the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Data-driven rolling model for global wave height
Abstract. Significant Wave Height (SWH) is crucial for many human activities, such as marine navigation, offshore operations, and coastal management. Traditionally, SWH is modeled using numerical wave models, which, while accurate, are computationally intensive and constrained by incomplete physical representations of wave spectral evolution. This study introduces a simple global deep learning-based model for SWH, which uses the current SWH field and the wind field at the next time step as inputs to predict the SWH field at the next time step. This approach mirrors the rolling prediction strategy of numerical wave models. After training on a re-analysis dataset, the errors of the model diverge lightly with time when given a good initial field because no spectral information is used. However, after diverging for ~200 hours, the errors stabilize, remaining comparable to those of state-of-the-art numerical wave models. Additionally, the error divergence can be mitigated through the assimilation of altimeter measurements. This deep learning model can not only serve as an efficient surrogate for traditional numerical wave models but also provide a baseline for statistical modeling of global SWH due to its simplicity in inputs and outputs.
- Preprint
(8455 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(2234 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 16 Dec 2024)
-
RC1: 'Comment on gmd-2024-181', Anonymous Referee #1, 19 Nov 2024
reply
Through adopting a rolling  strategy, an artificial intelligence model is established by using a U-Net architecture, and global SWH prediction is produced by the model after trained using ERA5 data.
Specific comments:Â
1. I just wonder if  the RMSEs in Figure 2c and Figure 4d are smaller than that of climatology.
2. For the sake of comparison, the colorbar scales in  Figures 6-7 should be the same as those used in Figures 4-5.
3. The units of variables on the vertical axis are missing in (b) and (c) in Figures 2-3.Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-181-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Xinxin Wang, 22 Nov 2024
reply
We thank reviewer 1 for these insightful and useful comments. Please find the reply in the attached pdf.
-
RC2: 'Reply on AC1', Anonymous Referee #1, 22 Nov 2024
reply
The authors have satisfactorily addressed my previous concerns. I recommend acceptance for publication.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-181-RC2
-
RC2: 'Reply on AC1', Anonymous Referee #1, 22 Nov 2024
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Xinxin Wang, 22 Nov 2024
reply
-
CEC1: 'Comment on gmd-2024-181', Juan Antonio Añel, 28 Nov 2024
reply
Dear authors,
Unfortunately, after checking your manuscript, it has come to our attention that it does not comply with our "Code and Data Policy".
https://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/policies/code_and_data_policy.htmlWe have detected several major flaws in your manuscript, and In this way, if you do not fix these problems in a prompt manner, we will have to reject your manuscript for publication in our journal. Actually, with such flaws your manuscript should have never been accepted in Discussions. Therefore, the situation with your manuscript is irregular, as we can not accept manuscripts in Discussions that do not comply with our policy.
First, you have archived your code on GitHub. However, GitHub is not a suitable repository for scientific publication. Our policy mentions it clearly. GitHub itself instructs authors to use other long-term archival and publishing alternatives, such as Zenodo, PANGAEA, FigShare, etc. Please, publish your code in one of the appropriate repositories and reply to this comment with the relevant information (link and a permanent identifier for it (e.g. DOI)) as soon as possible. Also, in the GitHub repository no license is listed. If you do not include a license the code remains your property and nobody can use it. Therefore, when uploading the model's code to the new repository you could want to choose a free software/open-source (FLOSS) license. We suggest the GPLv3 or similar ones. For the GPLv3 you simply need to include the file 'https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.txt' as LICENSE.txt with your code. Also, you can choose other options: e.g., GPLv2, Apache License, MIT License, etc.
Second, in your manuscript you state "The WW3-ST6 dataset is available from Liu et al (2021)". Actually this statement is useless, as Liu et al. (2021) only say that the dataset is made available by contacting the authors by email, something explicitly forbidden by the policy of our journal, which clearly states that all the assets necessary to replicate a work must be published openly in a permanent repository before submission. Therefore, you must publish the WW3-ST6 dataset in a suitable repository, and again reply to this comment with the corresponding link and DOI.
Also, being this submission about a deep-learning model it is necessary that you provide a repository with the specific data that you have used to train your model, not generic mentions to the full datasets used. The same is of application for the output data. This information is necessary to replicate your work. The same rules on DOI and link that I commented above for the other datasets apply here.
Finally, you must include the modified 'Code and Data Availability' section in a potentially reviewed manuscript, with the new DOIs and links for the requested repositories. As I have said, given the lack of necessary information to correctly evaluate your manuscript, and that it was accepted in Discussions and undergone peer review despite it, you must address quickly all this issues.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor  ÂCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-181-CEC1 -
AC2: 'Reply on CEC1', Xinxin Wang, 29 Nov 2024
reply
Thank you for your constructive feedback and support. We have carefully addressed all the concerns raised and completed the necessary revisions. Please find our detailed response in the attached PDF.
-
AC2: 'Reply on CEC1', Xinxin Wang, 29 Nov 2024
reply
Data sets
AI-Rolling-Wave-Height-Model Xinxin Wang https://github.com/YulKeal/AI-Rolling-Wave-Height-Model
Video supplement
Supplementary Movies S1 & S2 Xinxin Wang https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1zo-HOSLDrLjMSCDiwWIf9I37pFYPG3Zt?usp=sharing
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
369 | 55 | 15 | 439 | 30 | 3 | 4 |
- HTML: 369
- PDF: 55
- XML: 15
- Total: 439
- Supplement: 30
- BibTeX: 3
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1