Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2018-257
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2018-257

Submitted as: model evaluation paper 22 Nov 2018

Submitted as: model evaluation paper | 22 Nov 2018

Status: this preprint has been withdrawn by the authors.

Use an idealized protocol to assess the nesting procedure in regional climate modelling

Shan Li1,2, Laurent Li1, and Hervé Le Treut2 Shan Li et al.
  • 1Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (LMD), Sorbonne Université, CNRS, École Normale Supérieure, École Polytechnique, 4 Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France
  • 2Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, Sorbonne Université, 4 Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris, France

Abstract. Newtonian relaxation allowing RCM to follow GCM is a widely used technique for climate downscaling and regional weather forecasting. A thorough assessment on effects of the relaxation procedure in an idealized framework is presented in this paper for both synoptic variability and long-term mean climate. LMDz is a global atmospheric general circulation model that can be configured as a regional model if the outside domain of the focused region is applied with a relaxation. It thus plays the role of both GCM and RCM in this paper. Same physical parameterization and identical dynamical configuration are kept to ensure a rigorous comparison between the two models. The experimental set-up that can be referred to as “Master (GCM) versus Slave (RCM)” considers the GCM as the reference to assess the behavior of RCM. A further simulation with RCM in a higher resolution configuration allows isolating the effect of relaxation procedure from that of mesh refinement. In terms of mean climate in GCM and RCM, there are noticeable differences, not only in the border areas, but also within the domain. In terms of synoptic variability, there is a general spatial resemblance and temporal concomitance between the two models. But there is a dependence on variables, seasons, spatiotemporal scales and spatial mode of atmospheric circulation. Winter/Summer has the most/least resemblance between the RCM and the GCM. A better similarity is noticed when atmospheric circulations manifested on large scales. No-correlation cases can be remarked when the dominant circulation of the region is at a small scale.

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Shan Li et al.

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Shan Li et al.

Shan Li et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 712 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
496 177 39 712 45 44
  • HTML: 496
  • PDF: 177
  • XML: 39
  • Total: 712
  • BibTeX: 45
  • EndNote: 44
Views and downloads (calculated since 22 Nov 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 22 Nov 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 569 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 568 with geography defined and 1 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 12 Apr 2021
Download

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Short summary
Newtonian relaxation allowing RCM (regional climate model) to follow GCM (global climate model) is a widely-used technique for climate downscaling and regional weather forecasting. It is thoroughly assessed in an idealized framework for both synoptic variability and long-term mean climate. LMDz is a GCM, but it can be configured as a RCM. It thus acts as both GCM and RCM. The experimental set-up “Master versus Slave” considers GCM as the reference to assess behaviors of RCM.