Model evaluation paper
27 Apr 2017
Model evaluation paper
| 27 Apr 2017
Spatiotemporal evaluation of EMEP4UK-WRF v4.3 atmospheric chemistry transport simulations of health-related metrics for NO2, O3, PM10, and PM2. 5 for 2001–2010
Chun Lin et al.
Viewed
Total article views: 2,263 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 15 Aug 2016)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,468 | 685 | 110 | 2,263 | 317 | 117 | 146 |
- HTML: 1,468
- PDF: 685
- XML: 110
- Total: 2,263
- Supplement: 317
- BibTeX: 117
- EndNote: 146
Total article views: 1,876 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 27 Apr 2017)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,238 | 537 | 101 | 1,876 | 201 | 105 | 133 |
- HTML: 1,238
- PDF: 537
- XML: 101
- Total: 1,876
- Supplement: 201
- BibTeX: 105
- EndNote: 133
Total article views: 387 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 15 Aug 2016)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
230 | 148 | 9 | 387 | 116 | 12 | 13 |
- HTML: 230
- PDF: 148
- XML: 9
- Total: 387
- Supplement: 116
- BibTeX: 12
- EndNote: 13
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 2,160 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,148 with geography defined
and 12 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,783 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,771 with geography defined
and 12 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 377 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 377 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
13 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Can Data Assimilation of Surface PM2.5 and Satellite AOD Improve WRF-Chem Forecasting? A Case Study for Two Scenarios of Particulate Air Pollution Episodes in Poland M. Werner et al. 10.3390/rs11202364
- Life Course Air Pollution Exposure and Cognitive Decline: Modelled Historical Air Pollution Data and the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 T. Russ et al. 10.3233/JAD-200910
- Air quality simulations for London using a coupled regional-to-local modelling system C. Hood et al. 10.5194/acp-18-11221-2018
- The relationship between personal exposure and ambient PM2.5 and black carbon in Beijing C. Lin et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139801
- High resolution application of the EMEP MSC-W model over Eastern Europe – Analysis of the EMEP4PL results M. Werner et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.04.025
- Advanced methods for uncertainty assessment and global sensitivity analysis of an Eulerian atmospheric chemistry transport model K. Aleksankina et al. 10.5194/acp-19-2881-2019
- Spatial analysis and evolution of four air pollutants in England and Wales Á. Prieto et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145665
- Assessing the health estimation capacity of air pollution exposure prediction models J. Krall et al. 10.1186/s12940-022-00844-0
- Applying air pollution modelling within a multi-criteria decision analysis framework to evaluate UK air quality policies Z. Chalabi et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.08.057
- A grey spatiotemporal incidence model with application to factors causing air pollution J. Sun et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143576
- A Satellite-Based Spatio-Temporal Machine Learning Model to Reconstruct Daily PM2.5 Concentrations across Great Britain R. Schneider et al. 10.3390/rs12223803
- Comparing the performance of air pollution models for nitrogen dioxide and ozone in the context of a multilevel epidemiological analysis B. Butland et al. 10.1097/EE9.0000000000000093
- Socioeconomic and urban-rural differentials in exposure to air pollution and mortality burden in England A. Milojevic et al. 10.1186/s12940-017-0314-5
12 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Can Data Assimilation of Surface PM2.5 and Satellite AOD Improve WRF-Chem Forecasting? A Case Study for Two Scenarios of Particulate Air Pollution Episodes in Poland M. Werner et al. 10.3390/rs11202364
- Life Course Air Pollution Exposure and Cognitive Decline: Modelled Historical Air Pollution Data and the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 T. Russ et al. 10.3233/JAD-200910
- Air quality simulations for London using a coupled regional-to-local modelling system C. Hood et al. 10.5194/acp-18-11221-2018
- The relationship between personal exposure and ambient PM2.5 and black carbon in Beijing C. Lin et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139801
- High resolution application of the EMEP MSC-W model over Eastern Europe – Analysis of the EMEP4PL results M. Werner et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.04.025
- Advanced methods for uncertainty assessment and global sensitivity analysis of an Eulerian atmospheric chemistry transport model K. Aleksankina et al. 10.5194/acp-19-2881-2019
- Spatial analysis and evolution of four air pollutants in England and Wales Á. Prieto et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145665
- Assessing the health estimation capacity of air pollution exposure prediction models J. Krall et al. 10.1186/s12940-022-00844-0
- Applying air pollution modelling within a multi-criteria decision analysis framework to evaluate UK air quality policies Z. Chalabi et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.08.057
- A grey spatiotemporal incidence model with application to factors causing air pollution J. Sun et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143576
- A Satellite-Based Spatio-Temporal Machine Learning Model to Reconstruct Daily PM2.5 Concentrations across Great Britain R. Schneider et al. 10.3390/rs12223803
- Comparing the performance of air pollution models for nitrogen dioxide and ozone in the context of a multilevel epidemiological analysis B. Butland et al. 10.1097/EE9.0000000000000093
Latest update: 27 May 2022
Short summary
We evaluated EMEP4UK-WRF v4.3 atmospheric chemistry transport simulations at 5 km horizontal resolution over the UK for use in air pollution epidemiology and health burden assessment. Model-measurement comparison focused on daily and annual means for NO2, O3, PM10, and PM2.5. Important statistics for evaluation of air-quality model output against policy (and hence health)-relevant standards – correlation, bias, and root mean square error – were evaluated by site type, year, month and day-of-week.
We evaluated EMEP4UK-WRF v4.3 atmospheric chemistry transport simulations at 5 km horizontal...