Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 10, issue 8
Articles | Volume 10, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3085-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3085-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Articles | Volume 10, issue 8
Model evaluation paper
 | 
21 Aug 2017
Model evaluation paper |  | 21 Aug 2017

Biogenic isoprene emissions driven by regional weather predictions using different initialization methods: case studies during the SEAC4RS and DISCOVER-AQ airborne campaigns

Min Huang, Gregory R. Carmichael, James H. Crawford, Armin Wisthaler, Xiwu Zhan, Christopher R. Hain, Pius Lee, and Alex B. Guenther

Viewed

Total article views: 6,219 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
4,638 1,305 276 6,219 311 208 289
  • HTML: 4,638
  • PDF: 1,305
  • XML: 276
  • Total: 6,219
  • Supplement: 311
  • BibTeX: 208
  • EndNote: 289
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Jan 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Jan 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 6,219 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 5,846 with geography defined and 373 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 27 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
Various sensitivity simulations during two airborne campaigns were performed to assess the impact of different initialization methods and model resolutions on NUWRF-modeled weather states, heat fluxes, and the follow-on MEGAN isoprene emission calculations. Proper land initialization is shown to be important to the coupled weather modeling and the follow-on emission modeling, which is also critical to accurately representing other processes in air quality modeling and data assimilation.
Read more
Share