1 Y. Quilcaille et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-1129-2023
- Pathfinder v1.0.1: a Bayesian-inferred simple carbon–climate model to explore climate change scenarios T. Bossy et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-8831-2022
- Guidance on emissions metrics for nationally determined contributions under the Paris Agreement S. Denison et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab4df4
- Pathways analysis to reducing aircraft emissions for China-Foreign routes Q. Cui & Y. Lei 10.1038/s44168-023-00047-4
- Machine learning for weather and climate are worlds apart D. Watson-Parris 10.1098/rsta.2020.0098
- Potential for bias in effective climate sensitivity from state-dependent energetic imbalance B. Sanderson & M. Rugenstein 10.5194/esd-13-1715-2022
- Assessing the size and uncertainty of remaining carbon budgets R. Lamboll et al. 10.1038/s41558-023-01848-5
- The impact of optimal climate change control on rice production in critical regions: the case of Southeast Asia S. De Nardi et al. 10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.07.155
- Mechanisms and Impacts of Earth System Tipping Elements S. Wang et al. 10.1029/2021RG000757
- Equity is more important for the social cost of methane than climate uncertainty F. Errickson et al. 10.1038/s41586-021-03386-6
- From emission scenarios to spatially resolved projections with a chain of computationally efficient emulators: coupling of MAGICC (v7.5.1) and MESMER (v0.8.3) L. Beusch et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-2085-2022
- Diagnosing Transient Response to CO2 Forcing in Coupled Atmosphere‐Ocean Model Experiments Using a Climate Model Emulator J. Tsutsui 10.1029/2019GL085844
- ClimateBench v1.0: A Benchmark for Data‐Driven Climate Projections D. Watson‐Parris et al. 10.1029/2021MS002954
- Quantifying the probability distribution function of the transient climate response to cumulative CO2 emissions L. Spafford & A. MacDougall 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6d7b
- Climate and air quality impacts due to mitigation of non-methane near-term climate forcers R. Allen et al. 10.5194/acp-20-9641-2020
- Animal-based foods have high social and climate costs F. Errickson et al. 10.1038/s43016-021-00265-1
- Sustainable aviation in the context of the Paris Agreement: A review of prospective scenarios and their technological mitigation levers S. Delbecq et al. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2023.100920
- Effective radiative forcing and adjustments in CMIP6 models C. Smith et al. 10.5194/acp-20-9591-2020
- Silicone v1.0.0: an open-source Python package for inferring missing emissions data for climate change research R. Lamboll et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-5259-2020
- Bayesian estimation of Earth's climate sensitivity and transient climate response from observational warming and heat content datasets P. Goodwin & B. Cael 10.5194/esd-12-709-2021
- Minimal CMIP Emulator (MCE v1.2): a new simplified method for probabilistic climate projections J. Tsutsui 10.5194/gmd-15-951-2022
- Much of zero emissions commitment occurs before reaching net zero emissions C. Koven et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acab1a
- Stringent mitigation substantially reduces risk of unprecedented near-term warming rates C. McKenna et al. 10.1038/s41558-020-00957-9
- An integrated approach to quantifying uncertainties in the remaining carbon budget H. Damon Matthews et al. 10.1038/s43247-020-00064-9
- Climate and air-quality benefits of a realistic phase-out of fossil fuels D. Shindell & C. Smith 10.1038/s41586-019-1554-z
- Social cost of carbon under a carbon-neutral pathway A. Liu et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac6819
- Current fossil fuel infrastructure does not yet commit us to 1.5 °C warming C. Smith et al. 10.1038/s41467-018-07999-w
- Improving reduced complexity model assessment and usability M. Sarofim et al. 10.1038/s41558-020-00973-9
- Changes in IPCC Scenario Assessment Emulators Between SR1.5 and AR6 Unraveled Z. Nicholls et al. 10.1029/2022GL099788
- Uncompensated claims to fair emission space risk putting Paris Agreement goals out of reach G. Ganti et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acb502
- Metrics for the emissions of F-gas refrigerants N. Miranda et al. 10.1016/j.seta.2023.103348
- Radiative forcing climate footprints in the agricultural sector: Comparison of models from the IPCC 5th and 6th Assessment Reports X. Luo et al. 10.1016/j.farsys.2023.100057
- Definitions and implications of climate-neutral aviation N. Brazzola et al. 10.1038/s41558-022-01404-7
- The 2019 Raikoke eruption as a testbed used by the Volcano Response group for rapid assessment of volcanic atmospheric impacts J. Vernier et al. 10.5194/acp-24-5765-2024
- Asset Pricing with Disagreement about Climate Risks T. Lontzek et al. 10.2139/ssrn.4473164
- Modifying emissions scenario projections to account for the effects of COVID-19: protocol for CovidMIP R. Lamboll et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-3683-2021
- Carbon Dioxide as a Risky Asset A. Bauer et al. 10.1007/s10584-024-03724-3
- Estimating and tracking the remaining carbon budget for stringent climate targets J. Rogelj et al. 10.1038/s41586-019-1368-z
- Carbon farming: Climate change mitigation via non-permanent carbon sinks J. Leifeld 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117893
- Mechanisms and Impacts of Earth System Tipping Elements S. Wang et al. 10.1029/2021RG000757
- Modeling the climate and carbon systems to estimate the social cost of carbon T. Thompson 10.1002/wcc.532
- Global Carbon Budget Study using Global Carbon Cycle Model O. Kwon & J. Jung 10.5322/JESI.2018.27.12.1169
- The Bern Simple Climate Model (BernSCM) v1.0: an extensible and fully documented open-source re-implementation of the Bern reduced-form model for global carbon cycle–climate simulations K. Strassmann & F. Joos 10.5194/gmd-11-1887-2018
127 citations as recorded by crossref.
- The social costs of hydrofluorocarbons and the benefits from their expedited phase-down T. Tan et al. 10.1038/s41558-023-01898-9
- Impacts of reductions in non-methane short-lived climate forcers on future climate extremes and the resulting population exposure risks in eastern and southern Asia Y. Li et al. 10.5194/acp-23-2499-2023
- Current and future global climate impacts resulting from COVID-19 P. Forster et al. 10.1038/s41558-020-0883-0
- HIRM v1.0: a hybrid impulse response model for climate modeling and uncertainty analyses K. Dorheim et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-365-2021
- Quantifying negative radiative forcing of non-permanent and permanent soil carbon sinks J. Leifeld & S. Keel 10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115971
- Estimating a social cost of carbon for global energy consumption A. Rode et al. 10.1038/s41586-021-03883-8
- Climate economics support for the UN climate targets M. Hänsel et al. 10.1038/s41558-020-0833-x
- Optimal Strategies for Climate Change Mitigation M. Arrighini et al. 10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.07.095
- Arctic Oceanic Carbon Cycle: A Comprehensive Review of Mechanisms, Regulations, and Models X. Ye et al. 10.3390/w16121667
- Estimating Remaining Carbon Budgets Using Temperature Responses Informed by CMIP6 M. Rypdal et al. 10.3389/fclim.2021.686058
- Strong control of effective radiative forcing by the spatial pattern of absorbing aerosol A. Williams et al. 10.1038/s41558-022-01415-4
- The effect of uncertainties in natural forcing records on simulated temperature during the last millennium L. Lücke et al. 10.5194/cp-19-959-2023
- FROT: A Framework to comprehensively describe radiative contributions to temperature responses E. Monteiro et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad8807
- FaIRv2.0.0: a generalized impulse response model for climate uncertainty and future scenario exploration N. Leach et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-3007-2021
- The evolution of UK sea-level projections J. Weeks et al. 10.1088/2515-7620/acc020
- Estimating the timing of geophysical commitment to 1.5 and 2.0 °C of global warming M. Dvorak et al. 10.1038/s41558-022-01372-y
- Path analysis for controlling climate change in global aviation Q. Cui et al. 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110126
- Energy Budget Constraints on the Time History of Aerosol Forcing and Climate Sensitivity C. Smith et al. 10.1029/2020JD033622
- Equilibrium- and Transient-State Dependencies of Climate Sensitivity: Are They Important for Climate Projections? O. Geoffroy & D. Saint-Martin 10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0248.1
- Climate Impacts of COVID‐19 Induced Emission Changes A. Gettelman et al. 10.1029/2020GL091805
- OpenSCM Two Layer Model: A Python implementation of the two-layer climate model Z. Nicholls & J. Lewis 10.21105/joss.02766
- Past warming trend constrains future warming in CMIP6 models K. Tokarska et al. 10.1126/sciadv.aaz9549
- DICE and the Carbon Budget for Ambitious Climate Targets C. Azar & D. Johansson 10.1029/2021EF002041
- The role of prior assumptions in carbon budget calculations B. Sanderson 10.5194/esd-11-563-2020
- Delayed emergence of a global temperature response after emission mitigation B. Samset et al. 10.1038/s41467-020-17001-1
- Quantifying airborne fraction trends and the destination of anthropogenic CO2 by tracking carbon flows in a simple climate model L. Pressburger et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acca35
- The historical social cost of fossil and industrial CO2 emissions W. Rickels et al. 10.1038/s41558-023-01709-1
- STITCHES: a Python package to amalgamate existing Earth system model output into new scenario realizations A. Snyder et al. 10.21105/joss.05525
- Reckoning with the Rocky Relationship Between Eruption Size and Climate Response: Toward a Volcano-Climate Index A. Schmidt & B. Black 10.1146/annurev-earth-080921-052816
- Implications of non-linearities between cumulative CO2 emissions and CO2-induced warming for assessing the remaining carbon budget Z. Nicholls et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab83af
- The Multi‐Decadal Response to Net Zero CO2 Emissions and Implications for Emissions Policy S. Jenkins et al. 10.1029/2022GL101047
- National attribution of historical climate damages C. Callahan & J. Mankin 10.1007/s10584-022-03387-y
- The Framework for Assessing Changes To Sea-level (FACTS) v1.0: a platform for characterizing parametric and structural uncertainty in future global, relative, and extreme sea-level change R. Kopp et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-7461-2023
- Model calibration using ESEm v1.1.0 – an open, scalable Earth system emulator D. Watson-Parris et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-7659-2021
- U.S. manure methane emissions represent a greater contributor to implied climate warming than enteric methane emissions using the global warming potential* methodology M. Beck et al. 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1209541
- Achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions critical to limit climate tipping risks T. Möller et al. 10.1038/s41467-024-49863-0
- Probability of committed warming exceeding 1.5 ∘C and 2.0 ∘C Paris targets S. Sherwood et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac6ff6
- Effect of aerosol radiative forcing uncertainty on projected exceedance year of a 1.5 °C global temperature rise A. Peace et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/aba20c
- IPCC and the effectiveness of carbon sinks C. Azar & D. Johansson 10.1088/1748-9326/ac5bb2
- The role of negative carbon emissions in reaching the Paris climate targets: The impact of target formulation in integrated assessment models D. Johansson et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/abc3f0
- The key role of propane in a sustainable cooling sector P. Purohit et al. 10.1073/pnas.2206131119
- Latest climate models confirm need for urgent mitigation P. Forster et al. 10.1038/s41558-019-0660-0
- The fractional energy balance equation for climate projections through 2100 R. Procyk et al. 10.5194/esd-13-81-2022
- Implications of temperature overshoot dynamics for climate and carbon dioxide removal policies in the DICE model W. Rickels & J. Schwinger 10.1088/1748-9326/ac22c0
- Large uncertainty in future warming due to aerosol forcing D. Watson-Parris & C. Smith 10.1038/s41558-022-01516-0
- Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO2 K. Rennert et al. 10.1038/s41586-022-05224-9
- Adjusting 1.5 degree C climate change mitigation pathways in light of adverse new information A. Gambhir et al. 10.1038/s41467-023-40673-4
- Reducing Planetary Health Risks Through Short‐Lived Climate Forcer Mitigation Y. Zheng & N. Unger 10.1029/2021GH000422
- Post COP26: does the 1.5°C climate target remain alive? A. Wiltshire et al. 10.1002/wea.4331
- Credibility gap in net-zero climate targets leaves world at high risk J. Rogelj et al. 10.1126/science.adg6248
- Accelerated increases in global and Asian summer monsoon precipitation from future aerosol reductions L. Wilcox et al. 10.5194/acp-20-11955-2020
- The Transient Sea Level Response to External Forcing in CMIP6 Models A. Grinsted et al. 10.1029/2022EF002696
- Suppressed Late‐20th Century Warming in CMIP6 Models Explained by Forcing and Feedbacks C. Smith & P. Forster 10.1029/2021GL094948
- A theoretical basis for the equivalence between physical and economic climate metrics and implications for the choice of Global Warming Potential time horizon D. Mallapragada & B. Mignone 10.1007/s10584-019-02486-7
- Paris Agreement's Ambiguity About Aerosols Drives Uncertain Health and Climate Outcomes P. Polonik et al. 10.1029/2020EF001787
- Scaling up gas and electric cooking in low- and middle-income countries: climate threat or mitigation strategy with co-benefits? E. Floess et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acb501
- Uncertainty in carbon budget estimates due to internal climate variability K. Tokarska et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/abaf1b
- A multimodel analysis of post-Glasgow climate targets and feasibility challenges D. van de Ven et al. 10.1038/s41558-023-01661-0
- Consequences of equivalency metric design for energy transitions and climate change M. Edwards & J. Trancik 10.1007/s10584-022-03442-8
- Climate uncertainty impacts on optimal mitigation pathways and social cost of carbon C. Smith et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acedc6
- Large Variations in Volcanic Aerosol Forcing Efficiency Due to Eruption Source Parameters and Rapid Adjustments L. Marshall et al. 10.1029/2020GL090241
- Relating climate sensitivity indices to projection uncertainty B. Sanderson 10.5194/esd-11-721-2020
- Regionally aggregated, stitched and de‐drifted CMIP‐climate data, processed with netCDF‐SCM v2.0.0 Z. Nicholls et al. 10.1002/gdj3.113
- Unknown Eruption Source Parameters Cause Large Uncertainty in Historical Volcanic Radiative Forcing Reconstructions L. Marshall et al. 10.1029/2020JD033578
- Assessing the economic implications of carbon emissions on climate change: Estimating the impact using methane-adjusted DICE model S. Aleshina et al. 10.1016/j.strueco.2024.06.001
- Physical inconsistencies in the representation of the ocean heat-carbon nexus in simple climate models R. Séférian et al. 10.1038/s43247-024-01464-x
- Overconfidence in climate overshoot C. Schleussner et al. 10.1038/s41586-024-08020-9
- Credibility gap in net-zero climate targets leaves world at high risk J. Rogelj et al. 10.1126/science.adg6428
- Matilda v1.0: An R package for probabilistic climate projections using a reduced complexity climate model J. Brown et al. 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000295
- Quantifying aviation’s contribution to global warming M. Klöwer et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac286e
- Institutional decarbonization scenarios evaluated against the Paris Agreement 1.5 °C goal R. Brecha et al. 10.1038/s41467-022-31734-1
- Advancing the estimation of future climate impacts within the United States C. Hartin et al. 10.5194/esd-14-1015-2023
- The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report WGIII climate assessment of mitigation pathways: from emissions to global temperatures J. Kikstra et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-9075-2022
- Temperature neutrality and Irish methane policy J. Wheatley 10.1080/14693062.2023.2191921
- Demonstrating GWP*: a means of reporting warming-equivalent emissions that captures the contrasting impacts of short- and long-lived climate pollutants J. Lynch et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6d7e
- Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project Phase 2: Synthesizing Earth System Knowledge for Probabilistic Climate Projections Z. Nicholls et al. 10.1029/2020EF001900
- Improving statistical projections of ocean dynamic sea-level change using pattern recognition techniques V. Malagón-Santos et al. 10.5194/os-19-499-2023
- Agriculture's Contribution to Climate Change and Role in Mitigation Is Distinct From Predominantly Fossil CO2-Emitting Sectors J. Lynch et al. 10.3389/fsufs.2020.518039
- Physically based equation representing the forcing-driven precipitation in climate models D. Lee et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acf50f
- Durability of carbon dioxide removal is critical for Paris climate goals C. Brunner et al. 10.1038/s43247-024-01808-7
- Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project Phase 1: introduction and evaluation of global-mean temperature response Z. Nicholls et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-5175-2020
- Self‐Adaptive Multi‐Objective Climate Policies Align Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies A. Carlino et al. 10.1029/2022EF002767
- Potential impacts of rapidly changing european use of fossil fuels on global warming C. Huntingford et al. 10.1088/2515-7620/acf3d7
- Radiative forcing of climate change from the Copernicus reanalysis of atmospheric composition N. Bellouin et al. 10.5194/essd-12-1649-2020
- Climate change modulates the stratospheric volcanic sulfate aerosol lifecycle and radiative forcing from tropical eruptions T. Aubry et al. 10.1038/s41467-021-24943-7
- Methane emissions from California dairies estimated using novel climate metric Global Warming Potential Star show improved agreement with modeled warming dynamics E. Pressman et al. 10.3389/fsufs.2022.1072805
- Evaluation of the University of Victoria Earth System Climate Model version 2.10 (UVic ESCM 2.10) N. Mengis et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-4183-2020
- Improved calculation of warming-equivalent emissions for short-lived climate pollutants M. Cain et al. 10.1038/s41612-019-0086-4
- CMIP6 simulations with the compact Earth system model OSCAR v3.1 Y. Quilcaille et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-1129-2023
- Pathfinder v1.0.1: a Bayesian-inferred simple carbon–climate model to explore climate change scenarios T. Bossy et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-8831-2022
- Guidance on emissions metrics for nationally determined contributions under the Paris Agreement S. Denison et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab4df4
- Pathways analysis to reducing aircraft emissions for China-Foreign routes Q. Cui & Y. Lei 10.1038/s44168-023-00047-4
- Machine learning for weather and climate are worlds apart D. Watson-Parris 10.1098/rsta.2020.0098
- Potential for bias in effective climate sensitivity from state-dependent energetic imbalance B. Sanderson & M. Rugenstein 10.5194/esd-13-1715-2022
- Assessing the size and uncertainty of remaining carbon budgets R. Lamboll et al. 10.1038/s41558-023-01848-5
- The impact of optimal climate change control on rice production in critical regions: the case of Southeast Asia S. De Nardi et al. 10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.07.155
- Mechanisms and Impacts of Earth System Tipping Elements S. Wang et al. 10.1029/2021RG000757
- Equity is more important for the social cost of methane than climate uncertainty F. Errickson et al. 10.1038/s41586-021-03386-6
- From emission scenarios to spatially resolved projections with a chain of computationally efficient emulators: coupling of MAGICC (v7.5.1) and MESMER (v0.8.3) L. Beusch et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-2085-2022
- Diagnosing Transient Response to CO2 Forcing in Coupled Atmosphere‐Ocean Model Experiments Using a Climate Model Emulator J. Tsutsui 10.1029/2019GL085844
- ClimateBench v1.0: A Benchmark for Data‐Driven Climate Projections D. Watson‐Parris et al. 10.1029/2021MS002954
- Quantifying the probability distribution function of the transient climate response to cumulative CO2 emissions L. Spafford & A. MacDougall 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6d7b
- Climate and air quality impacts due to mitigation of non-methane near-term climate forcers R. Allen et al. 10.5194/acp-20-9641-2020
- Animal-based foods have high social and climate costs F. Errickson et al. 10.1038/s43016-021-00265-1
- Sustainable aviation in the context of the Paris Agreement: A review of prospective scenarios and their technological mitigation levers S. Delbecq et al. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2023.100920
- Effective radiative forcing and adjustments in CMIP6 models C. Smith et al. 10.5194/acp-20-9591-2020
- Silicone v1.0.0: an open-source Python package for inferring missing emissions data for climate change research R. Lamboll et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-5259-2020
- Bayesian estimation of Earth's climate sensitivity and transient climate response from observational warming and heat content datasets P. Goodwin & B. Cael 10.5194/esd-12-709-2021
- Minimal CMIP Emulator (MCE v1.2): a new simplified method for probabilistic climate projections J. Tsutsui 10.5194/gmd-15-951-2022
- Much of zero emissions commitment occurs before reaching net zero emissions C. Koven et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acab1a
- Stringent mitigation substantially reduces risk of unprecedented near-term warming rates C. McKenna et al. 10.1038/s41558-020-00957-9
- An integrated approach to quantifying uncertainties in the remaining carbon budget H. Damon Matthews et al. 10.1038/s43247-020-00064-9
- Climate and air-quality benefits of a realistic phase-out of fossil fuels D. Shindell & C. Smith 10.1038/s41586-019-1554-z
- Social cost of carbon under a carbon-neutral pathway A. Liu et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac6819
- Current fossil fuel infrastructure does not yet commit us to 1.5 °C warming C. Smith et al. 10.1038/s41467-018-07999-w
- Improving reduced complexity model assessment and usability M. Sarofim et al. 10.1038/s41558-020-00973-9
- Changes in IPCC Scenario Assessment Emulators Between SR1.5 and AR6 Unraveled Z. Nicholls et al. 10.1029/2022GL099788
- Uncompensated claims to fair emission space risk putting Paris Agreement goals out of reach G. Ganti et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acb502
- Metrics for the emissions of F-gas refrigerants N. Miranda et al. 10.1016/j.seta.2023.103348
- Radiative forcing climate footprints in the agricultural sector: Comparison of models from the IPCC 5th and 6th Assessment Reports X. Luo et al. 10.1016/j.farsys.2023.100057
- Definitions and implications of climate-neutral aviation N. Brazzola et al. 10.1038/s41558-022-01404-7
- The 2019 Raikoke eruption as a testbed used by the Volcano Response group for rapid assessment of volcanic atmospheric impacts J. Vernier et al. 10.5194/acp-24-5765-2024
- Asset Pricing with Disagreement about Climate Risks T. Lontzek et al. 10.2139/ssrn.4473164
- Modifying emissions scenario projections to account for the effects of COVID-19: protocol for CovidMIP R. Lamboll et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-3683-2021
- Carbon Dioxide as a Risky Asset A. Bauer et al. 10.1007/s10584-024-03724-3
- Estimating and tracking the remaining carbon budget for stringent climate targets J. Rogelj et al. 10.1038/s41586-019-1368-z
- Carbon farming: Climate change mitigation via non-permanent carbon sinks J. Leifeld 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117893
4 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Mechanisms and Impacts of Earth System Tipping Elements S. Wang et al. 10.1029/2021RG000757
- Modeling the climate and carbon systems to estimate the social cost of carbon T. Thompson 10.1002/wcc.532
- Global Carbon Budget Study using Global Carbon Cycle Model O. Kwon & J. Jung 10.5322/JESI.2018.27.12.1169
- The Bern Simple Climate Model (BernSCM) v1.0: an extensible and fully documented open-source re-implementation of the Bern reduced-form model for global carbon cycle–climate simulations K. Strassmann & F. Joos 10.5194/gmd-11-1887-2018
Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Short summary
FAIR v1.3 is a simple Python-based climate model emulator. It takes emissions of greenhouse gases and aerosol and ozone precursors to calculate radiative forcing and temperature change. It includes a simple representation of carbon cycle feedbacks due to temperature and accumulated carbon uptake. Large ensembles can be run with minimal computational expense for any user-specified emissions pathway. We produce such an ensemble using the RCP emissions datasets.
FAIR v1.3 is a simple Python-based climate model emulator. It takes emissions of greenhouse...