the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PyGLDA: a fine-scale Python-based Global Land Data Assimilation system for integrating satellite gravity data into hydrological models
Abstract. Data Assimilation (DA) of time-variable satellite gravity observations, e.g., from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE), GRACE-Follow On (GRACE-FO) and future gravity missions, can be applied to constrain the vertical sum of water storage simulations of Global Hydrological Models (GHMs). However, the state-of-the-art DA of these measured Terrestrial Water Storage (TWS) changes into models is often performed regionally, and if globally, at low spatial resolution. This choice is made to handle the considerably high computational demands of DA, and to avoid numerical problems, e.g., instabilities related to the inversion of covariance matrices. To fully exploit the potential of satellite gravity observations and the high spatial resolution of GHMs, we developed a Python-based open-source PyGLDA system that allows performing DA globally at a fine scale with high numerical efficiency. The main novelties of the system include (i) implementing a globe-scale patch-wise DA via domain localization and neighbouring-weighted global aggregation and (2) its great compatibility between basin-scale and grid-scale DAs. This PyGLDA system represents a considerable functional advancement on previous implementations with wide and flexible options offered to allow for various user-specific studies. The modular structure of PyGLDA provides users with various possibilities to interact with (and add/remove) individual water storage compartments, change the representation of observations, and, therefore, the ability to choose different GHMs. In this paper, we present a full description of this system and its application for the Danube River Basin as a regional case study and through a global DA. The DA demonstrations are performed using the monthly TWS fields of GRACE (2002–2010) and the W3RA water balance model at 0.1-degree/daily spatial-temporal resolution.
- Preprint
(4819 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (extended)
-
RC1: 'Comment on gmd-2024-125', Anonymous Referee #1, 25 Jul 2024
reply
General comments:
This study presents an open-source global data assimilation (DA) system for integrating GRACE/GRACE-FO total water storage into Global Hydrological Models. The study achieves a previously unseen high spatial resolution, with the potential to increase the use of GRACE/GRACE-FO data in the hydrological modelling community. The study is well within the scope of GMD and a relevant contribution, particularly as it provides a reproducible and transparent approach. The authors have done a thorough effort to test that their implementation can be used at the targeted levels and with consistency.
The paper could benefit from a proof-reading and more importantly some clarifications – quite a few terms are treated as self-explanatory which they are not for non-GRACE experts, who might still benefit from using the tools and models developed and kindly made available by the authors.
While the data processing and DA setups are quite thorough, the GHM used is still quite fundamental to the DA and clearer details on its limitations and structure could be beneficial both to understanding some of the results, but also to identify where additional experiments and developments are warranted. I think the paper would gain in strength and impact if it were to include some model validation and analysis of the hydrological consistency.
Specific comments:
l. 28-30 I would revise how you classify the models – most of these are rainfall-runoff and conceptual which is also the case of a water balance model. In general we talk more of conceptual versus physically based and whether a model is lumped, distributed or semi-distributed (e.g. SWAT with Hydrological Response Units). The question can also be how many processes are lumped/conceptualized and how simple the model structure is.
l. 71 spelling of project name
2.2 Which up- or down-scaling routine are you using?
2.3 How are the parameters down-scaled? Is there any risk of non-linearities at the boundaries between pixels or basins?
2.4 Please explain more clearly what ITSG-2018 is and who is developing it? In 2.4 you only present the three official data centers, and it would be good with a bit more background information on ITSG-2018 and why you prefer an unofficial provider (and whether that is available to any user). Why is a better quality expected with ITSG-2018?
Figure 1. Several of the subparts are difficult to read even when zooming in on a screen (figure in b, boxes in the ensemble output) – I recommend that you either remove the text or increase the font size.
Would refining the grid size not increase your susceptibility to lateral redistribution? Does W3RA include any kind of routing component?
l.186 spelling of Gaussian
l. 189 verb missing in sentence
Table 1 – please give more details on the corrections which use acronyms or simple symbols, as well as what each correction does.
l. 206 Please clarify – do you mean that if the required number of ensembles is run, each individual ensemble is independent of each other or is that the case no matter the number of ensembles?
l. 214 What would be a recommended number of ensembles?
Figure 3 You are assuming no inter-correlation within the tiles but there is clearly hydrological correlation between several neighboring tiles crossing large river basins – can you clarify how that is not an issue?
3.3.2 How do you determine the width of the transition zone? Are there large differences where the average might not make sense? Have you tested whether your assumption of reasonability of the inverse-distance weight is correct?
l 325 This we would expect – the GW has much longer memory than the surface components.
l. 334 Please clarify “the phase shift has been compromised” – where is it happening in the model?
l. 377 Is the water balance also maintained?
l. 439 Have you considered using GRDC discharge data for validation?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-125-RC1
Data sets
The auxiliary dataset to drive our global data assimilation system Fan Yang https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12206756
Model code and software
Source code for our data assimilation system Fan Yang https://github.com/AAUGeodesyGroup/PyGLDA
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
458 | 157 | 14 | 629 | 24 | 12 |
- HTML: 458
- PDF: 157
- XML: 14
- Total: 629
- BibTeX: 24
- EndNote: 12
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1