117 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. The social costs of hydrofluorocarbons and the benefits from their expedited phase-down T. Tan et al. 10.1038/s41558-023-01898-9
2. Impacts of reductions in non-methane short-lived climate forcers on future climate extremes and the resulting population exposure risks in eastern and southern Asia Y. Li et al. 10.5194/acp-23-2499-2023
3. Current and future global climate impacts resulting from COVID-19 P. Forster et al. 10.1038/s41558-020-0883-0
4. HIRM v1.0: a hybrid impulse response model for climate modeling and uncertainty analyses K. Dorheim et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-365-2021
5. Quantifying negative radiative forcing of non-permanent and permanent soil carbon sinks J. Leifeld & S. Keel 10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115971
6. Estimating a social cost of carbon for global energy consumption A. Rode et al. 10.1038/s41586-021-03883-8
7. Climate economics support for the UN climate targets M. Hänsel et al. 10.1038/s41558-020-0833-x
8. Estimating Remaining Carbon Budgets Using Temperature Responses Informed by CMIP6 M. Rypdal et al. 10.3389/fclim.2021.686058
9. Strong control of effective radiative forcing by the spatial pattern of absorbing aerosol A. Williams et al. 10.1038/s41558-022-01415-4
10. The effect of uncertainties in natural forcing records on simulated temperature during the last millennium L. Lücke et al. 10.5194/cp-19-959-2023
11. FaIRv2.0.0: a generalized impulse response model for climate uncertainty and future scenario exploration N. Leach et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-3007-2021
12. The evolution of UK sea-level projections J. Weeks et al. 10.1088/2515-7620/acc020
13. Estimating the timing of geophysical commitment to 1.5 and 2.0 °C of global warming M. Dvorak et al. 10.1038/s41558-022-01372-y
14. Energy Budget Constraints on the Time History of Aerosol Forcing and Climate Sensitivity C. Smith et al. 10.1029/2020JD033622
15. Equilibrium- and Transient-State Dependencies of Climate Sensitivity: Are They Important for Climate Projections? O. Geoffroy & D. Saint-Martin 10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0248.1
16. Climate Impacts of COVID‐19 Induced Emission Changes A. Gettelman et al. 10.1029/2020GL091805
17. OpenSCM Two Layer Model: A Python implementation of the two-layer climate model Z. Nicholls & J. Lewis 10.21105/joss.02766
18. Past warming trend constrains future warming in CMIP6 models K. Tokarska et al. 10.1126/sciadv.aaz9549
19. DICE and the Carbon Budget for Ambitious Climate Targets C. Azar & D. Johansson 10.1029/2021EF002041
20. The role of prior assumptions in carbon budget calculations B. Sanderson 10.5194/esd-11-563-2020
21. Delayed emergence of a global temperature response after emission mitigation B. Samset et al. 10.1038/s41467-020-17001-1
22. Quantifying airborne fraction trends and the destination of anthropogenic CO2 by tracking carbon flows in a simple climate model L. Pressburger et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acca35
23. The historical social cost of fossil and industrial CO2 emissions W. Rickels et al. 10.1038/s41558-023-01709-1
24. Reckoning with the Rocky Relationship Between Eruption Size and Climate Response: Toward a Volcano-Climate Index A. Schmidt & B. Black 10.1146/annurev-earth-080921-052816
25. Implications of non-linearities between cumulative CO2 emissions and CO2-induced warming for assessing the remaining carbon budget Z. Nicholls et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab83af
26. The Multi‐Decadal Response to Net Zero CO2 Emissions and Implications for Emissions Policy S. Jenkins et al. 10.1029/2022GL101047
27. National attribution of historical climate damages C. Callahan & J. Mankin 10.1007/s10584-022-03387-y
28. The Framework for Assessing Changes To Sea-level (FACTS) v1.0: a platform for characterizing parametric and structural uncertainty in future global, relative, and extreme sea-level change R. Kopp et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-7461-2023
29. Model calibration using ESEm v1.1.0 – an open, scalable Earth system emulator D. Watson-Parris et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-7659-2021
30. U.S. manure methane emissions represent a greater contributor to implied climate warming than enteric methane emissions using the global warming potential* methodology M. Beck et al. 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1209541
31. Probability of committed warming exceeding 1.5 ∘C and 2.0 ∘C Paris targets S. Sherwood et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac6ff6
32. Effect of aerosol radiative forcing uncertainty on projected exceedance year of a 1.5 °C global temperature rise A. Peace et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/aba20c
33. IPCC and the effectiveness of carbon sinks C. Azar & D. Johansson 10.1088/1748-9326/ac5bb2
34. The role of negative carbon emissions in reaching the Paris climate targets: The impact of target formulation in integrated assessment models D. Johansson et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/abc3f0
35. The key role of propane in a sustainable cooling sector P. Purohit et al. 10.1073/pnas.2206131119
36. Latest climate models confirm need for urgent mitigation P. Forster et al. 10.1038/s41558-019-0660-0
37. The fractional energy balance equation for climate projections through 2100 R. Procyk et al. 10.5194/esd-13-81-2022
38. Implications of temperature overshoot dynamics for climate and carbon dioxide removal policies in the DICE model W. Rickels & J. Schwinger 10.1088/1748-9326/ac22c0
39. Large uncertainty in future warming due to aerosol forcing D. Watson-Parris & C. Smith 10.1038/s41558-022-01516-0
40. Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO2 K. Rennert et al. 10.1038/s41586-022-05224-9
41. Adjusting 1.5 degree C climate change mitigation pathways in light of adverse new information A. Gambhir et al. 10.1038/s41467-023-40673-4
42. Reducing Planetary Health Risks Through Short‐Lived Climate Forcer Mitigation Y. Zheng & N. Unger 10.1029/2021GH000422
43. Post COP26: does the 1.5°C climate target remain alive? A. Wiltshire et al. 10.1002/wea.4331
44. Credibility gap in net-zero climate targets leaves world at high risk J. Rogelj et al. 10.1126/science.adg6248
45. Accelerated increases in global and Asian summer monsoon precipitation from future aerosol reductions L. Wilcox et al. 10.5194/acp-20-11955-2020
46. The Transient Sea Level Response to External Forcing in CMIP6 Models A. Grinsted et al. 10.1029/2022EF002696
47. Suppressed Late‐20th Century Warming in CMIP6 Models Explained by Forcing and Feedbacks C. Smith & P. Forster 10.1029/2021GL094948
48. A theoretical basis for the equivalence between physical and economic climate metrics and implications for the choice of Global Warming Potential time horizon D. Mallapragada & B. Mignone 10.1007/s10584-019-02486-7
49. Paris Agreement's Ambiguity About Aerosols Drives Uncertain Health and Climate Outcomes P. Polonik et al. 10.1029/2020EF001787
50. Scaling up gas and electric cooking in low- and middle-income countries: climate threat or mitigation strategy with co-benefits? E. Floess et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acb501
51. Uncertainty in carbon budget estimates due to internal climate variability K. Tokarska et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/abaf1b
52. A multimodel analysis of post-Glasgow climate targets and feasibility challenges D. van de Ven et al. 10.1038/s41558-023-01661-0
53. Consequences of equivalency metric design for energy transitions and climate change M. Edwards & J. Trancik 10.1007/s10584-022-03442-8
54. Climate uncertainty impacts on optimal mitigation pathways and social cost of carbon C. Smith et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acedc6
55. Large Variations in Volcanic Aerosol Forcing Efficiency Due to Eruption Source Parameters and Rapid Adjustments L. Marshall et al. 10.1029/2020GL090241
56. Relating climate sensitivity indices to projection uncertainty B. Sanderson 10.5194/esd-11-721-2020
57. Regionally aggregated, stitched and de‐drifted CMIP‐climate data, processed with netCDF‐SCM v2.0.0 Z. Nicholls et al. 10.1002/gdj3.113
58. Unknown Eruption Source Parameters Cause Large Uncertainty in Historical Volcanic Radiative Forcing Reconstructions L. Marshall et al. 10.1029/2020JD033578
59. Credibility gap in net-zero climate targets leaves world at high risk J. Rogelj et al. 10.1126/science.adg6428
60. Quantifying aviation’s contribution to global warming M. Klöwer et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac286e
61. Institutional decarbonization scenarios evaluated against the Paris Agreement 1.5 °C goal R. Brecha et al. 10.1038/s41467-022-31734-1
62. Advancing the estimation of future climate impacts within the United States C. Hartin et al. 10.5194/esd-14-1015-2023
63. The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report WGIII climate assessment of mitigation pathways: from emissions to global temperatures J. Kikstra et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-9075-2022
64. Temperature neutrality and Irish methane policy J. Wheatley 10.1080/14693062.2023.2191921
65. Demonstrating GWP*: a means of reporting warming-equivalent emissions that captures the contrasting impacts of short- and long-lived climate pollutants J. Lynch et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6d7e
66. Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project Phase 2: Synthesizing Earth System Knowledge for Probabilistic Climate Projections Z. Nicholls et al. 10.1029/2020EF001900
67. Improving statistical projections of ocean dynamic sea-level change using pattern recognition techniques V. Malagón-Santos et al. 10.5194/os-19-499-2023
68. Agriculture's Contribution to Climate Change and Role in Mitigation Is Distinct From Predominantly Fossil CO2-Emitting Sectors J. Lynch et al. 10.3389/fsufs.2020.518039
69. Physically based equation representing the forcing-driven precipitation in climate models D. Lee et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acf50f
70. Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project Phase 1: introduction and evaluation of global-mean temperature response Z. Nicholls et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-5175-2020
71. Self‐Adaptive Multi‐Objective Climate Policies Align Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies A. Carlino et al. 10.1029/2022EF002767
72. Potential impacts of rapidly changing european use of fossil fuels on global warming C. Huntingford et al. 10.1088/2515-7620/acf3d7
73. Radiative forcing of climate change from the Copernicus reanalysis of atmospheric composition N. Bellouin et al. 10.5194/essd-12-1649-2020
74. Climate change modulates the stratospheric volcanic sulfate aerosol lifecycle and radiative forcing from tropical eruptions T. Aubry et al. 10.1038/s41467-021-24943-7
75. Methane emissions from California dairies estimated using novel climate metric Global Warming Potential Star show improved agreement with modeled warming dynamics E. Pressman et al. 10.3389/fsufs.2022.1072805
76. Evaluation of the University of Victoria Earth System Climate Model version 2.10 (UVic ESCM 2.10) N. Mengis et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-4183-2020
77. Improved calculation of warming-equivalent emissions for short-lived climate pollutants M. Cain et al. 10.1038/s41612-019-0086-4
78. CMIP6 simulations with the compact Earth system model OSCAR v3.1 Y. Quilcaille et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-1129-2023
79. Pathfinder v1.0.1: a Bayesian-inferred simple carbon–climate model to explore climate change scenarios T. Bossy et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-8831-2022
80. Guidance on emissions metrics for nationally determined contributions under the Paris Agreement S. Denison et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab4df4
81. Pathways analysis to reducing aircraft emissions for China-Foreign routes Q. Cui & Y. Lei 10.1038/s44168-023-00047-4
82. Machine learning for weather and climate are worlds apart D. Watson-Parris 10.1098/rsta.2020.0098
83. Potential for bias in effective climate sensitivity from state-dependent energetic imbalance B. Sanderson & M. Rugenstein 10.5194/esd-13-1715-2022
84. Assessing the size and uncertainty of remaining carbon budgets R. Lamboll et al. 10.1038/s41558-023-01848-5
85. Mechanisms and Impacts of Earth System Tipping Elements S. Wang et al. 10.1029/2021RG000757
86. Equity is more important for the social cost of methane than climate uncertainty F. Errickson et al. 10.1038/s41586-021-03386-6
87. From emission scenarios to spatially resolved projections with a chain of computationally efficient emulators: coupling of MAGICC (v7.5.1) and MESMER (v0.8.3) L. Beusch et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-2085-2022
88. Diagnosing Transient Response to CO2 Forcing in Coupled Atmosphere‐Ocean Model Experiments Using a Climate Model Emulator J. Tsutsui 10.1029/2019GL085844
89. ClimateBench v1.0: A Benchmark for Data‐Driven Climate Projections D. Watson‐Parris et al. 10.1029/2021MS002954
90. Quantifying the probability distribution function of the transient climate response to cumulative CO2 emissions L. Spafford & A. MacDougall 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6d7b
91. Climate and air quality impacts due to mitigation of non-methane near-term climate forcers R. Allen et al. 10.5194/acp-20-9641-2020
92. Animal-based foods have high social and climate costs F. Errickson et al. 10.1038/s43016-021-00265-1
93. Sustainable aviation in the context of the Paris Agreement: A review of prospective scenarios and their technological mitigation levers S. Delbecq et al. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2023.100920
94. Effective radiative forcing and adjustments in CMIP6 models C. Smith et al. 10.5194/acp-20-9591-2020
95. Silicone v1.0.0: an open-source Python package for inferring missing emissions data for climate change research R. Lamboll et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-5259-2020
96. Bayesian estimation of Earth's climate sensitivity and transient climate response from observational warming and heat content datasets P. Goodwin & B. Cael 10.5194/esd-12-709-2021
97. Minimal CMIP Emulator (MCE v1.2): a new simplified method for probabilistic climate projections J. Tsutsui 10.5194/gmd-15-951-2022
98. Much of zero emissions commitment occurs before reaching net zero emissions C. Koven et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acab1a
99. Stringent mitigation substantially reduces risk of unprecedented near-term warming rates C. McKenna et al. 10.1038/s41558-020-00957-9
100. An integrated approach to quantifying uncertainties in the remaining carbon budget H. Damon Matthews et al. 10.1038/s43247-020-00064-9
101. Climate and air-quality benefits of a realistic phase-out of fossil fuels D. Shindell & C. Smith 10.1038/s41586-019-1554-z
102. Social cost of carbon under a carbon-neutral pathway A. Liu et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac6819
103. Current fossil fuel infrastructure does not yet commit us to 1.5 °C warming C. Smith et al. 10.1038/s41467-018-07999-w
104. Improving reduced complexity model assessment and usability M. Sarofim et al. 10.1038/s41558-020-00973-9
105. Changes in IPCC Scenario Assessment Emulators Between SR1.5 and AR6 Unraveled Z. Nicholls et al. 10.1029/2022GL099788
106. Uncompensated claims to fair emission space risk putting Paris Agreement goals out of reach G. Ganti et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acb502
107. Metrics for the emissions of F-gas refrigerants N. Miranda et al. 10.1016/j.seta.2023.103348
108. Radiative forcing climate footprints in the agricultural sector: Comparison of models from the IPCC 5th and 6th Assessment Reports X. Luo et al. 10.1016/j.farsys.2023.100057
109. Definitions and implications of climate-neutral aviation N. Brazzola et al. 10.1038/s41558-022-01404-7
110. Asset Pricing with Disagreement about Climate Risks T. Lontzek et al. 10.2139/ssrn.4473164
111. Modifying emissions scenario projections to account for the effects of COVID-19: protocol for CovidMIP R. Lamboll et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-3683-2021
112. Estimating and tracking the remaining carbon budget for stringent climate targets J. Rogelj et al. 10.1038/s41586-019-1368-z
113. Carbon farming: Climate change mitigation via non-permanent carbon sinks J. Leifeld 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117893
114. Mechanisms and Impacts of Earth System Tipping Elements S. Wang et al. 10.1029/2021RG000757
115. Modeling the climate and carbon systems to estimate the social cost of carbon T. Thompson 10.1002/wcc.532
116. Global Carbon Budget Study using Global Carbon Cycle Model O. Kwon & J. Jung 10.5322/JESI.2018.27.12.1169
117. The Bern Simple Climate Model (BernSCM) v1.0: an extensible and fully documented open-source re-implementation of the Bern reduced-form model for global carbon cycle–climate simulations K. Strassmann & F. Joos 10.5194/gmd-11-1887-2018