Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-154
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-154
Submitted as: model description paper
 | 
18 Sep 2024
Submitted as: model description paper |  | 18 Sep 2024
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal GMD.

GraphFlow v1.0: approximating groundwater contaminant transport with graph-based methods – an application to fault scenario selection

Léonard Moracchini, Guillaume Pirot, Kerry Bardot, Mark W. Jessell, and James L. McCallum

Abstract. Groundwater contaminant transport problems remain challenging with respect to their computing requirements. Thus, it often limits the exploration of conceptual uncertainty, that is mainly related to large scale structural features and due to limited characterization. Here, to facilitate geological conceptual uncertainty exploration, we develop further the use of graph representation for geological models to approximate groundwater flow and transport. We consider a faulted multi-heterogeneous-layer medium to test our approach. The existing rank correlation between shortest path distribution from a contaminant source to the model domain outlet and cumulative mass distribution at the outlet enables to perform scenario selection. The scenario selection approach relies on a metric combining the Jaccard dissimilarity and the Wasserstein distance to compare binary images. Among a set combining eight alternative scenarios, where three faults can either act as a flow barrier or a preferential path, we show that the use of graph-approximations allows to retain or reject scenarios with confidence as well as to estimate the individual probability of a fault to act as a barrier or a path. This methodology framework opens up possibilities to explore more thoroughly conceptual geological uncertainty for processes affected by flow and transport.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Léonard Moracchini, Guillaume Pirot, Kerry Bardot, Mark W. Jessell, and James L. McCallum

Status: open (until 13 Nov 2024)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Léonard Moracchini, Guillaume Pirot, Kerry Bardot, Mark W. Jessell, and James L. McCallum

Data sets

GraphFlow Leonard Moracchini and Guillaume Pirot https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13328938

Model code and software

GraphFlow Leonard Moracchini and Guillaume Pirot https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13328938

Interactive computing environment

GraphFlow Leonard Moracchini and Guillaume Pirot https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13328938

Léonard Moracchini, Guillaume Pirot, Kerry Bardot, Mark W. Jessell, and James L. McCallum

Viewed

Total article views: 70 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
55 7 8 70 0 0
  • HTML: 55
  • PDF: 7
  • XML: 8
  • Total: 70
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Sep 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Sep 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 73 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 73 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 26 Sep 2024
Download
Short summary
To facilitate the exploration of alternative hydrogeological scenarios, we propose to approximate costly physical simulations of contaminant transport by more affordable shortest distances computations. It enables to accept or reject scenarios within a predefined confidence interval. In particular, it can allow to estimate the probability of a fault acting as a preferential path or a barrier.