Global evaluation of gross primary productivity in the JULES land surface model v3.4.1
Darren Slevin et al.
Total article views: 1,986 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 21 Sep 2016)Views and downloads (calculated since 21 Sep 2016)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 1,873 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,857 with geography defined and 16 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,302 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,289 with geography defined and 13 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 571 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 568 with geography defined and 3 with unknown origin.
21 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Global vegetation variability and its response to elevated CO<sub>2</sub>, global warming, and climate variability – a study using the offline SSiB4/TRIFFID model and satellite data Y. Liu et al. 10.5194/esd-10-9-2019
- ERA-5 and ERA-Interim driven ISBA land surface model simulations: which one performs better? C. Albergel et al. 10.5194/hess-22-3515-2018
- Uncertainty analysis of multiple global GPP datasets in characterizing the lagged effect of drought on photosynthesis X. Xie et al. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106224
- Process refinement contributed more than parameter optimization to improve the CoLM's performance in simulating the carbon and water fluxes in a grassland Y. Li et al. 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108067
- Spatio-temporal variability of gross primary productivity in moist and dry deciduous plant functional types of Northwest Himalayan foothills of India using temperature-greenness model R. Srinet et al. 10.1080/10106049.2020.1801855
- Using SMOS soil moisture data combining CO2 flask samples to constrain carbon fluxes during 2010–2015 within a Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) M. Wu et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111719
- Global terrestrial carbon fluxes of 1999–2019 estimated by upscaling eddy covariance data with a random forest J. Zeng et al. 10.1038/s41597-020-00653-5
- Coupled estimation of 500 m and 8-day resolution global evapotranspiration and gross primary production in 2002–2017 Y. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2018.12.031
- The impact of spatiotemporal variability in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration on global terrestrial carbon fluxes E. Lee et al. 10.5194/bg-15-5635-2018
- Skillful seasonal prediction of key carbon cycle components: NPP and fire risk P. Bett et al. 10.1088/2515-7620/ab8b29
- Impact of climate, rising atmospheric carbon dioxide, and other environmental factors on water-use efficiency at multiple land cover types M. Umair et al. 10.1038/s41598-020-68472-7
- Parallelization of a distributed ecohydrological model N. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.11.033
- Understanding the Land Carbon Cycle with Space Data: Current Status and Prospects J. Exbrayat et al. 10.1007/s10712-019-09506-2
- Peak growing season patterns and climate extremes-driven responses of gross primary production estimated by satellite and process based models over North America W. He et al. 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108292
- Sequential assimilation of satellite-derived vegetation and soil moisture products using SURFEX_v8.0: LDAS-Monde assessment over the Euro-Mediterranean area C. Albergel et al. 10.5194/gmd-10-3889-2017
- Impact of leaf area index from various sources on estimating gross primary production in temperate forests using the JULES land surface model H. Lee et al. 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107614
- A review of the global soil property maps for Earth system models Y. Dai et al. 10.5194/soil-5-137-2019
- Assessing the vulnerability of ecosystems to climate change based on climate exposure, vegetation stability and productivity K. Xu et al. 10.1186/s40663-020-00239-y
- Model Structure and Climate Data Uncertainty in Historical Simulations of the Terrestrial Carbon Cycle (1850–2014) G. Bonan et al. 10.1029/2019GB006175
- Implementation of Yale Interactive terrestrial Biosphere model v1.0 into GEOS-Chem v12.0.0: a tool for biosphere–chemistry interactions Y. Lei et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-1137-2020
- A narrower gap of grazing intensity. Reply to Fetzel et al., 2017. Seasonality constrains to livestock grazing intensity J. Irisarri et al. 10.1111/gcb.13800
Latest update: 22 Jan 2021