Articles | Volume 10, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3963-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3963-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Model evaluation paper
| 
03 Nov 2017
Model evaluation paper |
| 03 Nov 2017
DebrisInterMixing-2.3: a finite volume solver for three-dimensional debris-flow simulations with two calibration parameters – Part 2: Model validation with experiments
Albrecht von Boetticher
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Environmental Systems Science,
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich ETHZ, CHN H41, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL,
Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
Jens M. Turowski
Helmholtz-Centre Potsdam GFZ, German Research Center for Geosciences,
Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
Brian W. McArdell
Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL,
Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
Dieter Rickenmann
Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL,
Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
Marcel Hürlimann
Department of Geotechnical Engineering and Geosciences, Technical University of Catalonia UPC,
Jordi Girona, 1-3 (D2), 08034 Barcelona, Spain
Christian Scheidl
Institute of Mountain Risk Engineering, BOKU,
Peter-Jordan-Straße 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria
James W. Kirchner
Department of Environmental Systems Science,
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich ETHZ, CHN H41, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL,
Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
Viewed
Total article views: 3,963 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 28 Feb 2017)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,637 | 1,201 | 125 | 3,963 | 311 | 151 | 157 |
- HTML: 2,637
- PDF: 1,201
- XML: 125
- Total: 3,963
- Supplement: 311
- BibTeX: 151
- EndNote: 157
Total article views: 2,989 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 03 Nov 2017)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,043 | 856 | 90 | 2,989 | 186 | 135 | 118 |
- HTML: 2,043
- PDF: 856
- XML: 90
- Total: 2,989
- Supplement: 186
- BibTeX: 135
- EndNote: 118
Total article views: 974 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 28 Feb 2017)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 594 | 345 | 35 | 974 | 125 | 16 | 39 |
- HTML: 594
- PDF: 345
- XML: 35
- Total: 974
- Supplement: 125
- BibTeX: 16
- EndNote: 39
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,963 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,773 with geography defined
and 190 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,989 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,812 with geography defined
and 177 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 974 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 961 with geography defined
and 13 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
21 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Sensitivity and Calibration of Three‐Dimensional SPH Formulations in Large‐Scale Landslide Modeling S. Li et al. 10.1029/2022JB024583
- Stability and Deformation Degree of Wheel Loaders under the Impact of Debris Flow Z. Feng et al. 10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-1552
- An integral assessment of landslide dams generated by the occurrence of rainfall-induced landslide and debris flow hazard chain L. Ortiz-Giraldo et al. 10.3389/feart.2023.1157881
- An overview of debris-flow mathematical modelling M. Trujillo-Vela et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104135
- Shear-thinning, Coulomb friction and grain collisions in debris-flow waterfalls: Applications of a 3D phase mixture model with a single calibration parameter and a complex 4-way coupled resolved CFD-DEM approach A. von Boetticher et al. 10.1051/e3sconf/202341502024
- Landslide dynamics with energy loss in internal shearing S. Pudasaini & M. Mergili 10.1007/s10346-024-02424-4
- Modeling submerged granular flow across multiple regimes using the Eulerian–Eulerian approach with shear-induced volumetric behavior Q. Phan et al. 10.1063/5.0092726
- Towards a model for structured mass movements: the OpenLISEM hazard model 2.0a B. van den Bout et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-1841-2021
- faSavageHutterFOAM 1.0: depth-integrated simulation of dense snow avalanches on natural terrain with OpenFOAM M. Rauter et al. 10.5194/gmd-11-2923-2018
- Hazard assessment of debris flow by using FLO-2D and hazard matrix: a case study of Qingshui Gully in the southern Gansu Province, China P. Zhang et al. 10.5004/dwt.2023.30108
- A homogenized sliding-block model for landslide motion analysis F. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2025.02.019
- The compressible granular collapse in a fluid as a continuum: validity of a Navier–Stokes model with , -rheology M. Rauter 10.1017/jfm.2021.107
- An extended quasi two-phase mass flow model K. Khattri & S. Pudasaini 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2018.07.008
- An improved DebrisInterMixingFoam for debris flow simulation: numerical investigation and application R. Li & Y. Teng 10.1007/s11069-022-05376-x
- Methodology for assessing pipeline failure probability due to a debris flow in the near field S. Song et al. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15956
- Channel flow simulation of a mixture with a full-dimensional generalized quasi two-phase model K. Khattri & S. Pudasaini 10.1016/j.matcom.2019.03.014
- A generalized quasi two-phase bulk mixture model for mass flow P. Pokhrel et al. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2017.12.003
- Two-layer multi-state SPH modelling of momentum growth and its feedback in viscous debris flow on wet bed sediment Y. Ma et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107804
- Modeling the Slump-Type Landslide Tsunamis Part I: Developing a Three-Dimensional Bingham-Type Landslide Model T. Wu et al. 10.3390/app10186501
- Measurement of the effective dynamic viscosity of soil-rock mixture J. Lan et al. 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2025.105782
- A Multi‐Phase Mass Flow Model S. Pudasaini & M. Mergili 10.1029/2019JF005204
21 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Sensitivity and Calibration of Three‐Dimensional SPH Formulations in Large‐Scale Landslide Modeling S. Li et al. 10.1029/2022JB024583
- Stability and Deformation Degree of Wheel Loaders under the Impact of Debris Flow Z. Feng et al. 10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-1552
- An integral assessment of landslide dams generated by the occurrence of rainfall-induced landslide and debris flow hazard chain L. Ortiz-Giraldo et al. 10.3389/feart.2023.1157881
- An overview of debris-flow mathematical modelling M. Trujillo-Vela et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104135
- Shear-thinning, Coulomb friction and grain collisions in debris-flow waterfalls: Applications of a 3D phase mixture model with a single calibration parameter and a complex 4-way coupled resolved CFD-DEM approach A. von Boetticher et al. 10.1051/e3sconf/202341502024
- Landslide dynamics with energy loss in internal shearing S. Pudasaini & M. Mergili 10.1007/s10346-024-02424-4
- Modeling submerged granular flow across multiple regimes using the Eulerian–Eulerian approach with shear-induced volumetric behavior Q. Phan et al. 10.1063/5.0092726
- Towards a model for structured mass movements: the OpenLISEM hazard model 2.0a B. van den Bout et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-1841-2021
- faSavageHutterFOAM 1.0: depth-integrated simulation of dense snow avalanches on natural terrain with OpenFOAM M. Rauter et al. 10.5194/gmd-11-2923-2018
- Hazard assessment of debris flow by using FLO-2D and hazard matrix: a case study of Qingshui Gully in the southern Gansu Province, China P. Zhang et al. 10.5004/dwt.2023.30108
- A homogenized sliding-block model for landslide motion analysis F. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2025.02.019
- The compressible granular collapse in a fluid as a continuum: validity of a Navier–Stokes model with , -rheology M. Rauter 10.1017/jfm.2021.107
- An extended quasi two-phase mass flow model K. Khattri & S. Pudasaini 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2018.07.008
- An improved DebrisInterMixingFoam for debris flow simulation: numerical investigation and application R. Li & Y. Teng 10.1007/s11069-022-05376-x
- Methodology for assessing pipeline failure probability due to a debris flow in the near field S. Song et al. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15956
- Channel flow simulation of a mixture with a full-dimensional generalized quasi two-phase model K. Khattri & S. Pudasaini 10.1016/j.matcom.2019.03.014
- A generalized quasi two-phase bulk mixture model for mass flow P. Pokhrel et al. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2017.12.003
- Two-layer multi-state SPH modelling of momentum growth and its feedback in viscous debris flow on wet bed sediment Y. Ma et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107804
- Modeling the Slump-Type Landslide Tsunamis Part I: Developing a Three-Dimensional Bingham-Type Landslide Model T. Wu et al. 10.3390/app10186501
- Measurement of the effective dynamic viscosity of soil-rock mixture J. Lan et al. 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2025.105782
- A Multi‐Phase Mass Flow Model S. Pudasaini & M. Mergili 10.1029/2019JF005204
Latest update: 05 Jul 2025
Short summary
The open-source fluid dynamic solver presented in v. Boetticher et al. (2016) combines a Coulomb viscosplastic rheological model with a Herschel–Bulkley model based on material properties for 3-D debris flow simulations. Here, we validate the solver and illustrate the model sensitivity to water content, channel curvature, content of fine material and channel bed roughness. We simulate both laboratory-scale and large-scale debris-flow experiments, using only one of the two calibration parameters.
The open-source fluid dynamic solver presented in v. Boetticher et al. (2016) combines a Coulomb...
