Articles | Volume 10, issue 4
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1767–1787, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1767-2017
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1767–1787, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1767-2017

Model evaluation paper 27 Apr 2017

Model evaluation paper | 27 Apr 2017

Spatiotemporal evaluation of EMEP4UK-WRF v4.3 atmospheric chemistry transport simulations of health-related metrics for NO2, O3, PM10, and PM2. 5 for 2001–2010

Chun Lin et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 2,084 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,332 646 106 2,084 293 108 141
  • HTML: 1,332
  • PDF: 646
  • XML: 106
  • Total: 2,084
  • Supplement: 293
  • BibTeX: 108
  • EndNote: 141
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Aug 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Aug 2016)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,989 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,977 with geography defined and 12 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 08 Dec 2021
Download
Short summary
We evaluated EMEP4UK-WRF v4.3 atmospheric chemistry transport simulations at 5 km horizontal resolution over the UK for use in air pollution epidemiology and health burden assessment. Model-measurement comparison focused on daily and annual means for NO2, O3, PM10, and PM2.5. Important statistics for evaluation of air-quality model output against policy (and hence health)-relevant standards – correlation, bias, and root mean square error – were evaluated by site type, year, month and day-of-week.